Equipment
Vice Golf: Bringing a cheaper alternative to the golf ball game
The United States may be the center of the ball manufacturing business, but an event on the other side of the pond made waves in early 2015.
The German Golf Association, the umbrella organization representing over 800 golf clubs in the country and responsible for league competition among German amateur golfers, is an important organization for ball manufacturers and had an official golf ball sponsorship deal with a big brand.
That is until the Association shockingly announced that it would have a new ball sponsor for 2015 and 2016. Instead, it would be…Vice Golf? A three-year-old company that only sold golf balls online?
[quote_box_center] “Golf needs some change, everyone’s searching for the new thing, the new 2.0,” said Vice Golf co-founder Ingo Duellmann. “That’s probably what was what they were searching for in the GGA, something new with edges and someone who was willing to do something different from the traditional brands.”[/quote_box_center]
Vice Golf remains on as the Association’s official ball sponsor through 2016. And it’s the latest win for a company that has made in roads quickly in the golf ball manufacturing world in a unique way.
The financial investment in golf can add up quickly, and it doesn’t help when your local pro shop or sporting goods store sells golf balls, an essential part to the sport, at $50-60 a dozen.
Vice Golf, based out of Germany, has stepped in to bring complexity to the market, adding a new model into the old, establishment golf ball manufacturing business.
The company, founded by Duellmann and Rainer Stoeckl in 2012, sells golf balls through its website vicegolf.com. Consumers buy the company’s balls online and the goods are shipped directly to them, so Vice avoids dealing with the middlemen that characterize the rest of the business.
The Point A to Point B structure means no price markups, and thus a cheaper ball that Vice markets as having the same quality as the big brands.
While the balls from these giants will sell for the $50-60 per dozen after the middlemen raise prices at each point of the process, a dozen Vice Pro balls can be bought for $34.95 directly on the company’s website, and the price drops to $24.95 per dozen if a consumer buys 60 Vice Pro balls at once.
The Vice Tour model sells for $21.95 per dozen and $15.95 per dozen at a 60-ball purchase. The Vice Drive model starts at $14.95 per dozen and drops to a $10.95 per dozen price tag at 60 balls.
Stoeckl and Duellmann said that they try to keep their prices 40-50 percent below the big brands while keeping the ball of the same quality.
This has resulted in steady growth. Vice Golf increased 100 percent in sales in 2013 and jumped up 167 percent from that number in 2014. The staff nearly quadrupled in full time employees in that span, and customer satisfaction is high.
Stoeckl and Duellmann said that others are taking notice of their new movement in the golf ball manufacturing market, the nix-the-middle-man-and-pro-shop model, even if these other guys can’t feasibly join in.
Stoeckl and Duellmann met over a decade ago while studying law at the university level. Both would become lawyers. Duellmann worked for a sports company and dealt with business development in U.S. and Asian markets, while Stoeckl was in a business consultancy company where he did many projects in sports. Stoeckl had serious contact with manufacturers, and on one project in particular, he saw the cost structure of golf ball pricing.
Despite the steady jobs, their immersion in golf was growing and by 2010, they were hearing consistently from family and friends the complaints over exorbitant prices around golf balls.
[quote_box_center]”And at that time four or five years ago, all these direct-to-customer concepts popped up,” Duellmann said.[/quote_box_center]
With that impetus and their interest in golf, Duellmann and Stoeckl started looking into ways to get into the golf ball manufacturing business on a direct-to-customer basis.
[quote_box_center]”We thought manufacturing golf balls would be an easy job,” Duellmann said. “We thought we could skip out on our lawyer jobs and have a good time and not work so much. It turned out to not be that way. Instead of working less, we actually work more than we ever have before.”[/quote_box_center]
The duo started part time in their garage and hunkered down from there.
It took them about a year and a half from the conception of the company to when they sold their first batch of balls, a 50,000-unit set. To get to that point, they worked with testing labs in San Diego and Germany and collaborated with engineers at a technical university in Munich. They went through hundreds of prototypes to get to the quality of ball they were looking for.
In the end, they came out with three models in the Vice Pro, Vice Tour and Vice Drive.
Stoeckl and Duellman compare the Pro to the Titleist’s Pro V1, saying that the ball is a three-piece model that is most useful for low handicappers and pros who want a ball that stops quickly and generates max spin in the short game. The Pro comes in several versions, including the Pro Neon, Pro Shooter and Pro Flamingo, each offering a different color ball.
The Tour model is generally for single digit to mid-handicappers who want a three-piece ball that rolls more. The Drive two-piece ball usually works best for high handicappers who want a lot of roll and a more durable ball.
And Vice Golf will unveil a fourth model in April 2015: the Pro+.
[quote_box_center]”We compare [the Pro+] to the Pro V1x,” Stoeckl said. “It’s a four-piece ball, a cast urethane ball. It’s a really green grabbing ball, but takes less spin. It’s a little bit harder and it flies lower.”[/quote_box_center]
Stoeckl said that they came out with the Pro+ because customers wanted the feel of the Pro model but with less spin and a lower trajectory on drives.
And that’s another perk of the way Vice Golf does things as opposed to the establishment methods: They only report to the customers.
Part of the business model of the biggest golf ball brands is get tour players to use, and thus advertising, their balls. And dependence on selling balls in pro shops means a greater need for more frequent updated models, so that pro shops will clear their old stock to buy newer and (sometimes barely changed) versions of the same ball.
Vice Golf has neither of those worries. They hear from customers and have gotten positive feedback from some professionals who have used their golf balls. The company currently has a few professionals who play their balls, namely Camilo Sprinz and David Gerszstein of Europe’s Challenge Tour (the equivalent of the Web.com Tour circuit). But they have no official sponsorships with players, as they pride themselves on not spending that money.
Vice Golf does have some business in pro shops, but not in the traditional way.
These direct-to-pro shop sales account for less than 10 percent of Vice’s business, and the lack of sales reps means no extra costs and speaks to the lack of dependence Vice has on pro shops for revenue.
As Vice lacks these significant expenditures, they’ve been able expand their business.
The company mainly sold its balls first in Germany than in the rest of Europe for the first years of its existence, but added Australia to the mix last year and the massive United States market in 2015 due to high demand in those places.
Vice’s website promises 2-to-3 day shipping, and Stoeckl and Duellmann say they can indeed do so to any place in the world besides China, thanks to the logistics facilities they set up in Australia and Buffalo, New York when they incorporated these new markets.
In addition to new markets, Vice offers more than just normal golf balls.
Based off consumer feedback, Stoeckl and Duellmann implemented a customization feature to their golf balls a year into the business.
The customization on the golf balls can be wide ranging, from company logos to photos of birthdays and group trips to humorous printed phrases like “You found this ball, bring it back to the clubhouse,” and even a depiction of a pixelated naked girl (seriously).
There are limits (nothing crude and no trademarked properties), but Vice has cast a wide net on customization and now see 50 percent of its golf ball sales come from this department.
The key has been minimal extra cost and inconvenience, and a simple process to add your customization.
Vice isn’t done there either, with the release of a golf glove called Vice Golf Pure to come this year. The company also sells golf caps, and has found great success in their limited edition offerings. It started at the major championships last year, and the special caps sold out within hours.
Later, they released a limited-edition camo Ryder Cup cap, where a closer look showed the camp to actually be an outline of the Gleneagles layout.
Those hats sold out in minutes.
Stoeckl and Duellman said they plan to offer new versions of the major championship limited edition caps in 2015, with their release dates the weekend ahead of the each of the four tournaments.
The hat side of the business actually has less to do with money, than with branding. Vice has increased in recent years, as has general awareness for the company in the golf ball business.
But without the big name of “Titleist” or “Callaway,” Vice’s golf balls still face speculation even as the market share grows.
Ultimately, Vice has found its niche in the market and while it anticipates more growth and represents an alternative to the big brand model of business, the goal isn’t to challenge the Titleists of this world.
That being said, Stoeckl and Duellmann do expect pro shops to focus in future years more on helping people finding equipment, and thus less on golf ball sales.
Does this mean Vice Golf is ahead of the game? Maybe or maybe not. But watchers of the golf ball category are taking notice.
Equipment
Why Rickie Fowler is switching to a shorter driver at the PGA Championship
In a golf world where players are looking to eke out every yard possible, usually by lengthening their drivers to add clubhead speed, there’s one player at the PGA Championship who’s going in the opposite direction. In fact, for Rickie Fowler, his goal off the tee is not about gaining extra distance or yards north to south, but rather about shrinking the misses from east to west.
Ahead of the PGA Championship and the week prior at the Truist Championship. Fowler mentioned to Cobra Tour Rep Ben Schomin that the driver didn’t quite swing feel the same as everything in the bag. As a result, and with Schomin’s suggestion to try and sync everything up with the big stick, Fowler decided to test out a shorter length shaft.
“He’s been at 45 (inches), and he’d been at 45 for a few weeks, 44 1/8 (inches) is really is where he is been living really for the most part, for the last couple of years, and is where he is been comfortable,” Schomin told GolfWRX. “It just felt like it was a little long and loose on him.”
Interestingly, Fowler ranks 40th in Driving Accuracy this year on the PGA Tour. It’s his most accurate season with the driver since the start of the decade. But sometimes for players, feel is more important than statistics.
“It was really more of a trying to get the swing to feel the fluidness from club to club to club to try to get it to feel the same,” Schomin added. “And so we took it down to 43 and a quarter, and it was a touch of a ball speed loss, just based on that overall club head speed. But honestly, he squared it up probably a little better. The right miss wasn’t nearly as far. So really, overall down-range dispersion tightened up a fair amount, and he felt confident in swinging it.”
The change in length had Fowler’s caddie, Ricky Romano, beaming at how well he had driven during Tuesday’s practice round at Aronimink. So much so, he was asking Schomin not to suggest changes anymore.
Fowler’s shaft-shortening is one of a few driver adjustments he’s made this season, and to Schomin’s credit, it’s thanks to the fact that he and the rest of the Cobra team had Fowler fit very well into three of the four heads in the Cobra OPTM lineup.
“He had three distinct drivers and the biggest decision was trying to decide which worked best at that time,” Schomin told GolfWRX previously. “He’s played the majority of the season with OPTM X, but has also played a couple of tournaments with OPTM LS. His overall driving stats have been good.”
At the RBC Heritage earlier this spring, Fowler switched drivers, changing from his Cobra OPTM X and into the Tour, low-loft Max K model that Gary Woodland used to win just a few weeks prior.
Now for the PGA Championship, Fowler’s back in the X head, but still using the UST Mamiya LIN-Q PowerCore White 6TX shaft, just a little bit shorter.
“Will he stay there? I’m not sure,” Schomin added. “Could we end up say at like 43 and 7.5 (of an inch). If it’s giving him the same feel of consistency through the bag, then I think we might end up just a touch longer. But if he likes where he is at, he’s confident where he is at, that’s really all that matters.”
If there’s more testing, though, just don’t tell his caddie.
Equipment
GolfWRX Launch Report: 2026 Titleist GTS drivers
What you need to know: As is customary for the Fairhaven-based company, Titleist officially announced today that its GTS drivers are headed to retail, following a successful tour release. The GTS2, GTS3, and GTS4 drivers will be available in golf shops June 11.
Since debuting at the Texas Children’s Houston Open, the new GTS lineup has quickly gained traction on the PGA Tour, with more than 50 players already making the switch to a GTS2, GTS3, or GTS4 driver. Among them are Justin Thomas and Jordan Spieth.

Justin Thomas’ Titleist GTS2 driver (Greg Moore, GolfWRX)
According to Titleist, the GTS series builds upon the performance foundation established by the GT Series, while introducing several major technological advancements, including a new Split Mass Frame construction, refined aerodynamics, and an updated Speed Sync face design.

2026 Titleist GTS drivers: What’s new, key technology
Split Mass Frame and thermoform body
At the center of the new GTS lineup is a redesigned internal structure: the Split Mass Frame. This technology works with a full-thermoform body made from Titleist’s Proprietary Matrix Polymer (PMP), a lightweight composite that enables engineers to reposition mass more efficiently throughout the head. Compared to the previous GT generation, GTS drivers feature nearly double the PMP material, increasing from 13 grams to 26 grams, while maintaining the sound and feel preferred by better players.
The weight savings from the thermoform construction allowed Titleist engineers to strategically separate mass placement inside the head. Specifically, more weight is pushed rearward to improve stability and forgiveness, while additional mass is positioned low and forward to optimize speed, launch, and spin.
In short, golfers are able to maintain ball speed and consistency across both centered and off-center strikes.

Faster aerodynamics
Titleist also refined the aerodynamic shaping of the GTS heads to help players generate more clubhead speed.
The tails of the new GTS2 and GTS3 heads have been raised compared to previous models, helping airflow stay attached to the crown and sole longer during the swing. According to Titleist, the improved airflow reduces drag and increases speed without affecting launch conditions or center of gravity placement.
Typically, aerodynamic gains can compromise forgiveness or launch characteristics, but the weight savings from the Split Mass Frame allowed engineers to preserve preferred CG locations.

New Speed Sync face
The new Speed Sync Face design is engineered to improve ball speed retention across a larger portion of the face. A reinforced perimeter structure helps maximize face deflection and COR on centered strikes, while the upper portion of the support ring is opened up to increase speed on high-face impacts, a common strike location for many golfers. The face also features a variable thickness design to preserve speed and performance across a wider impact area.
Expanded adjustability
Each GTS model includes a dual-weighting system to fine-tune launch, spin, and shot shape more precisely than previous generations. GTS2 uses interchangeable forward and aft weights, while GTS3 and GTS4 combine a rear weight with an adjustable forward track weight system.
Tour-inspired face graphics
The new lineup features redesigned high-contrast face graphics to improve alignment and framing at address, according to Titleist. Sharp visual lines are designed to make it easier to center the golf ball and to perceive loft more easily at setup.

Additional model details
GTS2

- The GTS2 is the most forgiving model, designed for golfers seeking maximum stability and consistent speed across the face.
- It produces high launch with mid spin and features a larger, confidence-inspiring profile behind the ball.
- Standard weighting includes an 11-gram forward weight and a 5-gram rear weight, with additional fitting configurations available.
GTS3

- The GTS3 is aimed at players who want more control over launch, spin, and shot shaping.
- Compared to GTS2, the GTS3 offers lower launch and spin while featuring a more compact profile and deeper face design preferred by many stronger players.
- The head features an adjustable forward-track weight system to further fine-tune center of gravity placement.
GTS4

- The lowest-spinning option in the lineup, GTS4 is built for golfers looking to reduce excessive spin and maximize total distance.
- Unlike previous “4” models from Titleist, the new GTS4 features a full 460cc profile that improves forgiveness and stability while retaining its low-spin DNA.
- Like GTS3, it includes a forward track weighting system for precise fitting adjustments.

What Titleist says
“When we talk about driver design, it’s never about the one feature or benefit — it’s about all of them,” said Stephanie Luttrell, Titleist’s Senior Director of Metalwood R&D. “Ball speed, forgiveness, spin stability, adjustability, exceptional sound and feel… these are all attributes that golfers care about. It’s our job to design a lineup that elevates performance across the board without sacrificing in key areas, and we feel we’ve done that with GTS.”
“We know that forward CGs drive speed with great launch and spin characteristics, but you need to be able to do that with an inertial stability that still preserves ball speed, launch and spin consistency on off-center hits,” Luttrell said. “We’ve never before been able to hit these CG positions and inertia properties at the same time, and we’re achieving that because of GTS’ construction.”
Club Junkie’s take
I feel like every time there is a new Titleist wood release, I figure they can’t outdo their previous driver. And every year, I am wrong and impressed with the performance. The GTS fits right into that narrative again, as I didn’t know where Titleist could go from GT, but they pushed the limits again, and my fitting proved the smart people there found ways to improve.
My past four Titleist drivers have been a 2 series as my swing typically requires a little height, spin, and forgiveness so I figured I would just get a new GTS2 and be on my way. During the fitting, I was impressed by the new GTS construction, its added PMP material, and the advanced adjustability on each model. My fitter, Joey, got to work putting together a GTS2 and we started there. The launch and spin were great, and the consistency on misses was very tight. My average ball speed with the GTS went up a little bit as the new Speed Sync face creates more speed away from the center.
Joey then built up a GTS3 in 11 degrees, but I figured this wouldn’t have the stability I needed for tight dispersion on my miss hits. That thought was quickly erased after a few shots, and I really liked the more center start line and reduced draw on the misses I was seeing. We tried a few different settings and shafts to dial in the details in order to get the best fit. Having a forward and rear weight in the head allowed Joey to set up the GTS3 with a heavier rear weight to keep the launch and spin up, while the Sure Fit hosel set flat created a more center start line for me. My misses were not nearly as far left, and I was really impressed with the consistency on the spin and launch when I didn’t hit it in the center.
Titleist again created a wood line in GTS that delivers improvements over previous drivers while keeping the traditional look and feel you expect. More adjustability, better off-center speed, and 3 drivers that are playable over a wider range of players should make these extremely successful in fittings.
Pricing, specs, availability
GTS2 lofts: 8, 9, 10, 11 degrees (RH/LH)
GTS3 lofts: 8, 9, 10, 11 degrees (RH/LH)
GTS4 lofts: 8, 9, 10 (RH/LH)
Featured shafts
- Project X Titan Black
- Mitsubishi Tensei 1K White
- Mitsubishi Tensei 1K Blue
- Mitsubishi Tensei 1K Red
Premium shafts
- Graphite Design Tour AD DI
- Graphite Design Tour AD VF
- Graphite Design Tour AD FI
Available for fittings and pre-sale now.
In golf shops worldwide beginning June 11.
Price: $699 (standard), $899 (premium)
Equipment
Titleist launches new GTS2 and GTS3 fairways
Titleist has today introduced its new GTS2 and GTS3 fairways.
Lower and deeper center of gravity (CG) positions, new adjustable heel-toe weights and advanced clubface innovations drive total performance in the two tour-proven models.
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag4 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag2 weeks agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship













Shmivel
Apr 28, 2017 at 9:03 pm
Played the first round with my new Vice Pro Soft – White yesterday. Previously played with Titleist Velocity and anything else that I found on the course. I’ve been playing reasonably well as of late, (shooting in low to mid 80’s) so I decided to see if a properly suited ball would give me a chance to break 80, something I haven’t done for three seasons. Here are the results.
Off the tee:
I’m 64 years old and don’t hit the ball like I used to. These days, a 230 yard drive is about the best I can do. My club has two 18’s and I know pretty much every blade of grass, so when my ball was landing well beyond my normal off the tee location, I knew something was up. The ball has a piercing ball flight and my slight fade was gone. To be honest, I really didn’t notice a difference in the sound or feel, but that might have been due to me being preoccupied with admiring my drives. On the day, I hit 7 drives that were 240+ and one on #18 that was 250. A modest breeze helped on that one, but still, I couldn’t get the smile off my face until I left my eventual six foot birdie putt a full foot short. Now here’s an interesting note. One of my playing partners is a long ball hitter. He can approach 300 when he’s on his game. I gave him one of my Vice Pro Softs to try on a few holes. He was 10-15 yards shorter than his norm and tossed the ball back to me, so it’s not for everyone. I think he would be better suited to the Pro or Pro Plus, given his swing speed, but for me, the ball was simply awesome off the tee.
Irons:
I didn’t notice any distance gain, however, the ball did fly higher than my iron shots usually do and landed very softly on the greens. Maybe I was just swinging well, but I hit a lot of greens in regulation. The confidence I had over the ball had much to do with it, I’m certain. Oh, again, perhaps this was just me, or maybe the clear skies, but I found that I could see the ball very clearly in the air. One of my playing partners made comment on this, too.
Wedges:
I didn’t have many wedge shots on the day, but the few I had, felt great. A couple of hops and it stopped dead. I think with a bit more experience with my wedges, I will improve distance control. I left a few shots short as I have been used to more roll out.
Putter:
Didn’t notice much difference from what I’ve been used to. I wasn’t putting particularly well, but that wasn’t the ball’s fault.
The score:
This is the part of my review I’ve been waiting to reveal. I shot a 37/39 for a 76. Best round of golf I’ve enjoyed in years. How much did the Vice Pro Soft contribute to it? Who knows. Could I have achieved the same score with another better suited ball to my game? Maybe. Probably. What I do know is that it’s been a long time since I’ve been this anxious to get back out there to play another round.
Nick
Jun 24, 2016 at 2:04 pm
The people complaining about shipping probably didn’t check the website to see the flat rate shipping. I think 6.50 whether you order 1 dozen or 10 dozen balls.
Jack Hardy
May 18, 2016 at 7:29 am
I ordered the ‘Selected’ package from Vice and they were promptly delivered in less than a week, not bad considering I am in regional NSW. I have only played 9 holes with them but so far am very impressed. I played two balls, the Pro Plus and the Drive, on each hole. I thought the Drive would suit my game better as they are designed for slower clubhead speed. Maybe my clubhead speed has improved because I got better distance, and accuracy, off the tee with the Pro Plus. I am a 15 – 18 handicap player but really enjoyed hitting both of these balls, especially the Pro Plus. Normally, I get between 180m and 210m with the Driver but today didn’t hit anything less than 205m and scorched a 245m down the middle.I seemed to get a higher trajectory than my typically low, piercing trajectory up until now. I know golf ball preference can be a very personal thing but I love the ‘feel’ of these and the results I got today were great. I am yet to try the Pro and the Tour but am super impressed with the Pro Plus and Drive. I will be ordering more balls from Vice and I like the personalisation options.
Jeff
Apr 20, 2015 at 3:25 pm
And that’s it. The only time I imagine I’ll ever use the description Legit again. But that’s what this story is. Legit. Get a sleeve of Vice Pros and I’m golfing with extra money in my pocket.
Kane Carpenter
Apr 13, 2015 at 9:12 pm
Kevin has done a great job highlighting the important aspects of the Vice Golf business in this piece. It’s a vital angle to the Vice Golf story, and understanding what company founders Ingo and Rainer have in mind with the direct-to-consumer approach is pivotal in understanding the company.
That said, Vice Golf make stunning product, and their fashion and design approach encompasses the whole buying experience – from purchasing their golf balls online to receiving and opening the beautifully designed sleeves of golf balls.
We, at MINORHOUSE, have been able to chat with Ingo and Rainer on multiple occasions as the brand has grown over the years. Check out our most recent interview to gain a further understanding on what the guys are thinking with regards to design, aesthetics, and focusing on the details : http://minorhouse.com/2014/10/08/talking-designer-golf-balls-ingo-duellmann-rainer-stoeckl-vice-golf/
Darren
Apr 6, 2015 at 7:07 pm
Cheaper? £32 for a dozen??
Crazy i can get pro vs or taylormades for less
Il stick to the tour prefereds
MASSIVE MIKE!
Apr 6, 2015 at 12:15 am
HACK ATACK!
Colin
Apr 5, 2015 at 1:55 am
“That’s probably what was what they were searching for..”
Please proofread your article.
Ivan Kovacevic
Apr 4, 2015 at 7:23 am
hey, i’m Ivan from Germany, so please excuse if there are mistakes in my posting.
My handicap is 15 and I play the VICE Pro Balls in lime green now one year. I’m a big fan of these balls. In my opinion the VICE Pro is better than the NXT Tour and comes very close to the quality of the V1. And this to the half of the price….
The balls are in packages with nice details and grafics. When you open it, it’s a feeling like when you get a new iPhone.
You see, I really like it…
Gubment Cheez
Apr 4, 2015 at 6:49 pm
Go choke on one of those balls
RG
Apr 5, 2015 at 4:54 pm
I don’t think other people are into your bad habits.
Jay
Apr 4, 2015 at 5:19 am
I don’t see anything different that these guys are doing than any other company that clones golf balls and golf clubs. If they hadn’t said compare to ‘Pro V’s’, then I most likely wouldn’t think that way. But, that’s exactly what the equate brands do. They let the OEM’s spend the big bucks to advertise. The equate brands put their brand on the shelves and say compare to…OEM brand ingredients and/or results, etc. I’m always trying different golf balls that are in my price range that perform well because the High End OEM’s are out of my price range. If these clones were on the shelf at around 20 bucks per box, I’d buy a box to see if they compare to the real thing. I’m not saying that what these guys are doing is good or bad. I’m just saying that it is what it is, …..cloning. Capitalizing on what someone has already designed and advertised.
Mr. K
Apr 4, 2015 at 2:13 am
I don’t know why everyone is knocking a golf ball manufacturer that is trying to to upset the status quo in the golf world.
What;s it gonna hurt to give them a try besides, having to admit to yourself you might actually like something a little more than your vaunted Pro-V balls.
Lay off the kool-aid for a bit and try something new.
Tubbs and Crocket
Apr 3, 2015 at 9:17 pm
Somebody need Vice?
Call us!
Sean
Apr 3, 2015 at 2:34 pm
I’d like to see GolfWRX test these. It would be very interesting to see the results.
Bobby
Apr 3, 2015 at 8:08 am
These jerks don’t even ship to the united states
MaxPower
Apr 3, 2015 at 9:53 am
Yeah, having a special web site for the US and don’t ship?
Well think again Bobby.
They do …
Ken
Apr 6, 2015 at 7:49 am
Top right of their site … “Shipping in the US”. That was difficult.
Michael Bettencourt
Apr 2, 2015 at 5:23 pm
Vice is sick. Their style and design is out of this world. Way less stuffy and way more interesting than Titleist.
SJ
Apr 2, 2015 at 4:19 pm
how is this guy still allowed to write articles for WRX? Honestly, everything he has put on here is either super negative I.E. the Dustin Johnson article or Jimmy Walker article, or just flat out wrong. Brooks Koepka sure is struggling this year isn’t he?
Golfraven
Apr 2, 2015 at 4:07 pm
I give those boys credit for funding new golf ball company but I am afraid their choice of name failed baddly from the start and still continues. I associate Flake with a chocolate bar and Vice is just horrid. I rather buy 4 dozens V1s (for the price of 3) then 5 dozens vice pro for the season. I find Vice/Flake balls regularly on my course and the Pro or tour ball are nothing comparing to Titleist V1 and NXT which I normally play. Recently I found funny slogan next to Titleist balls in a golf shop: “Those with Vice come generally second to the Winner”. Their market is mid to high handicappers – indipendent of ball. Serious or tour player would not fame those with confidence.
RG
Apr 2, 2015 at 10:21 pm
Yeah no pro would ever play something so silly, like a Tear Drop putter or the Knife or a cheap ball like a Top-Flite or a Lynx club. Yeah no pro would ever do that.
Golfraven
Apr 3, 2015 at 1:18 am
those pros are usually paid for this endorsement very generously. Those companies you mentioned had some good technology that were maybe ahead of its tine but thise companies also almost disappeared in the 90s or lost market share significantly. I don’t see Top-Flite balls anymore in any recent reviews for instance. Lets see if Vice are still kicking about in 2030 – guess we all will live until then.
MaxPower
Apr 3, 2015 at 9:56 am
Yeah cause only Titleist spends the money they earn from the customers to give them to overpaid pro’s.
Please just go play golf and don’t think about golf business.
golferjack
Apr 2, 2015 at 2:51 pm
you see any tour pro playing These?
Fred
Apr 2, 2015 at 9:51 pm
If you’re spondered by Titleist or any of the other major brands, you’re going to play their equipment, including balls. They’re not going to play Vice when they get their balls free. Also agree that “Vice” is a bad name.
other paul
Apr 2, 2015 at 12:52 pm
I am still not sure why I hear in golf ball articles that high handicappers need a durable golf ball at all. I regularly shoot in the low 80s and high 70s and I still lose a ball every round. I think my record is 18 holes with one ball ( I also have a net in my garage and I wreck a ball a month, which is over 2000 hits per ball) Dont high handicappers need a ball that spins less offline? And goes farther? I assumed durability is only important to driving ranges and golf performance centers.
Don Lamoora
Apr 2, 2015 at 12:17 pm
Isn’t this the same business model as MasterGrip (now just MG) Golf Company? For 30+ years.
I’ve never seen their products in retail locations and I’ve been buying from them since before the internet. I would get their printed catalogs in the mail (and still do) and order directly from them. Currently things are the same, except they now also have a website site to buy from them directly.
MHendon
Apr 2, 2015 at 12:02 pm
My guess is someone at the German Golf Association has a financial interest in Vice golf. And lets be real what golf store is selling other high end balls for $50 or more a dozen, none that I buy from!
Scooter McGavin
Apr 2, 2015 at 12:26 pm
It’s sort of half-accurate. Retail stores are going to sell for the usual prices in the 40’s, topping out around $48 (I think) for the ProV1. However at plenty of golf club/course pro shops you’ll find the same ball priced into the 50’s or 60’s.
Al
Apr 2, 2015 at 10:19 am
I’ve wrongly long held in contempt the hackers who support the golf industry by trying to buy a game with “overpriced” equipment because I didn’t realize they’re actually supporting my “don’t put a ten dollar haircut on a ten cent head” golf. I can “afford” Pro V1s, and I think they “feel” better, but my ball is the least of my problems.
I still cringe a little when I hook one of my “winter” balls into the woods, and I have ~500 of ’em. I blame it on Depression-era grandparents.
mr. b
Apr 2, 2015 at 9:15 am
direct to consumer model that cuts out the middle man mark ups. what a novel idea for the golf industry.
TJ Horton
Apr 2, 2015 at 9:03 am
I can get a pack of nike PD softs for 10 bucks no shipping, a pack of nitros for 7 and a pack of burners for 12 cheap golf balls are plentiful
Adam S.
Apr 2, 2015 at 9:02 am
Thanks for writing this! I’ve been playing the ProV1 for some time, but not a fan of the price.
Are there any tests or reviews out there of these balls? I didn’t see anything about them on the forums.
Kevin Casey
Apr 2, 2015 at 11:18 am
Hey Adam,
The Vice guys told me that they’ve had the balls independently tested to ensure high quality of product. As for reviews, I don’t know if there are any in the forums here but Vice has a section on their website where they put all the media coverage of them. There are some reviews there. Hope that helps!
Dan
Apr 2, 2015 at 12:16 pm
Wait, the company told you they were independently tested and performed as well as the leading ball in the market for the last 15 years, but didn’t show you any data? I’m sold!!! Can’t wait to order these at more $$/doz after shipping than Pro V’s!!!!
DaveJohns
Apr 2, 2015 at 6:11 pm
Send me a set of balls for $12 to cover the shipping and handling and I will be happy to play them along side my used Internet AAAA Pro V1x balls this season and give them a very fair review.
Ken S
Jun 13, 2016 at 7:59 am
Check out IGolfReviews it shows Spin rate,Speed,Launch Angle,Distance and on wedges roll out.Ive checked a few reviews because I was interested in trying a sample pack which comes with a box of all their balls.