Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Are you a swing junkie?

Published

on

Recreational golfers are unlike any other recreational sportsman. I know of no other sport where the recreational participants are as wrapped up in the technique as golfers. Visit any driving range and you are certain to see the majority of the golfers fiddling with their swing.

My guess is that technique preoccupies the minds of golfers more so than technique does in all other recreational sports combined. Visit a basketball court and watch a player miss a shot. Does that player stop and look at his feet or check the angle of his shoulders? Go to a baseball batting cage… Do you see anyone look behind themselves to check the position of the bat? Go fishing and ask your buddy if he has ever checked his wrist angle in order to improve his casting. Be careful with that one, you may get thrown out of the boat!

Modern golf has produced a recreational participant that is too often more involved in the golf swing than they are in watching the golf shot. Watch how seldom golfers hit their shot and watch it fly, land and come to a stop. More times than not, golfers will be seen checking a position or making a practice swing while their golf shot is still in the air. I refer to this type of golfer as a “swing junkie.”

The origins of the swing junkie can be traced back to a wonderful and historic book, Ben Hogan’s “Five Lessons: The Modern Fundamentals of Golf.” This book and the Hogan myth that grew out of this book have done more to create a modern recreational golfer that thinks more about how to swing the golf club than he does about how to play the game. The swing junkie defends his approach to golf by believing that Hogan himself was a swing junkie.

While Hogan continues to be the hero and go-to swing for most swing junkies, others too have caught the attention of the swing junkie. The 1970s brought into popularity Homer Kelley’s book “The Golfing Machine.” The first authorized instructor of the Golfing Machine was Ben Doyle, and his passion for teaching the system was a perfect match for the swing junkies. Golfing Machine swing junkies were seldom seen without their stack of graphs to check sequence photos. For you youngsters, the graph check sequence photos camera took eight still photographs and could be timed for the length of a golf swing. The Polaroid film used with the graph check allowed instant review of the swing. The result was that swing junkies could now spend more time analyzing their swing than watching the ball fly through the air.

Graph Check Sequence Photos

In the 1980s, Jimmy Ballard caught the imagination of the swing junkies. Commonly known as the “Pioneer of Connection,” Ballard had success with golfers as different as Gary Player and Sandy Lyle. Connection resonated well with the swing junkies. After all, on page 82 of Hogan’s “Five Lessons,” Hogan states that “the elbows remain tightly glued to the sides.” Unfortunately for Ballard, swing junkies have a short attention span and the age of connection was short lived.

David Leadbetter’s student Nick Faldo was the perfect golfer for the swing junkie to copy. Faldo seemed to have an endless number of swing drills. In Faldo, the swing junkies found their hero, a golfer who made more practice swings than he hit balls. While the swing junkie was busy trying to keep up with all of Faldo’s drills, the golf swing theory landscape was changing.

The success and popularity of Leadbetter brought into fashion the swing guru, and with that the swing junkie would now and for ever more enjoy technique and method overload. Leadbetter’s “Distance Through Resistance” would soon share the stage with Hank Haney’s concept of swinging the club on plane.

Jim McLean’s X-Factor had swing junkies twisting their torsos to the max. The No. 1 golf instructor was Butch Harmon Jr., but he was never a favorite of the swing junkie. Too much of his instruction was on how to hit golf shots and the swing junkies focus was always to make a better swing.

Today, entirely new ways of dissecting the golf swing are being developed to spark the imagination of the swing junkies. FlightScope and Trackman systems work with 3D Doppler radar tracking technology. Up to 26 individual data points are collected from every golf swing and shot. Data speak like “if you zero the swing plane with that degree of downward angle you will hit a draw” is now replacing the age old image of Ben Hogan’s downswing plane being a little under the backswing plane.

Will 3D radar data be the next step in the long evolution of swing junkie? Like something out of the movie The Matrix, will swing junkies become so focused on the data stream that they don’t even know what their swing looks like? Or will there be a split among the swing junkies? What will happen to the old guard that depends and protects the “good old way, the tried and true” use of video and pictures in their quest to find the perfect swing. What about the new breed of “techno swing junkie” who is always searching for new data points in order to build their perfect swing?

Whatever the future, swing junkies have their own special passion for the game and their own philosophy as to how to get the most enjoyment out of the game. Truth be known, every golfer who enjoys the game has some degree of swing junkie inside. Just keep in mind that the goal of this game is to get the ball in the hole as fast as possible.

As a professional golfer, Ron Stelten has experienced tournaments on every major golf tour in the world, and has won both in the U.S. and Europe. An entertainer, he hosts golf outings and clinics where he shares stories of his life on tour, plays great golf and provides all the instruction wanted. Ron's teaching skills focus on making golfers the best players they can be. Still competitive at 58, Ron can occasionally be seen playing tournament golf at the highest levels. He splits his time between the Ron Stelten Golf School at Taos Country Club (New Mexico) from June to October and The Palms Golf Club in La Quinta, Calif., November to May. Contact Ron at www.ronstelten.com

4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Jim Benjamin

    May 21, 2014 at 12:02 pm

    A friend of mine learned the Golfing Machine swing from Ben Doyle in the 70’s and is an excellent player. He tried teaching me and I improved to a point. I learned a lot about the Golfing Machine theory and can recognize the swing aspects present or missing in any player. The biggest problem I had was I couldn’t do it well enough. I’m a big thick guy and at 66 can’t turn fast enough to get any resulting swing speed. I was trying some new clubs at a Van’s Golf Shop and the pro asked me to release the club more. I knew what he meant and started more of an arm swing, releasing the club through impact instead of holding on trying to release the club with my body. I started hitting the club much longer. Since then I have referenced books by Jim Flick and have been working on a swing that allows me to swing the arms and let the body react. It works much better for me going from a 15 to a 9 hdcp. Pro swings are not for everybody.

  2. jmichael204

    May 21, 2014 at 10:41 am

    I think in golf we get soo caught up in teaching people the proper swing instead of focusing on pitching, chipping and putting where they will make up most of there strokes.. No matter how good your swing is your going to miss the green at some point or need to get up and down from 50 yards etc.. I used to be someone who was always focused on my Driver and full swings.. This year I have spent half the time on the range and more time around the chipping and putting green and have seen dramatic improvement in my game where if I am hitting the ball like garbage I can still “save my round” with the short game.

  3. 1 Junk

    May 20, 2014 at 9:55 pm

    Gimme gimme gimme more more more! Swing it swing it swing it yeah yeah yeah that’s it that’s it that’s it

  4. tom stickney

    May 20, 2014 at 12:18 pm

    As a teacher whom has taught on both sides of the coin- with and without technology…I can tell you that when video came out it caused us to become too “position” focused and guided us into trying to make robotic swings until we learned that everyone had their “own” swing. Thus some things that looked good on camera didn’t translate into great scores…so finally we were ok with different looking moves as long as they “worked” for the player.

    With the advent of Trackman (I have one and love it!) we are seeing the same thing- most teachers trying to push players into “robotic swings” with low face to path relationships with a tight spin axis for less curvature. Trying to eliminate all the variables. This too will pass in time….

    Therefore in the end I believe that Trackman will help golfers go BACK to swings that work for them- ones that are NOT position or aesthetic based- but FUNCTIONAL for the golfer whom uses them because the Trackman is not video based. It’s not about what you look like it’s about what works best for you!!!!! Personally I could care less about the numbers you produce (to a point) as long as they fit what you want your ball flight to look like in your own mind.

    New technology always elicits the same learning curve until instructors truly learn how to best teach with the new systems…it happened with video, 3D motion analysis, and now Trackman.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers

Published

on

PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.

In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.

Check out the full Q&A below.

Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?

Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.

I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.

Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?

Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.

Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.

Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?

Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.

In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.

Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?

Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.

Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?

Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.

Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.

Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?

Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.

The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.

Continue Reading

Club Junkie

A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast

Published

on

In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.

We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.

To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50

Published

on

This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?

As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.

I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.

Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.

I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.

It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.

So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.

1. Think About What You Want

Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.

Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.

For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.

You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.

The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.

But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.

None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.

2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work

One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.

You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.

You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.

I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.

Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.

I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.

3. Get Custom Fit

If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.

If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.

Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.

It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.

Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.

I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.

So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.

Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.

Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.

I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.

4. Distance and Strategy Matter

There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.

I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.

Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending