Opinion & Analysis
An open letter to golf from a black man who loves the game
June 10, 2020
An open letter to the golf industry:
Like everyone, I have been touched by the brutal murder of George Floyd. It has sparked a wave of protests and demonstrations that haven’t been seen in this country since the height of the Civil Rights movement. As a journalist who covers politics as well as golf, I have been struck by the magnitude of the moment and the multitudes that have responded. Hopefully, it will lead to lasting reforms that will ameliorate the many inequalities and injustices in our country.
I also have noted the reactions and responses from different corners of society, including the sports world. Numerous athletes and officials from major sports leagues have registered their concerns. I read with particular interest the remarks from PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan.
“This past weekend, I – like many of you, I’m sure – spent a lot of time trying to understand and process the civil unrest that has engulfed many cities across The United States, following the tragic death of George Floyd in Minneapolis. The hardships and injustices that have and continue to impact the African-American community are painful to watch and difficult to comprehend. And as a citizen of this country and a leader of this organization, I must admit that I’m struggling with what my role should be. But I’m not giving up.”
Monahan went on to say that he had engaged in several “emotional” conversations with colleagues and friends in the black community who showed him that “sometimes listening and making a commitment to understanding are the only things you can offer, and that’s OK.
“We might not know exactly what to do right now,” Monahan added, “but we shouldn’t be deterred. We should communicate and learn. We should talk to our family, friends, and colleagues in an open and compassionate way. We should grow as individuals and as an organization. And, most importantly, we should demand better.”
He said that the PGA Tour wants to play a role but that he is struggling with what to do and how to do it.
My question is, why is the industry struggling for a response?
I have been fortunate in my life in that I was not exposed to virulent racism early in life like my parents were. Both moved from segregated South Carolina to Washington, D.C. to escape the crushing yoke of racism. They raised us to be strong, independent, and to see character before color. In pre-school, I was reading to my class, so I was accepted at Sidwell Friends School in Washington, D.C., and became the first African American male to attend from Kindergarten through 12th grade. As children do, the only race that mattered was on the playground at recess. As I moved into the world, I did experience my share of prejudice and bigotry. For an African American man in America, it just comes with the territory.
I have been in the golf business for 17 years. I have operated golf courses—one of them a historic course that was opened specifically for black people when every course in DC was segregated—and have gone on to become a member of the golf media. In that time, I have been blessed to have been a guest at some of the most special places in golf and the experiences have given me a lifetime of memories. I have made friends with people of all races, religions, and nationalities in my time in the golf world. I have worn a kilt in Scotland, and I have said grace at dinner in the most exclusive club in Mississippi. From the tip of the African Cape to the valleys of India, from the beaches of Asia to the mountains of Northern Europe, I have borne witness to the magic of golf when walking 18 holes in God’s creation brings out the best in His people.
But I have also experienced the fact that black people in golf are viewed as a rare and sometimes unwanted presence. I have become accustomed to being the only African American in any given clubhouse, media gathering, or industry meeting. If I had a round of golf at Augusta National for every time that I have been standing in front of a clubhouse or hotel and had someone hand me their keys to park their car or ask me to put their bag on a cart, well, I’d have more experience at Augusta than most of the Tour.
In the United States, the game and industry of golf are intertwined with privilege and exclusion. And as the nation has faced the ugliness of racism and sexism and made advances, so has golf. Renee Powell, Charlie Sifford, Lee Elder; these are the names of pioneers, giants who broke down barriers and made it possible for me to do what I do. But despite these heroes, there remains a homogenous nature to the game composed of money, privilege, and race. When I was named Media Person of the Year in 2014 for the PGA Middle Atlantic section, I was the first and only person of color to win an award in any category in a section that was founded in 1925. Sadly, six years later that is still the case.
In recent times the game has initiated efforts to change both the impression and the reality that golf is only for a certain kind of person. But too often, what begin as noble agents of change get assimilated into the more pressing issues surrounding the bottom line.
The First Tee program (TFT) started out as a way to bring the game to underserved communities. Over time, corporate interests overwhelmed both the mission and the message. Now, TFT has the mission of generally “growing the game”. Many chapters are now run from exclusive country clubs and are essentially finishing schools for the current “golf culture.”
There are diversity officers in each of the game’s governing bodies such as the PGA of America and the USGA, but what significant initiative or accomplishment can they point to? The leadership at East Potomac Golf Course in Washington, D.C. tried to prod the PGA of America diversity office to facilitate the establishment of a golf program at Howard University, the historically black university located in the nation’s capital. Every year calls were made and interest was shown but no action was taken. It took Steph Curry, a basketball player, to take his celebrity on the court to make strides on the course.
For years, I have taken proposals to all of the top golf course operating groups, making the case for how the game can become relevant in diverse communities if they would devote time and resources to that cause. All of them gave me responses that reminded me of one I got from a bank manager rejecting a plan for a business loan, “Michael, it’s not a good idea. It’s not a bad idea. It’s just your idea.”
I have begged and pleaded with the governing bodies of the game to be proactive in promoting diversity and displaying leadership. I have tried to explain that the culture of the game and industry is that people of color are not wanted and that eventually there would be an incident that would bring a deluge of negative attention to the game.
Last year at the U.S. Open, I attended an invitation-only reception that featured two prominent PGA Tour professionals, one a possible future Hall of Fame player. That Hall-of-Fame-caliber player told the assembled crowd the story of the night his neighbor Tiger Woods had his infamous car accident at Isleworth, and as a “joke” the pro put on blackface and a wig then convinced a blonde companion to drive around with him pretending to be Tiger in an attempt to prank the media. There was shock and nervous laughter but not a single person voiced an objection.
As the only African American guest in the room, I felt every eye in the place on me. Trying to control my anger, I raised my hand and told that player that I respected his accomplishments, but he should be ashamed of telling that story. He later gave me the apology line, “I’m sorry if you were offended.” He said he would call me later to discuss it. Oddly enough, I’m still waiting for that call. Later, many people in the room approached me to say that they appreciated my speaking up, but I couldn’t put aside my anger and bewilderment at how easy it was for that pro to assume that it was a socially acceptable story.
I implored the USGA, the PGA, the Golf Channel, and others to take that incident as a bullet dodged and a signal to be proactive and to take the lead in providing sensitivity training and initiating programs that would build a bridge to the community at large. My efforts were largely ignored. I have been told that the pro in question was forced by sponsors to take sensitivity training; I’d love to hear from him how that training has changed his outlook. I didn’t report the story of that day at the U.S. Open, partly because I was not there as a member of the media and I felt conflicted. But I also wanted to give the sport I love the chance to do the right thing without taking the withering press that would come with the public revelation of the incident. Now, I feel even more conflicted but not for the same reasons.
The answer for golf is the same as it is for culture at large. The goal isn’t to eliminate bigotry and intolerance; I believe that those are, sadly, part of the human condition. But we can make them rare and unacceptable, by recognizing that they exist and then taking steps to hold people accountable for harboring it in any part of the game. We can educate and train people to empathize and appreciate those with different backgrounds and experiences. We can teach people how to reach out and invite those who might be intimidated and make them feel at home.
It’s not hard to figure out what to do. The thing that makes this action difficult is properly balancing the action with the potential reaction of a core clientele that is conservative by nature and is mostly apathetic or actively opposed to significant social change. But if we have been reminded of one thing from recent events, it is that change involves taking actions that will make some people uncomfortable and that the only constant in this world is change. For this to work, there has to be a willingness to reject the familiar and embrace the future. The answers for golf and for the nation lie outside their comfort zone.
The golf leadership is right to do some analytical thinking on a best approach, but there is low- hanging fruit when it comes to concrete actions that can and should be taken immediately. There are some glaring deficiencies that can be addressed with some specific actions addressing specific issues:
- Golf’s touring professionals are its most visible and effective ambassadors. But by nature and by nurture they tend to be a very sequestered and homogenous group, shut off from the glaring realities of the day to day world by the demands of their profession and the wealth it affords them. Disturbing as it may be, the incident with the golf pro at the U.S. Open is not an isolated occurrence. People of color are routinely subjected to words and actions that are hurtful, disrespectful, and damaging to individuals as well as to the institution of golf. Touring professionals are already powerful advocates for any number of worthy causes—why should social justice not be among them? As was the case with the golf pro at the U.S. Open, every player on every professional tour should be required to take a course on diversity issues that covers race and gender. The training would enable them to empathize with diverse communities and build awareness within the traditional golf community.
- Part of the future acceptance of people of color in golf is recognizing the contributions that we have made in the past to the history of the game. Sometime this year, Tiger Woods will be inducted into the World Golf Hall of Fame, making him only the second African American to be inducted (Charlie Sifford was the first). The WGHOF is the pinnacle of golf achievement, a testament to the enduring impact made on the game by its members. It seems to me a curiosity at best and an injustice at worst, that names like Bing Crosby and Bob Hope have lockers in the Hall while some of the greatest contributors to the game, who just happen to be black, do not. To rectify that, the next Hall of Fame class should include Renee Powell (LPGA pioneer and golf course owner), Lee Elder (first African-American to play in the Masters and most recent recipient of the USGA Bob Jones Award, its highest honor), Calvin Peete (winner of the Players Championship and the straightest driver the game has ever known) and John Shippen (the first American golf professional). The induction ceremony for this stellar group would be a clarion call to the world that in golf, all are welcome and all are appreciated.
- There have been suggestions for convening a summit to discuss solutions to race and social justice issues. While the idea is noble, the example of The First Tee I mentioned before shows how efforts to make progress can all too easily be co-opted by the effort to make a profit.
Instead of a one-time meeting or summit, there should be a standing committee to assess diversity and inequality within the game and the industry, with the mission of creating a list of concrete action items for improvement and advancement of diversity, equality, and social justice issues. The committee could be made up of representatives from the game’s governing bodies, sponsors, and professionals, as well as representatives from the media, politics, and community advisors. The object would be to both develop original ideas and to take in ideas and initiatives that have worked outside of golf, then facilitate their implementation in the golf world. This group would ensure the constant flow of good ideas and sustain in perpetuity those ideas that prove effective.
- There are around 150 jobs as a PGA Tour professional, but there are thousands of careers in the golf business, many of which have practically zero minority participation. To correct that, there should be funds set aside in the form of scholarships and paid internships to develop careers for minorities and women in golf that are not related to playing professionally, such as golf course design, golf course management, and the media. For example, the fact that there are no persons of color or women among the prominent course architects in the game is a disgrace,
but one that is utterly correctable through opportunities that would be afforded by scholarships and internships. - An organization should be fostered to take over the previous mission of The First Tee, that is, to introduce the game to underserved communities and to make the continued pursuit of the game more affordable and accessible for those that wish to participate. Providing funding for the cost of equipment, apparel, instruction and course access will allow the game to be enjoyed by those not necessarily of the affluent class.
These suggestions are of course just a starting point. There is a stable full of ideas and initiatives out there. But there must be the will to implement and establish them.
Golf is unique among major sports in that it is a game that is defined by the people that make the game part of their lives rather than the people that play it for a living. Golf should be a way of life available to all people. It should be known for building bridges rather than putting up gates.
That’s not the case right now, but it can be.
There is a clear path for Mr. Monahan and others to take the lead and, as is always the case, there is very little foot traffic on the high road. Some people might say that with all that is going on in the world, what difference does it make what golf does? My response is that it is important because I live here, it is part of my world, and it is not exempt from responsibility for its connection to the wider world.
I appreciate the good work that has been done to date in the golf community to facilitate change. I also know that there is a lot left to be done. Like a good round of golf, let’s take it one shot at a time.
If you have questions, you know where to find me.
Sincerely,
Michael Williams
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship
