Opinion & Analysis
The equipment changes this Tour player made to improve
I spend most of my days working with club players who are trying to reach their potential, and most often they feel the answer is a better-looking swing. I thought it would make an interesting read for people to learn about what touring professionals do to find the 1 percent of improvement that can make such a big difference to their lives.
I have been working with Ben Silverman, a PGA Tour Canada player, for nearly two years now. Ben originally came to me looking to find some extra yardage, so we broke out all the usual testing protocols, including strength and power screens, as well as 3D motion capture. We were able to identify a couple opportunities for him to mix up his physical conditioning program to help him build some more speed, but this wasn’t the answer for him to have a better season in 2015. The first few months of our relationship were spent getting the technical thoughts out of Ben’s head so he could play freely. Once we had achieved a mental state where both practice and play were fun again, we started to identify opportunities for improvement.
The first thing we started looking at was Ben’s ability to stop the ball with long irons under tour conditions. His landing angles were coming in shallow, and we also found a yardage gap in a key scoring area. The first things to go were the shafts; Ben had been playing stiff flex Aerotech i95’s at the recommendation of another fitter. I feel it’s important to note that these were not tested for performance on a launch monitor. The Aerotech’s ended up in Ben’s bag due to a couple common assumptions that I’ve seen from both tour pros and amateurs alike:
- Lighter is not always faster.
- Graphite does not always fly higher.
Some players do experience a slight increase in club head speed, but this is not always the case, and there are several other factors to consider. Shaft manufacturers give us basic shaft information such as weight, flex, kick point and torque, but what they can’t tell us is how the golfer will respond to the shaft. Through controlled testing, we were able to increase launch angle and steepen landing angle by going to a shaft that was actually heavier and stiffer. True Temper’s Dynamic Gold Tour Issue S400 shafts performed the best in Ben’s irons, and they weigh a whopping 130 grams. That is an increase in static weight of nearly 40 percent.
Why did it work?
The increased overall weight caused Ben to release the club better, resulting in a significant increase in dynamic loft. By only changing the shaft, the ball was flying 11 feet higher, 6 yards farther and landing a full degree steeper with Ben’s irons. These went into play right away and he nearly got a win with the new shafts at the Mackenzie (Canadian) Tour stop in Fort McMurray, Alberta.
Now that the shaft issue had been dealt with, it was time to get the gapping sorted out. A gapping analysis is a process whereby we measure the carry distance of every club in the bag. This is a critical step if you truly want to optimize equipment performance, but it is one that nearly all amateurs and most professionals have never done properly. In order to get this done, I hopped on a plane from Toronto and headed out to meet Ben in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, at a PGA Tour Canada event.
To do a proper gapping analysis is a very arduous process. We did outdoor Trackman testing with each individual iron and Ben’s tournament golf ball to make sure that they hit the carry numbers that we charted out in the hotel room the night before.
In order to maximize accuracy, we found a spot on course at The Willows Country Club in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, where we had level ground and no wind. The Normalize feature from Trackman is fantastic, but when working with a Tour Pro, I don’t want to leave anything to chance. We had our list of desired carry distances, but that did not mean we could create that with optimized landing angles. We went through the whole bag club by club until we had things exactly the way we wanted.
On our first run through the bag, we measured every single club to get a good baseline of where performance was. We could have checked the lies and lofts first, but I think that would have been a waste of time. After all, it is not the loft that matters; it’s the carry yardage. I think it is a good idea for most players to work backward here, determine the number you need for each club in the bag, and then find a club fitter that can optimize equipment to perform to your needs. Head Professional Brennen Gee was kind enough to give free reign in his club repair room so we headed back get to work where we immediately found that we had to work on both the lofts AND the swing weights.
While swing weight is important for consistency in the balance of the club throughout the set, it also has a small affect on launch angle. Several of the clubs in Ben’s set were lighter than his preferred D2 swing weight. I started weighing and carving the lead tape on the head, and then we had Ben double check everything on the swing weight scale. We adjusted the necessary lofts and headed back out to test.
We had to repeat this process, adjust and retest three times to get the 6 and 7 irons perfectly tuned. Every player has challenging spots in their golf bag to get just right. I call this the “compression gap.” It’s a function of club speed and loft, but all you really need to know is if you have a lower club speed it will occur in a short iron, and if you have a high club speed it will shift toward the longer clubs.
With everything taken care of, the upgraded hardware was in the bag ready to go. And Ben found himself one shot away from a win at the PGA Tour Canada event in Saskatoon.
I would strongly recommend that serious golfers, regardless of skill level, go through the same process Ben and me did if they have access to a launch monitor, a lie/loft machine and a swing weight scale. Something as simple as optimizing your carry distance and landing angle can have a significant improvement on performance for players of all levels.
You can follow Ben on Twitter @benw_silverman or his website www.bensilvermangolf.com as he enters the final stage of Web.com Q-school in early December.
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship







Panther
Sep 7, 2016 at 12:34 am
The merchandiser in town has a loft/lie leverage clamp. I would be there twice a year because I could see my gaps change on course, they thought I was crazy. But I bought a couple dozen balls each time as partial reparations. The pro at my favorite course had 56 & 57* wedges, but a tweek here, a shaft change there and his gaps were squared away. Good article, it shows what working with a experienced fitter can help your game right away.
RJ
Dec 7, 2015 at 1:29 pm
Great article. Probably a process that better players will benefit more from. However, all players could definitely use a gap check and loft/lie adjustment!
Dan Corun
Dec 3, 2015 at 12:05 pm
To begin with I have been fitted for the clubs I currently play. It just comes down to what feels right and plays best for you. I feel that I swing faster with all my clubs and still have feel with graphite shafts. Mainly 55-65 gr. With steel shafts I do hit them solid but, I lose club head speed and I was wondering what his normal swing speed is or did I miss it in the article. Mine is 85-90 with the driver. I’m 63 and I do drills to increase my swing speed and keep flexible and in shape so, it isn’t that I can’t handle heavier shafts but that I prefer graphite shafts and the performance I get from them. The 73 yr old gentleman seems to like the heavier steel shafts so, it would seem age isn’t always a factor. I enjoy these golf discussions and always enjoy reading about other golfers thoughts and the equipment they play.
redneckrooster
Dec 1, 2015 at 2:11 pm
For o’l man what’s the cost of a fitting?
Not all have access to such fittings , any in Tennessee /Mississippi?
Liam Mucklow
Dec 1, 2015 at 5:47 pm
You guys would need to find someone that has Trackman, Lie/Loft Machine, golf course access, real golf balls, and the willingness and logic to perform the process. I can’t imagine anyone throwing this service in for free if you purchase irons as the margin on golf clubs is so small to begin with.
Collin
Nov 30, 2015 at 4:20 am
Where could someone get this done at.
Rich
Nov 29, 2015 at 5:03 pm
Shaft change and gapping? BORING! When you said equipment changes, I thought you were going to tell us that he got a whole new bag of clubs and was transformed into world no.1! I was so excited, but now I’m left with this empty feeling inside 🙁
MRC
Nov 29, 2015 at 10:27 am
Enjoyed tha article. I made the switch to Aerotech shafts and my ball flight is higher and I’m carrying the ball further. Swing speed is low to mid 90’s. Made possible thru professional fitter using trackman & outdoor driving range. Shafts were also pured.
KK
Nov 28, 2015 at 10:56 pm
I am surprised that the pro was not fitted via Trackman prior to 2013.
Liam Mucklow
Nov 28, 2015 at 2:48 pm
His putting stats are through the roof 🙂
Bill
Nov 28, 2015 at 12:41 pm
What about his pants, surely some improvement could be made there
TCJ
Nov 29, 2015 at 2:38 pm
Agreed!
Bob
Dec 2, 2015 at 12:00 pm
Yes Ben need’s a fashion fix to match his club fix. While we are fixing things the correct grammar would be “Ben and I” not “Ben and me did if they have access to a launch monitor”.
Great advise though.
Anthony
Nov 28, 2015 at 12:20 pm
Great read. Just curious, did you consider changing heads as well to possibly change launch angles? Say a CB in the long irons or has your experience shown the launch doesn’t change much assuming same lofts?
Also, what about his swing allowed him to hit it higher with a stiffer tipped shaft? I’m asking because I’m experimenting with XP115 to possibly increase launch.
Liam Mucklow
Nov 28, 2015 at 2:49 pm
Anthony,
This will be the subject of my next article.
MLECUNI
Nov 30, 2015 at 7:40 am
Hi, great article !
Really hope that you post the next one before x-mas !
Thanks
Sleng
Nov 28, 2015 at 3:40 am
Now that’s pants
I'm Ron Burgundy??
Nov 28, 2015 at 12:02 am
I enjoyed the read and love technology and tinkering.
Now about the irons.. Are those considered obsolete since Taylormade has come out with 15 sets since he got those?
Ob
Nov 28, 2015 at 10:44 am
You’re obsolete cos you’re only able to make the same stupid comments all the time
SAndrew
Nov 27, 2015 at 10:55 pm
Did the change in shafts for the longer iron (presumably 3, 4 & 5) resulted in the overall change in shafts for the shorter iron too? Or is it common for tour pros to use an odd shaft for a particular number of clubs only? If yes to the latter, does that matter?
Liam Mucklow
Nov 28, 2015 at 1:32 am
We changed the shafts in the entire set. The performance change was linear across all clubs.
Double Mocha Man
Nov 27, 2015 at 4:33 pm
Yep, Silverman needs to make an equipment adjustment with the pants. If I wore those I’d be distracted on every shot hearing chuckles from players within 300 yards of me.
Liam Mucklow
Nov 27, 2015 at 3:52 pm
There are a couple specialized testing techniques that I use for driver optimization. It takes to long to get into here, but could be a great subject for a follow up article.
BIG STU
Nov 27, 2015 at 8:15 pm
Finally someone who thinks and does like I have been doing for years. I ‘tune all of my clubs like that exactly. It does take a lot of time and effort when you do everything yourself.
N
Nov 27, 2015 at 3:44 pm
It’s the pants
Christian Sarran
Nov 27, 2015 at 1:50 pm
Any adjustments to the driver or fairway wood for more yards?
jjoro
Nov 27, 2015 at 12:52 pm
In my Experience I agree with the article. As a young man I played heavy, 130 gr. x tipped an inch in my irons and the same in Woods. I was really long with all and Graphite was not around then. I played a few PGA events and had a + hcp. for years. As I got older I fell into the light weight stuff thinking it would be better. As a club maker for a Major mfgr. I had access to all the latest stuff and fell into the lighter is better theory.
As I tried the newer light clubs I saw no significant gains and a real downturn in accuracy. At 75 I figured it was just age etc. Last year I was given a set of clubs from my old employer with 95 gr. steel shafts, they are wonderful. I hit the ball more solid, higher, and longer with the heavier clubs. Granted 95 gr. is not that heavy, but heavier than the 65 gr Graphites I have been playing, I love em. I also went to heavier Graphite Wood shafts and find it to be more manageable.
I really think that the lite clubs do little if anything to help. I have just had Open Heart Surgery and can hardly wait to get back at it and even to try heavier shafts. I have found that impact is more solid and consistent, height and distance is better, and accuracy is greatly improved, and I have found something I have lost with lite, and that is feel.
Bob Pegram
Dec 16, 2015 at 4:47 pm
jjoro –
I experienced the same thing. I went to 85 gram graphite x-flex shafts because I could hit a 4 iron in the shop farther than with the S400 is was using (with Flightscope). However, the 85 gram shafts were too light. I lost distance. As I have aged and become less flexible I made clubs that are 1-1/2 inches over length, still with graphite X flex shafts. Those got my distance back and allow me to stand more upright which is easier on my back. I lengthened the woods too for the same reason and got that distance back as well. The longer wood shafts are about 80 grams each.
In addition, with the longer shafts I don’t have to practice as much to keep my swing in shape.
Mat
Nov 27, 2015 at 12:42 pm
Iron gaps, ball flight, and landing angle. For every person that comes into this site and says they want more distance out of their irons, no. You don’t. THIS is how it’s done. Maybe you don’t have a trackman, but you can get your GameGolf to tell you your approximate gaps. This information is GOLDEN. Golf is a target game.
Now about those pants…
Don
Nov 27, 2015 at 10:25 am
This was a good read. Every little crevice is explored for the sake of that one percent!