17 Comments

1. 

   Derek

   Oct 11, 2014 at 8:13 am

   The only shot that mattered between US and EURO golfers was the shot each team had at the Ryder Cup. The EUROs definitely had that one down PAT.

   Nuff said.

   No physiques required.

   Reply Report comment
2. 

   mrjoe

   Oct 9, 2014 at 10:55 am

   This is actually a pretty good way to play golf. See the target and hit it, with no pause in between.

   Reply Report comment
3. 

   Wayz2go

   Oct 8, 2014 at 5:02 pm

   Yeah Right. Nice job with the video editing though……

   Reply Report comment
4. 

   JEFF

   Oct 8, 2014 at 11:49 am

   anyone who believes this is real is a complete IDIOT!

   Reply Report comment
5. 

   esmo kelly

   Oct 7, 2014 at 9:00 pm

   If I look closely enough at the background, I think I can even see bigfoot shaking its head in disbelief …

   Reply Report comment
6. 

   MartyMoose

   Oct 6, 2014 at 1:58 pm

   Now, can Bubba do it with driver or will he think it is too hokey? Your move Bubba.

   Reply Report comment
7. 

   West

   Oct 6, 2014 at 12:34 pm

   Awesome! Wonder how many golf balls it took though…?

   Reply Report comment
8. 

   Robert Boucher

   Oct 6, 2014 at 11:53 am

   Once again, EU beats US

   “The Clay Pigeon Golf Shot”
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCEB9GgKoJ0

   Reply Report comment
   • 

     moses

     Oct 6, 2014 at 12:16 pm

     NOT!!!!

     Took 4-5 guys using wedges with the skeet going straight up and down so the target was bigger and angle much easier.

     Sneds did it with a 4 iron and a much tougher angle.

     Yup takes 4-5 Euros what it takes for 1 American can do. 😀

     Reply Report comment
     • 

       Scooter McGavin

       Oct 6, 2014 at 12:38 pm

       Yeah, not to take sides in the whole US vs. Euro debate, but Brandt’s shot was definitely more impressive.

       Reply Report comment
     • 

       Rich

       Oct 7, 2014 at 8:56 am

       If you want to look at the two types of shots from purely a physics point of view, the euro tour shot is actually more difficult. The vectors that each object travel on intersect at the point of collision. The time at which the two objects could collide with the angles of approach in relation to each other is actually much longer with the Snedeker shot. The euro shot is much closer to the paths of the objects colliding at right angles which is a much shorter time frame of possible collision than the Snedeker shot that the two paths travel on a much more acute angle to each other. So, actually physics tells us, regardless of the club used, the chance of the euro shot being achieved has a much lower probability than the Snedeker shot. Regardless, they were both done and both great shots.

       Reply Report comment
       • 

         bunnyfoofoo

         Oct 8, 2014 at 1:36 am

         As a D1 golfer and physics major, I have to say Rich, your comment was quite entertaining. I haven’t had a laugh like that in a long time. Hahaha. “Physics tells us”. Physics ain’t telling YOU squat

         Reply Report comment
         • 

           Argument from autority

           Oct 8, 2014 at 11:10 am

           Besides a pitiful attempt at an argument from authority, please do enlighten us how physics “ain’t telling” us “squat”.

           Reply Report comment
         • 

           Rich

           Oct 9, 2014 at 4:43 pm

           Yes, I’d like to hear how you support your argument of “squat”.

           Reply Report comment
       • 

         MHendon

         Oct 8, 2014 at 4:53 pm

         Wow golf ain’t science fellas. Hell of a shot though if it was real.

         Reply Report comment
         • 

           Shelton Cooper

           Oct 9, 2014 at 4:44 pm

           Physics explains everything!

           Reply Report comment
   • 

     Nice

     Oct 6, 2014 at 12:17 pm

     Yeah! And much better production too! Nice shot, nice shot man!

     Reply Report comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.