Instruction
Taking the mystery out of Strokes Gained Putting

When I ask people about their games, inevitably most tell me that they are good putters. I like this answer, because to putt as well as you can, you must have confidence. But do these players really know what good putting is?
A statistic that has taken the PGA Tour by storm the past few years is called “strokes gained putting,” developed by Columbia University professor Mark Broadie. It is the best measure to gauge overall putting prowess that we have, far better than total putts, percentage-made statistics or total distance of holed putts. In this article, I hope to take the mystery out of the statistic and show you how you can use it to measure your own putting ability.
Strokes gained putting is the measure of how well someone putts compared to the field average, taking into account the length of the first putt. You then compare the number of actual putts taken to the average number of putts the field would take from those given distances. If the golfer putts better than the field, he would said to be “plus” strokes gained putting, and if he putts worse, he would be “minus.”
As an example from the 2013-14 PGA Tour season, the median percentage for putts made from four feet was 92 percent (Chesson Hadley, 89th out of 177). You could then say the expected stroke average, rounded to the nearest tenth, for a PGA Tour player from four feet would be 1.1. From eight feet, the median percentage of made putts was 52 percent, so the expected stroke average here would be approximately 1.5. If a Tour player’s first putt on the first hole was four feet and first putt on the second hole was eight feet, his expected stroke average for these two holes would be 2.6. If he took two putts, he gained .6 strokes on the field and if he took three, he lost .4 strokes.
To figure your own strokes gained putting prowess, measure the length of your first putt on every hole to the nearest foot, and record the expected number of strokes from there on your scorecard. Not being the tallest guy myself, I can measure relatively accurately using short steps of about two feet each. If you’re playing with others, and walking off your putts might be a problem, do your best to visually estimate the distance of your first putt, although being as precise as you can is ideal. Do not use putts from the fringe — only use first putts from on the green itself. The chart to use is as follows, based on the 2013-14 PGA Tour season:
*This number is more difficult to precisely figure, as putts in this length category can vary wildly, but is a good estimate from 26 feet and longer.
At the end of the round, compare the number of actual putts taken to the expected number of strokes. This will give you your strokes gained putting number for the round. If you are minus (taking more putts than the expected average), don’t be too hard on yourself; after all, you are comparing yourself to a PGA Tour pro!
To compare yourself to those of your own skill level, a good estimate can be determined by adding six to your handicap index and multiplying that figure by 0.2. Take the result and add it to the expected number of strokes total for the round. For example, if your index is 14.0, adding six gives us 20.0. Multiply 20 by 0.2 and the result is four. In other words, a typical PGA Tour player (with a handicap index of +6.0) will putt about four strokes better, on average, than a 14-index golfer. This will be a much more realistic estimate of how well you putt for your skill level.
You can also use this method to determine from what lengths your putting might be strong or weak by figuring individually how well you putt from various distances, using several rounds. Don’t get too picky with this. Say you average 1.3 strokes from six feet, 1.9 strokes from seven feet and 1.5 strokes from eight feet. You’re still a very good putter in the 6-8 foot range.
Golf statistics have made tremendous leaps in the past 10 years, and even non-Tour players who don’t have ShotLink can use some of them. Strokes gained putting gives you a quantifiable way to truly determine how well you putt.
Instruction
The Wedge Guy: Beating the yips into submission

There may be no more painful affliction in golf than the “yips” – those uncontrollable and maddening little nervous twitches that prevent you from making a decent stroke on short putts. If you’ve never had them, consider yourself very fortunate (or possibly just very young). But I can assure you that when your most treacherous and feared golf shot is not the 195 yard approach over water with a quartering headwind…not the extra tight fairway with water left and sand right…not the soft bunker shot to a downhill pin with water on the other side…No, when your most feared shot is the remaining 2- 4-foot putt after hitting a great approach, recovery or lag putt, it makes the game almost painful.
And I’ve been fighting the yips (again) for a while now. It’s a recurring nightmare that has haunted me most of my adult life. I even had the yips when I was in my 20s, but I’ve beat them into submission off and on most of my adult life. But just recently, that nasty virus came to life once again. My lag putting has been very good, but when I get over one of those “you should make this” length putts, the entire nervous system seems to go haywire. I make great practice strokes, and then the most pitiful short-stroke or jab at the ball you can imagine. Sheesh.
But I’m a traditionalist, and do not look toward the long putter, belly putter, cross-hand, claw or other variation as the solution. My approach is to beat those damn yips into submission some other way. Here’s what I’m doing that is working pretty well, and I offer it to all of you who might have a similar affliction on the greens.
When you are over a short putt, forget the practice strokes…you want your natural eye-hand coordination to be unhindered by mechanics. Address your putt and take a good look at the hole, and back to the putter to ensure good alignment. Lighten your right hand grip on the putter and make sure that only the fingertips are in contact with the grip, to prevent you from getting to tight.
Then, take a long, long look at the hole to fill your entire mind and senses with the target. When you bring your head/eyes back to the ball, try to make a smooth, immediate move right into your backstroke — not even a second pause — and then let your hands and putter track right back together right back to where you were looking — the HOLE! Seeing the putter make contact with the ball, preferably even the forward edge of the ball – the side near the hole.
For me, this is working, but I am asking all of you to chime in with your own “home remedies” for the most aggravating and senseless of all golf maladies. It never hurts to have more to fall back on!
Instruction
Looking for a good golf instructor? Use this checklist

Over the last couple of decades, golf has become much more science-based. We measure swing speed, smash factor, angle of attack, strokes gained, and many other metrics that can really help golfers improve. But I often wonder if the advancement of golf’s “hard” sciences comes at the expense of the “soft” sciences.
Take, for example, golf instruction. Good golf instruction requires understanding swing mechanics and ball flight. But let’s take that as a given for PGA instructors. The other factors that make an instructor effective can be evaluated by social science, rather than launch monitors.
If you are a recreational golfer looking for a golf instructor, here are my top three points to consider.
1. Cultural mindset
What is “cultural mindset? To social scientists, it means whether a culture of genius or a culture of learning exists. In a golf instruction context, that may mean whether the teacher communicates a message that golf ability is something innate (you either have it or you don’t), or whether golf ability is something that can be learned. You want the latter!
It may sound obvious to suggest that you find a golf instructor who thinks you can improve, but my research suggests that it isn’t a given. In a large sample study of golf instructors, I found that when it came to recreational golfers, there was a wide range of belief systems. Some instructors strongly believed recreational golfers could improve through lessons. while others strongly believed they could not. And those beliefs manifested in the instructor’s feedback given to a student and the culture created for players.
2. Coping and self-modeling can beat role-modeling
Swing analysis technology is often preloaded with swings of PGA and LPGA Tour players. The swings of elite players are intended to be used for comparative purposes with golfers taking lessons. What social science tells us is that for novice and non-expert golfers, comparing swings to tour professionals can have the opposite effect of that intended. If you fit into the novice or non-expert category of golfer, you will learn more and be more motivated to change if you see yourself making a ‘better’ swing (self-modeling) or seeing your swing compared to a similar other (a coping model). Stay away from instructors who want to compare your swing with that of a tour player.
3. Learning theory basics
It is not a sexy selling point, but learning is a process, and that process is incremental – particularly for recreational adult players. Social science helps us understand this element of golf instruction. A good instructor will take learning slowly. He or she will give you just about enough information that challenges you, but is still manageable. The artful instructor will take time to decide what that one or two learning points are before jumping in to make full-scale swing changes. If the instructor moves too fast, you will probably leave the lesson with an arm’s length of swing thoughts and not really know which to focus on.
As an instructor, I develop a priority list of changes I want to make in a player’s technique. We then patiently and gradually work through that list. Beware of instructors who give you more than you can chew.
So if you are in the market for golf instruction, I encourage you to look beyond the X’s and O’s to find the right match!
Instruction
What Lottie Woad’s stunning debut win teaches every golfer

Most pros take months, even years, to win their first tournament. Lottie Woad needed exactly four days.
The 21-year-old from Surrey shot 21-under 267 at Dundonald Links to win the ISPS Handa Women’s Scottish Open by three shots — in her very first event as a professional. She’s only the third player in LPGA history to accomplish this feat, joining Rose Zhang (2023) and Beverly Hanson (1951).
But here’s what caught my attention as a coach: Woad didn’t win through miraculous putting or bombing 300-yard drives. She won through relentless precision and unshakeable composure. After watching her performance unfold, I’m convinced every golfer — from weekend warriors to scratch players — can steal pages from her playbook.
Precision Beats Power (And It’s Not Even Close)
Forget the driving contests. Woad proved that finding greens matters more than finding distance.
What Woad did:
• Hit it straight, hit it solid, give yourself chances
• Aimed for the fat parts of greens instead of chasing pins
• Let her putting do the talking after hitting safe targets
• As she said, “Everyone was chasing me today, and managed to maintain the lead and played really nicely down the stretch and hit a lot of good shots”
Why most golfers mess this up:
• They see a pin tucked behind a bunker and grab one more club to “go right at it”
• Distance becomes more important than accuracy
• They try to be heroic instead of smart
ACTION ITEM: For your next 10 rounds, aim for the center of every green regardless of pin position. Track your greens in regulation and watch your scores drop before your swing changes.
The Putter That Stayed Cool Under Fire
Woad started the final round two shots clear and immediately applied pressure with birdies at the 2nd and 3rd holes. When South Korea’s Hyo Joo Kim mounted a charge and reached 20-under with a birdie at the 14th, Woad didn’t panic.
How she responded to pressure:
• Fired back with consecutive birdies at the 13th and 14th
• Watched Kim stumble with back-to-back bogeys
• Capped it with her fifth birdie of the day at the par-5 18th
• Stayed patient when others pressed, pressed when others cracked
What amateurs do wrong:
• Get conservative when they should be aggressive
• Try to force magic when steady play would win
• Panic when someone else makes a move
ACTION ITEM: Practice your 3-6 foot putts for 15 minutes after every range session. Woad’s putting wasn’t spectacular—it was reliable. Make the putts you should make.
Course Management 101: Play Your Game, Not the Course’s Game
Woad admitted she couldn’t see many scoreboards during the final round, but it didn’t matter. She stuck to her game plan regardless of what others were doing.
Her mental approach:
• Focused on her process, not the competition
• Drew on past pressure situations (Augusta National Women’s Amateur win)
• As she said, “That was the biggest tournament I played in at the time and was kind of my big win. So definitely felt the pressure of it more there, and I felt like all those experiences helped me with this”
Her physical execution:
• 270-yard drives (nothing flashy)
• Methodical iron play
• Steady putting
• Everything effective, nothing spectacular
ACTION ITEM: Create a yardage book for your home course. Know your distances to every pin, every hazard, every landing area. Stick to your plan no matter what your playing partners are doing.
Mental Toughness Isn’t Born, It’s Built
The most impressive part of Woad’s win? She genuinely didn’t expect it: “I definitely wasn’t expecting to win my first event as a pro, but I knew I was playing well, and I was hoping to contend.”
Her winning mindset:
• Didn’t put winning pressure on herself
• Focused on playing well and contending
• Made winning a byproduct of a good process
• Built confidence through recent experiences:
- Won the Women’s Irish Open as an amateur
- Missed a playoff by one shot at the Evian Championship
- Each experience prepared her for the next
What this means for you:
• Stop trying to shoot career rounds every time you tee up
• Focus on executing your pre-shot routine
• Commit to every shot
• Stay present in the moment
ACTION ITEM: Before each round, set process goals instead of score goals. Example: “I will take three practice swings before every shot” or “I will pick a specific target for every shot.” Let your score be the result, not the focus.
The Real Lesson
Woad collected $300,000 for her first professional victory, but the real prize was proving that fundamentals still work at golf’s highest level. She didn’t reinvent the game — she simply executed the basics better than everyone else that week.
The fundamentals that won:
• Hit more fairways
• Find more greens
• Make the putts you should make
• Stay patient under pressure
That’s something every golfer can do, regardless of handicap. Lottie Woad just showed us it’s still the winning formula.
FINAL ACTION ITEM: Pick one of the four action items above and commit to it for the next month. Master one fundamental before moving to the next. That’s how champions are built.
PGA Professional Brendon Elliott is an award-winning coach and golf writer. You can check out his writing work and learn more about him by visiting BEAGOLFER.golf and OneMoreRollGolf.com. Also, check out “The Starter” on RG.org each Monday.
Editor’s note: Brendon shares his nearly 30 years of experience in the game with GolfWRX readers through his ongoing tip series. He looks forward to providing valuable insights and advice to help golfers improve their game. Stay tuned for more Tips!
Pingback: What exactly is ‘Strokes Gained Putting’? | Instruction | Compleat Golfer
Rob
Apr 21, 2015 at 8:46 am
You guys obviously don’t play at Royal Melbourne then….a 6 footer there is often a 2.0
Tom D.
Apr 21, 2015 at 1:19 am
Good article. I use a similar system, but with a much simpler chart. 0-6ft is a 1-putt. Over 6ft is a 2-putt. If I sink a 7-footer in 1 putt, that’s 1 stroke gained. If it takes me 2 putts to sink a 6-footer, that’s 1 stroke lost. You get the idea. Far more meaningful than a total putt count. Accounts for those holes where I chip it close and then sink a 2-footer. That would look like a 1-putt normally. With strokes gained/lost, it’s a 0 – nothing gained, nothing lost.
Earl
Apr 20, 2015 at 8:42 pm
Nice article and please don’t post this in the instructional forum. So much false info on there. It isn’t even funny anymore
MJ
Apr 20, 2015 at 7:04 pm
Does it factor in degree of difficulty of short putts and if your going to miss the cut by 8 shots. I think rather then charting the whole field it should be top 10 20 30 etc
Anyone who makes a pga tour field has great talent but when the difference from 1st money to last money is 25 strokes it seems like a stat like that has many human elements that can’t be charted
John
Apr 20, 2015 at 2:28 pm
Great article. I hadn’t seen such a simple explanation of Strokes Gained putting before.
Brutus
Apr 20, 2015 at 1:30 pm
Good explanation of the strokes gained. I knew it had something to do with comparing one against the field, but the details were fuzzy until now. I don’t know about the add 6 to one’s index and multiply by 0.2 does for me. So a pro putts in your example 4 strokes better than a 14. So? it would be nice if a league records that, but play is slow enough that having them pace off their putts! Bottom line is one’s score still, not putts gained or lost.
other paul
Apr 19, 2015 at 1:51 pm
I would green read like that guy if everyone else did it to. And I would putt like Michelle wie because it works, if I didn’t get so many butt jokes.
Andy
Apr 18, 2015 at 3:29 pm
Yeah, like that clears is up? And who on earth greenreads like that besides CV.