Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

PGA Tour Equipment Changes: A behind-the-scenes account

Published

on

This past week I was back out on the PGA Tour working with a couple players to optimize their equipment performance. As GolfWRX readers know, Tour players are very particular with their equipment, and they want to squeeze every last bit of performance out of their clubs. I wanted to share my experience from last week with GolfWRXers, as I know these kinds of first-person accounts are of great interest to the community.

At the tournament, I was working with a player who I had not seen in a couple months. I have to apologize that I cannot name him. I have to maintain a certain level of client confidentiality about my players, but I can tell you he is a five-time winner.

The first thing I wanted to do, after a careful study of his statistics, was compare the distances he was hitting his short irons. His statistics showed me a weakness from 140-160 yards, so I thought we should first see if it was an equipment-related problem.

There is a major opportunity to improve performance from 140-160

There is a major opportunity to improve performance from 140-160 yards.

I validated his on-course data by testing the carry distances with Trackman, and there was definitely a small gap between his 9 iron and 8 iron. I headed off to the Rockstar Energy truck to see my friend Scott E G (that’s me and him together on the cover image). After going through the lofts, sure enough the 9 iron had slid back 1 degree weaker than where we wanted it.

On board the Rockstar Energy truck

On board the Rockstar Energy truck.

The next order of business was to address the player’s hybrid. Prior to the season, we did significant testing to optimize the static weight of the driver shaft. Back in October, we increased club head speed by 5 mph by switching him from a 53-gram shaft to a 78-gram shaft. I know that sounds weird, but bear with me. My next article is going to be exclusively on shaft weight, and I will do a deep dive on this topic in the coming weeks.

We also nailed the standard 10-gram weight progression in his 3 and 5 woods. Last year, this player’s hybrid was his favorite, and the heaviest club in his bag. This year it was still good, but the 90-gram shaft was 5 grams lighter than his 5-wood shaft, and more than 30-grams lighter than his iron shafts.

On the range with Foresight and Trackman

On the range with Foresight and Trackman.

Whenever I am doing testing of drivers, fairway woods, or hybrids, I will use both my Foresight GC2 with HMT and Trackman launch monitors. The HMT unit actually measures impact point, which in my opinion is the most overlooked performance characteristic. In this particular case, impact was dead center with his current gamer.

Thats about as centred as it gets.

This is about as centered as contact can get.

The current hybrid setup was creating the launch angle we wanted, but the spin rate was so low that the ball was landing too hot to be an effective approach club. The launch and spin number were ones that most club players would probably like, but the resultant shallow landing angle was not going to be easy to control on PGA Tour greens. We got our hands on a couple shafts from Fujikura and Aerotech that were both in the range of 105-110 grams, and the boys over on the Titleist truck had the shafts built up and ready to go in a matter of minutes.

Every last detail, from grip type to tape job to swing weight, is nailed by the tour techs on the van, and it was no different on that day. I can tell you from experience that there is nowhere else in the world where golf clubs have to be built so quickly with such a high level of precision. Shout out to the boys on the TaylorMade truck who were helping with the gear for a couple other players, too.

With the heavier shaft in place, the player instantly started to release the club more naturally and we got the desired increase in spin rate and landing angle we were looking for. It is not uncommon for players to either drag the handle through impact or throw away the lag early in the downswing when the static weight gets too light. Most importantly, center impact was never off now that the player had a more suitable shaft.

the increased shaft weight averaged significantly more spin and steepened the landing angle

Increasing shaft weight added significantly more spin and steepened the landing angle.

What’s the takeaway for the readers out there?

The simple one is that every last component matters: static weight, loft, lie angle, etc. Having perfectly fitted clubs is a recipe, not a menu. You simply can’t pick and choose what elements you want; it’s about how they blend together to create optimum ball flight.

Don’t ever forget, however, that center impact overrides all other priorities. It doesn’t matter how great your launch and spin numbers are if you’re not making center contact. So if you’re consistently making off-center contact, then contact a local club fitter and start to experiment with weight and flex until you find something that works for you.

M1 vs M3 Full Video https://vimeo.com/ondemand/m1vm3 Discount Code "golfwrx" Liam is Canada's Senior Aimpoint Instructor, the PGA of Canada's first Trackman Master, TPI Power Coach Instructor, K-Vest Advisory Board Member, Boditrak Advisory Board Member, and PGA of Canada Technical Advisory Panel Member. You can find out more about Liam by visiting his website, http://mucklowgolf.com/, and can find him in Toronto at King Valley Golf Club.

18 Comments

18 Comments

  1. graymulligan

    Mar 27, 2016 at 6:35 pm

    Great write-up. You’ve captured what a few of the technical writers here can’t seem to do, the ability to translate the minutiae of what’s going on with the tech/specs into an article that doesn’t read like a wall of tedious text. Cool stuff, and interesting to read.

  2. Snowman9000

    Mar 26, 2016 at 9:23 am

    IMO too many recreational players are playing clubs that are too light for them. Even slow swinging players might do better with heavier shafts. From my own attempts to find shafts, I can say that there is a gap in the market for those 90 MPH players who need heavier graphite shafts in woods and irons. I would love to find a good graphite iron shaft that is 100 grams at cut length and is not a stout shaft. There was a time when a 100 gram shaft was super light! 🙂

  3. Lowell

    Mar 25, 2016 at 3:47 pm

    Great Article and makes me wish I had a chance to really dial in my equipment. One take away I got from the article is this and one that proves that lessons probably will payoff tenfold over new equipment any day. “Don’t ever forget, however, that center impact overrides all other priorities. It doesn’t matter how great your launch and spin numbers are if you’re not making center contact.” So true yet often never achieved consistently enough to worry about what clubs you play. I believe the more consistent a player gets with hitting the center of any of their clubs, the next obvious step in player progression is getting better equipment that suits them.

  4. kn

    Mar 25, 2016 at 2:59 pm

    I enjoyed reading this article, as it appeals to my wanna-be tech nerd/geek side. All these variables are what keep my attention in the game. Knowing that they exist should make the average golfer realize how important it is to get clubs professionally fit for them (if they are seeking consistent game improvement).

  5. Mike Desy

    Mar 25, 2016 at 1:49 pm

    My New address e-mail.

  6. TheFightingEdFioris

    Mar 24, 2016 at 11:45 pm

    Very interesting stuff.. i know it seems cynical and is not the point, but the player is definitely Ryan Moore. I am definitely looking forward to the Shaft Weight article.

  7. Andy

    Mar 24, 2016 at 4:28 pm

    I think the player is Ben Crane. He has 5 wins on tour, and I think he played a 53 gram shaft in his driver and 90 gram shaft in his hybrid last year. Plus, the photo shows a player wearing True Links shoes, and I believe that Ben wears those.

  8. Scotty P

    Mar 24, 2016 at 3:32 pm

    How does one become a trackman Master? Thanks!

  9. Leon

    Mar 24, 2016 at 2:55 pm

    Great article. Look forward to the incoming series.

  10. mlecuni

    Mar 24, 2016 at 2:47 pm

    Great article, please post the next one quickly
    : )

  11. Chuck

    Mar 24, 2016 at 12:22 pm

    Great article. Well written. Smart. Interesting.

    One question: If the player’s 9-iron had slid to an extra degree weak, wouldn’t that create a larger and not smaller gap between 8 and 9?

    Second question: Do you see irons that are used often in practice on the range generally slipping to weaker lofts, or stronger? I have a Mitchell machine of my own, and I very often see oft-used practice clubs slipping to weaker lofts, and I never understood it. You’d think that banging them with repeated practice would strengthen the lofts.

    Third question: Do you trust Trackman on a consistent basis to give you accurate carry distances? Because you and I both know just how exacting (to. the. yard. !) tour players are about carry distances with short irons. Do you ever have to resort to real-life observations with a target and a laser. (I sort of expect you’ll tell me that the players spend hours on that, on their own, without you.)

    Thanks much. Looking forward to a lot more of your writing!

    • Liam Mucklow

      Mar 24, 2016 at 1:20 pm

      Great questions.
      1. The gap did get larger, hence the poor performance from 140-160.
      2. I have seen irons move all over the place for different players. Sometime weak, sometimes strong. The same goes with flat and upright. I believe it has to do with the delivery pattern.
      3. I have done laser testing to make sure trackman’s carry distances are accurate. They are excellent, you just have to remember that it measures “Carry Flat”, so if it’s downhill it will chart Carry as where the ball is when it falls to the same elevation as the radar.

  12. Joshuaplaysgolf

    Mar 24, 2016 at 12:06 pm

    LOVE this article. As a true equipment nerd and tinkerer I can fully appreciate playing with weighting, flex, and lofts to get things just right.

  13. Double Mocha Man

    Mar 24, 2016 at 12:03 pm

    Looking forward to your shaft weight article. When is the tour van coming to my local muni? 🙂

    • Joshuaplaysgolf

      Mar 24, 2016 at 12:40 pm

      Lol. Right?? I thought the same thing…we’d probably wear those dudes out considering the difficulty in finding a quality fitter for us ams. Also super excited for the shaft weight article. I’ve got an Oban Kyoshi white 75 gm hanging on my wall that I’m considering reshafting to fit my M1, not sure I love the 65 gm AD-MT currently in it.

    • Liam Mucklow

      Mar 24, 2016 at 1:21 pm

      Just come up to Toronto! The Candian dollar is weak 🙂

  14. RAT

    Mar 24, 2016 at 9:54 am

    Interesting, I purchased a driver that is advertised as “The Right Light” and I felt that it was too light and caused me to hit the ball right side of the fairway. This article makes sense. Interested in more info.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers

Published

on

PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.

In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.

Check out the full Q&A below.

Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?

Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.

I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.

Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?

Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.

Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.

Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?

Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.

In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.

Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?

Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.

Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?

Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.

Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.

Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?

Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.

The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.

Continue Reading

Club Junkie

A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast

Published

on

In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.

We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.

To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50

Published

on

This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?

As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.

I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.

Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.

I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.

It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.

So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.

1. Think About What You Want

Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.

Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.

For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.

You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.

The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.

But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.

None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.

2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work

One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.

You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.

You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.

I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.

Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.

I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.

3. Get Custom Fit

If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.

If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.

Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.

It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.

Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.

I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.

So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.

Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.

Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.

I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.

4. Distance and Strategy Matter

There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.

I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.

Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending