Instruction
Increase your driving distance by becoming more efficient

The holy grail of driving distance is efficiency. Not how physically strong you are, or your club head speed, and certainly not your effort level! I’ll say it again: distance efficiency is king.
Now I want you to remember the following numbers: 1.49, 2.78, 37 and+5. There will be a quiz later on.
Consider the following chart:
Trackman has established these numbers as optimal for different angles of attack.
First question: Are your best drives going as far as the maximums on the +5 angle of attack lines in this chart? That means at sea level, without wind or lucky bounces. No cheating!
For example, a perfectly optimal golfer swinging at 90 mph should net 250 yards off the tee. That is around 2.78 yards per mph of club head speed. This is best effort, not average. We will examine that in a minute.
You must have the three magic numbers in place to achieve this level of performance. First, 1.49 smash factor (or higher), which is an indication of square center contact. Second, you must achieve a +5 or greater angle of attack. Third, you must land the ball with about a 37-degree angle of descent. This requires the right combination of launch angle and spin rate.
Most golfers are missing 30 yards or more due to inefficiencies in contact, club head delivery and trajectory. My experience on the lesson tee tells me lost distance can be as high as 80 yards! Don’t believe me? Keep reading!
Of course, no golfer is a robot; we all mishit and have variances in our swings. Then there’s outside variables like wind and ground condition. So most golfers probablt won’t achieve 2.78 yards per mph, but it is still an area where they improve tremendously. Even great golfers can be losing a ton of distance. Let’s take an example from the PGA Tour to prove this point.
At 112 mph (average Tour club head speed), the perfect efficiency quotient moves to 2.82 mph (interpolated from the chart above).
Tim Clark led the Tour in driving distance efficiency in 2013 at 2.64 yards per mph. Studying previous years, it appears the upper boundary for this stat is around 2.70.
Clark averaged 276 yards per drive at only 104.5 mph. Comparatively, Sergio Garcia (who ranked 176th), averaged 292 yards per drive at nearly 121 mph, for a 2.42 yards per mph.
If Garcia was equally as efficient as Clark, he would pick up 26 yards per drive, from 292 yards up to 318 yards! By comparison, Garcia would need to increase his swing speed, given his current efficiency, to a mind-boggling 132 mph to reach a 318 average! See why efficiency can be so helpful?
Why such a large discrepancy? I’ll give you a hint: Clark hits up on the ball at impact, while Garcia hits steeply down. By the way, I’ll take Clark’s accuracy over Sergio’s any day too: 70 percent versus 61 percent in 2013. Who are these people who insist Garcia is one of the best drivers in the world today?
Nick Watney, another prominent star, could gain 25 yards, and Tiger Woods could gain 16 yards. Former Masters Champion Trevor Immelman took the inefficiency award for 2013. He would have been 33 yards longer on average if he was as efficient as Clark. With a better angle of attack, his driving distance could improve from 278 yards per drive to 311 yards!
Now if a top PGA Tour pro can gain this much distance by becoming more efficient, how much can the average golfer increase his or her drives? I don’t care if you’re a scratch golfer with a great swing. I bet you’re leaving at least 20 yards on the table.
So rather than swinging harder or buying new driver after new driver, make 2014 your year to get a more economical driver swing! You’ll drive your buddies nuts outdriving them with your “smooth, easy” swing!
Instruction
The Wedge Guy: Beating the yips into submission

There may be no more painful affliction in golf than the “yips” – those uncontrollable and maddening little nervous twitches that prevent you from making a decent stroke on short putts. If you’ve never had them, consider yourself very fortunate (or possibly just very young). But I can assure you that when your most treacherous and feared golf shot is not the 195 yard approach over water with a quartering headwind…not the extra tight fairway with water left and sand right…not the soft bunker shot to a downhill pin with water on the other side…No, when your most feared shot is the remaining 2- 4-foot putt after hitting a great approach, recovery or lag putt, it makes the game almost painful.
And I’ve been fighting the yips (again) for a while now. It’s a recurring nightmare that has haunted me most of my adult life. I even had the yips when I was in my 20s, but I’ve beat them into submission off and on most of my adult life. But just recently, that nasty virus came to life once again. My lag putting has been very good, but when I get over one of those “you should make this” length putts, the entire nervous system seems to go haywire. I make great practice strokes, and then the most pitiful short-stroke or jab at the ball you can imagine. Sheesh.
But I’m a traditionalist, and do not look toward the long putter, belly putter, cross-hand, claw or other variation as the solution. My approach is to beat those damn yips into submission some other way. Here’s what I’m doing that is working pretty well, and I offer it to all of you who might have a similar affliction on the greens.
When you are over a short putt, forget the practice strokes…you want your natural eye-hand coordination to be unhindered by mechanics. Address your putt and take a good look at the hole, and back to the putter to ensure good alignment. Lighten your right hand grip on the putter and make sure that only the fingertips are in contact with the grip, to prevent you from getting to tight.
Then, take a long, long look at the hole to fill your entire mind and senses with the target. When you bring your head/eyes back to the ball, try to make a smooth, immediate move right into your backstroke — not even a second pause — and then let your hands and putter track right back together right back to where you were looking — the HOLE! Seeing the putter make contact with the ball, preferably even the forward edge of the ball – the side near the hole.
For me, this is working, but I am asking all of you to chime in with your own “home remedies” for the most aggravating and senseless of all golf maladies. It never hurts to have more to fall back on!
Instruction
Looking for a good golf instructor? Use this checklist

Over the last couple of decades, golf has become much more science-based. We measure swing speed, smash factor, angle of attack, strokes gained, and many other metrics that can really help golfers improve. But I often wonder if the advancement of golf’s “hard” sciences comes at the expense of the “soft” sciences.
Take, for example, golf instruction. Good golf instruction requires understanding swing mechanics and ball flight. But let’s take that as a given for PGA instructors. The other factors that make an instructor effective can be evaluated by social science, rather than launch monitors.
If you are a recreational golfer looking for a golf instructor, here are my top three points to consider.
1. Cultural mindset
What is “cultural mindset? To social scientists, it means whether a culture of genius or a culture of learning exists. In a golf instruction context, that may mean whether the teacher communicates a message that golf ability is something innate (you either have it or you don’t), or whether golf ability is something that can be learned. You want the latter!
It may sound obvious to suggest that you find a golf instructor who thinks you can improve, but my research suggests that it isn’t a given. In a large sample study of golf instructors, I found that when it came to recreational golfers, there was a wide range of belief systems. Some instructors strongly believed recreational golfers could improve through lessons. while others strongly believed they could not. And those beliefs manifested in the instructor’s feedback given to a student and the culture created for players.
2. Coping and self-modeling can beat role-modeling
Swing analysis technology is often preloaded with swings of PGA and LPGA Tour players. The swings of elite players are intended to be used for comparative purposes with golfers taking lessons. What social science tells us is that for novice and non-expert golfers, comparing swings to tour professionals can have the opposite effect of that intended. If you fit into the novice or non-expert category of golfer, you will learn more and be more motivated to change if you see yourself making a ‘better’ swing (self-modeling) or seeing your swing compared to a similar other (a coping model). Stay away from instructors who want to compare your swing with that of a tour player.
3. Learning theory basics
It is not a sexy selling point, but learning is a process, and that process is incremental – particularly for recreational adult players. Social science helps us understand this element of golf instruction. A good instructor will take learning slowly. He or she will give you just about enough information that challenges you, but is still manageable. The artful instructor will take time to decide what that one or two learning points are before jumping in to make full-scale swing changes. If the instructor moves too fast, you will probably leave the lesson with an arm’s length of swing thoughts and not really know which to focus on.
As an instructor, I develop a priority list of changes I want to make in a player’s technique. We then patiently and gradually work through that list. Beware of instructors who give you more than you can chew.
So if you are in the market for golf instruction, I encourage you to look beyond the X’s and O’s to find the right match!
Instruction
What Lottie Woad’s stunning debut win teaches every golfer

Most pros take months, even years, to win their first tournament. Lottie Woad needed exactly four days.
The 21-year-old from Surrey shot 21-under 267 at Dundonald Links to win the ISPS Handa Women’s Scottish Open by three shots — in her very first event as a professional. She’s only the third player in LPGA history to accomplish this feat, joining Rose Zhang (2023) and Beverly Hanson (1951).
But here’s what caught my attention as a coach: Woad didn’t win through miraculous putting or bombing 300-yard drives. She won through relentless precision and unshakeable composure. After watching her performance unfold, I’m convinced every golfer — from weekend warriors to scratch players — can steal pages from her playbook.
Precision Beats Power (And It’s Not Even Close)
Forget the driving contests. Woad proved that finding greens matters more than finding distance.
What Woad did:
• Hit it straight, hit it solid, give yourself chances
• Aimed for the fat parts of greens instead of chasing pins
• Let her putting do the talking after hitting safe targets
• As she said, “Everyone was chasing me today, and managed to maintain the lead and played really nicely down the stretch and hit a lot of good shots”
Why most golfers mess this up:
• They see a pin tucked behind a bunker and grab one more club to “go right at it”
• Distance becomes more important than accuracy
• They try to be heroic instead of smart
ACTION ITEM: For your next 10 rounds, aim for the center of every green regardless of pin position. Track your greens in regulation and watch your scores drop before your swing changes.
The Putter That Stayed Cool Under Fire
Woad started the final round two shots clear and immediately applied pressure with birdies at the 2nd and 3rd holes. When South Korea’s Hyo Joo Kim mounted a charge and reached 20-under with a birdie at the 14th, Woad didn’t panic.
How she responded to pressure:
• Fired back with consecutive birdies at the 13th and 14th
• Watched Kim stumble with back-to-back bogeys
• Capped it with her fifth birdie of the day at the par-5 18th
• Stayed patient when others pressed, pressed when others cracked
What amateurs do wrong:
• Get conservative when they should be aggressive
• Try to force magic when steady play would win
• Panic when someone else makes a move
ACTION ITEM: Practice your 3-6 foot putts for 15 minutes after every range session. Woad’s putting wasn’t spectacular—it was reliable. Make the putts you should make.
Course Management 101: Play Your Game, Not the Course’s Game
Woad admitted she couldn’t see many scoreboards during the final round, but it didn’t matter. She stuck to her game plan regardless of what others were doing.
Her mental approach:
• Focused on her process, not the competition
• Drew on past pressure situations (Augusta National Women’s Amateur win)
• As she said, “That was the biggest tournament I played in at the time and was kind of my big win. So definitely felt the pressure of it more there, and I felt like all those experiences helped me with this”
Her physical execution:
• 270-yard drives (nothing flashy)
• Methodical iron play
• Steady putting
• Everything effective, nothing spectacular
ACTION ITEM: Create a yardage book for your home course. Know your distances to every pin, every hazard, every landing area. Stick to your plan no matter what your playing partners are doing.
Mental Toughness Isn’t Born, It’s Built
The most impressive part of Woad’s win? She genuinely didn’t expect it: “I definitely wasn’t expecting to win my first event as a pro, but I knew I was playing well, and I was hoping to contend.”
Her winning mindset:
• Didn’t put winning pressure on herself
• Focused on playing well and contending
• Made winning a byproduct of a good process
• Built confidence through recent experiences:
- Won the Women’s Irish Open as an amateur
- Missed a playoff by one shot at the Evian Championship
- Each experience prepared her for the next
What this means for you:
• Stop trying to shoot career rounds every time you tee up
• Focus on executing your pre-shot routine
• Commit to every shot
• Stay present in the moment
ACTION ITEM: Before each round, set process goals instead of score goals. Example: “I will take three practice swings before every shot” or “I will pick a specific target for every shot.” Let your score be the result, not the focus.
The Real Lesson
Woad collected $300,000 for her first professional victory, but the real prize was proving that fundamentals still work at golf’s highest level. She didn’t reinvent the game — she simply executed the basics better than everyone else that week.
The fundamentals that won:
• Hit more fairways
• Find more greens
• Make the putts you should make
• Stay patient under pressure
That’s something every golfer can do, regardless of handicap. Lottie Woad just showed us it’s still the winning formula.
FINAL ACTION ITEM: Pick one of the four action items above and commit to it for the next month. Master one fundamental before moving to the next. That’s how champions are built.
PGA Professional Brendon Elliott is an award-winning coach and golf writer. You can check out his writing work and learn more about him by visiting BEAGOLFER.golf and OneMoreRollGolf.com. Also, check out “The Starter” on RG.org each Monday.
Editor’s note: Brendon shares his nearly 30 years of experience in the game with GolfWRX readers through his ongoing tip series. He looks forward to providing valuable insights and advice to help golfers improve their game. Stay tuned for more Tips!
Aaron
Sep 7, 2019 at 12:22 am
Something nobody ever thinks about is the fact that hitting it straighter just indirectly will increase your distance by 20%
christian
Jan 24, 2014 at 10:13 pm
Efficiency is of course important. But without decent swing speed you will NOT hit the ball a long distance, no matter how “efficient” you are.
Steve Pratt
Jan 29, 2014 at 12:43 am
Most golfers will gain more yards with efficiency than speed. Sergio Garcia is never ever going to average 132 mph for a year, but he will hit the ball that far by being efficient.
dcorun
Jan 22, 2014 at 9:32 am
If I play my driver off my left toe wouldn’t I have a tendency to hit a hook or am I missing something. Which could be at my age 🙂
Scott Hogan
Jan 24, 2014 at 1:23 pm
Actually Chris, moving the ball forward promotes a fade because the club will be swinging left of the target line by then (D-Plane). If you are hooking the ball, you are making a compensation so where in your swing to have that happen and would need the other numbers.
Steve Pratt
Jan 24, 2014 at 9:05 pm
Yes for every one degree you swing upwards, you should also be swinging one degree rightward (right handed golfer). If your path was already straight, you could easily do this by closing the stance one inch.
Chris
Jan 21, 2014 at 5:34 pm
Nice article and info, good work.
I like to use the factor of 2.4 or 2.5 yds per carry ss mph when fitting the avg swing speeds of 90-100. It takes away the unknown and every changing “ground condition factors” being firm or soft.
Also, its not as easy for someone to just move the ball up in their stance and easily chance the AOA and ball flight results other swing path problems can occur…see your local professional….results may vary
LiveWire
Jan 19, 2014 at 10:30 pm
I’m glad I read this. Great information. Thank You Steve. I have lost yardage in the last couple years, my angle of attack has definitely been a little more aggressive. I purposely did it with my irons and it has probably slowly moved into my tee shot as well.
Thanks
Brian Cutler
Jan 18, 2014 at 8:37 am
Good article, I completely agree. With what I see in fitting I’ve got plenty of guys leaving 20-80 yards on the table without ever changing their club head speed.
However, making sure the driver is efficient plays a role too. Yesterday I took a guy from an R5 that he hits 250, to an SLDR that he now hits 280. He is still leaving another 40 yards on the table, but the driver helped drop the spin.
Scott Hogan
Jan 24, 2014 at 1:25 pm
Brian,
You added loft to the driver as well when you go to the SLDR?
Steve Pratt
Jan 17, 2014 at 9:31 pm
I recommend playing the ball off the front big toe on a driver to help get you to the +5. Playing the instep will make it very difficult to achieve this. You will also have to release the clubhead on time and achieve some kind of side tilt at impact.
With the same motion that hits up on the driver, you can also hit down on the irons simply with ball position, relative to the instep, which should be the low point in your swing for every club.
Notice on the chart how once you achieve a +5 AoA (or close), you have to reduce spin loft. Your drives will be higher launching but flatter, and probably apex a bit lower overall. Through good club fitting, you can get to the 37 degree landing angle.
LiveWire
Jan 19, 2014 at 10:38 pm
What do you mean by side tilt?
Cris
Jan 17, 2014 at 6:01 pm
Makes sense. Suggestions to make our swings more efficient or starting hitting up on the ball? I hit on the ball 1.5 degrees down on average with the driver. Feel that I place the ball inside my left armpit.
Thanks!
MJ
Jan 17, 2014 at 5:51 pm
Okay I fall in the inefficient scratch player category. Probably a Garcia as far as getting the most out of my drives. I have always felt I left a lot on the table even though I can get it out there reasonably well.
What modifications to my setup and downswing to follow through can be made to start hitting up more on the ball without just ballooning the ball?
Thanks!
Jerry Crowell
Jan 17, 2014 at 4:57 pm
Who said to swing UP on your irons, Bob?
You hit DOWN on an iron. Ball position, stance variance = a different contact point with an iron vs. a driver. Understanding the math invloved will take you to a HIGHER level! It’s NOT hard either!!
Great work Professor Pratt!!!
bob
Jan 17, 2014 at 4:26 pm
and start topping irons because i’m swinging up errrr
Rich
Jan 17, 2014 at 4:06 pm
What happened to the quiz Steve??????? 🙂 Cool article. My driver numbers are no where near those so now I have something I can work towards improving (as well as learning how to chip again!). Thanks.