Opinion & Analysis
5 things we learned on Thursday at the 2018 U.S. Open

Jon Jennings, superintendent at Shinnecock Hills golf club, tells the story of the linksy look of the property. In the days of coal-fired train engines, embers would occasionally light the land where the course now rests, prohibiting the sustained growth of anything tall. On Thursday, some of those embers returned in a metaphoric sense. As the winds whipped along Peconic Bay, as firm yet wide fairways ricocheted balls into rough and worse, major-championship hopes were burned to a crisp for some, while fires of contention were lit for others. With that poetic opener, let’s find out what the engine dragged out of round one, with 5 things we learned on Thursday at the US Open
5) The U.S. Open is golf’s version of Survivor
In the 1970s and 80s, many bemoaned the high rough at fairways’ edge and greens’ side. This year, 2018 brings a different version of this torture, thanks to the antithesis of those traditional venues. Where trees once pinched fairways, eliminating recovery shots to greens, absence of trees allows winds to dance and hex the flight of golfers’ shots. Firm greens demand that shots land short or else! What is else? Closely-mown recovery areas, extensive strands of fescue, and bunkers galore. Offer 3 more rounds of 1-under to any of the golfers at that figure (or any others in the field) and they would sign that contract immediately.
We've all been there…#USOpen pic.twitter.com/If71gN7urb
— U.S. Open (USGA) (@usopengolf) June 14, 2018
4) If anyone tells you that experience matters…
Take a look at the top 19 golfers (there are 17 tied for 20th, so we won’t go there) and you find just 5 major champions. Each (Rose, Reed, Johnson, Stenson, Dufner) has one major title on his resume. The multiple-major names that were expected to stake a claim on Thursday (Mickelson, Spieth, McIlroy, Woods) could not summon similar results. Mickelson was low among that foursome with 77 on the day. Called by some “the sternest test in golf,” the U.S. Open is never the same from year to year. In fact, it’s never the same on the same course. Shinnecock in 1986 differed greatly in 2004, and 2018 is its own unique experience. If destiny taps you on the shoulder, Brian Gay or anyone else, take advantage!
We ???? you @BrianGayPGA! #USOpen pic.twitter.com/Ixf3k7fQtY
— U.S. Open (USGA) (@usopengolf) June 14, 2018
3) There’s always room for anyone to shine
Whether your name is Dean Burmester or David Bransdon, many frustrating swings can be erased by one glorious execution. Be it the long putt, the dunked bunker shot, or the fairway hole-out, the U.S. Open sends many away with a cherished memory. When you troll the bottom of the leader board, where the weekend is no more than travel time, keep in mind that most experience a spotlight moment.
Slam. Dunk. What a way to end your round, @BurmyGolf! #USOpen pic.twitter.com/dDilmkueuS
— U.S. Open (USGA) (@usopengolf) June 14, 2018
2) If you have to put your money somewhere …
It won’t be on Ian Poulter, Scott Piercy, or Russell Henley. Although they are tied with Dustin Johnson atop the sheet at minus-one, their odds at victory are slim. IF Poulter were to win, however, Lee Westwood and Colin Montgomerie would grind their teeth to nubbins. Neither won a major title, despite being the best British golfers of their day. Poulter’s individual record has not measured up to that of his Ryder Cup persona. Same goes for Piercy. Imagine the history of golf, with Scott Piercy as a U.S. Open champion, but not Phil Mickelson. The golf gods are truly mad on some days. Instead, put your money on the world number one, Dustin Johnson. He has won this tournament recently, on a course of similar brawn, and he has the demeanor to shrug off the bad and the good, and keep the ship headed toward shore.
Sharing is caring! @DJohnsonPGA wanted to join @JasonDufner at the top of the leader board. #USOpen pic.twitter.com/mGGKkSRUoP
— U.S. Open (USGA) (@usopengolf) June 14, 2018
1) What can we expect on Friday?
First, more combing through fescue for golf balls. Next, more decisions on whether to clip-and-spin, bump-and-run, or putt the ball from areas around the green. Third, rejection of driver off the tee, replaced by hybrids and irons for position and a chance to make par or birdie. Fourth, one golfer at 1-under will toss up a sub-par second round, and be at or near the top of the board. Joining him will be the first person to shoot 67 or 66 for the tournament. It will feel like 61. Finally, a farewell to a number of pre-tournament favorites, drummed falsely to the top by media hype, shaking their heads, wondering how it went so bad, so quickly.
The #USOpen return of @TigerWoods got off to a rocky start. One in which he never fully recovered. pic.twitter.com/GeKMgqxmFK
— U.S. Open (USGA) (@usopengolf) June 14, 2018
Opinion & Analysis
The 2 primary challenges golf equipment companies face

As the editor-in-chief of this website and an observer of the GolfWRX forums and other online golf equipment discourse for over a decade, I’m pretty well attuned to the grunts and grumbles of a significant portion of the golf equipment purchasing spectrum. And before you accuse me of lording above all in some digital ivory tower, I’d like to offer that I worked at golf courses (public and private) for years prior to picking up my pen, so I’m well-versed in the non-degenerate golf equipment consumers out there. I touched (green)grass (retail)!
Complaints about the ills of and related to the OEMs usually follow some version of: Product cycles are too short for real innovation, tour equipment isn’t the same as retail (which is largely not true, by the way), too much is invested in marketing and not enough in R&D, top staffer X hasn’t even put the new driver in play, so it’s obviously not superior to the previous generation, prices are too high, and on and on.
Without digging into the merits of any of these claims, which I believe are mostly red herrings, I’d like to bring into view of our rangefinder what I believe to be the two primary difficulties golf equipment companies face.
One: As Terry Koehler, back when he was the CEO of Ben Hogan, told me at the time of the Ft Worth irons launch, if you can’t regularly hit the golf ball in a coin-sized area in the middle of the face, there’s not a ton that iron technology can do for you. Now, this is less true now with respect to irons than when he said it, and is less and less true by degrees as the clubs get larger (utilities, fairways, hybrids, drivers), but there remains a great deal of golf equipment truth in that statement. Think about it — which is to say, in TL;DR fashion, get lessons from a qualified instructor who will teach you about the fundamentals of repeatable impact and how the golf swing works, not just offer band-aid fixes. If you can’t repeatably deliver the golf club to the golf ball in something resembling the manner it was designed for, how can you expect to be getting the most out of the club — put another way, the maximum value from your investment?
Similarly, game improvement equipment can only improve your game if you game it. In other words, get fit for the clubs you ought to be playing rather than filling the bag with the ones you wish you could hit or used to be able to hit. Of course, don’t do this if you don’t care about performance and just want to hit a forged blade while playing off an 18 handicap. That’s absolutely fine. There were plenty of members in clubs back in the day playing Hogan Apex or Mizuno MP-32 irons who had no business doing so from a ballstriking standpoint, but they enjoyed their look, feel, and complementary qualities to their Gatsby hats and cashmere sweaters. Do what brings you a measure of joy in this maddening game.
Now, the second issue. This is not a plea for non-conforming equipment; rather, it is a statement of fact. USGA/R&A limits on every facet of golf equipment are detrimental to golf equipment manufacturers. Sure, you know this, but do you think about it as it applies to almost every element of equipment? A 500cc driver would be inherently more forgiving than a 460cc, as one with a COR measurement in excess of 0.83. 50-inch shafts. Box grooves. And on and on.
Would fewer regulations be objectively bad for the game? Would this erode its soul? Fortunately, that’s beside the point of this exercise, which is merely to point out the facts. The fact, in this case, is that equipment restrictions and regulations are the slaughterbench of an abundance of innovation in the golf equipment space. Is this for the best? Well, now I’ve asked the question twice and might as well give a partial response, I guess my answer to that would be, “It depends on what type of golf you’re playing and who you’re playing it with.”
For my part, I don’t mind embarrassing myself with vintage blades and persimmons chasing after the quasi-spiritual elevation of a well-struck shot, but that’s just me. Plenty of folks don’t give a damn if their grooves are conforming. Plenty of folks think the folks in Liberty Corner ought to add a prison to the museum for such offences. And those are just a few of the considerations for the amateur game — which doesn’t get inside the gallery ropes of the pro game…
Different strokes in the game of golf, in my humble opinion.
Anyway, I believe equipment company engineers are genuinely trying to build better equipment year over year. The marketing departments are trying to find ways to make this equipment appeal to the broadest segment of the golf market possible. All of this against (1) the backdrop of — at least for now — firm product cycles. And golfers who, with their ~15 average handicap (men), for the most part, are not striping the golf ball like Tiger in his prime and seem to have less and less time year over year to practice and improve. (2) Regulations that massively restrict what they’re able to do…
That’s the landscape as I see it and the real headwinds for golf equipment companies. No doubt, there’s more I haven’t considered, but I think the previous is a better — and better faith — point of departure when formulating any serious commentary on the golf equipment world than some of the more cynical and conspiratorial takes I hear.
Agree? Disagree? Think I’m worthy of an Adam Hadwin-esque security guard tackle? Let me know in the comments.
@golfoncbs The infamous Adam Hadwin tackle ? #golf #fyp #canada #pgatour #adamhadwin ? Ghibli-style nostalgic waltz – MaSssuguMusic
Podcasts
Fore Love of Golf: Introducing a new club concept

Episode #16 brings us Cliff McKinney. Cliff is the founder of Old Charlie Golf Club, a new club, and concept, to be built in the Florida panhandle. The model is quite interesting and aims to make great, private golf more affordable. We hope you enjoy the show!
Opinion & Analysis
On Scottie Scheffler wondering ‘What’s the point of winning?’

Last week, I came across a reel from BBC Sport on Instagram featuring Scottie Scheffler speaking to the media ahead of The Open at Royal Portrush. In it, he shared that he often wonders what the point is of wanting to win tournaments so badly — especially when he knows, deep down, that it doesn’t lead to a truly fulfilling life.
View this post on Instagram
“Is it great to be able to win tournaments and to accomplish the things I have in the game of golf? Yeah, it brings tears to my eyes just to think about it because I’ve literally worked my entire life to be good at this sport,” Scheffler said. “To have that kind of sense of accomplishment, I think, is a pretty cool feeling. To get to live out your dreams is very special, but at the end of the day, I’m not out here to inspire the next generation of golfers. I’m not out here to inspire someone to be the best player in the world, because what’s the point?”
Ironically — or perhaps perfectly — he went on to win the claret jug.
That question — what’s the point of winning? — cuts straight to the heart of the human journey.
As someone who’s spent over two decades in the trenches of professional golf, and in deep study of the mental, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of the game, I see Scottie’s inner conflict as a sign of soul evolution in motion.
I came to golf late. I wasn’t a junior standout or college All-American. At 27, I left a steady corporate job to see if I could be on the PGA Tour starting as a 14-handicap, average-length hitter. Over the years, my journey has been defined less by trophies and more by the relentless effort to navigate the deeply inequitable and gated system of professional golf — an effort that ultimately turned inward and helped me evolve as both a golfer and a person.
One perspective that helped me make sense of this inner dissonance around competition and our culture’s tendency to overvalue winning is the idea of soul evolution.
The University of Virginia’s Division of Perceptual Studies has done extensive research on reincarnation, and Netflix’s Surviving Death (Episode 6) explores the topic, too. Whether you take it literally or metaphorically, the idea that we’re on a long arc of growth — from beginner to sage elder — offers a profound perspective.
If you accept the premise literally, then terms like “young soul” and “old soul” start to hold meaning. However, even if we set the word “soul” aside, it’s easy to see that different levels of life experience produce different worldviews.
Newer souls — or people in earlier stages of their development — may be curious and kind but still lack discernment or depth. There is a naivety, and they don’t yet question as deeply, tending to see things in black and white, partly because certainty feels safer than confronting the unknown.
As we gain more experience, we begin to experiment. We test limits. We chase extreme external goals — sometimes at the expense of health, relationships, or inner peace — still operating from hunger, ambition, and the fragility of the ego.
It’s a necessary stage, but often a turbulent and unfulfilling one.
David Duval fell off the map after reaching World No. 1. Bubba Watson had his own “Is this it?” moment with his caddie, Ted Scott, after winning the Masters.
In Aaron Rodgers: Enigma, reflecting on his 2011 Super Bowl win, Rodgers said:
“Now I’ve accomplished the only thing that I really, really wanted to do in my life. Now what? I was like, ‘Did I aim at the wrong thing? Did I spend too much time thinking about stuff that ultimately doesn’t give you true happiness?’”
Jim Carrey once said, “I think everybody should get rich and famous and do everything they ever dreamed of so they can see that it’s not the answer.”
Eventually, though, something shifts.
We begin to see in shades of gray. Winning, dominating, accumulating—these pursuits lose their shine. The rewards feel more fleeting. Living in a constant state of fight-or-flight makes us feel alive, yes, but not happy and joyful.
Compassion begins to replace ambition. Love, presence, and gratitude become more fulfilling than status, profits, or trophies. We crave balance over burnout. Collaboration over competition. Meaning over metrics.
Interestingly, if we zoom out, we can apply this same model to nations and cultures. Countries, like people, have a collective “soul stage” made up of the individuals within them.
Take the United States, for example. I’d place it as a mid-level soul: highly competitive and deeply driven, but still learning emotional maturity. Still uncomfortable with nuance. Still believing that more is always better. Despite its global wins, the U.S. currently ranks just 23rd in happiness (as of 2025). You might liken it to a gifted teenager—bold, eager, and ambitious, but angsty and still figuring out how to live well and in balance. As much as a parent wants to protect their child, sometimes the child has to make their own mistakes to truly grow.
So when Scottie Scheffler wonders what the point of winning is, I don’t see someone losing strength.
I see someone evolving.
He’s beginning to look beyond the leaderboard. Beyond metrics of success that carry a lower vibration. And yet, in a poetic twist, Scheffler did go on to win The Open. But that only reinforces the point: even at the pinnacle, the question remains. And if more of us in the golf and sports world — and in U.S. culture at large — started asking similar questions, we might discover that the more meaningful trophy isn’t about accumulating or beating others at all costs.
It’s about awakening and evolving to something more than winning could ever promise.
jeffrey monnich
Jun 16, 2018 at 5:09 pm
the most important thing I learned from day one and forgot about from last year was TURN THE VOLUME DOWN ON FOX. and today I’m having a more pleasant viewing experience.
Justin
Jun 15, 2018 at 8:40 am
Harvest Hill forever
Ronald Montesano
Jun 16, 2018 at 5:57 am
The Hill
seabass
Jun 15, 2018 at 6:40 am
I love this. Make it hard like it was years ago. No more fairways 100 yards wide, and 1/2 inch rough.
Make this about penalties for mistakes. Force them to hit fairways not just long bombs with easy rough.
Ronald Montesano
Jun 16, 2018 at 6:15 am
For the most part, it’s a different type of hard, or difficult. Shinny allows for the fast/firm/frenetic, in a way that dark-earth courses do not. Oakmont is an inland exception, perhaps why Mike Davis likes it so much. The rest of the arable-land courses need a different set-up. Going back to “hit in high rough, chop out, save par, repeat” is not the ideal manner.
Mike Davis has hinted that 3 courses (Shinny, Oaky and Pebble Beach) should host the US Open once every 8 years. If we take an 8-year period, that gives us those three, plus room for 5 more. Since June is way better for an Open than July or August, and since it is a priority to bring the event to as many geographic regions as possible, here is a list of 10 courses that might be interest in hosting a US Open:
Pinehurst #2
Trinity Forest
Erin Hills
Chambers Bay
Winged Foot
Southern Hills
Places like Olympic and Merion are in a bind, as they don’t have access to the space required to host a modern Open. I’m hoping that Torrey Pines sees its last Open in 2021, as the course is more “tour” than “USGA.” The two most important playings in the next 10 years are 2022 and 2023. The USGA needs another northeastern site, since Bethpage went the way of the PGA stable. The Country Club, outside Boston, fits the bill. The association would love to have LA country club on the rolls every 10-12 years, but the question is whether the membership will be one-and-done or embrace it.
ND Hickman
Jun 15, 2018 at 3:38 am
Colin Montgomerie isn’t English, pal.
Ronald Montesano
Jun 15, 2018 at 7:49 am
Ach, ye lads! Ye’ve caught me. No research went into the publication of this piece, as you can tell. It’s my addled brain that connected those two Brits. Thanks for being the astute readers and critics that you are, Craig Goodwin and others. Keep reading, continue commenting, and find my flaws!!
…RM
Ronald Montesano
Jun 15, 2018 at 7:50 am
ND,
Good to know we’re pals
…RM
ND Hickman
Jun 15, 2018 at 7:37 pm
All credit to fact checking.
Craig Goodwin
Jun 15, 2018 at 2:34 am
Monty is scottish not English good research
Man
Jun 14, 2018 at 10:09 pm
“…one FROM which he never recovered.”
Come on USGA…. you can’t even speak English. No wonder it’s a mess.
Reeves
Jun 14, 2018 at 9:45 pm
Finally, a farewell to a number of pre-tournament favorites, drummed falsely to the top by media hype, shaking their heads, wondering how it went so bad, so quickly. US OPEN about the only course set up that club and ball companies know even the best players cannot make their equipment magic. If courses were set up week in and week out like this Pros would need handicaps to win.
Ronald Montesano
Jun 15, 2018 at 7:52 am
You’re on to something, but would we tune in? Once a year is quite all right, and I suspect that the USGA has cards to play, to soften the course in case the wind whips with greater fury. The sun is the greater enemy, in my opinion. We’ll see how it plays out.