Opinion & Analysis
Clark: Give Nike Golf credit where credit is due
Remember all the criticism hurled at Rory McIlroy when he decided to switch to Nike Golf equipment? It’s quieter now, isn’t it?
The meteoric rise of Nike Golf has been nothing short of amazing considering that not very long ago, Nike Golf was the new kid on the block in the golf club business; a young company in a very old, well-developed industry. The success of Tiger Woods — and more recently McIlroy and Michelle Wie — has certainly been a huge part of the company’s growth, but success in the golf equipment industry has always come down to one thing: Do the clubs perform or not?
I’ve been on staff with Nike Golf now for some 10 years, so I’ve had a front row seat to watch it develop from an apparel company that also sold golf clubs to a full-fledged golf equipment powerhouse. It’s true that Nike is my company of choice as a golf professional, but If you’ve read any of my other GolfWRX stories you know that I let history, science and little else affect my opinions.
Here’s a story that nicely sums up Nike’s progress in the golf equipment world. I was giving a lesson about eight years ago and when we finished the student told me that he was interested in trying a new driver. I gave him mine to hit, a Nike Sasquatch, which at the time was one of the most forgiving drivers on the market and was pretty hot, too. But it had a problem and if you’ve ever hit one you know exactly what it was. People say it sounded like an aluminum baseball bat at impact and frankly I have to agree. While it was a great performer, it was one of the loudest drivers I’ve ever heard on the range.
Fast forward to today and you’ll find that Nike makes some of the best-looking, best-sounding and sweetest-feeling golf clubs in the industry. They offer a wide-ranging line of drivers, fairway woods, hybrids, irons, wedges, putters and golf balls that have impressed everyone from the mini-tour players I teach to golfers who are just learning the game.
I’ve also been impressed with Nike’s ascendance on the PGA Tour. The company has teamed up with some the Tour’s finest young players: Kevin Chappell, Kyle Stanley, Scott Brown, Seung Yul Noh, Russell Henley, Jhonny Vegas and the world’s former No. 1-ranked amateur Patrick Rodgers. Ten years ago, it might have been hard for Nike to attract so many good young players to its golf brand. Now, Nike has its pick of the litter. That says a lot about how the perception of Nike Golf has changed among good players.
I also have great respect for the performance-first approach the GolfWRX Staff took with its 2014 Gear Trials: Best Clubs list, and you’ll see that Nike lead the way in several categories with its Covert 2.0 and 2.0 Tour drivers, and posted even more impressive results in the Best Players Irons and Best Game-Improvement irons with its Covert Forged and Covert 2.0 irons, respectively.
It is not hard to see why. As a teaching professional, I rely on feedback from my students and ball flight observations of my own. My FlightScope radar gives me raw data, but no technology can capture feel, that elusive feedback we get from impact and ball flight. The overwhelming positive responses I get from the current Nike offerings sanction my recommendations time after time.
It has been my experience that brand loyalty is not as high on a golfer’s priority list as one might think; my students will hit brand “XYZ” if I can show them the results, and Nike’s clubs and golf balls absolutely perform. For better players, Nike is truly at the forefront in the players irons and wedge categories, producing clubs that are not only innovative but meet incredibly high standards in looks, feel and performance.
The company’s master model maker, Mike Taylor, is the only living club maker who has made custom clubs for Ben Hogan, Jack Nicklaus and Tiger Woods, and he was the force behind Nike’s new VR X3X Toe Sweep wedges, which have their heels designed in a way that allows golfers to hit shots around the green from deep rough without the heel-snagging problem that can affect more traditional wedges. For such a different-looking wedge, the reception with tour players has been phenomenal.
The radical-looking Nike VR X3X Toe Sweep wedge that Rory McIlroy used to win the BMW PGA Championship. Michelle Wie also won the 2014 U.S. Open with two Toe Sweep wedges in her bag (56 and 60 degrees).
McIlroy used a 59-degree Toe Sweep to win the BMW PGA Championship, Europe’s most prestigious event outside The Open Championship. Michelle Wie used a combination of Nike’s VR X3X Dual Sole and Toe Sweep wedges to win her first major, the 2014 U.S. Women’s Open at Pinehurst. The list goes on and on.
Nike Golf has never lost sight of its original goal when it entered the golf equipment space: To be the best. Neither the company’s affiliation with Nike Inc., nor its star-studded lineup of athletes who play its equipment could truly move Nike Golf toward that goal without a dedication to create the industry’s best products for its best players. The Nike Golf team also knew that it had to capture the great mass of average golfers around the world by crafting golf clubs that work for them, too, and the company has done just that.
How has Nike Golf come so far, so fast? It’s a simple formula: Hire the best people, listen to the industry’s feedback and make products of the highest quality. And as Nike so quickly learned, they should look, sound and feel amazing, too. At this rate of progress, the sky is truly the limit for them.
As always, feel free to send a swing video to my Facebook page and I will do my best to give you my feedback.
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
RBC Heritage Tour Report: More minis, course-specific setups, Spider & GTS launches
Justin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
Best fairway woods of 2026: The most versatile fairway woods + the most forgiving fairway woods
What’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
Cadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
The 24 players who can win the Masters
Rory McIlroy’s winning WITB: 2026 Masters
Kristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
J.J. Spaun’s winning WITB: 2026 Valero Texas Open
Cameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
Alex Fitzpatrick WITB 2026 (May)
Driver: Ping G440 LST (9 degrees) Shaft: Fujikura Ventus Black 6 X 3-wood: TaylorMade Qi4D (15 degrees) Shaft: Fujikura Ventus...
Kristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
Driver: Ping G440 Max (9 degrees) Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei 1K White 60 TX 3-wood: Ping G440 Max (15 degrees) Shaft:...
WITB Time Machine: Rory McIlroy’s winning WITB, 2021 Truist Championship
Rory McIlroy’s victory at the 2021 Wells Fargo Championship 2021 (now the Truist Championship) marked a significant return to form,...
Collin Morikawa WITB 2026 (May)
Driver: TaylorMade Qi4D LS (8 degrees) Shaft: Mitsubishi Diamana D+ Limited 60 TX 3-wood: TaylorMade SIM Tour (14 degrees) Shaft:...
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days ago
Kristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship
Pingback: ?? ??? PGA ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?? | ??? ??? ?? ???
golffan4life
Sep 7, 2014 at 2:05 pm
Dennis, my son just finished his college career playing all Nike equipment, he has not turned pro and is staying with nike. It has worked for him just fine. The new ball is very good as well. RZN black. Thanks for sticking up for what we feel is a great company.
Mark Thorpe
Aug 20, 2014 at 5:33 pm
My Nike Pro Combos
The seven and nine iron rusted after only two weeks use have been waiting for seven weeks
Don’t buy poor quality poor customer service
Scotty
Aug 5, 2014 at 2:13 pm
…but it’s not Titleist.
4under
Jul 30, 2014 at 2:25 pm
Dear Nike Golf,
Congrats on the recent success.
Your club designs / quality control are still awful.
Justin
Aug 17, 2014 at 11:54 pm
Isn’t that why Tiger uses Muira irons?
golffan4life
Sep 7, 2014 at 2:03 pm
Maybe you are just awful and not the clubs..
Stuart
Jul 26, 2014 at 3:17 am
Couldn’t agree more but I will not buy as in Australia there is no custom fit for nike u buy as if off the shelf which is a big ask to the consumer forking out 1300$ for non fit irons
GChild
Jul 25, 2014 at 7:42 pm
This is a really great article that speaks to the evolution of nike golf, great job! Rory, Money and marketing aside, all of these “young” players could NOT be more competitive and want to win every week. So the mention of the young talent Nike is attracting is a true testament to their commitment to excel and grow their brand. Also, I have know 3 nike staff pros who switched to another mfg because their margins were better and would increase their bottom line so to say the author is biased isn’t entirely true, you have to love the brand and how it performs to stick with a company for over 10 years. Especially if it may it may not be the most profitable.
Dennis Clark
Jul 29, 2014 at 6:01 pm
Thanks, I’m glad you enjoyed the article!
rocagolf
Jul 25, 2014 at 3:45 pm
I know it sounds picky, but why cant they make their newer tour head drivers in black?? That red is so ugly. Doesn’t appeal as much to better amateur players in my (limited) experience, but I reckon Tiger and Rory play them for a reason.
This is part of a broader complaint against drivers for being to gimmicky and ugly. Where are the Mizuno MP 600 classic shaped heads of 4 years ago? Even Titleist stuff sets up shut…
Nike Irons in my experience are quite nice, though they’re a bit goosenecked…
Harry
Jul 24, 2014 at 6:01 pm
No one buys Nike. I mean, they are giving away a free driver with a set of irons at pga. Who does that? They try to flood the market but no one wants the low level cast or standard stuff at least. They have improved, yes, but they are not Go to a country club, how many players use nike? Go to a club that rents clubs …they will tell you people laugh at nike. They are forcing them in your kids especially colleges so they have no choice and they just sponsor them. They are money whores. Over pay tiger Rory and everyone else. Nike is not a top golf company. They have improved but seriously, they aren’t close.
Billy
Jul 25, 2014 at 1:51 am
They are giving away free drivers with irons to compete with other companies, makes sense to me.
Callaway did it, I am sure TM has done it as well.
GChild
Jul 25, 2014 at 7:52 pm
This is a very narrow minded view and makes no sense
JR
Aug 5, 2014 at 4:32 pm
Taylor Made just had a promo giving a free fairway wood with a purchase of a JetSpeed driver.
Harry
Jul 24, 2014 at 5:57 pm
Walk into a pga super store There’s a small section in the corner of the new clubs. The used club rack is flooded with nike. Yes, for the top of the line blades and maybe wedges here may be some quality. Maybe muira doesn’t make tigers irons any more. But either way, while it has come a long way since the ugly sling shots it made, it is no where near on the same level as the top club makers. People can buy what they want and a very few buy nike. Look at the market share. And a tour player can use whatever they want. Very few use nike. They overpay for all their talent. If Rory was given equal money by a competitor he wouldn’t have signed with Nike. And their balls blow. It’s a ridiculous percentage who used titleist this year. What percentage actually used nike balls. The oven is all for show. How do you know the quality??? They have some innovative ideas and good adjustment trends but other companies have actually made it better
James
Jul 29, 2014 at 1:36 pm
^This guy. PGA stores are about as useful as dicks sporting goods. Look how good bringing in tons of product did for them. Selling golf equipment is hard now. Thanks to taylormade and callaway. Nike does it right and puts out great product. Can’t help the dumb closed minded people that probably thing the are tour pros but in reality are a 12 handicap.
Justin
Aug 17, 2014 at 11:59 pm
I wouldn’t say “Great”. I bought a Covert Tour 2.0 to mess with the adjustability (different from my Cobra ZL). It’s very much a “meh” club. I reshafted it to the same as my Cobra, eventually left it on “N” and 10.5 (like the Cobra), and other than the loud impact sound, there isn’t much difference.
Barney Boom
Jul 24, 2014 at 12:34 pm
I was fortunate enough to travel from South Africa to The Oven about a year ago. I must say I was blown away by their dedication to innovation and by not following status quo by designing clubs that aren’t necessarily traditional looking. Their fitting facility is world class and ultimately as a fitter myself I know that by putting Nike clubs in a golfers hands they will perform and are definately a quality product. We need brands that aren’t scared to do something different because if it makes the game easier – I’m all for it
Harry
Jul 24, 2014 at 6:15 pm
Barney drank the kool aid
Patrick R
Jul 25, 2014 at 3:31 pm
Harry drank something else I guess. What did Nike do to you besides market Golf with Tiger to where golf became more popular than ever? Apparently you don’t see how you benefit with all the new courses, golf stores, web sites and product development. I personally don’t own a Nike club, but I have used their balls, they work fine. I have tried their blades and they felt great, I personally like how they have less offset than any of the other sets out there. But come on man, relax. More companies just mean more options for you.
Moon
Jul 24, 2014 at 11:29 am
How could Nike take a credit in Rory’s recent victories? If order to do so, Nike must take a blame for Rory’s slump just before. If a player does well, it’s the equipment and when doesn’t do well it’s all personal?? Also, when Michelle Wie did not play well, it was her father, but now when she won it’s Nike’s credit??
Don’t get me wrong. I like Nike as a company. Most of my apparels as well my balls are Nike. But, I just don’t think there is a credit due for Nike here.. I really don’t think Rory won because the equipments he was playing was superior to what others were playing including Tiger’s. I think he won because of his hard work and talents.
Jimmy
Jul 24, 2014 at 12:11 pm
Nike isn’t taking credit for his win. They, along with his other sponsors, are celebrating and congratulating Rory for his victory and accomplishment using their products. Same for Michelle Wie. If anything, look at the campaign Taylor Made put on when Kaymer won the US Open? It was far more boastful than anything Nike has done.
Moon
Jul 24, 2014 at 1:14 pm
I agree with you 100%. It’s just that the title of this article is “Give Nike Golf credit where credit is due”. 🙂
Dennis Clark
Jul 24, 2014 at 2:42 pm
Moon, The Title refers to Nike Golf’s growth as an equipment company, not “credit” for Rory’s victory. They have reached the top of the industry in a very short time and that’s why credit should be given.
Moon
Jul 25, 2014 at 10:58 am
This I can live better with. Just like pretty much everyone said that Nike produced mediocre equipment and the beginning. But, as the time progressed, Nike is producing top notch products. I just hope they drop “Victory Red” theme in near future. This is coming from a guy who has 5 red polos! 🙂
Jimbo
Jul 24, 2014 at 12:38 pm
The guy who wrote this works for Nike. Just more of an advertisement than an article. Their clubs have been getting gold stars from golf digest and sites for years …since they came out …probably load up review sites with nike staffers
Justin
Aug 18, 2014 at 12:01 am
That’s why they pay the big bucks for ad space… to get those gold and silver stars!
Bluefan75
Jul 24, 2014 at 10:25 am
I have the VR Pro Blades, and let me tell you they are maybe the best feeling blades I have played. And that includes an earlier Mizuno offering. That isn’t to say the others don’t make some quaity products, but Nike is certainly not out of place at the big boy table.
Heck, while I’ve been wanting to get my hands on a Method putter, I still have an Ignite from 2008 that has performed quite well for me.
The only issue I have with Nike Golf is that up here in Canada, they will do whatever they can for Golftown, but very few pro shops carry them, and my understanding is that its due to Nike Golf’s lack of interest in them, and not the other way around. Which is a shame if you ask me.
Jon Bon Jovie
Jul 24, 2014 at 9:14 am
Nike is what people who don’t really play golf, or know anything about it, wear/use because they’ve seen Tiger Woods using/wearing it.
Rob
Jul 24, 2014 at 10:30 am
The Covert Forged are an excellent set of sticks for anyone from a 5-15 handicap. The Pro Combos and blades are nice as well.
I won’t fault a person for having a reasonable opinion, but I’d give them a whirl before knocking them. Just because something has a swoosh doesn’t mean it’s inferior.
cheeshead42
Jul 24, 2014 at 1:41 pm
That is just proof that their marketing is working. If every new golfer thinks that Nike is the only brand because Tiger and Rory wear or play it, then their endorsement contracts are more than justified.
Pazinboise
Jul 24, 2014 at 5:21 pm
Now there’s a snobby statement. So what if casual golfers gravitate towards Nike? They make good products end of story. That’s why I have a Covert driver pair with my Mizuno irons.
Harry
Jul 24, 2014 at 6:40 pm
Just look at the percentage of pros that use it……number speak for themselves bro
Pazinboise
Jul 25, 2014 at 2:56 pm
Number of pro using a particular brand doesn’t necessarily speak to the quality of their products. Companies like Callaway and Taylor Made have a lot of pros using their products but that doesn’t mean they make the best equipment. Other factor in addition to performance, like say endorsement money, factor in to Pro decisions to use a particular product. I wouldn’t say Nike make the best product out there but they certainly make a good one. Besides outside of Tiger and a few other pros I’m not sure what their endorsement budget looks like when it comes to golf.
GChild
Jul 25, 2014 at 8:06 pm
That’s right bro! I bet Rory signs with Wilson now since their irons have won the most majors right? If you are quoting numbers and talking taylormade and their Rocketballzier stuff, then this is the most hypocritical stuff I have heard in awhile.
Notorious G.I.B.
Jul 24, 2014 at 8:58 am
i am glad to see Nike doing so well, i remember back in the day when they started putting out golf shoes, boy those were uncomfortable, lol. but, they got better with those and they have come to the table lately with some fine offerings. its good for all in golf to have another company produce solid products. and while i am mostly a TMAG guy, i have used multiple products from Nike over the last 10 years and can say i was never disappointed in any of them. i particularly think they made some great wedges and golf balls as well. i wore those ‘DD’ balls out a few years ago.
as for Rory, i think he had more than equipment issues when he was going through the “slump”, you can tell in his interviews that he was trying to get a grasp of what it really takes to be a megastar in golf.
Nike truly is a power brand now with having both great apparel and great equipment. IMO, a good thing for all golfers to see……
KK
Jul 24, 2014 at 7:55 am
I like all the advancements in tech but I’m not sure it makes too much of a difference at the end of the day and on the scorecard without a proper fitting. Golfers properly fit with 10 year old clubs and shafts will outplay self-fit golfers with the latest equipment (same skill level) the vast majority of the time, IMO.
Dennis Clark
Jul 24, 2014 at 8:23 am
I see your point. I would think the best of both worlds would be latest equipment fit properly. Thx for reading. DC
Justin
Aug 18, 2014 at 12:11 am
Not really.
Driver specs (COR, MOI, head volume, face height, etc.) have been capped for about 7 or so years now. Companies realized years ago that moving the CG of a blade away from the heel and into the center of the face (using shorter hosels and/or adding weight around the toe) actually makes them more playable.
As Barney Adams said in his piece, clubs are “static”. How are they going to improve? It’s not like you can take, say, Scandium and use it for a driver face… it still has to have a COR no higher than .83. Compare that to a cellphone, where this year’s model can have a much more powerful processor in it compared to last year’s.
Jimbo
Jul 24, 2014 at 7:39 am
They have definitely come a long way. New woods are very good and that forged covert set of irons felt great. I think the standard models are good for a mid handicapper, not high. The putters are horrible though. The new wedge looks interesting and I heard they have new technology coming out with new clubs to keep an eye on.
One negative thing I heard from a couple of very experienced club makers, are when they took apart nike clubs they notice the quality of material used to make the clubs are well below average. I just don’t think they can compete with the ping line and those types but, yes they have come a long way.
spinout
Jul 24, 2014 at 3:21 am
The toe sweep looks like the perfect lobbing club out of the rough around the green. Anyone play with it yet or know the loft and bounce offerings?
fit for purpose golf
Jul 24, 2014 at 2:50 am
Very Interesting. I am a UK based club builder and play at a club in Scotland that has just opened the first Nike Performance centre outside of the US, somewhere that European tour pros come to get their Nike gear but also club golfers will be fitted there. It is an amazing set up. To be honest I haven’t done much fitting with Nike products except for a few Pros connected with above venture. In the UK and particularly Scotland where I am based you just never see anyone using Nike woods and I don’t know why. I think it might be a generational thing, talking with US friends they tell me their children won’t wear any sports shoes or clothing that isn’t Nike, when they get into golf they will be Nike devotes. In the UK currently the aspirational brands are Titleist and TaylorMade, and I believe Callaway still has the image that its an “old mans” product. I am going to go out of my way to test Covert 2.0 to at least try and form my own opinion. On a side note I think the toe sweep wedge looks amazing and can’t believe its a new idea as it appears that there are few “new” ideas in golf. 🙂
nicklaus
Jul 24, 2014 at 2:24 am
every major club manufacturer produces a legit product. period. tour players are out there smashing these things pure; day in and day out.
this years major champions have the following sponsors:
Bubba – Ping
Kaymer – TM
Rory – Nike
none of the above conform to the most popular of brands… Buba may play a pro v, but you get the picture. obviously the equipment matters, but to say that one major manufacturer is inferior to the other is rediculous. on that note, im going to try out Cobra’s tour trusty’s… i have a direct connect on these and have been contemplating replacing 3 wedges. after watching Ricky demolish both the british and US open, why would i even second guess it. LOL!
Jeff
Jul 24, 2014 at 1:55 am
Great article. I love the 3wood. But I agree with Heintz, it should get downgraded if it isn’t made lefty. I’m sure if Phil went to Nike he’d get a set made.
Gary Jones
Jul 24, 2014 at 12:30 am
I tried a Covert driver (6-9) months ago and it felt like a brick and the end of the club and I couldn’t hit at all. Maybe it just didn’t fit me that day. But I definitely agree that product loyalty isn’t a big factor as much any more. If the club works, I’m all for it. The better Nike can be the better it will make the rest.
Dennis Clark
Jul 23, 2014 at 10:56 pm
Many would be surprised at how sensitive elite level ball strikers are to very subtle changes in their equipment. It’s amazing really.
Terry
Jul 24, 2014 at 1:13 am
I was not a believer as i remember a bulky yellow club of some sort. This year out of curiosity, I pulled a Covert 5 wood out of a used bin. Never hit them before. It has become my go to and has replaced a utility from another brand. I was stunned how workable and hot it was and promptly went hunting for a 3 wood. These are Standard not tour models. I am a convert. It has become a scoring club for me as it has shortened some par 5s by a full stroke. Totally new and delicious. Keep it up.
Don
Jul 23, 2014 at 9:43 pm
What I don’t get is the absence of golf clubs at the Nike stores, especially after the huge expense with endorsements and ads with Rory and Tiger etc.
For example the Nike store in San Francisco in a high rent area has a huge amount of wasted space in layout and only a small golf apparel section. I stopped in on holiday with time n my hands figuring to give the stuff a good look.
Golferguy1966
Jul 23, 2014 at 8:52 pm
It ain’t the clubs, he could have won with a set of pinseekers.
Dennis Clark
Jul 23, 2014 at 9:20 pm
He did have Pinseekers; they were called Nike 🙂
MHendon
Jul 23, 2014 at 11:56 pm
Yeah but everyone wanted to blame the clubs last year when he was struggling.
David Heintz
Jul 23, 2014 at 8:50 pm
Nice if you are right handed. We lefties don’t get the Covert Forged.
I am of the opinion that a club should at least be down graded in these reviews if it is not available left hand. Other companies make the commitment; they should be recognized.
Dennis Clark
Jul 23, 2014 at 10:50 pm
I agree David and I’ll mention it. Thx for bringing it up.
Billy
Jul 24, 2014 at 1:07 am
LH love coming from Nike in the Fall and in 2015.
Martin
Jul 23, 2014 at 7:13 pm
I bought a Covert 2.0 Driver about a month ago and love the thing after pretty much bashing every Nike product I ever tried.
Desmond
Jul 23, 2014 at 6:58 pm
I wrote a post, saying I guess it wasn’t the clubs after Ror’s victory. All I got was crickets. And I don’t even play Nike. The clubs are better, no doubt. I did play the original Pro Combos, Nike Wedges (all good), and the original SQ — the SQ 2 was the loud one – like someone hit a trash can.
Nike …. you’ve come a long way.
John
Jul 23, 2014 at 2:41 pm
I just picked up a 58 toe sweep. and ah lak it allah.
MHendon
Jul 23, 2014 at 2:14 pm
Dennis like so many WRX’ers at one time I had a hard time taking Nike seriously trusting in more traditional brands like Titleist, Ping, Mizuno, and Cleveland. But two years ago I found myself looking for a new driver. Being somewhat of a traditionalist I came across the VrPro limited with it’s bonded hosel and smaller by today’s standard pear shaped head and decided to give it a try. I found it more forgiving then what I had been using a Titleist 905T, plus it actually felt or sounded better depending on how you judge feel and produced the perfect flight for me. I don’t see it leaving the bag anytime soon.
Dennis Clark
Jul 23, 2014 at 3:09 pm
Yea thats kind of why I wrote this piece. Their stuff is awesome, as good or better than any out there. And they’re not done. Just watch!
Jeff
Jul 23, 2014 at 4:15 pm
That particular club. The vr pro limited driver, I think that was the beginning of the new Nike Golf, since it’s release almost everything has been high quality. I hate the red paint jobs but that will probably be phased out too
Dennis Clark
Jul 23, 2014 at 7:32 pm
I agree; there is always a turning point. The business model has been most effective. Finger on the pulse of the general golf community while crafting tools for the best in the world. They don’t quit!
JBH
Jul 23, 2014 at 5:14 pm
I went through a few drivers before finding the VR Pro Limited Edition. Was tired of all the adjustable heads and gimmicky things on the market, I never adjusted the club head to begin with. Anyhow, I absolutely love this driver, so much so that I went and bought the 3w and 5w. Very clean look and such a nice sound off the forged head. I wish Nike still made these as I would love to have a back up option if I should ever break them. Currently in my bag Nike VR Pro Limited Edition Driver, 3W, 5W, Nike Vr Pro Combo Irons, Nike V-rev 52° & 56° (although I have ordered the vr pro forged in same lofts, something about a forged club feel better than the cast ones) & Nike Method Midnight 008 putter. Yeah I may be a Nike whore but I gotta say it’s some great equipment.
Dennis Clark
Jul 23, 2014 at 7:33 pm
That driver gets the BEST readings on my Flightscope fittings, hands down.
RobG
Jul 23, 2014 at 6:20 pm
A few years ago my golf clubs were stolen and when it came time to select a new driver I tried just about every club on the market and could not find a single one that I liked. Out of sheer desperation I relented and tried the VR Pro LTD with the bonded hosel. I hit a dozen or so balls on the range – I was sold. But just to be sure I played one round with it and it completely won me over. It is by far the best driver I have owned, and it will not be leaving my bag any time soon.
deaus
Jul 23, 2014 at 2:13 pm
Nike clubs are great for low handicaps. Especially the Irons. I have a few of the Tour Only clubs and they are truly amazing. I have a Dymo 380 and VR Tour version 5 and they are the best of the best. I agree that the hybrids are not great. Im interested in tryin the ToeSweep.
Dennis Clark
Jul 23, 2014 at 7:34 pm
Ive put 5 really good players in the toe sweep in the last few weeks. Its all about performance!
LorenRobertsFan
Jul 23, 2014 at 2:06 pm
Their irons are top notch. Still rocking my VR Split Cavities. Method putters would do better if more looked like the Midnight 006 or Rory’s putter. The hybrids are among the worst shaped from address I’ve seen.
Joe
Jul 23, 2014 at 4:46 pm
The shape of the hybrid head might not be the best but I seem to not be able to take mine out of the bag. I have the Covert Tour (1st year) and pretty much leave it set on 21* and I can’t miss with it. I was the guy who wanted long irons because I couldn’t find a hybrid that fit me. I started hitting this one and have loved it ever since. Feel a lot more comfortable attacking most par 5’s in 2 with it. I however can’t stand the red paint and I sanded that off after a few rounds. So now it’s just a solid silver head with the black face. I also use the DG 60* wedge that might get replaced with the new toe sweep. My wife plays the Nike Ltd Drive 9.5* and she absolutely loves it.
Dennis Clark
Jul 23, 2014 at 7:36 pm
I can forgive any look when the ball does what I want it, but I agree on the hybrid shape; knowing NIke Golf, that too will soon be better.