Opinion & Analysis
Why chasing quick fixes keeps you from getting better (and what to do about it)
I’m sure you’ve done this yourself or had a buddy do it. You head to the range on the weekend determined to fix your swing during a range session with an extra large bucket of balls. And it starts out pretty rough.
The ball flight is inconsistent. Your typical miss won’t go away. Then about halfway through the session you “find it.” Most of the shots you’re hitting are perfect, and contact is solid. Actually, PGA Master Professional Dennis Clark just wrote about this phenomenon for GolfWRX, and his explanation of it was perfect.
“If golfers hit enough balls, they can start to time their compensations perfectly.”
You compensate well on the range, but when the next match or game with your buddies rolls around it’s gone. The only consistencies are poor shots and double bogeys.
There’s a good reason this keeps happening. The research shows that this kind of repetitive practice (same shot, same club, same lie) will lead to better short-term performance, but it doesn’t mean what you’ve learned will transfer to the golf course in a day or two.
Embracing the quick fix doesn’t help you get better and build skills that consistently transfer to the golf course. In fact, practice that leads to rapid improvement in performance doesn’t support retained long-term learning. We explored this topic with researcher Dr Robert Bjork and coach Adam Young here.
But it’s not your fault. The golf industry has ingrained the concept of the quick fix. A new driver that’s promising 10 yards more distance? It’s the same game as the YouTube video that promises to fix your slice in 5 minutes.
Think of it this way. If you wanted to learn Spanish, you wouldn’t expect to practice once a week, see a tutor twice a month, and attempt to have a conversation in Spanish on Saturday morning and be fluent in a year. It takes consistent coaching and an environment that facilitates growth. In fact, practice that leads to rapid improvement in performance doesn’t support retained long-term learning.
The Alternative
The concept of long-term group coaching has been catching on in golf. Instead of seeing an instructor in a 1-on-1 setting for 30-60 minutes once or twice a month, why not make a plan and commit to 3-6 months or even 12 months of coaching? Doing that, you and your coach can build a game plan and get the proper practice and coaching you need. There’s even the possibility of getting out on the golf course and getting some course strategy lessons.
This type of coaching is highly effective, and yet more affordable than the traditional model of 1-on-1 instruction. Instead of just standing there hitting balls and getting some info every once in awhile, you’ll be working on all aspects of your game that you might not otherwise.

Will Robins
Will Robins is a coach in Sacramento who has embraced long-term group coaching (groups of 6 getting together once a week for 90 minutes over 12 weeks) because of the difference in results he’s seen in students.
I asked him about the difference when he switched from 1-on-1 instruction to group coaching, and his response is below.
Robins: Prior to the coaching model, people came to me with their problems and wanted quick fixes. I wasn’t happy with the model and they weren’t getting better as quickly as they should. So I sat down with a group of 16 guys and explained that I had enough of that model and told them they needed to learn how to play the game and score better instead of always trying to figure out how to hit their driver. So we set up a plan and they came out to practice and play with me.

I helped them with all aspects of their games and got them the skills and information they needed to actually shoot lower scores. For one, it freed me up so I became a coach and no longer the teacher who was the source of knowledge. I could work with the players on what I knew they needed to work on… because I was their coach.
Another hidden aspect of working with a group of students is the competitiveness of the team and getting used to the pressure of people watching. The big thing with long-term coaching is you put your game on the line and it forces the coach to step up and really get the results. The coach has to be committed.
The Results
According to Robins, the 16 golfers dropped an average of 11 shots on their average round over the first 12 weeks of group coaching.
Since that time, he has coached thousands of students in the group-coaching model, and has seen its power. In fact, he’s worked with dozens of coaches to help their use the same model in their coaching (if you’re a coach find out more about this here). It’s a true win-win situation, he says, as group coaching is not only more fun for the student (and the coach), but more affordable than the traditional 1-on-1 model.
Who’s tried long-term group coaching before? Let me know in the comments section.
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship

Jason Helman
Apr 5, 2016 at 6:52 pm
I have been saying this for years. The word lesson and quick have been removed from all marketing. I’m experimenting with a 21 day fix this year but for all intense in purposes I’m not really a big fan of “fix” merely spinning it off the show much like I did with a Biggest Loser contest which was very successful a couple of years ago.
I’m going to have to disagree. It’s more important that the student be committed and held to some accountability in the long term coaching programs. The coach has already committed into the program by planning the process or pathway to success. If there is a fail, it comes when the student does not measure up and stay on task. The coach can only motivate so far.
Group coaching can work. Never had any success with it from the male perspective and it’s very dependent on your club members and personalities.
Big Slice
Apr 4, 2016 at 5:01 pm
As with other commenters, I would also like more information on where to find these coaches and sessions. Sounds like it could be a good option. My whole issue with private lessons is about finding the right instructor. You could waste a lot of money trying to find the right instructor, the one who works well for your game. I wish there was a better repository of reviews for instructors to make a better decision. There aren’t many out there, leaving you to go by either word of mouth, or trial and error (which could be expensive).
Cordie Walker
Apr 6, 2016 at 9:23 am
Definitely feel the pain! Where are you located?
Might be able to refer you to someone who runs a group coaching program like this.
Big Slice
Apr 6, 2016 at 12:50 pm
That would be great. I’m in the suburbs around Philadelphia. Thanks!
Cornfused...
Apr 4, 2016 at 3:15 pm
This article was like a teaser for an actual article on group coaching. I don’t have anywhere near enough information to know what it is or why it would be better.
Cordie Walker
Apr 6, 2016 at 9:24 am
Maybe this warrants a follow up article! What info would you like to see covered?
Hawk
Apr 4, 2016 at 2:44 pm
Ok I’m confused. You say: “In fact, practice that leads to rapid improvement in performance doesn’t support retained long-term learning.”
And follow it up with: “According to Robins, the 16 golfers dropped an average of 11 shots on their average round over the first 12 weeks of group coaching.”
To me that is counter intuitive to your point. How can I expect 16 golfers who dropped an average of 11 shots be able to retain that long-term based on what you said earlier? Am I missing something?
For me personally, I never see improvement at the range, I don’t see how anyone does. I always see the improvement after the fact on the course. Maybe I’m practicing differently? When I hit the range I use the same theory: one club, one lie, one target. I repetitively try to hit my target. However; my goal isn’t in ball flight. When I practice I practice one distinct flaw in my swing and I only practice that correct form for that one flaw. Then as if it were ingrained, it changes almost permanently, and the new form carries over to the course. Maybe that is the difference, I don’t practice hitting balls, I practice a more perfect swing.
Cordie Walker
Apr 6, 2016 at 9:26 am
Over the 12 weeks they did on course assessments, on course playing lessons, and focused on the entire game not just swing.
I would say most golfers expect to improve after a swing lesson or two. Getting together once a week for 12 weeks and really practicing in a great learning environment (not just hitting balls on the range) can see some serious improvements and retained skills.
Having a “coach” also means you have someone telling you what to work on. They set up the training session depending on what they see in your game when they watch you play on the golf course.
Shaun
Apr 4, 2016 at 1:04 pm
Mike, I am only guessing here but I assume the benefit would come from the repetition. Meaning not everyone can afford to see a $60+ coach twice a week for the time it would take to improve. it sounds like you either pay less or pay more but get more time with a coach in terms of frequency. That is the hardest part, imho, getting far away from your last lesson without seeing a coach.
Howard
Apr 4, 2016 at 11:36 am
Ditto the first comment. I’m intrigued but have no idea how it works. How about a description of the process when you’ve got 16 people all working on different aspects of the game? Where’s the “coach” if all 16 are on the course at the same time? Are the students seen together or in smaller groups on different days? How are the students charged?
Mike
Apr 3, 2016 at 9:27 pm
Well this is a nice article. So it exposes the
Benefits of group coaching…..hmmm. So it is better than 1 on 1? How can that be? If I can’t learn by direct teaching, I will learn more efficiently by group teaching? Call me a non- believer, skeptic, whatever. Really trying to understandn it, but a non-starter for me.