Opinion & Analysis
Unfiltered: A Q&A with Callaway CEO Chip Brewer

We could say a lot about Callaway CEO Chip Brewer, and trust us, there would be plenty to talk about.
There’s the quantum leaps Callaway has made in revitalizing its image since Brewer took over three years ago, the economics of the golf industry, Callaway’s frequent product launches… All of that and more would be part of the discussion.
Instead of telling you what we think, we had a better idea. Let’s have someone sit down with Brewer and hear what he has to say.
Our Managing Editor Zak Kozuchowski did exactly that, peppering Brewer with questions in his office at Callaway HQ. Enjoy Brewer’s unfiltered take on the hot-button issues for Callaway and the rest of the golf equipment world.
—
ZK: We hear a lot from other media and other people inside the industry about the health of golf. What’s your take on the health of golf right now?
CB: You know, on one hand I share some of the concerns that others have espoused. Clearly the game is not growing like we would like it to be. It shrank significantly with the great recession in 2008-2009. After that, I am more optimistic than most are. I think that the amount of negative PR around the sport is not helpful … If you look at the industry over the last several years, it clearly shrank in 2008-2009 with the recession and it has not sprung back after like it has after previous recessions. None of us really get that, other than this recession was different. But it hasn’t really substantially changed since then either. It’s just kind of meandered. Its had a couple good years and a couple not so good years. We’re just in a year this year that has just not been a good year for the industries total, although Callaway as you mentioned has been able to buck that trend.
I think that although the outlook could be glass half empty … you can also look at some of the positives. There are a lot of initiatives underway that are intended to help participation. It is too soon to judge their outcome, but they are uniform views that this is something that the entire industry wants to address. You could look at the PGA Championship and the ratings and the energy that was around the sport as very positive. I think that the story of golf’s demise is not a great argument and is overstated. On the other hand, I understand that we clearly have participation concerns and we have to work together to try to address that.
ZK: Do you think golf will start to grow again?
CB: You know, I don’t know. I’m not really much of a forecaster. If you just went from the business side of it, the greatest argument for growth is that the baby boomers should have led for growth over the last few years and I think the recession stopped that from happening. As the effects of the recession wear off, assuming they do, the baby boomers will have a positive impact on the sport.
I think that if Rory McIlroy and Rickie Fowler and those types of players continue to play well and we get the energy around the game that will drive growth. There is no question that Tiger Woods was part of the formula that drove growth in the sport around the turn of the century, right? We have seen this happen in the game many times in the past where there have been transition periods between periods of excitement with the top players and we’re are probably going through or went through one of those over the last year or so. And then things like Top Golf … all the growth initiatives, and I’m a fan of all of them. Get Golf Ready is a phenomenal program. We are big supporters of that. What TaylorMade started with Hack Golf I think is phenomenal. I can’t be more positive about it. But what really is going move the needle is Top Golf. It exposes the game to a whole different demographic and age group in a way that they love. It hasn’t moved the needle yet because it’s been so small. It’s only had 10 locations. It’s been more regional, as they roll that out I have high hopes that that could be a positive influence in the sport.
The one area we are concerned about is millennials. I think we understand some of the reasons they aren’t playing as much as they have in the past. Part of it is the change in the way we live today, but part of it is economics — they don’t have any jobs or money. This game requires money. If you segment the millennials by income group, those that have higher incomes and jobs are playing as much as they ever have. So, you get out of school and you have a bunch of debt … When I went to school everybody got a job out of college, right? And now that is not the case. No wonder they aren’t playing golf. They not in a position to. As the economics resolve, I think it will be incredibly helpful and the data suggests that and Top Golf can be a catalyst. I’m not in the forecasting business, but I do think that the negative points of view have been overstated and that has had the run of the PR game. It’s all you’ve heard about.
ZK: One of those stories is with Dick’s Sporting Goods. It blames its demise on having too many new products in the store.
CB: Well, Dick’s and TaylorMade have struggled in golf this year. They have in turn highlighted the difficulties of the industry and that’s natural. When my predecessor was here and he was doing bad he claimed a lot of third-party issues, too. And there is no doubt that there have been headwinds to the industry this year, but not to the degree that some of the naysayers have talked about.
ZK: Do you anticipate that you will catch some flak — particularly from the serious golfer audience — for having three drivers in the marketplace this fall and potentially more in the spring and summer?
CB: From the serious golfer, no. From the trade and blogospheres, yes.
ZK: That’s a pretty good way to put it.
CB: Obviously your audience is serious, serious golfers and we value them and take them very seriously as you know. We desperately want positive relationships, and brand image and reputation are very important to us. The consumer that I play golf with at the club… they get excited about new toys.
ZK: They love it. The more the better, right?
CB: When Apple came out with the 5c and other derivatives of the iPhone, I don’t remember us giving them grief. I remember people lining up for it. And now they’ve got a new 6 and 6+. It took them a year on this one, but on the previous ones they were faster and innovation varies from time to time.
ZK: Callaway is in an interesting position, because certain brands have become associated with certain categories. TaylorMade is associated with the driver and Titleist is associated with the golf ball. What is Callaway associated with now, and what does it want to be associated with?
CB: That is a great question and we have to answer that. We have some categories where we are leaders again. We have been a leader in putters with the Odyssey brand for a long period and we have strengthened that position in the last few years. We have regained our No. 1 position in fairway woods and irons over the last several months, but I think that the brand is going to need to stand for excellence in product. Callaway has a unique brand position; it has a heritage of being very innovative and technical, but also very premium. So when we look at our R&D — which I think we have invested in more than anybody over a longer period of time — that fits with that strategy. What we should be is a leader in total performance premium golf equipment. That is, in essence, the best of the best high tech product lines.
ZK: So if Callaway could only be known for one thing… If you had one chance to reach our readers, what would it be?
CB: It needs to be the best premium golf equipment in the world.
ZK: And you seem to be making pushes in each category.
CB: Yeah, there isn’t a single category that we want to stand for above the others. We have clearly focused on hard goods, which sounds pretty stupid because… duhhh, what else would you focus on? But that was less clear three years ago, what we were. That was one of the changes here, but it’s now been a while. But we are, first and foremost a hard goods company. We want to be the world’s best at that. That’s what turns us on and gets us excited. Products like Apex irons and the (Big Bertha) Alpha driver … some of the new innovations that you see coming out that move the needle forward for the categories for the business for golfers. This cup-face technology that we have in woods and are expanding into irons, it’s phenomenal. It differentiates and that is the type of thing we want to be known for.
ZK: You mentioned Top Golf as a potential big driver of the game. On our site, it seems to be an increased interest in custom fitting. How do you see that playing out in golf’s future?
CB: I think it is the future. I sit up and espouse that to the team here constantly. You look at our investments … custom fitting is the future of the golf club business, and probably golf balls in the future as well. It is the future of hard goods. In the past, you could make a breakthrough technology and do it in a way that one size would fit everybody. We would come out in the past with a new driver made out of titanium. Literally, the Big Bertha was made for everybody, right?
ZK: It was such a huge leap. You can’t seem to make those leaps anymore.
CB: Well, I would argue that we could make similar leaps with other new tech like CAD systems and the ability to dial in CG locations. We build mass customization and manufacturing techniques that allow us to take these paradigm moves and customize them for an individual player. That takes it to another level. A cup face is better for everybody because of an increased ball speed, but that doesn’t mean any one size fits everybody perfectly. We are talking about more than just changing loft and lie angle nowadays. The amount of options available in shafts and their performance criteria, the total weight of the golf club, the ability to move the center of gravity vertically as well as horizontally … all of those things can be dialed in to take a driver that would be good for you Zak, and move it to a whole different level.
ZK: Well, I found one of those at your testing center.
CB: Right. If you look at our new drivers, it has double digit amount of customizable shafts available for no upcharge.
ZK: Is that something you brought from Adams? Is that something you saw success with there and thought it would work at a bigger company, too?
CB: I am a creature of my past so I brought some thoughts I wanted to continue, but there are 2000 people here with their own points of view and we talk it through. It’s not reasonable or fair to say I brought it with me. It is reasonable to say that I believe in it, and I have talked it through here. The team here agrees and embraces the same things. We have a huge technical advantage at Callaway — on drivers and metal woods we can create a lighter chassis. We have a multi-material advantage and expertise in composites that create a lighter chassis and allows us to add more adjustability without any tradeoffs. And we also have a legacy of spending $30 million a year over the last decade to build up a war chest of capabilities on the R&D side that we’re really excited about leveraging. Fitting and customization is one of those truisms; it is the future. You can see in everything we are doing our strong belief in that.
ZK: Is there a “most important” launch this year for Callaway?
CB: There isn’t one per se. They are all very important. The Big Bertha franchise is critical being that it is the most premium brand. We are bringing great innovation to that and a fitting approach. One driver doesn’t fit all, but we have new technology in every single one of them. Some people wish that it was simpler. That we could have one-size wood fit everyone, that you wouldn’t have to go through a fitting, that everybody would benefit from lighter or lower spin… but it’s not true. So to deliver the best product to the consumer we are going with the purer answer of three different drivers that we guarantee will be better for the consumer if they get fit into the right one from Big Bertha. And that will be important to us. We have some movement in the golf ball category, which we’re incredibly excited about. The iron category for us is huge. With this cup-face approach in irons, we think that will be a game changer in that category. You go down the line and they are all pretty important.
ZK: What could get in Callaway’s way coming out of the recession?
CB: What could get in Callaways way? Mostly ourselves. We have to stay humble and hungry — have to continue to listen, change and adapt and get better. Over the long haul, we have a great brand and great resources. We can be a positive factor for the industry, Zak. We’re never going to be perfect, we’re always going to make mistakes, but we have to be honest with ourselves and then use our resources in the right way.
ZK: Is that why you push R&D so hard?
CB: Yeah, I guess so I push everybody a little bit hard. I hope they know I love them, because I do, but we’ve got to be great. You can’t have a product out there that you aren’t wildly proud of, and that is the essence of what motivates us everyday. It’s the same with the marketing and the Tour. We have to keep getting better. We are growing on Tour, growing in popularity and we are making players better most of the time. One of the things I’m most proud of on the Tour is that the players who have joined us… the vast majority are getting better. We graduated seven guys off the Web.com (Tour). Both the No. 1 off the regular season money list and playoff money list were Callaway players. When did that happen last? Never? Stories like Patrick Reed, Chris Kirk, Gary Woodland — when they make the conversions to our gear they get better.
ZK: There doesn’t seem to be a drop off for a lot of the guys that have signed.
CB: Yeah, it’s been the opposite. We’ve all known that hasn’t always been true in the past with every manufacturer, probably even including Callaway.
ZK: What could get in the industry’s way coming out of the recession?
CB: What the industry has to worry about is that the business practices do change. If you look at the drops in average selling prices and excess inventory that has been put into the marketplace over the last few years, that has been a cancer to the golf industry. Everybody is talking about that changing now and it really needs to. If you look at another area that I’m really proud of Callaway, is it that over the last three years we have raised average selling prices in the field. We have gained a ton of market share and we have done it as we’ve raised average selling prices. It’s not that we are trying to gouge consumers. That’s not even a strategy if you wanted it to be, because nobody wants to pay more unless it’s better value, it’s worth it. But where we are using our abilities is to deliver product that is worth it, that delivers on the benefit. Because if you deliver “me too” product, you’re going to have to discount it to sell it through. And then if you over supply that “me too” product, then you’ve not only screwed yourself. You’ve screwed the industry. What we are doing is investing and bringing out products like Apex irons.
ZK: Is there a product that you are most proud of with your time at Callaway?
CB: Apex is up there.
ZK: A $1100 set of irons…
CB: That people love. They don’t like them; they love them. And when people are putting Apex in the bag, they are going to become huge advocates for Callaway because they’re having that kind of impact on their game.
ZK: Is that what you play?
CB: Yeah, but the feedback is almost universal and it wasn’t even on the radar screen but it was within our capabilities. And there are several products, and obviously I’ve said that if we are not proud of them I won’t sleep at night, so I’m proud of everything we’ve put out. But some really live up to the standard that we are talking about.
ZK: Do you think that innovation is ever going to be as sexy as it was when you went to original Big Bertha or when golf went to oversized-perimeter-weighted irons? Are we ever going to see anything like that again that is just so much better?
CB: I really don’t know, Zak. There’s a possibility that it always looks better. It’s like talking about the good old days you know and so you remember them with rose-colored glasses. Some of the innovations that have come out over the last few years are phenomenal. These high-CT fairway woods — they’ve obsoleted other fairway woods. If you’re not using a high-CT fairway wood, you are not in the modern age. Our version of that, X Hot, has moved us back into No. 1 in the fairway wood category. Now you can wax eloquently about oversized irons driving similar change, but it wasn’t any better. It’s just that you remember it as if it was. The changes in the adjustability of these drivers are phenomenal right now.
ZK: Do you think that we’ll look back at the current product and say how great it was?
CB: Absolutely. We’re are going to look back on this 10 years from now and go, “How come we don’t have great innovations like cup faces anymore or vertical CG adjustability?”
ZK: So this is a thing, you believe, of human nature?
CB: I think part of it is because we are in the process. We are going to change irons next year. We are going to change irons to the point where everything else out there is going to be obsolete. We did that in fairway woods now and we’ve got some thoughts on the golf ball category. You know, everybody says innovations are going to get harder and harder, and to a degree that’s true, but darn over the next few years all I see is opportunity and we are delivering on it. It’s not theory. We show you the cup face in the fairway wood and what that has done to the category. And to the credit of Adams and Taylormade, the slot started that and if you are not playing a high-CT fairway wood you’re in the stone age. Those similar types of changes, you’re starting to see that in irons. We are going to take that to a new level. We’ve got an argument in almost every category right now. Blockbuster change.
ZK: Where can you get better?
CB: Zak, we are not nearly as good as we should be or want to be yet. This is only 2.5 years into a change process. Callaway is an interesting spot. I’m glad to hear you say that you think the moral is good and I think it is too, but we are very self critical still in terms of how we can continue to improve in all areas of our business … There are products that were already produced that we decided not to launch. We made that decision last month because we got new information and the new information said that it wasn’t the right answer for the consumer.
ZK: Can you tell me more?
CB: It’s not available for writing about right now, but we’ll tell you when the time is right.
ZK: OK, let’s talk more about the criticism you’ve received for having too many products, especially drivers, in the market place? How can people be upset about having more choices?
CB: It doesn’t fit their paradigm of the world, they don’t understand it and we’re not ready to discuss it yet. So we’ll just let them slap us around a little bit. And yeah, it came quickly after the Big Bertha launch in February. We’re introducing V-Series now and maybe we should have put V-Series out in November (with the new Big Bertha Alphas), but you make decisions as you go … V-Series fits a lot of people. It’s a product that definitely needs to be out in the field, but obviously that low spin stuff for a guy like you is going to be game changing, right? V-Series is not going to be your driver.
Clearly you can see the success it’s having, and you know that for a sixty-year-old guy that is buying a 10.5- or 13.5-degree driver, a 295-gram aerodynamic V-Series driver is a perfect answer. Giving that guy a 320-gram driver with low spin is idiotic. I’m not serving the consumer. And to simplify the product offering to make some guy on a blog happy is dumb. Now, how we manage it is very important so where we work those transitions and managing the excess inventory is one of the big differences that we don’t get credit for.
ZK: Is there a differentiating factor right now between Callaway and its competitors?
CB: Well, Callaway is its own animal. We have our own flavor of coming to market and running our business, and people can’t lump anybody in. We are very aggressive on bringing innovation and cool products, but we also are very attentive to managing the field inventories and making sure that we are not flooding the market with excess inventory and such. That, I think, supports the strategy well. I think that the industry got into a lot of trouble over the last few years chasing too much growth that wasn’t there. If you take every order and you keep shipping into the field and keep making old product you’re going to oversupply it, especially if your products don’t differentiate in any particular year.
The world doesn’t need more cheap fairway woods or more cheap drivers. New golfers get excited about products that make a difference for them. We are really good at that. Some of the others are really good too at that, but we are also showing the discipline of a premium brand market leader and some of the blogs are not giving us credit for that. But the data is very clear. We are obviously gaining market share and we are obviously exciting consumers. We are growing with good players, with average players… we are growing across the globe. We’re making golfers happy.
ZK: What is the vision you have for Callaway and when do think it can come into fruition?
CB: The vision is to do what we are doing, so we are in the process. You are never going to get there. There is never an end point. That is part of life, business — for you, for me, for anybody. There will be milestones along the way where we’ll stop and high five. Then we have to think about how we are going to continue to get better. The vision for Callaway is to have this be the No. 1 premium total performance golf brand in the world and I don’t believe that we are there yet, but I believe we are moving in that direction. The only reason I believe it is because the outside world — the objective evidence — is suggesting that we are. There is almost no metric that would suggest otherwise, but clearly I know what our potential is and we are not even halfway there to that yet. We continue to get so much better and we are continuing to invest accordingly. I kind of like, in a perverse way, the fact that we are doing well in a tough market because that means that we are going to be continuing to grow on Tour going into next year and we’ll be investing aggressively. We’ll continue to invest in R&D and marketing. Being the guy that is bucking the trend and putting more money into key areas when others may not have the ability to do that, usually that pays off. The guys that made those investments in 2008 and 2009 did well after that period. So I’m excited about that opportunity as well.
Opinion & Analysis
The 2 primary challenges golf equipment companies face

As the editor-in-chief of this website and an observer of the GolfWRX forums and other online golf equipment discourse for over a decade, I’m pretty well attuned to the grunts and grumbles of a significant portion of the golf equipment purchasing spectrum. And before you accuse me of lording above all in some digital ivory tower, I’d like to offer that I worked at golf courses (public and private) for years prior to picking up my pen, so I’m well-versed in the non-degenerate golf equipment consumers out there. I touched (green)grass (retail)!
Complaints about the ills of and related to the OEMs usually follow some version of: Product cycles are too short for real innovation, tour equipment isn’t the same as retail (which is largely not true, by the way), too much is invested in marketing and not enough in R&D, top staffer X hasn’t even put the new driver in play, so it’s obviously not superior to the previous generation, prices are too high, and on and on.
Without digging into the merits of any of these claims, which I believe are mostly red herrings, I’d like to bring into view of our rangefinder what I believe to be the two primary difficulties golf equipment companies face.
One: As Terry Koehler, back when he was the CEO of Ben Hogan, told me at the time of the Ft Worth irons launch, if you can’t regularly hit the golf ball in a coin-sized area in the middle of the face, there’s not a ton that iron technology can do for you. Now, this is less true now with respect to irons than when he said it, and is less and less true by degrees as the clubs get larger (utilities, fairways, hybrids, drivers), but there remains a great deal of golf equipment truth in that statement. Think about it — which is to say, in TL;DR fashion, get lessons from a qualified instructor who will teach you about the fundamentals of repeatable impact and how the golf swing works, not just offer band-aid fixes. If you can’t repeatably deliver the golf club to the golf ball in something resembling the manner it was designed for, how can you expect to be getting the most out of the club — put another way, the maximum value from your investment?
Similarly, game improvement equipment can only improve your game if you game it. In other words, get fit for the clubs you ought to be playing rather than filling the bag with the ones you wish you could hit or used to be able to hit. Of course, don’t do this if you don’t care about performance and just want to hit a forged blade while playing off an 18 handicap. That’s absolutely fine. There were plenty of members in clubs back in the day playing Hogan Apex or Mizuno MP-32 irons who had no business doing so from a ballstriking standpoint, but they enjoyed their look, feel, and complementary qualities to their Gatsby hats and cashmere sweaters. Do what brings you a measure of joy in this maddening game.
Now, the second issue. This is not a plea for non-conforming equipment; rather, it is a statement of fact. USGA/R&A limits on every facet of golf equipment are detrimental to golf equipment manufacturers. Sure, you know this, but do you think about it as it applies to almost every element of equipment? A 500cc driver would be inherently more forgiving than a 460cc, as one with a COR measurement in excess of 0.83. 50-inch shafts. Box grooves. And on and on.
Would fewer regulations be objectively bad for the game? Would this erode its soul? Fortunately, that’s beside the point of this exercise, which is merely to point out the facts. The fact, in this case, is that equipment restrictions and regulations are the slaughterbench of an abundance of innovation in the golf equipment space. Is this for the best? Well, now I’ve asked the question twice and might as well give a partial response, I guess my answer to that would be, “It depends on what type of golf you’re playing and who you’re playing it with.”
For my part, I don’t mind embarrassing myself with vintage blades and persimmons chasing after the quasi-spiritual elevation of a well-struck shot, but that’s just me. Plenty of folks don’t give a damn if their grooves are conforming. Plenty of folks think the folks in Liberty Corner ought to add a prison to the museum for such offences. And those are just a few of the considerations for the amateur game — which doesn’t get inside the gallery ropes of the pro game…
Different strokes in the game of golf, in my humble opinion.
Anyway, I believe equipment company engineers are genuinely trying to build better equipment year over year. The marketing departments are trying to find ways to make this equipment appeal to the broadest segment of the golf market possible. All of this against (1) the backdrop of — at least for now — firm product cycles. And golfers who, with their ~15 average handicap (men), for the most part, are not striping the golf ball like Tiger in his prime and seem to have less and less time year over year to practice and improve. (2) Regulations that massively restrict what they’re able to do…
That’s the landscape as I see it and the real headwinds for golf equipment companies. No doubt, there’s more I haven’t considered, but I think the previous is a better — and better faith — point of departure when formulating any serious commentary on the golf equipment world than some of the more cynical and conspiratorial takes I hear.
Agree? Disagree? Think I’m worthy of an Adam Hadwin-esque security guard tackle? Let me know in the comments.
@golfoncbs The infamous Adam Hadwin tackle ? #golf #fyp #canada #pgatour #adamhadwin ? Ghibli-style nostalgic waltz – MaSssuguMusic
Podcasts
Fore Love of Golf: Introducing a new club concept

Episode #16 brings us Cliff McKinney. Cliff is the founder of Old Charlie Golf Club, a new club, and concept, to be built in the Florida panhandle. The model is quite interesting and aims to make great, private golf more affordable. We hope you enjoy the show!
Opinion & Analysis
On Scottie Scheffler wondering ‘What’s the point of winning?’

Last week, I came across a reel from BBC Sport on Instagram featuring Scottie Scheffler speaking to the media ahead of The Open at Royal Portrush. In it, he shared that he often wonders what the point is of wanting to win tournaments so badly — especially when he knows, deep down, that it doesn’t lead to a truly fulfilling life.
View this post on Instagram
“Is it great to be able to win tournaments and to accomplish the things I have in the game of golf? Yeah, it brings tears to my eyes just to think about it because I’ve literally worked my entire life to be good at this sport,” Scheffler said. “To have that kind of sense of accomplishment, I think, is a pretty cool feeling. To get to live out your dreams is very special, but at the end of the day, I’m not out here to inspire the next generation of golfers. I’m not out here to inspire someone to be the best player in the world, because what’s the point?”
Ironically — or perhaps perfectly — he went on to win the claret jug.
That question — what’s the point of winning? — cuts straight to the heart of the human journey.
As someone who’s spent over two decades in the trenches of professional golf, and in deep study of the mental, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of the game, I see Scottie’s inner conflict as a sign of soul evolution in motion.
I came to golf late. I wasn’t a junior standout or college All-American. At 27, I left a steady corporate job to see if I could be on the PGA Tour starting as a 14-handicap, average-length hitter. Over the years, my journey has been defined less by trophies and more by the relentless effort to navigate the deeply inequitable and gated system of professional golf — an effort that ultimately turned inward and helped me evolve as both a golfer and a person.
One perspective that helped me make sense of this inner dissonance around competition and our culture’s tendency to overvalue winning is the idea of soul evolution.
The University of Virginia’s Division of Perceptual Studies has done extensive research on reincarnation, and Netflix’s Surviving Death (Episode 6) explores the topic, too. Whether you take it literally or metaphorically, the idea that we’re on a long arc of growth — from beginner to sage elder — offers a profound perspective.
If you accept the premise literally, then terms like “young soul” and “old soul” start to hold meaning. However, even if we set the word “soul” aside, it’s easy to see that different levels of life experience produce different worldviews.
Newer souls — or people in earlier stages of their development — may be curious and kind but still lack discernment or depth. There is a naivety, and they don’t yet question as deeply, tending to see things in black and white, partly because certainty feels safer than confronting the unknown.
As we gain more experience, we begin to experiment. We test limits. We chase extreme external goals — sometimes at the expense of health, relationships, or inner peace — still operating from hunger, ambition, and the fragility of the ego.
It’s a necessary stage, but often a turbulent and unfulfilling one.
David Duval fell off the map after reaching World No. 1. Bubba Watson had his own “Is this it?” moment with his caddie, Ted Scott, after winning the Masters.
In Aaron Rodgers: Enigma, reflecting on his 2011 Super Bowl win, Rodgers said:
“Now I’ve accomplished the only thing that I really, really wanted to do in my life. Now what? I was like, ‘Did I aim at the wrong thing? Did I spend too much time thinking about stuff that ultimately doesn’t give you true happiness?’”
Jim Carrey once said, “I think everybody should get rich and famous and do everything they ever dreamed of so they can see that it’s not the answer.”
Eventually, though, something shifts.
We begin to see in shades of gray. Winning, dominating, accumulating—these pursuits lose their shine. The rewards feel more fleeting. Living in a constant state of fight-or-flight makes us feel alive, yes, but not happy and joyful.
Compassion begins to replace ambition. Love, presence, and gratitude become more fulfilling than status, profits, or trophies. We crave balance over burnout. Collaboration over competition. Meaning over metrics.
Interestingly, if we zoom out, we can apply this same model to nations and cultures. Countries, like people, have a collective “soul stage” made up of the individuals within them.
Take the United States, for example. I’d place it as a mid-level soul: highly competitive and deeply driven, but still learning emotional maturity. Still uncomfortable with nuance. Still believing that more is always better. Despite its global wins, the U.S. currently ranks just 23rd in happiness (as of 2025). You might liken it to a gifted teenager—bold, eager, and ambitious, but angsty and still figuring out how to live well and in balance. As much as a parent wants to protect their child, sometimes the child has to make their own mistakes to truly grow.
So when Scottie Scheffler wonders what the point of winning is, I don’t see someone losing strength.
I see someone evolving.
He’s beginning to look beyond the leaderboard. Beyond metrics of success that carry a lower vibration. And yet, in a poetic twist, Scheffler did go on to win The Open. But that only reinforces the point: even at the pinnacle, the question remains. And if more of us in the golf and sports world — and in U.S. culture at large — started asking similar questions, we might discover that the more meaningful trophy isn’t about accumulating or beating others at all costs.
It’s about awakening and evolving to something more than winning could ever promise.
Frank Magee
Dec 15, 2016 at 2:34 pm
Chip is a thoroughbred. He comes from the finest people in golf. He needs to connect with us to find the heart and soul of golf, the desire for excellence and improvement. We hope he will develop into a leader in the game, rather than following the mainstream. Golf needs to be first in ethics, integrity and fairness. We wish he would call us. Callaway needs to take some new initiatives on behalf of the players who troubled themselves to become excellent, or suffer the fate deserved for not doing so.
Mtek VersaSpeed
Dec 19, 2014 at 5:18 pm
Hey Zak, I’m surprised you didnt ask Chip how important ethics & integrity is to a big golf club manufacturing company like Callaway & how Callaway handles important ethics & integrity issues compared to Odysee. Afiak Callaway has a ethics charter right & they won a award years ago from Torch….?
cheers
Mark
Pingback: An Interview With Callaway CEO Chip Brewer | Callaway Golf News and Media
Johan
Nov 20, 2014 at 11:44 pm
By way of context for my comments: I love the Apex irons. I currently game X Forged 2013 irons and love those too. I love the new Tour Grind wedge. I think Callaway’s support is fantastic (almost as good as PING’s). I love their new muscle back irons. I also love the Big Bertha fairways woods. As for Brewer’s comments…
1. To compare new Apple iPhone releases with golf clubs is either stupid, or Machiavellian. I can’t recall a governing body for smartphones that only allows tiny changes in the products like the R&A and PGA. Secondly, Apple does not release products nearly as often as Callaway does.
2. He says he knows people who love new toys. Of course, there are lots of people who think a new club will magically fix their game. Or, just love a new toy for no other reason than cosmetics. That’s all fine, but he should have answered the real question by explaining why his and TM’s frantic release schedule is good for golf, as opposed to Titleist’s and PING’s more measured release schedule. He obviously knows there are many of us who think the fast release schedule is net negative, and he chose to ignore addressing this head on.
3. This may be a personal impression, but he comes across like a hard-hitting salesman. This means I’m inclined to disbelieve most of what he says. Most of the best salespeople I’ve met never struck me as salespeople, as a result I was willing to listen and be convinced.
Will
Oct 30, 2014 at 10:44 am
Good article. Zak, thanks. I love what they are doing at Callaway. I don’t understand all the hate. I don’t get mad at a company because the have to many products or I can’t afford it. I would love to have a Porsche 911 turbo, but I have a Ford Fusion. I think the interview was spot on and he gave his opinion or answered the questions he was presented.
Dpavs
Oct 30, 2014 at 8:25 am
We’re unique, … blah, blah, blah, ….We want to be the best… blah, blah, blah, … provide great value…. blah, blah, blah…. the latest technology… blah, blah, blah…we listen to and care about our customers… blah, blah, blah…
These always sound the same to me regardless what manufacturer is being interviewed.
Still I suppose it was nice for Chip to take the time out of his schedule to do the interview.
Dpavs
Oct 30, 2014 at 8:27 am
Oh and I should add that I do agree that from a customer support perspective, Callaway really is top notch!
8thehardway
Oct 30, 2014 at 7:40 am
Seriously, I think some people want ‘Zakie TMZ’ to ambush Chip Brewer at a Top Golf party and pepper him with questions until he admits he’s naming their next driver after the hot waitress he just met while snapping photos of him using a custom Krank driver (13* loft) with a Scotty Go-Lo hidden under a Tuttle putter cover in his bag.
mo
Oct 30, 2014 at 12:48 am
This was a very good inteview. I’m anxious to see what’s in store next year.
marcel
Oct 29, 2014 at 11:31 pm
golf has got one problem. its the most technical sport on the planet yet “golfers” tend to spend money for driver but not the lesson… most of golfer are plying wrong gear based on emotions… resulting in poor game and therefore loss of interest…
J Taylor
Oct 29, 2014 at 10:41 pm
Great interview Zak,
Can’t wait to see whats in store in 2015 from Callaway; I wish he would have told us what they decided not to release!
Zak Kozuchowski
Oct 30, 2014 at 9:21 am
Thanks J. We will find that out soon. You have my word.
Minh
Oct 29, 2014 at 10:26 pm
Great job Zak. My favorite line from Mr. Brewer, “to simplify the product offering to make some guy on a blog happy is dumb”.
Zak Kozuchowski
Oct 30, 2014 at 9:23 am
Thanks Minh.
marionmg
Oct 29, 2014 at 9:50 pm
I’m going all callaway now….
tom
Oct 29, 2014 at 7:24 pm
Nice job, Zak. I enjoyed the interview and think CB is a sharp guy. Too many people on here are so darn negative about everything.
Zak Kozuchowski
Oct 30, 2014 at 9:24 am
Negative? Who’s negative on the internet? 😉
Thanks Tom.
Desmond
Oct 29, 2014 at 6:59 pm
Zak, good job. A few nuggets showed up, and that is all you can reasonably expect. You’ve got to get Chip’s personality on paper, and he comes across as an avid golfer who demands excellence from his people, yet reasonable.
I like his answer regarding 3 drivers – Chip is right – Serious golfers will get it – you’ve got a driver for 3 different markets – I enjoy the V Series and its fairways. And Chip is right about face cup technology. So it’s existed for a number of years in Japan, but not here. Callaway has brought it (well, so has Jesse Ortiz in Bobby Jones) to the masses and improved on the basic technology.
Chip, let’s bring face cup to your next series of drivers if you can get the sound/feel right. That’s another area where Callaway has improved each year – feel/sound. The V Series has it.
Appreciate the interview. Keep ’em coming.
Zak Kozuchowski
Oct 30, 2014 at 9:25 am
We’re going to keep them coming, Desmond. Thanks for reading and for taking the time to post a thoughtful comment.
Andrew
Oct 29, 2014 at 6:40 pm
Bravo Chip!
IMHO, you are naming the right tune with regards to the category! Too many folks in positions of influence have bastardized the industry narrative… but please go easier on Ms. Bertha. She will love you back for along time if you do.
Aye
Oct 29, 2014 at 6:31 pm
ZK: So if Callaway could only be known for one thing… If you had one chance to reach our readers, what would it be?
CB: It needs to be the best premium golf equipment in the world.
…I’m pretty sure every golf company wants to be the premium golf equipment. Seems like CB didn’t know the answer to it…
Alvaro
Oct 29, 2014 at 6:13 pm
It was nice to hear the acknowledgement about the issues with an overabundance of product inventories, but find it hard to believe they wont fill orders in order to serve the greater good. I guess only time will tell.
Alex
Oct 29, 2014 at 4:18 pm
I’m a proud Ping man. I think Callaway has always made great clubs but TaylorMade has thrown a gauntlet that Callaway decided to pick up and in a way they’re paying the price: consumers have grown a completely polarised view of the brand. I played Callaway in the past, but now I would’t buy that brand. My view of Callaway is somehow negative.
Mike
Oct 29, 2014 at 2:50 pm
Total marketing prattle, cup faces have been around for 10 years and more and make a couple yards difference at best. This statement is as shameless as it gets – “These high-CT fairway woods — they’ve obsoleted other fairway woods. If you’re not using a high-CT fairway wood, you are not in the modern age”
The faces of fairway woods are so small they hardly flex at all and high CT fairways have been around in various incarnations for years as well.
The fact is Callaway and TM continue to flood the market with product in hopes of driving out all the smaller competing brands. Golfsmith and Cleveland and others made composite material differential CG heads more than 10 years ago. Adjustable drivers only adjust loft if you rotate the face to square at address (and maintain through impact) so seems he forgot to mention that. They are not the same or as effective as loft change by two different clubs with higher and lower lofts…it’s all distinction without a tangible difference and that’s because the USGA regulates the parameters that make a real difference.
And by the way how does aggressively paying tour pros to use your product represent progress…? These gifted players could just as easily win with any number of brands.
other paul
Oct 29, 2014 at 2:42 pm
Don’t worry Zak, we all liked the article. Even if we don’t admit it.
Zak Kozuchowski
Oct 29, 2014 at 3:18 pm
Thanks Paul. I appreciate the support, and am glad I got to share my conversation with all of you.
John
Oct 29, 2014 at 4:22 pm
“conversation”
cody
Oct 29, 2014 at 5:21 pm
Nice job, looks like it was a fun conversation. I love the looks of the new cally stuff. I wish my wallet liked it as much as my eyes.
Jafar
Oct 29, 2014 at 1:43 pm
This wasn’t a bad interview. He asked why do they release so many new drivers each year.
To think that equipment from the past 5 years is obsolete is ignorant and people criticizing probably can’t hit a driver anyway, so.
They are probably pushing these products because R&D is making as many patents as possible. Much like the tech world, it’s not about the released product, it’s about keeping the technology from your competitors. This also lets the consumer know that your company is the innovator in the market and not a follower.
RogerinNZ
Oct 29, 2014 at 12:43 pm
Zak,
Thanks for a great interview with Chip.
He has Real Passion for getting a Better Product out to Market.
I appreciate that.
He compliments other Innovators on design.
I think Callaway have a great leader.
He chooses a High R & D spend over short term profit.
Again Zak, thanks for taking the time with Chip.
Clearly some WRXR’s are not impressed with the article….
Thats life folks !
Zak Kozuchowski
Oct 29, 2014 at 12:56 pm
Thanks for reading, Roger.
Things have certainly changed at Callaway since Chip Brewer took over. Peoples’ opinions of that change are quite polarizing, as you can see in these comments, but from a product performance perspective things have certainly changed for the better. The years to come will be interesting to watch.
RyderFan
Oct 29, 2014 at 12:29 pm
Can’t expect much here. He can’t even keep up the uPro GPS website like he (Callaway) promised to do until the end of 2014. It’s been down since Oct. 23.
cmasty
Oct 29, 2014 at 12:23 pm
Throw him another softball, Zak.
enrique
Oct 29, 2014 at 12:12 pm
Chip confirming I’ll never again play his brand. Answers like:
Question: Are you catching flak [from flooding the market with product]?
Chip: From the serious golfer, no. From the trade and blogospheres, yes.
So Chip, you don’t think the players here on WRX that refuse to play your product due to the nature of your business model are serious golfers?
Not a fan of Chip, Harry, or their products.
alejandro flores
Oct 29, 2014 at 3:56 pm
Serious golfers choose the product that works for them regardless if it’s only been out for x number of months. Serious golfers care about their game first, ego second! Callaway’s products works just as Taylormade’s, Titleist’s, etc.. Obviously you are choosing to ignore a certain brand based on your own personal opinion of their business model which is exactly what he said by “trade and blogospheres.” And your last line shows exactly what golfer you choose to be.
enrique
Oct 29, 2014 at 9:12 pm
i couldn’t care less how long a club has been out – the condescending nature of their mgmt team is what I’m referring to. All fluff and no stuff.
DP
Oct 29, 2014 at 12:09 pm
Good insight right there and ZK, great questions.
It is always fun to see what the top guys have to say with direct questions about the industry and question the product lines.
CB it seems is a good leader.
Zak Kozuchowski
Oct 30, 2014 at 9:33 am
Thanks DP. From what I’ve seen, there’s a lot of respect in the building for Chip Brewer.
John
Oct 29, 2014 at 12:08 pm
Agreed. Infomercial.
enrique
Oct 29, 2014 at 12:13 pm
Typical WRX
west
Oct 29, 2014 at 12:04 pm
Good interview, GolfWRX needs more like this.
Michael Trautman
Oct 29, 2014 at 11:58 am
Unfiltered I don’t really think so. There was no push back on the question about the cost of irons. I love the Apex but that is not the issue it is the cost of the Apex that is the issue. Three drivers again in one year, poor resell and is feeding a beast that one day will not be present. I have no problem with Golfwrx bringing us this interview but let us call it what it is and that is in my opinion an advertising piece for Callaway. Nothing wrong with that at all, but let’s not make this piece something it is not.
west
Oct 29, 2014 at 12:12 pm
Bit harsh. You can’t expect the CEO of a corporation to make overly aggressive (but the “cheap” comment was obviously slightly motivated), bold, or anything less than self-promoting comments. I think it’s awesome Chip is willing to take the time to answer the questions, and do his best to represent his company in a positive light. Way more interesting to read than what we got from Barney Adams, but that’s what makes these interviews great, no single perspective or style…Hope GolfWRX continues down this path and continues to interview the industry’s leaders!
jsutin
Oct 29, 2014 at 7:03 pm
Your cost of iron problem just with Callaway? There are plenty of iron sets that cost over $1000. If you can’t afford them, that’s not Chip’s fault. Also, golf clubs have ALWAYS had poor resale values, probably the worst of anything you can buy.
Dennis Marker
Oct 29, 2014 at 11:57 am
I am, and have been for 32 years, a golf equipment retailer at a green grass location. With all due respect to Mr. Brewer, it is hard to imagine (based on this interview) how he could be less aware of the marketplace at ground zero. I would agree that one product does not fit all. However, providing a “new” club every few months with infinite options and nearly immediate obsolescence is clearly not the answer. These current marketing strategies serve only very short term, reactive goals that ultimately overwhelm, out price and wear out the consumer. For further reading refer to Aesop’s fable concerning the “Golden Goose”. Dennis Marker
Michael
Oct 29, 2014 at 11:30 am
Advertorial. Zzzzzzz
Tom Bowles
Oct 29, 2014 at 1:12 pm
Well is he is the CEO. What else would he be doing? Saying they suck??
John
Oct 29, 2014 at 7:34 pm
Point: We don’t expect the interviewee to say anything different. We expect more from the interviewer.
Zak Kozuchowski
Oct 30, 2014 at 9:34 am
What more would you like to see, John?