Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Want to start a golf business? Here’s some advice

Published

on

So, you love golf. If you’re a GolfWRXer, that goes without saying. And perhaps, like many golfers, you’ve thought about making your passion your profession.

No, this isn’t a discussion of the merits of the PGA’s PGM Program, but rather, it’s our attempt to provide valuable information and context if you’re considering starting a golf-related business.

For help in this endeavor, we talked to folks who invest in, buy, and build companies in the golf industry: Evan Roosevelt and Matthew Erley, both Managing Partners, at Old Tom Capital.

The duo describes Old Tom Capital as “an investment firm narrowly focused on the golf industry with a wide perspective around investing across all stages of companies.”

They also operate the private investment group, Old Tom Venture Club, which offers accredited investors early-stage investment opportunities in the golf industry.

Check out GolfWRX’s full conversation below.

GolfWRX: Many golfers have sketched an idea for a training aid on a napkin or conceived of some innovation that could change the game. Similarly, plenty of golf-adjacent businesses seem to come and go. Before getting into specifics, can you speak to the paths to success, and maybe point out a couple of companies who are doing well with and without investment?

Roosevelt & Erley: Certainly! While golf is a unique industry to build in, the foundational paths to success, especially for startups and innovators, are no different than building in any other category. They involve a solid understanding of the market, a unique value proposition, and the ability to execute and find a path to scale.

There is inherent risk to building in golf in that the category is sexy and fun, which isn’t a bad thing, but founders need to think critically about what they are building and if there is truly a market opportunity. What we would call the “golf goggles” problem is a very real thing and passionate golfers turned founders need to constantly decouple their passion for the game to ensure that what they are working on has the potential to be a sustainable business.

As investors, we see a dozen or so pitches a week and one of the most common mistakes is founders who have a solution looking for a problem. Founders need to validate their ideas outside of a core group of family, friends, and fellow playing partners, who will typically provide positive feedback on anything.

Does the golf course need better technology to improve on-course delivery of food? Will enough players adopt embedded sensors in their clubs to track data? Will a 10K square foot simulator bar survive in your market? The answer to all these questions may be yes, but there is a deep level of validation required to move forward that we would always recommend.

Companies like Arccos Golf and SuperSpeed Golf are great examples of successful ventures in the golf industry. Each has taken a different path. Arccos, known for its advanced golf analytics and shot-tracking systems, leveraged data to enhance player performance, attracting a mix of direct customers and B2B partnerships with equipment manufacturers. After a lot of success and growth, they secured significant funding, helping them scale their technology and outreach.

On the other hand, SuperSpeed Golf, known for its swing speed training system, started with a more grassroots approach. They focused heavily on product quality and customer education, building credibility through endorsements from professionals and strong online content. SuperSpeed Golf’s growth came from reinvesting profits rather than relying heavily on external capital, which allowed them to maintain control over their brand and business direction.

Raising capital is certainly not the only path to success and oftentimes it can be detrimental to a business. We recommend first focusing on market validation and growth, even at a small level, before considering funding.

GolfWRX: At GolfWRX, we see start-up equipment manufacturers come and go. It’s a difficult space with thin margins, whether you’re a custom putter manufacturer or selling starter sets at attractive prices. I know from our previous conversations, you don’t think it’s a model that’s particularly ripe for investment. Can you speak to why that is and what growth and success look like for these companies?

R&E: The equipment manufacturing space in golf is challenging, primarily due to high production costs, thin margins, and the need for significant brand recognition. Many new entrants struggle to achieve the scale required to be profitable and spend a great deal of cash along the way, as established brands dominate market share and benefit from economies of scale.

From an investment perspective, the capital-intensive nature of equipment manufacturing, coupled with the need for extensive marketing to build brand awareness, makes it less attractive to us as investors. The returns are typically not commensurate with the risks involved to fund a startup. However, there are exceptions, particularly if a company can differentiate itself significantly—be it through unique technology, materials, or customization options.

As mentioned earlier, our recommendation is always to start within a niche customer segment, build profitably, and then decide whether scaling makes sense. There are a ton of opportunities to build solid businesses in equipment, but we are not bullish on startup brands having the ability to challenge the incumbents in golf.

Growth and success in this space often come from focusing on niche markets or innovative products that offer clear advantages over existing options. For instance, companies like Swag Golf have found success by offering high-end, precision-milled putters with a focus on niche branding and building a focused community. They’ve built a loyal following and positioned themselves as a premium brand, which allows them to maintain healthier margins.

GolfWRX: I’d just like to establish some context here. Can you speak to what’s going on in the “business of golf” world broadly? What has changed (and what has not) since the pandemic?

R&E: The golf industry has obviously experienced notable shifts since the pandemic. The pandemic was a catalyst that increased equipment sales, tee times, and overall interest in the game. But, the most important change in the game started nearly 10 years before that, with the rise of off-course entertainment, giving the “golf curious” consumer new entry points into the game.

This new wave of golfers have had a much lower barrier of entry into golf, and a less intimidating path to play the game. That trend, along with the rise of golf technology, has driven new demographics into the sport, including younger players who are more tech-savvy and diverse in their interests.

These evolutions in the game of golf are profound for operators and founders building businesses inside of golf because they open up the aperture of potential customers and provide opportunity outside of traditional green-grass. Many of the next big golf companies are being built today on the backs of technology and the golf curious consumer.

Take a company like Dryvebox, one of our investments at Old Tom, who build mobile golf simulators that are used for corporate events, birthday parties, sponsor activations, etc. They have so much scale available to them due to how they have positioned their business in the golf entertainment space. Or another one of our portfolio companies, TMRW Sports, with the launch of their indoor golf league, TGL, which is positioned to bring golf to a more mass audience of viewers outside of the traditional tours.

Traditional golf is also healthy, but it’s now a more narrow segment of a growing category where “golf” can be so much more. That screams opportunity for us as investors, which is why we are spending more of our dollars in these high-growth segments of the game.

GolfWRX: Taking this further, looking into your crystal ball, what’s next, five years, 10 years down the road?

R&E: Looking ahead, the next five to ten years in golf will likely see continued integration of technology, both on and off the course, as well as new formats of the game to take advantage of the golf curious consumer and their path to enjoy the game.

We expect to see advancements in what we would term the “connected course,” with physical tech to monitor swings and ball tracking, better software connected to the phone, carts, pro shop, etc., as well as data for agronomy purposes, making the whole experience more integrated, fun, and compelling.

Another trend to watch is the evolution of golf’s audience and participant base. Efforts to make the sport more inclusive and accessible will likely intensify, with more initiatives aimed at attracting women, young people, and diverse groups who are underrepresented. This could lead to changes in how courses are designed and marketed, as well as how events and tournaments are organized.

Where does a player continue to experience golf and advance as a golfer after they leave a Top Golf, SIM, putting concept, etc.? We see a huge gap between off-course entertainment and on-course play. This is a big opportunity for founders to build businesses that can help the golf curious advance through the game.

Sustainability will also play a critical role. As environmental concerns continue to grow, golf courses and manufacturers will need to adopt more sustainable practices. This includes everything from water conservation and reducing chemical use on courses to exploring eco-friendly materials in equipment manufacturing.

GolfWRX: Getting down to the meat of our questions, what golf-related businesses does Old Tom feel are suitable for investment? Conversely, what areas are non-starters for you?

R&E: At Old Tom, we invest in great businesses run by great founders with an opportunity to scale and return capital. As mentioned earlier, a sustainable business model with a path to growth should always be the number one priority for founders, whether they are building inside or outside of golf.

From an investment perspective, we are most interested in golf-related businesses that can take a big chunk out of the industry and can scale to be $100M+ businesses. While it’s hard to say exactly what type of companies can do this, we tend to gravitate to the following: off-course entertainment, companies going after the golf curious consumer, software with broad product market fit, women’s golf, international golf (i.e new growth markets like India), agronomy tech, golf travel, and marketplace concepts.

On the other hand, businesses heavily reliant on traditional manufacturing, such as small-scale equipment makers, swing training aids, or apparel brands without a strong differentiator, are generally less attractive. The high production costs and competitive landscape make it difficult for these types of companies to scale profitably without significant capital investment and marketing spend.

Additionally, ventures solely focused on niche products without a clear path to broader market adoption may struggle to gain traction with investors. It’s essential to have a scalable business model and a plan for reaching a wider audience or integrating into larger ecosystems within the golf industry.

GolfWRX: For those who are brainstorming the next great golf business idea, what advice do you have? And for those who don’t plan to solely bootstrap and are looking to accelerate their growth with a capital infusion at some point, what do you say?

R&E: Our advice would be to start building. We see too many people at the idea stage, pitching concepts, looking for someone to sign an NDA to learn more, holding the cards close to their chest, and generally not creating enough progress and momentum.

The best way to build a company is to start working on it, find some level of traction and validation, and show a path and strategy to growth (even on a unit economic level). And you don’t need to leave your job, burn the ships, and be hand-to-mouth to build a company. Start small, build in public, and use the early validation to decide if you’re ready to make the leap to full-time.

For aspiring golf entrepreneurs, it’s crucial to start with a thorough understanding of the market and your target audience. Identify a specific problem or need within the golfing community that your product or service can address. This could be anything from improving performance, enhancing convenience, or making the game more accessible to new demographics. And then validate, validate, validate. Don’t make assumptions and don’t only trust the opinions of the people around you.

When seeking capital, prepare a comprehensive business plan that outlines what you have done and where you are going. We need to see the opportunity to scale and a believable path to growth. Demonstrating a clear path to profitability and scalability is key to attracting investors. We also want to see momentum. Even if it’s at a small scale, that can be enough for investors. And if you’re going to raise money, investors need to believe that you have a path to get large and take a big chunk of revenue in the golf market.

We share your golf passion. You can follow GolfWRX on Twitter @GolfWRX, Facebook and Instagram.

Opinion & Analysis

The 2 primary challenges golf equipment companies face

Published

on

As the editor-in-chief of this website and an observer of the GolfWRX forums and other online golf equipment discourse for over a decade, I’m pretty well attuned to the grunts and grumbles of a significant portion of the golf equipment purchasing spectrum. And before you accuse me of lording above all in some digital ivory tower, I’d like to offer that I worked at golf courses (public and private) for years prior to picking up my pen, so I’m well-versed in the non-degenerate golf equipment consumers out there. I touched (green)grass (retail)!

Complaints about the ills of and related to the OEMs usually follow some version of: Product cycles are too short for real innovation, tour equipment isn’t the same as retail (which is largely not true, by the way), too much is invested in marketing and not enough in R&D, top staffer X hasn’t even put the new driver in play, so it’s obviously not superior to the previous generation, prices are too high, and on and on.

Without digging into the merits of any of these claims, which I believe are mostly red herrings, I’d like to bring into view of our rangefinder what I believe to be the two primary difficulties golf equipment companies face.

One: As Terry Koehler, back when he was the CEO of Ben Hogan, told me at the time of the Ft Worth irons launch, if you can’t regularly hit the golf ball in a coin-sized area in the middle of the face, there’s not a ton that iron technology can do for you. Now, this is less true now with respect to irons than when he said it, and is less and less true by degrees as the clubs get larger (utilities, fairways, hybrids, drivers), but there remains a great deal of golf equipment truth in that statement. Think about it — which is to say, in TL;DR fashion, get lessons from a qualified instructor who will teach you about the fundamentals of repeatable impact and how the golf swing works, not just offer band-aid fixes. If you can’t repeatably deliver the golf club to the golf ball in something resembling the manner it was designed for, how can you expect to be getting the most out of the club — put another way, the maximum value from your investment?

Similarly, game improvement equipment can only improve your game if you game it. In other words, get fit for the clubs you ought to be playing rather than filling the bag with the ones you wish you could hit or used to be able to hit. Of course, don’t do this if you don’t care about performance and just want to hit a forged blade while playing off an 18 handicap. That’s absolutely fine. There were plenty of members in clubs back in the day playing Hogan Apex or Mizuno MP-32 irons who had no business doing so from a ballstriking standpoint, but they enjoyed their look, feel, and complementary qualities to their Gatsby hats and cashmere sweaters. Do what brings you a measure of joy in this maddening game.

Now, the second issue. This is not a plea for non-conforming equipment; rather, it is a statement of fact. USGA/R&A limits on every facet of golf equipment are detrimental to golf equipment manufacturers. Sure, you know this, but do you think about it as it applies to almost every element of equipment? A 500cc driver would be inherently more forgiving than a 460cc, as one with a COR measurement in excess of 0.83. 50-inch shafts. Box grooves. And on and on.

Would fewer regulations be objectively bad for the game? Would this erode its soul? Fortunately, that’s beside the point of this exercise, which is merely to point out the facts. The fact, in this case, is that equipment restrictions and regulations are the slaughterbench of an abundance of innovation in the golf equipment space. Is this for the best? Well, now I’ve asked the question twice and might as well give a partial response, I guess my answer to that would be, “It depends on what type of golf you’re playing and who you’re playing it with.”

For my part, I don’t mind embarrassing myself with vintage blades and persimmons chasing after the quasi-spiritual elevation of a well-struck shot, but that’s just me. Plenty of folks don’t give a damn if their grooves are conforming. Plenty of folks think the folks in Liberty Corner ought to add a prison to the museum for such offences. And those are just a few of the considerations for the amateur game — which doesn’t get inside the gallery ropes of the pro game…

Different strokes in the game of golf, in my humble opinion.

Anyway, I believe equipment company engineers are genuinely trying to build better equipment year over year. The marketing departments are trying to find ways to make this equipment appeal to the broadest segment of the golf market possible. All of this against (1) the backdrop of — at least for now — firm product cycles. And golfers who, with their ~15 average handicap (men), for the most part, are not striping the golf ball like Tiger in his prime and seem to have less and less time year over year to practice and improve. (2) Regulations that massively restrict what they’re able to do…

That’s the landscape as I see it and the real headwinds for golf equipment companies. No doubt, there’s more I haven’t considered, but I think the previous is a better — and better faith — point of departure when formulating any serious commentary on the golf equipment world than some of the more cynical and conspiratorial takes I hear.

Agree? Disagree? Think I’m worthy of an Adam Hadwin-esque security guard tackle? Let me know in the comments.

@golfoncbs The infamous Adam Hadwin tackle ? #golf #fyp #canada #pgatour #adamhadwin ? Ghibli-style nostalgic waltz – MaSssuguMusic

Continue Reading

Podcasts

Fore Love of Golf: Introducing a new club concept

Published

on

Episode #16 brings us Cliff McKinney. Cliff is the founder of Old Charlie Golf Club, a new club, and concept, to be built in the Florida panhandle. The model is quite interesting and aims to make great, private golf more affordable. We hope you enjoy the show!

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

On Scottie Scheffler wondering ‘What’s the point of winning?’

Published

on

Last week, I came across a reel from BBC Sport on Instagram featuring Scottie Scheffler speaking to the media ahead of The Open at Royal Portrush. In it, he shared that he often wonders what the point is of wanting to win tournaments so badly — especially when he knows, deep down, that it doesn’t lead to a truly fulfilling life.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by BBC SPORT (@bbcsport)

“Is it great to be able to win tournaments and to accomplish the things I have in the game of golf? Yeah, it brings tears to my eyes just to think about it because I’ve literally worked my entire life to be good at this sport,” Scheffler said. “To have that kind of sense of accomplishment, I think, is a pretty cool feeling. To get to live out your dreams is very special, but at the end of the day, I’m not out here to inspire the next generation of golfers. I’m not out here to inspire someone to be the best player in the world, because what’s the point?”

Ironically — or perhaps perfectly — he went on to win the claret jug.

That question — what’s the point of winning? — cuts straight to the heart of the human journey.

As someone who’s spent over two decades in the trenches of professional golf, and in deep study of the mental, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of the game, I see Scottie’s inner conflict as a sign of soul evolution in motion.

I came to golf late. I wasn’t a junior standout or college All-American. At 27, I left a steady corporate job to see if I could be on the PGA Tour starting as a 14-handicap, average-length hitter. Over the years, my journey has been defined less by trophies and more by the relentless effort to navigate the deeply inequitable and gated system of professional golf — an effort that ultimately turned inward and helped me evolve as both a golfer and a person.

One perspective that helped me make sense of this inner dissonance around competition and our culture’s tendency to overvalue winning is the idea of soul evolution.

The University of Virginia’s Division of Perceptual Studies has done extensive research on reincarnation, and Netflix’s Surviving Death (Episode 6) explores the topic, too. Whether you take it literally or metaphorically, the idea that we’re on a long arc of growth — from beginner to sage elder — offers a profound perspective.

If you accept the premise literally, then terms like “young soul” and “old soul” start to hold meaning. However, even if we set the word “soul” aside, it’s easy to see that different levels of life experience produce different worldviews.

Newer souls — or people in earlier stages of their development — may be curious and kind but still lack discernment or depth. There is a naivety, and they don’t yet question as deeply, tending to see things in black and white, partly because certainty feels safer than confronting the unknown.

As we gain more experience, we begin to experiment. We test limits. We chase extreme external goals — sometimes at the expense of health, relationships, or inner peace — still operating from hunger, ambition, and the fragility of the ego.

It’s a necessary stage, but often a turbulent and unfulfilling one.

David Duval fell off the map after reaching World No. 1. Bubba Watson had his own “Is this it?” moment with his caddie, Ted Scott, after winning the Masters.

In Aaron Rodgers: Enigma, reflecting on his 2011 Super Bowl win, Rodgers said:

“Now I’ve accomplished the only thing that I really, really wanted to do in my life. Now what? I was like, ‘Did I aim at the wrong thing? Did I spend too much time thinking about stuff that ultimately doesn’t give you true happiness?’”

Jim Carrey once said, “I think everybody should get rich and famous and do everything they ever dreamed of so they can see that it’s not the answer.”

Eventually, though, something shifts.

We begin to see in shades of gray. Winning, dominating, accumulating—these pursuits lose their shine. The rewards feel more fleeting. Living in a constant state of fight-or-flight makes us feel alive, yes, but not happy and joyful.

Compassion begins to replace ambition. Love, presence, and gratitude become more fulfilling than status, profits, or trophies. We crave balance over burnout. Collaboration over competition. Meaning over metrics.

Interestingly, if we zoom out, we can apply this same model to nations and cultures. Countries, like people, have a collective “soul stage” made up of the individuals within them.

Take the United States, for example. I’d place it as a mid-level soul: highly competitive and deeply driven, but still learning emotional maturity. Still uncomfortable with nuance. Still believing that more is always better. Despite its global wins, the U.S. currently ranks just 23rd in happiness (as of 2025). You might liken it to a gifted teenager—bold, eager, and ambitious, but angsty and still figuring out how to live well and in balance. As much as a parent wants to protect their child, sometimes the child has to make their own mistakes to truly grow.

So when Scottie Scheffler wonders what the point of winning is, I don’t see someone losing strength.

I see someone evolving.

He’s beginning to look beyond the leaderboard. Beyond metrics of success that carry a lower vibration. And yet, in a poetic twist, Scheffler did go on to win The Open. But that only reinforces the point: even at the pinnacle, the question remains. And if more of us in the golf and sports world — and in U.S. culture at large — started asking similar questions, we might discover that the more meaningful trophy isn’t about accumulating or beating others at all costs.

It’s about awakening and evolving to something more than winning could ever promise.

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending