Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

An open letter to golf from a black man who loves the game

Published

on

June 10, 2020

An open letter to the golf industry:

Like everyone, I have been touched by the brutal murder of George Floyd. It has sparked a wave of protests and demonstrations that haven’t been seen in this country since the height of the Civil Rights movement. As a journalist who covers politics as well as golf, I have been struck by the magnitude of the moment and the multitudes that have responded. Hopefully, it will lead to lasting reforms that will ameliorate the many inequalities and injustices in our country.

I also have noted the reactions and responses from different corners of society, including the sports world. Numerous athletes and officials from major sports leagues have registered their concerns. I read with particular interest the remarks from PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan.

“This past weekend, I – like many of you, I’m sure – spent a lot of time trying to understand and process the civil unrest that has engulfed many cities across The United States, following the tragic death of George Floyd in Minneapolis. The hardships and injustices that have and continue to impact the African-American community are painful to watch and difficult to comprehend. And as a citizen of this country and a leader of this organization, I must admit that I’m struggling with what my role should be. But I’m not giving up.”

Monahan went on to say that he had engaged in several “emotional” conversations with colleagues and friends in the black community who showed him that “sometimes listening and making a commitment to understanding are the only things you can offer, and that’s OK.

“We might not know exactly what to do right now,” Monahan added, “but we shouldn’t be deterred. We should communicate and learn. We should talk to our family, friends, and colleagues in an open and compassionate way. We should grow as individuals and as an organization. And, most importantly, we should demand better.”

He said that the PGA Tour wants to play a role but that he is struggling with what to do and how to do it.

My question is, why is the industry struggling for a response?

I have been fortunate in my life in that I was not exposed to virulent racism early in life like my parents were. Both moved from segregated South Carolina to Washington, D.C. to escape the crushing yoke of racism. They raised us to be strong, independent, and to see character before color. In pre-school, I was reading to my class, so I was accepted at Sidwell Friends School in Washington, D.C., and became the first African American male to attend from Kindergarten through 12th grade. As children do, the only race that mattered was on the playground at recess. As I moved into the world, I did experience my share of prejudice and bigotry. For an African American man in America, it just comes with the territory.

I have been in the golf business for 17 years. I have operated golf courses—one of them a historic course that was opened specifically for black people when every course in DC was segregated—and have gone on to become a member of the golf media. In that time, I have been blessed to have been a guest at some of the most special places in golf and the experiences have given me a lifetime of memories. I have made friends with people of all races, religions, and nationalities in my time in the golf world. I have worn a kilt in Scotland, and I have said grace at dinner in the most exclusive club in Mississippi. From the tip of the African Cape to the valleys of India, from the beaches of Asia to the mountains of Northern Europe, I have borne witness to the magic of golf when walking 18 holes in God’s creation brings out the best in His people.

But I have also experienced the fact that black people in golf are viewed as a rare and sometimes unwanted presence. I have become accustomed to being the only African American in any given clubhouse, media gathering, or industry meeting. If I had a round of golf at Augusta National for every time that I have been standing in front of a clubhouse or hotel and had someone hand me their keys to park their car or ask me to put their bag on a cart, well, I’d have more experience at Augusta than most of the Tour.

In the United States, the game and industry of golf are intertwined with privilege and exclusion. And as the nation has faced the ugliness of racism and sexism and made advances, so has golf. Renee Powell, Charlie Sifford, Lee Elder; these are the names of pioneers, giants who broke down barriers and made it possible for me to do what I do. But despite these heroes, there remains a homogenous nature to the game composed of money, privilege, and race. When I was named Media Person of the Year in 2014 for the PGA Middle Atlantic section, I was the first and only person of color to win an award in any category in a section that was founded in 1925. Sadly, six years later that is still the case.

In recent times the game has initiated efforts to change both the impression and the reality that golf is only for a certain kind of person. But too often, what begin as noble agents of change get assimilated into the more pressing issues surrounding the bottom line.

The First Tee program (TFT) started out as a way to bring the game to underserved communities. Over time, corporate interests overwhelmed both the mission and the message. Now, TFT has the mission of generally “growing the game”. Many chapters are now run from exclusive country clubs and are essentially finishing schools for the current “golf culture.”

There are diversity officers in each of the game’s governing bodies such as the PGA of America and the USGA, but what significant initiative or accomplishment can they point to? The leadership at East Potomac Golf Course in Washington, D.C. tried to prod the PGA of America diversity office to facilitate the establishment of a golf program at Howard University, the historically black university located in the nation’s capital. Every year calls were made and interest was shown but no action was taken. It took Steph Curry, a basketball player, to take his celebrity on the court to make strides on the course.

For years, I have taken proposals to all of the top golf course operating groups, making the case for how the game can become relevant in diverse communities if they would devote time and resources to that cause. All of them gave me responses that reminded me of one I got from a bank manager rejecting a plan for a business loan, “Michael, it’s not a good idea. It’s not a bad idea. It’s just your idea.”

I have begged and pleaded with the governing bodies of the game to be proactive in promoting diversity and displaying leadership. I have tried to explain that the culture of the game and industry is that people of color are not wanted and that eventually there would be an incident that would bring a deluge of negative attention to the game.

Last year at the U.S. Open, I attended an invitation-only reception that featured two prominent PGA Tour professionals, one a possible future Hall of Fame player. That Hall-of-Fame-caliber player told the assembled crowd the story of the night his neighbor Tiger Woods had his infamous car accident at Isleworth, and as a “joke” the pro put on blackface and a wig then convinced a blonde companion to drive around with him pretending to be Tiger in an attempt to prank the media. There was shock and nervous laughter but not a single person voiced an objection.

As the only African American guest in the room, I felt every eye in the place on me. Trying to control my anger, I raised my hand and told that player that I respected his accomplishments, but he should be ashamed of telling that story. He later gave me the apology line, “I’m sorry if you were offended.” He said he would call me later to discuss it. Oddly enough, I’m still waiting for that call. Later, many people in the room approached me to say that they appreciated my speaking up, but I couldn’t put aside my anger and bewilderment at how easy it was for that pro to assume that it was a socially acceptable story.

I implored the USGA, the PGA, the Golf Channel, and others to take that incident as a bullet dodged and a signal to be proactive and to take the lead in providing sensitivity training and initiating programs that would build a bridge to the community at large. My efforts were largely ignored. I have been told that the pro in question was forced by sponsors to take sensitivity training; I’d love to hear from him how that training has changed his outlook. I didn’t report the story of that day at the U.S. Open, partly because I was not there as a member of the media and I felt conflicted. But I also wanted to give the sport I love the chance to do the right thing without taking the withering press that would come with the public revelation of the incident. Now, I feel even more conflicted but not for the same reasons.

The answer for golf is the same as it is for culture at large. The goal isn’t to eliminate bigotry and intolerance; I believe that those are, sadly, part of the human condition. But we can make them rare and unacceptable, by recognizing that they exist and then taking steps to hold people accountable for harboring it in any part of the game. We can educate and train people to empathize and appreciate those with different backgrounds and experiences. We can teach people how to reach out and invite those who might be intimidated and make them feel at home.

It’s not hard to figure out what to do. The thing that makes this action difficult is properly balancing the action with the potential reaction of a core clientele that is conservative by nature and is mostly apathetic or actively opposed to significant social change. But if we have been reminded of one thing from recent events, it is that change involves taking actions that will make some people uncomfortable and that the only constant in this world is change. For this to work, there has to be a willingness to reject the familiar and embrace the future. The answers for golf and for the nation lie outside their comfort zone.

The golf leadership is right to do some analytical thinking on a best approach, but there is low- hanging fruit when it comes to concrete actions that can and should be taken immediately. There are some glaring deficiencies that can be addressed with some specific actions addressing specific issues:

  • Golf’s touring professionals are its most visible and effective ambassadors. But by nature and by nurture they tend to be a very sequestered and homogenous group, shut off from the glaring realities of the day to day world by the demands of their profession and the wealth it affords them. Disturbing as it may be, the incident with the golf pro at the U.S. Open is not an isolated occurrence. People of color are routinely subjected to words and actions that are hurtful, disrespectful, and damaging to individuals as well as to the institution of golf. Touring professionals are already powerful advocates for any number of worthy causes—why should social justice not be among them? As was the case with the golf pro at the U.S. Open, every player on every professional tour should be required to take a course on diversity issues that covers race and gender. The training would enable them to empathize with diverse communities and build awareness within the traditional golf community.
  • Part of the future acceptance of people of color in golf is recognizing the contributions that we have made in the past to the history of the game. Sometime this year, Tiger Woods will be inducted into the World Golf Hall of Fame, making him only the second African American to be inducted (Charlie Sifford was the first). The WGHOF is the pinnacle of golf achievement, a testament to the enduring impact made on the game by its members. It seems to me a curiosity at best and an injustice at worst, that names like Bing Crosby and Bob Hope have lockers in the Hall while some of the greatest contributors to the game, who just happen to be black, do not. To rectify that, the next Hall of Fame class should include Renee Powell (LPGA pioneer and golf course owner), Lee Elder (first African-American to play in the Masters and most recent recipient of the USGA Bob Jones Award, its highest honor), Calvin Peete (winner of the Players Championship and the straightest driver the game has ever known) and John Shippen (the first American golf professional). The induction ceremony for this stellar group would be a clarion call to the world that in golf, all are welcome and all are appreciated.
  • There have been suggestions for convening a summit to discuss solutions to race and social justice issues. While the idea is noble, the example of The First Tee I mentioned before shows how efforts to make progress can all too easily be co-opted by the effort to make a profit.

Instead of a one-time meeting or summit, there should be a standing committee to assess diversity and inequality within the game and the industry, with the mission of creating a list of concrete action items for improvement and advancement of diversity, equality, and social justice issues. The committee could be made up of representatives from the game’s governing bodies, sponsors, and professionals, as well as representatives from the media, politics, and community advisors. The object would be to both develop original ideas and to take in ideas and initiatives that have worked outside of golf, then facilitate their implementation in the golf world. This group would ensure the constant flow of good ideas and sustain in perpetuity those ideas that prove effective.

  • There are around 150 jobs as a PGA Tour professional, but there are thousands of careers in the golf business, many of which have practically zero minority participation. To correct that, there should be funds set aside in the form of scholarships and paid internships to develop careers for minorities and women in golf that are not related to playing professionally, such as golf course design, golf course management, and the media. For example, the fact that there are no persons of color or women among the prominent course architects in the game is a disgrace,
    but one that is utterly correctable through opportunities that would be afforded by scholarships and internships.
  • An organization should be fostered to take over the previous mission of The First Tee, that is, to introduce the game to underserved communities and to make the continued pursuit of the game more affordable and accessible for those that wish to participate. Providing funding for the cost of equipment, apparel, instruction and course access will allow the game to be enjoyed by those not necessarily of the affluent class.

These suggestions are of course just a starting point. There is a stable full of ideas and initiatives out there. But there must be the will to implement and establish them.

Golf is unique among major sports in that it is a game that is defined by the people that make the game part of their lives rather than the people that play it for a living. Golf should be a way of life available to all people. It should be known for building bridges rather than putting up gates.

That’s not the case right now, but it can be.

There is a clear path for Mr. Monahan and others to take the lead and, as is always the case, there is very little foot traffic on the high road. Some people might say that with all that is going on in the world, what difference does it make what golf does? My response is that it is important because I live here, it is part of my world, and it is not exempt from responsibility for its connection to the wider world.

I appreciate the good work that has been done to date in the golf community to facilitate change. I also know that there is a lot left to be done. Like a good round of golf, let’s take it one shot at a time.

If you have questions, you know where to find me.

Sincerely,

Michael Williams

Williams has a reputation as a savvy broadcaster, and as an incisive interviewer and writer. An avid golfer himself, Williams has covered the game of golf and the golf lifestyle including courses, restaurants, travel and sports marketing for publications all over the world. He is currently working with a wide range of outlets in traditional and electronic media, and has produced and hosted “Sticks and Stones” on the Fox Radio network, a critically acclaimed show that combined coverage of the golf world with interviews of the Washington power elite. His work on Newschannel8’s “Capital Golf Weekly” and “SportsTalk” have established him as one of the area’s most trusted sources for golf reporting. Williams has also made numerous radio appearances on “The John Thompson Show,” and a host of other local productions. He is a sought-after speaker and panel moderator, he has recently launched a new partnership with The O Team to create original golf-themed programming and events. Williams is a member of the United States Golf Association and the Golf Writers Association of America.

Opinion & Analysis

The 2 primary challenges golf equipment companies face

Published

on

As the editor-in-chief of this website and an observer of the GolfWRX forums and other online golf equipment discourse for over a decade, I’m pretty well attuned to the grunts and grumbles of a significant portion of the golf equipment purchasing spectrum. And before you accuse me of lording above all in some digital ivory tower, I’d like to offer that I worked at golf courses (public and private) for years prior to picking up my pen, so I’m well-versed in the non-degenerate golf equipment consumers out there. I touched (green)grass (retail)!

Complaints about the ills of and related to the OEMs usually follow some version of: Product cycles are too short for real innovation, tour equipment isn’t the same as retail (which is largely not true, by the way), too much is invested in marketing and not enough in R&D, top staffer X hasn’t even put the new driver in play, so it’s obviously not superior to the previous generation, prices are too high, and on and on.

Without digging into the merits of any of these claims, which I believe are mostly red herrings, I’d like to bring into view of our rangefinder what I believe to be the two primary difficulties golf equipment companies face.

One: As Terry Koehler, back when he was the CEO of Ben Hogan, told me at the time of the Ft Worth irons launch, if you can’t regularly hit the golf ball in a coin-sized area in the middle of the face, there’s not a ton that iron technology can do for you. Now, this is less true now with respect to irons than when he said it, and is less and less true by degrees as the clubs get larger (utilities, fairways, hybrids, drivers), but there remains a great deal of golf equipment truth in that statement. Think about it — which is to say, in TL;DR fashion, get lessons from a qualified instructor who will teach you about the fundamentals of repeatable impact and how the golf swing works, not just offer band-aid fixes. If you can’t repeatably deliver the golf club to the golf ball in something resembling the manner it was designed for, how can you expect to be getting the most out of the club — put another way, the maximum value from your investment?

Similarly, game improvement equipment can only improve your game if you game it. In other words, get fit for the clubs you ought to be playing rather than filling the bag with the ones you wish you could hit or used to be able to hit. Of course, don’t do this if you don’t care about performance and just want to hit a forged blade while playing off an 18 handicap. That’s absolutely fine. There were plenty of members in clubs back in the day playing Hogan Apex or Mizuno MP-32 irons who had no business doing so from a ballstriking standpoint, but they enjoyed their look, feel, and complementary qualities to their Gatsby hats and cashmere sweaters. Do what brings you a measure of joy in this maddening game.

Now, the second issue. This is not a plea for non-conforming equipment; rather, it is a statement of fact. USGA/R&A limits on every facet of golf equipment are detrimental to golf equipment manufacturers. Sure, you know this, but do you think about it as it applies to almost every element of equipment? A 500cc driver would be inherently more forgiving than a 460cc, as one with a COR measurement in excess of 0.83. 50-inch shafts. Box grooves. And on and on.

Would fewer regulations be objectively bad for the game? Would this erode its soul? Fortunately, that’s beside the point of this exercise, which is merely to point out the facts. The fact, in this case, is that equipment restrictions and regulations are the slaughterbench of an abundance of innovation in the golf equipment space. Is this for the best? Well, now I’ve asked the question twice and might as well give a partial response, I guess my answer to that would be, “It depends on what type of golf you’re playing and who you’re playing it with.”

For my part, I don’t mind embarrassing myself with vintage blades and persimmons chasing after the quasi-spiritual elevation of a well-struck shot, but that’s just me. Plenty of folks don’t give a damn if their grooves are conforming. Plenty of folks think the folks in Liberty Corner ought to add a prison to the museum for such offences. And those are just a few of the considerations for the amateur game — which doesn’t get inside the gallery ropes of the pro game…

Different strokes in the game of golf, in my humble opinion.

Anyway, I believe equipment company engineers are genuinely trying to build better equipment year over year. The marketing departments are trying to find ways to make this equipment appeal to the broadest segment of the golf market possible. All of this against (1) the backdrop of — at least for now — firm product cycles. And golfers who, with their ~15 average handicap (men), for the most part, are not striping the golf ball like Tiger in his prime and seem to have less and less time year over year to practice and improve. (2) Regulations that massively restrict what they’re able to do…

That’s the landscape as I see it and the real headwinds for golf equipment companies. No doubt, there’s more I haven’t considered, but I think the previous is a better — and better faith — point of departure when formulating any serious commentary on the golf equipment world than some of the more cynical and conspiratorial takes I hear.

Agree? Disagree? Think I’m worthy of an Adam Hadwin-esque security guard tackle? Let me know in the comments.

@golfoncbs The infamous Adam Hadwin tackle ? #golf #fyp #canada #pgatour #adamhadwin ? Ghibli-style nostalgic waltz – MaSssuguMusic

Continue Reading

Podcasts

Fore Love of Golf: Introducing a new club concept

Published

on

Episode #16 brings us Cliff McKinney. Cliff is the founder of Old Charlie Golf Club, a new club, and concept, to be built in the Florida panhandle. The model is quite interesting and aims to make great, private golf more affordable. We hope you enjoy the show!

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

On Scottie Scheffler wondering ‘What’s the point of winning?’

Published

on

Last week, I came across a reel from BBC Sport on Instagram featuring Scottie Scheffler speaking to the media ahead of The Open at Royal Portrush. In it, he shared that he often wonders what the point is of wanting to win tournaments so badly — especially when he knows, deep down, that it doesn’t lead to a truly fulfilling life.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by BBC SPORT (@bbcsport)

“Is it great to be able to win tournaments and to accomplish the things I have in the game of golf? Yeah, it brings tears to my eyes just to think about it because I’ve literally worked my entire life to be good at this sport,” Scheffler said. “To have that kind of sense of accomplishment, I think, is a pretty cool feeling. To get to live out your dreams is very special, but at the end of the day, I’m not out here to inspire the next generation of golfers. I’m not out here to inspire someone to be the best player in the world, because what’s the point?”

Ironically — or perhaps perfectly — he went on to win the claret jug.

That question — what’s the point of winning? — cuts straight to the heart of the human journey.

As someone who’s spent over two decades in the trenches of professional golf, and in deep study of the mental, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of the game, I see Scottie’s inner conflict as a sign of soul evolution in motion.

I came to golf late. I wasn’t a junior standout or college All-American. At 27, I left a steady corporate job to see if I could be on the PGA Tour starting as a 14-handicap, average-length hitter. Over the years, my journey has been defined less by trophies and more by the relentless effort to navigate the deeply inequitable and gated system of professional golf — an effort that ultimately turned inward and helped me evolve as both a golfer and a person.

One perspective that helped me make sense of this inner dissonance around competition and our culture’s tendency to overvalue winning is the idea of soul evolution.

The University of Virginia’s Division of Perceptual Studies has done extensive research on reincarnation, and Netflix’s Surviving Death (Episode 6) explores the topic, too. Whether you take it literally or metaphorically, the idea that we’re on a long arc of growth — from beginner to sage elder — offers a profound perspective.

If you accept the premise literally, then terms like “young soul” and “old soul” start to hold meaning. However, even if we set the word “soul” aside, it’s easy to see that different levels of life experience produce different worldviews.

Newer souls — or people in earlier stages of their development — may be curious and kind but still lack discernment or depth. There is a naivety, and they don’t yet question as deeply, tending to see things in black and white, partly because certainty feels safer than confronting the unknown.

As we gain more experience, we begin to experiment. We test limits. We chase extreme external goals — sometimes at the expense of health, relationships, or inner peace — still operating from hunger, ambition, and the fragility of the ego.

It’s a necessary stage, but often a turbulent and unfulfilling one.

David Duval fell off the map after reaching World No. 1. Bubba Watson had his own “Is this it?” moment with his caddie, Ted Scott, after winning the Masters.

In Aaron Rodgers: Enigma, reflecting on his 2011 Super Bowl win, Rodgers said:

“Now I’ve accomplished the only thing that I really, really wanted to do in my life. Now what? I was like, ‘Did I aim at the wrong thing? Did I spend too much time thinking about stuff that ultimately doesn’t give you true happiness?’”

Jim Carrey once said, “I think everybody should get rich and famous and do everything they ever dreamed of so they can see that it’s not the answer.”

Eventually, though, something shifts.

We begin to see in shades of gray. Winning, dominating, accumulating—these pursuits lose their shine. The rewards feel more fleeting. Living in a constant state of fight-or-flight makes us feel alive, yes, but not happy and joyful.

Compassion begins to replace ambition. Love, presence, and gratitude become more fulfilling than status, profits, or trophies. We crave balance over burnout. Collaboration over competition. Meaning over metrics.

Interestingly, if we zoom out, we can apply this same model to nations and cultures. Countries, like people, have a collective “soul stage” made up of the individuals within them.

Take the United States, for example. I’d place it as a mid-level soul: highly competitive and deeply driven, but still learning emotional maturity. Still uncomfortable with nuance. Still believing that more is always better. Despite its global wins, the U.S. currently ranks just 23rd in happiness (as of 2025). You might liken it to a gifted teenager—bold, eager, and ambitious, but angsty and still figuring out how to live well and in balance. As much as a parent wants to protect their child, sometimes the child has to make their own mistakes to truly grow.

So when Scottie Scheffler wonders what the point of winning is, I don’t see someone losing strength.

I see someone evolving.

He’s beginning to look beyond the leaderboard. Beyond metrics of success that carry a lower vibration. And yet, in a poetic twist, Scheffler did go on to win The Open. But that only reinforces the point: even at the pinnacle, the question remains. And if more of us in the golf and sports world — and in U.S. culture at large — started asking similar questions, we might discover that the more meaningful trophy isn’t about accumulating or beating others at all costs.

It’s about awakening and evolving to something more than winning could ever promise.

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending