Equipment
Ping S55 irons spotted
The initial prototypes of Ping’s new S55 irons were made about one-eighth of an inch larger than their predecessors.
That small of a change would likely go unnoticed in any other Ping iron line: the G-Series, I-Series or Anser irons. But it didn’t cut it for an S-Series iron, which has to fit the eye of a very particular group of testers – tour players.
[quote_box_center]“The [tour] players noticed immediately,” said Mike Nicolette, senior design engineer for Ping. “They all said, ‘I would almost prefer that it would be a little smaller.’”[/quote_box_center]
Such is the crux of creating a “players iron,” whose target audience includes everyone from the best golfers in the world to single-digit handicappers. But unlike most golfers, that audience isn’t looking for more forgiveness, although Nicolette said that it wouldn’t hurt them. They place more value on an iron’s look, feel and workability.
That’s why there weren’t a lot of changes made to the S55 irons – their predecessors, the S56 irons, were already thought of as one of the best-looking, best-feeling irons Ping had ever produced. And for their size, the S56’s were extremely forgiving, and offered enough workability to find their way into the bags of countless professionals. But we’re talking about Ping, a company that prides itself on engineering, so of course there were some improvements that could be made.
In the playing position, the S55 and S56 irons look nearly identical, but as Hunter Mahan noticed when he tested them in the days before The Barclays, the S55’s feel different. That’s because Ping swapped the thermoplastic urethane (TPU) insert that was used on the company’s S56 irons for a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) insert, which Nicolette said is a more flexible material that is able to absorb more vibration at impact. For most golfers, that will translate into a softer feel.
Click here to see in-hand photos of the S55 irons shot at The Barclays.
The TPE insert, which Ping calls its Custom Tuning Port (CTP), is also larger in the S55 irons than the S56’s, meaning it takes up a greater amount of space in the center of the iron head. That freed up more discretionary weight for Ping engineers to redistribute to the perimeter of the irons, giving them about a 0.5 percent higher moment of inertia (MOI) than the S56’s.
One-half percent more MOI doesn’t sound like a lot, but according to Nicolette, it can make a difference. A 0.5-inch mishit with a 7 iron will fly about 1 or 2 yards farther with an S55 than a S56 iron, Nicolette said, which can big a big deal for a tour player aiming for a tucked pin.
According to Nicolette, the higher MOI of the irons won’t affect workability, as the S55 irons have a similar MOI to the S56’s “above the shaft axis.” Translation: it takes the same amount of energy for golfers to manipulate the club face to their desired position as they approach impact, the definition of workability.
Recent iron releases from Ping have seen the company release sets with progressive sole widths, which means that the long irons have wider soles than the short irons to help golfers hit them higher in the air. That is not the case with the S55’s, which have a sole design that is essentially identical to their predecessors.
But the S55’s do have an element of a progressive design. Nicolette said that the 4-or-so grams of discretionary weight the larger CTP freed up allows the S55 long irons to have a lower, more rearward CG to help golfers hit their long irons higher and farther, while the short irons have a CG that is located more forward in the head to make them fly a little lower.
Maybe the biggest change golfers will notice is with the lofts of the S55 short irons, which are strengthened about 1 degree. That will make them fly a little farther — about 4 yards, Nicolette said. But even though the lofts of the mid and short irons are relatively unchanged (the S55 6 iron measures 30 degrees, 0.5 degrees stronger, the 4 iron measures 0.25 degrees weaker), their lower CG should help them fly a little farther than their predecessors as well, which means golfers won’t have a problem with gapping.
Like the S56 irons, the S55’s are cast from 17-4 stainless steel. But thanks to tour player feedback, their overall size is a little smaller than the S56 irons.
“There’s about a coat of paint difference,” Nicolette said.
The irons will be available at retail Nov. 1 in 3-PW. They will come stock with Ping’s CFS shaft, and will be offered with KBS Tour, True Temper Dynamic Gold or Project X shafts for an upcharge.
Click here to see what members are saying about the S55 irons in the forums.
Cameron Young’s WITB from his win at the 2025 Wyndham Championship. Cameron is a Titleist staff player but his bag is definitely filled with some unique clubs. Here are the clubs he used to secure his first PGA Tour win!
Driver: Titleist GT2 (9 degrees, A1 SureFit setting)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei 1K Pro Orange 70 TX
3-wood: Titleist GT3 (15 degrees)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei 1K White 80 TX
Hybrid: Titleist GT2 (21 degrees)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus HB Black VeloCore+ 10 X
Irons: Titleist T200 (4), Titleist T100 (5), Titleist 631.CY Prototype (6-9)
Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold X7 (4-9)
Wedges: Titleist Vokey Design SM10 (48-10F, 52-12F, 56-14F @57), WedgeWorks (60-K* @62)
Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold X7
Putter: Scotty Cameron Phantom 9.5 Tour Prototype
Grips: Golf Pride Tour Velvet Cord
Ball: Titleist Pro V1x Prototype
- Peter Malnati what’s in the bag accurate as of the Wyndham Championship. More photos from the event here.
Driver: Titleist GT3 (10 degrees, C2 SureFit setting)
Shaft: Project X Denali Blue 60 TX
3-wood: Titleist GT3 (15 degrees, A1 SureFit setting)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus TR Blue 7 X
7-wood: Titleist GT2 (21 degrees, D1 SureFit setting)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus TR Blue 8 X
Irons: Titleist T150 (4, 5), Titleist T100 (6-9)
Shafts: True Temper AMT Tour White X100
Wedges: Titleist Vokey Design SM10 (48-10F @47, 52-12F, 56-08M @57, 60-04T @62)
Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue S400
Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Style Fastback 1.5 Tour Prototype
Grips: Golf Pride Tour Velvet
Ball: Titleist Pro V1x Yellow
We’re proud to once again partner with 2nd Swing Golf to bring you GolfWRX Members Choice 2025! 2nd Swing has more than 150,000 new and pre-swung golf clubs available in six store locations and online. Check them out here.
What is the best driver in 2025? At GolfWRX, we take great pride in our online community and the cumulative knowledge and experience of our members. When it comes to the best driver of 2025, we want to know what our forum faithful think.
Since our founding in 2005, the bedrock of GolfWRX.com has been the community of passionate and knowledgeable golfers in our forums, and we put endless trust in the opinions of our GolfWRX members — the most knowledgeable community of golfers on the internet. No other group of golfers in the world tests golf clubs as frequently or as extensively, nor is armed with such in-depth information about the latest technology.
Below are the results of GolfWRX member voting for the 2025 best driver, along with the vote percentage for each club.
Best driver of 2025: The top 5
5. Callaway Elyte Triple Diamond: 6.02%
Callaway’s pitch: “For golfers looking for a fast, forgiving, yet workable driver, the Elyte Triple Diamond features a tour-inspired shape and is the preferred model by most Callaway tour players.”
You can read what other golfers are saying about the driver in the GolfWRX forums, and see our launch piece here. Shop the Callaway Elyte Triple Diamond here.
4. Ping G440 Max: 6.86%
Ping’s pitch: “The most forgiving G440 model, MAX has a hotter face to generate speed and distance, and a lighter overall system weight with a longer shaft (46″) for faster clubhead speed, higher launch and longer carries. The Free Hosel and Carbonfly Wrap crown save weight to create our lowest CG ever and increase forgiveness while contributing to a more muted, pleasing sound.”
You can read what other golfers are saying about the driver in the GolfWRX forums, and see our launch piece here. Shop the Ping G440 Max here.
3. Ping G440 LST: 9.53%
Ping’s pitch: “LST is an especially good fit for faster swings, offering less spin and more control with a penetrating trajectory. A hotter face, lighter overall system weight and longer shaft (46″) deliver more speed and distance while maintaining tight dispersion.”
@phizzy30: “Not a fan of Ping drivers in general, but 440 LST takes the cake. It’s super forgiving across the face for a low spin head, looks and sounds good and the ability to make it play neutral or slightly fade biased through the hosel settings is very appealing.”
You can read what other golfers are saying about the driver in the GolfWRX forums, and see our launch piece here. Shop the Ping G440 LST here.
2. Titleist GT3: 16.55%
Titleist’s pitch: “The GT3 Driver offers Titleist’s boldest combination of power and personalization through adjustable performance. Dial in the CG Track to your frequent contact location to make your biggest drives even bigger while taking total control over flight and shaping.”
@mrmikeac: “I’ve been Anti-Titleist for years and years and years (outside of Vokey, of course). With that being said, HOLY BEGEEZUS the GT3 driver is an absolute NUCLEAR MONSTER! This thing blew my G430 10K Max out of the water in every single category. Forgiveness is the biggest thing that stands out of me, the 3 model has always been one of the less forgiving models in the past but this GT3 can take bad shot after bad shot and still end up in the fairway, I think a ton of that has to do with the adjustability, it’s actually effective. Feel and sound is perfect, that solid crack is so addicting to hear and when you hit it out the screws this thing can absolutely bomb it. Titleist, I’m sorry for doubting you. You have converted me.”
You can read what other golfers are saying about the driver in the GolfWRX forums, and see our launch piece here. Shop the Titleist GT3 here.
1. Titleist GT2: 22.91%
Titleist’s pitch: “Delivering impressive distance from any impact point, the Titleist GT2 Driver extracts maximum performance through a forgiving design. Get the stability and added confidence of a high-MOI driver without sacrificing speed.”
@DTorres: “The Titleist GT2 has proven to be the best driver of the year. Packaged in a classic profile, GT2 perfectly balances performance and forgiveness while consistently being a high performer across all categories.”
You can read what other golfers are saying about the driver in the GolfWRX forums, and see our launch piece here. Shop the Titleist GT2 here.
Other drivers receiving >2% of the vote
| Driver | Vote percentage (%) |
|---|---|
| Cobra DS Adapt Max K | 4.85% |
| Ping G430 Max 10K | 3.85% |
| Callaway Elyte Triple Diamond | 3.68% |
| TaylorMade Qi35 | 3.51% |
| Callaway Elyte | 3.18% |
| Cobra DS Adapt X | 2.34% |
| Cobra DS Adapt LS | 2.17% |
| TaylorMade Qi35 LS | 2.17% |
View this post on Instagram
‘Why would anybody want to change that swing?’ – Brandel Chamblee says PGA Tour star was wrong to change his swing
‘The stupidest freaking thing I’ve ever heard’ – Billy Horschel slams Open idea suggested by Padraig Harrington
WITB Time Machine: Brandt Snedeker’s winning WITB, 2018 Wyndham Championship
Golfer proudly posts photo of ball mark on iron, receives immediate roasting
WITB Time Machine: Matthew Wolff’s winning WITB, 2019 3M Open
Oakmont Country Club bans Wyndham Clark over locker incident; Reveals specific conditions to earn reinstatement
Adam Scott puts Callaway blades in the bag at Wyndham Championship
Report: LIV star fires caddie and coach in shock shake up
Rickie Fowler makes equipment change to ‘something that’s a little easier on the body’
The championship formula: How 3 key stats separate winners from the field
Peter Malnati WITB 2025 (August)
Peter Malnati what’s in the bag accurate as of the Wyndham Championship. More photos from the event here. Driver: Titleist...
Cameron Young’s winning WITB: 2025 Wyndham Championship
Driver: Titleist GT2 (9 degrees, A1 SureFit setting) Buy here. Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei 1K Pro Orange 70 TX 3-wood: Titleist...
Camilo Villegas WITB 2025 (July)
Camilo Villegas WITB accurate as of the Wyndham Championship. Villegas was undecided on a 3-wood when we shot his bag. ...
WITB Time Machine: Brandt Snedeker’s winning WITB, 2018 Wyndham Championship
Brandt Snedeker fired a final-round 65 at the 2018 Wyndham Championship to outlast Webb Simpson and C.T. Pan. His 5-under...
Jesse
Nov 5, 2013 at 6:18 pm
does anybody know the release date of these irons?
arlngo
Oct 16, 2013 at 7:15 am
I don’t agree. Look at
http://golfweek.com/news/2013/sep/17/bubba-watson-new-ping-irons-s55/
lloyd duffield
Oct 11, 2013 at 2:30 pm
TOOK A LOOK AT THESE ONE OF THESE PING S55 IRONS THE OTHER DAY AND I GOT TO SAY ITS A GREAT LOOKING IRON WHEN YOU SEE IT IN THE FLESH. THE PICS DONT DO THEM JUSTICE JUST WAITING ON THE PRICE TAG. LETS HOPE ITS NOT A RIP OFF PRICE
Atlanta Golfer
Oct 8, 2013 at 8:49 pm
These are suweet
P Healey
Oct 1, 2013 at 1:14 pm
These look fantastic! Probably the cleanest looking of all of the s series. S56s were pretty great so im interested to see if these are noticeably better. I do like the look though so I am optimistic about that these could be going in the bag.
Troy Vayanos
Sep 24, 2013 at 4:52 pm
Looking forward to trying these out as I use the Ping S56’s at present. Hopefully they have improved them even further which would be quite a task considering how good they are already.
J Duf
Sep 6, 2013 at 2:49 pm
wow these are really cool! They kind of look just like the…um, kind of like the S56, S57, S58, and S59.
Shawn
Sep 5, 2013 at 8:28 pm
In my personal opinion, I have never like the “feel” of Pings s56 although my playing partner swears by their irons. I think they are to clickey and don’t get the same feedback as I do from a forged iron. Not dissing Ping or anyone the plays them, just my personal opinion. My one question from reading this thread is to the Ping faithful. If you love your s56 set so much, why would you drop your hard earned money based on the new looks alone. A single digit HC won’t reap the rewards as much as they think from the .5 degree difference in MOI or the stronger lofts that will add 3-4 yards. When the 712 AP2 were released, I tested them and my numbers weren’t any different than my 710, although Titleist claimed they were better than the previous model. Ill do the same thing when the 714 are released this fall, but will have to buy a new set before the end of the year due to the wear on my faces. Ill test other brands as well as I don’t think I should paint myself into a box with an OEM unless they are paying me to do so.
Shawn
Sep 5, 2013 at 8:46 pm
But for the record, I do think it is a good looking iron from Ping
Mac
Aug 29, 2013 at 8:44 am
just bought the new x forged… love them, but might be trading them in sooner than expected, these look awesome!
Rich
Aug 25, 2013 at 10:26 am
Just looked at these again and I wonder if I’m on my own here. I think they have a hint of S58’s about them……….anyone else think the same thing?
TravisLG
Aug 28, 2013 at 10:40 pm
Yeah I can see a little S58 in them. Honestly I only look at them at address so that is what matters most to me in looks. We will see if they have the performance to kick the S56s out of the bag when they get released!
jhart
Aug 24, 2013 at 6:34 am
I have been playing Ping irons, with a little dalliance to Wilson for over 20 years. I enjoyed the look and feel of the S56 so much that I purchased 3 sets of the shockers – combining shaft type and length to get my ideal configuration, and mix of hot and cool weather optimum performance. I have loved these irons, albeit that I found them a little harsher than the best of the forged clubs, and tended to balloon the high irons somewhat. However their durability, playability and mid to long irons have been superb. I have struggled to think how I would find an ideal replacement. Until recently I was going move to Titleist CBs with Rifle 6.0 shafts. The S55 may now change that – strengthening the loft of higher irons, seems absolutely spot on – while to my eye the new look is much cleaner and more ‘forged/Anser’ like – but in a shape and size that still says better player, and sits nicely behind the ball. Sorry Titleist… love your woods, but think I may be on the Ping iron bandwagon for a while longer… Look forward to any feedback from people who will have tried the S55s vs the S56.
Tyler
Aug 22, 2013 at 8:23 pm
These may be the best looking irons for the 2014 season. However, it looks like there is more offset vs. the competition which may defer “players” to a different set.
Rich
Aug 21, 2013 at 10:59 pm
Love these, they look awesome but I’ll be looking for S56 sets that hit the BST when these are released (or lower priced new S56’s). Still using S57’s now so figure it won’t matter if I’m one model behind.
LL
Aug 21, 2013 at 2:58 pm
I’m not sure a lot of the tour pros will switch. The S56s are money. Widening the elastomer is like taking a step backward to the S57 with less feedback on mishits, and making it softer is going to make it feel like a Titleist AP2.
Mike
Aug 20, 2013 at 11:46 pm
it looks awesome, love it
Joe
Aug 20, 2013 at 3:53 pm
PING has lost it
JEFF SMITH
Aug 20, 2013 at 3:15 pm
HUH, I THOUGHT THEY WOULD LOOK A LITTLE BETTER THAN THAT!
Jeffrey
Aug 20, 2013 at 10:44 am
I don’t think people understand what forging is. Forging does not make a club softer. The hardness of a club is determined by the metal used. What would you rather be hit with, an 8620 cast club or and 8620 forged club? I honestly believe that there is no advantage to forging a club, other than making it cost more. The technological advances in cast clubs are growing rapidly. Today’s cast irons allow players to work the ball and if they mishit, it’s not game over.
Aaron
Aug 20, 2013 at 11:18 am
And I’m not sure you understand it, either… you say “Today’s cast irons allow players to work the ball and if they mishit, it’s not game over.” You seem to be confusing “cast” with “cavity back.” How you form the iron (casting or forging) into the right shape doesn’t make it forgiving or difficult to hit; the weight distribution takes care of that. You can easily make a blade that is cast and very unforgiving while making a forged cavity back iron that is a lot easier to hit consistently.
Alex
Aug 20, 2013 at 7:27 pm
It was easier to forge blades because they were relatively simple. It’s more difficult to be as accurate if you forged a fairly dramatic looking CB. So they started to cast them, because it was easier to mass produce.
I also think that casting is less expensive. Someone can correct me on this. You can also use harder metal with the casting process, which means it’s less expensive for material, which is why the cheaper irons are harder metal and cast.
john
Aug 20, 2013 at 9:09 pm
if you could imagine being able to see all of the atoms/molecules that make up the metal in the head of an iron. in a forged iron those molecules are closer together because the material starts as a large, soft (hot) piece of metal and pressed down into its shape. cast irons start as molten metal and poured into a “cast” and hardens into its shape, which makes the molecules farther apart from each other. this is where feel comes in, the closer the molecules are together, the better the metal resonates and carries the vibrations up to your hands (this is what “fee'” is), thus most forged irons tend to “feel” softer. now enter “form forged”…this is where that molten metal is poured into the cast and actually pressed down harder instead of just letting it cool. mizuno does this actually, and then goes to the press forge to align the grain of the metal (grain flow forged) form forging has allowed companies to continue to forge golf clubs without charging ridiculous prices
Blanco
Aug 19, 2013 at 5:12 pm
I need some club soda and baking powder for my pants
Tony
Aug 20, 2013 at 3:06 pm
LOL, that was good!
jgpl001
Aug 19, 2013 at 4:58 pm
These look brilliant, BUT why oh why are they not forged???
Once Ping took the plunge with the Ansers why not offer their tour club in forged, even as an option???
I am not a fan of Ping irons, but the S56 was good, very good, but more than a tad clicky with a slightly harsh feeling
These will sell in huge numbers though, and rightly so.
Blanco
Aug 20, 2013 at 10:49 pm
They’re not forged because PING INVENTED investment casting and has produced castings that rival the feel of a forging, are more forgiving, longer lasting, better finish, less expensive… the list goes on. They also softened the CTP which I was hoping for myself. Can’t wait to trick these out.
TravisLG
Aug 21, 2013 at 9:04 pm
Longer lasting finish…funny my s56 are a two months old and the chrome is peeling off the toe of the 8 and 7 iron. Love the irons, just hate having to send them back to Ping so soon.
Trevor
Jul 18, 2016 at 11:49 am
So will PING repair this for free? Any advice?
Billy
Aug 19, 2013 at 2:16 pm
So……….. they’re not forged?
Connor
Aug 19, 2013 at 2:24 pm
anser line are the only forged irons ping makes. cast is their bread and butter so to speak.
Billy
Aug 19, 2013 at 5:10 pm
Thanks, not really into Ping or their irons/equipment.
These do look nice. I would be willing to try the S56. Assuming they have a price drop when these irons release.
christian
Aug 19, 2013 at 1:51 pm
“They also have slightly stronger lofts, which are likely the result of Ping’s ability to move more discretionary weight to the perimeter of the club head”…Since when did perimeter weighting have anything to do with stronger lofts? There is zero connection between perimeter weighting, which helps with forgivness, and stronger lofts. Weirdest claim ever
Me nunya
Aug 19, 2013 at 2:19 pm
C’mon , dude.
This website’s for grown-ups. Don’t come here and troll.
christian
Aug 20, 2013 at 3:18 pm
Care to elaborate? Why would perimeter weighting “allow” for more loft to be added more so then with a blade for example? Or any other iron design? There just is zero connection between the two
Robert
Aug 20, 2013 at 11:27 pm
FWIW anytime I buy a new set of irons, I insist on 1.5 deg flat and 1.5 degree weaker lofts. I love hitting the ball high without having to dig out a huge divot, which then lands softer on the greens. WHo cares which iron goes which distance! So long as I know how far each iron goes, that is all that matters.
Blanco
Aug 23, 2013 at 9:43 pm
The perimeter weighting increases MOI and drives the CG lower, increasing shot trajectory– this allows them to lower the loft slightly to compensate for higher flight– it also puts lofts in line with competitors who unfortunately use claims of iron distance to drive sales.
Zach
Aug 25, 2013 at 12:08 pm
Best reply yet! Finally someone who truely understands club engineering. Can’t stand when people think they know what they’re talking about when it comes to design.
Matt
Aug 25, 2013 at 12:13 am
Actually there is a strong connection. With perimeter weighting more weight is moved towards the sole putting more mass below the equator of the ball at impact with the distinct purpose of helping get the ball airborne. As a result with everything else equal a 32 degree blade iron will hit the ball noticeably lower than a 32 degree cavity back. So in order to get similar launch characteristics with a cavity back you strengthen the loft.
R
Aug 19, 2013 at 4:33 pm
If you were familiar with physics, which evidently you are not, you could have thought that perhaps ping moved the weight LOWER and outside, which gives a higher launch and a higher moment of inertia. hence, the stronger lofts.
christian
Aug 20, 2013 at 3:20 pm
That train of thought has been killed by the likes of Tom Wishon several times over. It’s all just marketing bull.
Alex
Aug 20, 2013 at 7:24 pm
I’m thinking it’s simply a way to make the iron a little more forgiving on mishits so that the stronger lofts don’t punish you as much.
Make the sweet spot a bit bigger and suddenly missing the mark on a stronger loft may not be the low burner that it normally would. Probably also helps with the longer shaft lengths that many irons have now, too.
Jericho
Aug 19, 2013 at 1:46 pm
when are they coming out with a pure clean blade..ill be interested then
Rob
Aug 19, 2013 at 6:05 pm
Never…..so….see ya.
Evan
Aug 19, 2013 at 1:32 pm
These will be in my bag next spring!!! Purple dot w/ KBS C-taper Light X-stiff.
A.J.
Aug 19, 2013 at 11:17 am
drool…hey anyone have $1500 they want to donate to me? 🙂
Michael
Aug 19, 2013 at 12:12 pm
Why?…they’ll cost about $800-900
benseattle
Aug 20, 2013 at 1:44 pm
From David Dusek’s s55 article in Golfweek.com (August 19):
“Ping has not yet announced the stock shaft nor the price for the S55 irons.”
http://golfweek.com/news/2013/aug/19/ping-s55-irons/
john
Aug 20, 2013 at 9:01 pm
i’ll guarantee stock shaft is kbs tour and price will step up to $949.99
Connor
Aug 19, 2013 at 10:29 am
They look great. I was praying that they made these in the same finish as the G25 irons. If that were the case then it’d be a no brainer for me. I know that shouldn’t be a make or break issue but i thought they’d maybe step out on a limb and go for it. Even still, the last 3 S models have basically been the same club. Will be interesting to see if there is any vast improvement with this model, especially since it took them an especially long time to release it.
BcavWecllh
Aug 19, 2013 at 11:28 am
That may be tour player input. They may like that finish.
Blanco
Aug 20, 2013 at 10:46 pm
I think the G25 finish is cool but I’ve grown out of love with the color. These are the best looking PING irons ever created, by a sizable margin.
JnRadioActive
Aug 19, 2013 at 9:31 am
can see some anser iron influence in these as far as the look
John
Aug 19, 2013 at 9:42 am
Agree. Look a lot cleaner and nicer than most ping irons.
J
Aug 19, 2013 at 9:12 am
Look good
Tyler
Aug 19, 2013 at 7:54 am
Nice clean look with stronger lofts. I cannot wait until November to get these babies in my Latitude! It looks like I’ll be playing right on through the WV winter now.
Tyler
Aug 19, 2013 at 7:50 am
FINALLY!!! I have been waiting on this for months. I have literally been checking the internet everyday for the past weeks only to be disappointed every day with wild guesses and inaccurate renderings. Well, not anymore! 🙂
4-PW possibly w/Pxi’s – +1″, White Dot, New Decade Mid-Size Grips. 🙂
Nick Davis
Aug 19, 2013 at 7:14 am
Ummm 4-PW, Green dot, Dynamic Gold S300 shafts with black/orange New Decade grips PLEASE!!!!
Jake Garcia
Aug 26, 2013 at 9:26 pm
Can someone explain the difference between the shafts these are rumored to come in? I have G15’s now with the standard ping shafts and I was hoping to get fitted for the S55’s. Id just like to have some knowledge when I go in for a fitting.
Tyler
Sep 18, 2013 at 2:10 pm
If your currently playing G15 irons i would not recommend the S55’s unless your ball striking is good enough. The S55’s will only hurt your game because they are designed for tour players
John
Oct 22, 2013 at 12:22 pm
LMAO Tyler is incorrect. These ARE designed for lower handicap players, however, these ARE NOT only designed for tour players.