Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Squaring Things Up with Slope: A Not So Friendly Nassau

Published

on

We’re standing on the putting green, me and my new brother-in-law who thinks he’s a real shark. I’m looking over the scorecard. Belmont, it’s his home course. I’ve never seen it before.

“What’s slope?” I ask like an innocent fish. “144, what does that mean?”

“Oh, it’s something about how the course rates in this area.  Something like that…”

He wants to play for money. I can tell. He’s making slow circles around me. His jaws are flexing like he smells chum. Not wanting to further the already great divide between families, I ask nicely, “How many will you give me?”

He makes a face like “What?” “Your sister says you play all the time. I thought you’d be giving me strokes. What’s your handicap, anyway?”

“Uh, 16,” I tell him.

“Oh, really?” The shark opens his mouth. Drool. “Okay, I’m a 10, I’ll give you three a side.” Pause. He tries to hide the smile, but his pointy teeth gleam in the sun. “A friendly 20?”

I’m good at what comes next. I pretend that my stomach turns over, squirting a cup or two of acid up into my esophageal whatever… I have that look like I’ve just been splayed out onto the chopping block. And the meat cleaver is poised to strike.

“Like, a $20 Nassau, you mean?”

“Yeah. Too rich for you? I can’t believe that.”

“Uh, no, but… Hey, let me get a coffee first,” I tell him, “got to steady my nerves.” And I head for the grill.

Part of my innocent dork routine is to have professional backup in place before the negotiation is complete, so I sneak into the pro shop and naively ask the preoccupied pro, “What’s ‘slope’ anyway?” The old guy pretends to be busy with some woman over at the hats. She’s not interested in what he’s selling and he turns back to me.

“Slope?” he asks.

“Yeah, slope. What is it? It’s on all the scorecards.”

“Oh,” he says, “it tells you how much elevation you’ll find on the course. You know, like the slope of the fairways.” And with that he goes off to the hats again.

I’ve asked this question a lot and this is probably one of the dumbest answers I’ve gotten. It doesn’t out-stupid the one I got from a lady once who told me that “it predicted whether or not the cart had enough battery to make the entire 18 holes.” But from a guy who should know, “slope of the fairways” was pretty dumb.

I saw a young assistant pro in the back room at a small messy desk toting up some numbers on a calculator. I leaned in the doorway and asked him.

“It tells you the relative difficulty of courses for a bogey golfer,” he says without looking up. (There you have it. Always ask the younger guy. The old guy’s too lazy or tired to bring himself up to date.)

“I’m a bogey golfer,” I tell him, “so what does this 144 mean to me?”

He turns and looks me over. “What’s your index?” he says. I just happened to know my Handicap Index because I see it every time I post a score on GHIN. “15.5,” I respond.

“OK.” He turns back to the calculator and says, “Your index is your traveling handicap. Since you’re here at Belmont and not at your home course, you take that traveling handicap of 15.5 and multiply it times the Belmont slope of 144, then divide by 113, and that gives you your handicap for Belmont.” He’s doing the calculation as he speaks and I see 19.75 light up the screen.

“You should play about 20-over par here,” he says and smiles, like, “Anything else?”

“Thanks,” I say, and head back out to the putting green to gaff the not so Great White one.

“Bro,” I smile, “I was just talking to the pro, let’s play for 50. But you have to give me 5 a side.”

He blanches. “No, really. This course is much harder than my home course, that’s what the 144 tells us, and my 16 translates to a 19.75 here. That’s four more than what you were offering.  Shame on you. What do you say? 50?”

He stammers, “Wha.. whaddya mean five a side?”

“Well, that’s what the pro said,” I tell him again. The shark eyes are blank. He’s lost the scent: jaws frozen. “Well, OK, if you want to be really precise,” I continue, “you have to give me 9.75 strokes. Like 5 on the front and 4.75 on the back.”

“What?” Now his eyes look like they’re going in opposite directions. I think I’ve got him. “4.75?”

“Yeah,” I explain, “give me 0.75 on a hole, then if we tie the hole I win with a push. Just like in Blackjack.” His gills are pulsing, searching for oxygen. “Or, you can give me a quarter of a stroke on three different holes. Whaddya say?”

“I’m not giving you 9 or 10 strokes! Your sister says you’re really good.” He’s outraged.

“Oh, I thought you wanted a little action.” And I drop a couple of balls 3 feet from a hole and proceed to miss them badly: push, pull, push. The “relative” tries to think it over. But he’s dead in the water.

“Okay, look,” I continue, “if you don’t like the idea of 0.75 strokes, then just round if off: 5 on the front and 5 on the back. It’s the same thing.”

Not wanting to look like the manatee he really was, he eventually caved and agreed: $50 Nassau with five a side.

Now, whether or not he knew what slope was, I’ll never know. (And whether or not I’m really a 16, you’ll never know.) What I do know is that he thought he could use his home course advantage to take my money. But by squaring things up with slope, I got into his head in a major way. He spent the first nine cussing to himself and the back going totally to pieces.

He balked at the 2-down automatic press on the front and for the 18, and positively refused it on the back. So I only wound up taking $250 from him.

Welcome to the family. And pay attention to the slope.

Writing about golf, the game, the travel, and the experiences comprises the bulk of Baff’s retired time. That and trying to figure out how to crank a few extra yards out of his tee shot…

18 Comments

18 Comments

  1. ButchT

    Dec 21, 2016 at 10:06 am

    I appreciate learning how to use “slope.”

  2. Ben Richards

    Dec 20, 2016 at 9:20 pm

    Whoever green-lighted this article should be fired. This goes down as the worst article ever written on Golfwrx. That’s tough to do considering there have been a lot of bad ones in the past (many, many good ones too).

  3. Scott

    Dec 20, 2016 at 3:32 pm

    I am sorry, I have to call BS. A pro would never say that you are a 19.75 on the course today, unless you were playing some type of tournament which used a percent of the handicap. A course handicap calculator would have said 20. If the point of the article is to make sure that you are using handicaps and not indexes when you are betting then mission accomplished. I feel bad for every member of that course to have 2 clueless pros wondering around trying to hawk lessons and shirts.

  4. 8thehardway

    Dec 20, 2016 at 9:47 am

    You just furthered “the already great divide between families” and your poor sister’s gonna be stuck defending you to her sore loser husband for years. Divorce is inevitable but next go-around, be kind and go for the long con instead.

  5. TheCityGame

    Dec 20, 2016 at 9:40 am

    Can we count the ways this article makes no sense?

    1) As part of your innocent dork act, you ask 2 pros what slope means without your BIL there?

    2) You think you could get 19.75 strokes, so you clearly still don’t understand how a course handicap is calculated.

    3) You adjust YOUR handicap/index but not your BIL’s handicap index after learning what slope means.

    4) One pro doesn’t know what slope is. One pro tells you you’re a 19.75 and should shoot about 20 over PAR here. No, you should shoot about 20 over the COURSE RATING (or to be precise, the 10 best of your last 20 should average about 20 over the course rating).

    5) BIL agreed to play for 6 stokes, $20 nassau, but you come out of the clubhouse and counter-offer 10 strokes, $50 nassau and he’s ok with this.

    6) You have a $50 nassau, and he balks at the automatic presses, so (a) clearly the presses weren’t automatic and (b) how did a $50 nassau get to $250 if there weren’t any presses?

    7) “Whether or not I’m really a 16, you’re never know”. Are you suggesting you lied to your new brother in law about your index? “Welcome to the family”, indeed. Sounds like a really nice family.

    8) I’m leaving stuff out because I thought I was getting a little nit-picky.

    • Harry

      Dec 21, 2016 at 1:49 pm

      If this was the BIL home course then his handicap is 10 like he said.

      • Phil

        Dec 21, 2016 at 6:50 pm

        Nope – my handicap and my course handicap are totally different things. The article does not state that his BIL is referring to his course handicap as most people don’t. In fact, the article is pointing out that people should be using course handicap instead of just handicap.

  6. baddomes

    Dec 20, 2016 at 9:39 am

    I’ve been waiting almost a month for the second Jim Baffico article! I thought Jim Baffico was done writing articles! I’m glad he’s not!

    Thanks Jim!

  7. me

    Dec 20, 2016 at 9:10 am

    This is pure garbage.

  8. Dill Pickleson

    Dec 20, 2016 at 3:30 am

    so, you’re a cheat. this is why i only play scratch and i’ll give away advantage to better golfers. at least i have my honor. but, certainly won’t be betting $50 with an over-eager 15.5 hdcp.

    this is also why i avoid stableford competitions.

  9. Double Mocha Man

    Dec 19, 2016 at 8:13 pm

    I refuse any money rounds where I need to take my accountant along…

  10. Tom

    Dec 19, 2016 at 2:57 pm

    Loved the article, reminds me of a typical weekend at my course. What’s with the 25+ shanks…. too complicated for ya?

    • Phil

      Dec 19, 2016 at 7:54 pm

      I suspect the shanks is because he applied the slope rating to his handicap and conveniently failed to do so for his brother-in-law. He was only entitled to 7.75 strokes at best, not 10. And the deliberate missing of 3 foot putts. Lets face it – his brother-in-law never had a chance with a shark like this guy.

      • Double Mocha Man

        Dec 20, 2016 at 2:06 pm

        But his brother-in-law sounded like the shark in the first place. A little comeuppance never hurts an egotistical guy.

  11. Charlie

    Dec 19, 2016 at 1:00 pm

    Play from the correct tees and a set amount of money per hole.

  12. Pbar23

    Dec 19, 2016 at 10:34 am

    My question regarding this is when your index is a 0.0. In this case nothing ever changes for you regardless of slope because based on the equation it will always be 0. Now if you were a plus handicap then you would help in your favor. If you were a +1.5 at a 144 slope you would essentially play to a +1.1 (in the equation I am using a negative number for the index so 144 x -1.5= -216/113 =1.9 therefore take the .4 difference and subtract it from the 1.5). So my question is should the ability to have an index of 0 be possible or should it always be some form of a fractional number?

    • Eddie

      Dec 19, 2016 at 12:18 pm

      Yes, it is possible to have a 0.0 index. However, to have a differential of 0.0 for the round, the rating would need to be a whole number and you would need to shoot that exact number.

      Differential calculation is [[Score-Course Rating] x Slope]÷113

      So if you shot a 74 from the white tees at Bethpage Black (74 rating / 145 slope), your handicap differential for the round would be [[74-74] x 145]÷113=0.0.

      Had you shot 74 from the back tees at Bethpage Black (78.1/152), your differential for the round would have been [[74-78.1]x152]÷113= -5.5

    • George

      Dec 21, 2016 at 7:47 am

      Actually, if you have an index of +1.5 you’d have a course Hcp of 144/113*1.5=1.9. If you would have a course Hcp of 1.5 you’d have an index of 1.5/144*113=1.2. If I understand The US Hcp system.
      Over here in Europe the CR goes into the equation, too. So your course Hcp would be Slope/113*index-CR+Par
      E.g. On a course with Slope 144 and CR 73.1 and Par 72 you’d have a course hcp 144/113*1.5-73.1+72=+0.8 or +1

      Our player from the article would have a course hcp of -20.85 or -21

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers

Published

on

PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.

In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.

Check out the full Q&A below.

Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?

Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.

I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.

Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?

Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.

Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.

Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?

Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.

In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.

Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?

Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.

Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?

Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.

Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.

Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?

Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.

The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.

Continue Reading

Club Junkie

A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast

Published

on

In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.

We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.

To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50

Published

on

This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?

As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.

I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.

Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.

I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.

It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.

So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.

1. Think About What You Want

Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.

Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.

For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.

You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.

The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.

But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.

None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.

2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work

One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.

You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.

You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.

I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.

Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.

I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.

3. Get Custom Fit

If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.

If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.

Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.

It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.

Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.

I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.

So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.

Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.

Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.

I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.

4. Distance and Strategy Matter

There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.

I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.

Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending