Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

The 4 Biggest Myths About Biomechanics

Published

on

golf biomechanics

So what’s the point of biomechanics anyways?

It seems that I hear more negative comments about this word “biomechanics” than positive. “It’s making golf too complicated” is what I hear most. I have to admit that I thought this for a long time myself, but when I dived into the subject and started talking with actual “biomechanists” (PhDs doing the research) and coaches who have a deep understanding of the concepts, things started to change for me.

I realized no one had actually explained to me what biomechanics was or how we should look at it. Now, I’m excited to dive into the topic and help spread the word about what’s actually going on. To that end, let’s break down the 4 biggest myths about biomechanics so we can separate fact from fiction.

Myth #1: It’s a Method or Model of Teaching Golf

First, let’s define what biomechanics is so we’re all on the same page. It’s “the study of the structure and function of biological systems by means of the methods of mechanics.”

What I’ve picked up when talking with biomechanists is that they’re trying to figure out WHAT’S going on and WHY with golfers. It’s not about one method of swinging the golf club or finding people with some perfect metrics; it’s a study of a topic just like anything else in the world. And in their study, biomechanists are observing tremendous variability among golfers, regardless of skill level.

“What we’re finding is a lot of variability even if we have really good players,” says Dr. Scott Lynn.

Biomechanics isn’t just a term that’s related to golf. In fact, there are biomechanists that work in other sports like gymnastics, track and field and in the medical arena. You’ll find that most biomechanists who work in golf also do research in other sports and arenas.

Myth #2: It Makes Things More Complicated

Does biomechanics make golf instruction more complicated? It might seem that way if you’re looking at the data and some of the scientific papers for the first time. There are a lot of measurements, theories and concepts to learn, and there’s no question they can be overwhelming at first.

The best instructors I know have invested a lot of time educating themselves on biomechanics because they say it helps them make SMARTER decisions and communicate with more SIMPLICITY to their students.

“It just helps me to get there quicker,” says Top-100 Instructor John Dunigan of his study of biomechanics.

When you look up the word biomechanics you’ll find two goals. The first is to improve PERFORMANCE; the second is to avoid the risk of INJURY. To do that, there are two fields that are being looked at in biomechanics: kinetics and kinematics.

“Kinetics” is the study of forces that produce motion. A force is happening anytime two things come in contact (your hand on the club, your feet on the ground). There are three forces that act on the golf club during the swing: gravity, air resistance and the forces that the golfer applies to the grip with their hands. The last one, the forces the golfer applies to club, are by far and away are the major determinants of how the club moves.

The second area of study is “kinematics,” which examines actual motion without regard to the forces producing it. Anything that looks at movement is going to be related to kinematics, and this is what we’ve spent most of our time talking about in the golf world over the years. One aspect of kinematics you might have heard of is the kinematic sequence, which shows rotational velocities of different body segments. Using this data, we can learn to optimize efficiency and produce more power.

Myth #3: It’s All Graphs and Numbers

When you measure a golf swing and look at what’s going on you get a lot of numbers, graphs and data, but biomechanics isn’t just data. It’s not just motion-capture info or a pressure-mat reading. Biomechanics is looking at what those numbers mean and their influence on people and their movement patterns.

Without great tools to measure and assess the coaching, the training and study of biomechanics will always be limited. In fact, it’s because of the new technologies and new measurement devices that the study of biomechanics has been able to grow.

The goal of any instructor is to take all the data and make a smarter decision. Ultimately, a golfer has to get feedback in a way that allows them to make a meaningful change. That might be a certain swing “feel” from a biofeedback device like K-Vest or a swing thought about weight shift from a pressure mat like BodiTrak. At the end of the day, the numbers are observational tools that can establish baselines to help golfers and golf instructors make meaningful and quantifiable changes.

Besides looking to improve performance, biomechanics also attempts to help reduce the risk of injury. This aspect is definitely difficult to look at and follow through with in the real world. Telling players to reduce their performance potential to decrease likelihood of injuries is a line most players aren’t willing to cross.

“There’re just so many factors that go into injury,” says Dr. Sasho Mackenzie, a top expert in the field of biomechanics. “It’s subjective to the individual in terms of their body’s tissues ability to repair itself, to sustain multiple repeated forces over and over again. It becomes really, really challenging to predict…”

Myth #4: I’m just trying to break 90. Does it really matter?

A lot of people ask if they should get fit for clubs if they’re not an elite golfer, and the answer is typically going to be a resounding “yes” from any coach or instructor. The same is true for biomechanics.

Wouldn’t you want to have an instructor or coach with knowledge of how the body and swing works? Someone’s whose studied the best science and research and can make better decisions about what path to take you down?

Again, biomechanics is not about swinging the club in a specific way. The goal is to help you improve your performance as quickly as possible while reducing the chance of injury. That’s beneficial to any level of player.

So, what’s the future for biomechanics in golf?

The future is bright for biomechanics. As technology improves, it’s only going to be easier to capture more data and analyze what’s really going on and why in the golf swing.

“I think we’re still in our infancy,” says Dr. Phil Cheetham. “I mean, there are a million things we can look at and man, it’s a fun time right now.”

The biggest shift is going to be golf instructors taking their education seriously and understanding the topic so well that they improve their communication and decision making when working with golfers.

If you’re interested in learning more, over at the Golf Science Lab we’re spending the next few months diving into biomechanics and making it as simple and understandable as possible. Check out the podcast here.

Cordie has spent the last four years working with golf instructors, helping inform thousands on business and teaching best practices (if you're a coach or instructor check out http://golfinthelifeof.com/). Through that he's realized that it's time for the way golf is taught to be changed. When looking at research and talking with coaches and academics, he's launched the Golf Science Golf Science Lab , a website and audio documentary-style podcast focused on documenting what's really going on in learning and playing better golf.

20 Comments

20 Comments

  1. Bob Pegram

    Apr 24, 2017 at 3:58 am

    K-Vest does help, in certain circumstances, reduce the likelihood of future injury, but only when used by a highly trained professional or clubfitter. Titleist does the training for injury prevention and for swing efficiency. They are separate training. In other words, somebody trained in one may not be trained in the other one.

  2. Bob Pegram

    Apr 24, 2017 at 3:53 am

    All that matters is what any swing changes do in the hitting zone. As long as the changes don’t increase the likelihood of injury, or, better yet, reduce them, the path, speed, and aim of the head at impact are what matter.
    Do machines that measure this part of the swing help? Yes, but the teacher needs to explain why angle of attack, inside-out or outside in swing path, and face angle are important. He also needs to explain how any swing mistakes affect these.

  3. Smiller

    Apr 19, 2017 at 11:36 pm

    When I try to lean my shaft properly I cannot feel the pressure. Am I doing something wrong? I am thinking my shaft is not quite stiff enough.

  4. Ron

    Apr 13, 2017 at 10:31 pm

    While its good to gather different information or opinions, a good teacher adapts to the student rather than force the student into a hard set of guidelines and structured teachings.

    • Jim

      Apr 14, 2017 at 3:54 pm

      There’s a thousand miles between those two statements….Adapt to the student? At what point? When they can break 100 or 80. Maybe 1 out of a thousand who comes in a ridiculous set up, grip is breaking 90 and they’re stuck. They’ll never break that plateau – unless like a junkie or alcoholic they admit there’s a problem they can’t fix themselves and make the changes necessary to get better. Period. You can’t polish a 15 year shitty golf swing for someone to finally drop 15 shots and break 80….BUT that’s not saying there’s always the special few already playing & scoring really well with some pretty ugly moves….

      But, they’re generally happy and don’t take lessons…..NOW, if one starts really hurting his back and seeks my help to fix it, I can identify what he’s doing poorly that’s increasing the stress on the back and show him how to fix it….THAT’S NOT A ‘HARD SET’ of guidelines… What you are describing is someone teaching their swing method or philosophy. Good / bad biomechanics are just that and only that. You’re either moving efficently and maximizing the body’s effforts for the task at hand – or not.

      Come to me for help, you’ll get 110%. Refuse to change something I absolutely know is screwing up your ability to do the next move or stop the pain?

      Go away – I can’t fix stupid, and odds are you’re no Jim Furyk

  5. larrybud

    Apr 13, 2017 at 10:09 pm

    Like anything else in golf instruction, the information is only as good as the instructor. The study of biomechanics is certainly not bad in and of itself, but how that information is used. Same goes with things like video and launch monitor data. It’s just information.

    However, when sequencing charts are misunderstood, or when instructors don’t understand camera angles and parallax errors, or when they go chasing launch monitor numbers, you’re going to be in a world of hurt.

    BTW, #2 certainly isn’t a myth in the hands of a bad instructor, or even with a good instructor but with a student who doesn’t learn using technical information. If you’re blathering about spine angle, P3, P4, Px, or smash factor to a student who doesn’t care and doesn’t want to know about that, then you’re teaching incorrectly for that particular student.

  6. Forthewin!!

    Apr 12, 2017 at 11:28 pm

    Learning the concept can help your current swing. The hardest part is getting all the info to slowly become a natural part of your swing. I think the key is to not try and become a different golfer, but use the knowledge to enhance your current athletic ability.

  7. Progolfer

    Apr 12, 2017 at 9:54 pm

    I worked with a bio-mechanical coach, and unfortunately, the “myths” were realities. My game never got so bad, and I developed aches and pains. All the while, he kept telling me to stick with it. I won’t name him, but he is one of the sought-out bio-mechanical coaches in the country. Don’t waste your time or money trying it!!

  8. Nathan

    Apr 12, 2017 at 4:55 pm

    Golf bio-mechanics is unfortunately a joke at this point.

    Bio-mechanics are just analyzing the ‘effects’ without getting to the ’cause’.

    Tiger is with a bio-mechanic and can’t keep Tiger from getting stuck.

    Obviously Como’s bio-mechanical ‘knowledge’ is not effective or worse…

  9. Jack

    Apr 12, 2017 at 2:30 pm

    There is a “tremendous variability among golfers, regardless of skill level”? You need to read “Swing like a Pro: The Breakthrough Scientific Method of Perfecting Your Golf Swing” co-authored by Dr. Ralph Mann and Fred Griffin. They found there is hardly any variability among the swings of professional golfers. Dr. Mann is a former Olympic hurdler who has a Ph.D in Biomechanics. Griffin is a golf professional. I think I’ll stick with their findings.

  10. cgasucks

    Apr 12, 2017 at 11:59 am

    Butch Harmon said himself he doesn’t know what biomechanics even is and he seems to have an ok career as the coach. His record speaks for itself.

  11. david

    Apr 12, 2017 at 11:52 am

    I would take Harvey Penick as a teacher any day of the century over technical/biomechanical teachers such as Leadbetter or Sean Foley. I’ve watched their teachings and get dumfounded.

  12. Steve S

    Apr 12, 2017 at 10:00 am

    I’m all for using biomechanics in golf. Just like I think using physics in analyzing the golf swing has resulted in the exploding of myths about the golf swing. However, both need to be applied by people well versed in the subject. That ain’t happening with your typical golf coach. Any PhD and MD versed in biomechanics is not going to come cheap.

  13. ooffa

    Apr 12, 2017 at 9:03 am

    Nothing can replace feel.

    • Jalan

      Apr 12, 2017 at 9:19 am

      Can’t agree with that. I can ‘feel’ as though I made certain moves in the golf swing, yet when I see a video of that swing, I find I did not do what I felt. That doesn’t mean it was a bad swing, it means it wasn’t executed the way if ‘felt’.

    • bver

      Apr 12, 2017 at 9:53 am

      Really? You can “feel” that you’re reverse pivoting and over rotating? I’ve given thousands of lessons, and I can tell you that nobody can “feel” what they’re actually doing.

    • Mower

      Apr 12, 2017 at 11:35 am

      Well, you know the saying, “Feel & Real are two different things.”

      • Andrew Cooper

        Apr 12, 2017 at 12:42 pm

        The feel is always real, it just may not match up with the visual.

    • larrybud

      Apr 13, 2017 at 10:04 pm

      Rarely does a player feel what is real.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers

Published

on

PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.

In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.

Check out the full Q&A below.

Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?

Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.

I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.

Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?

Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.

Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.

Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?

Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.

In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.

Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?

Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.

Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?

Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.

Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.

Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?

Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.

The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.

Continue Reading

Club Junkie

A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast

Published

on

In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.

We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.

To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50

Published

on

This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?

As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.

I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.

Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.

I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.

It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.

So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.

1. Think About What You Want

Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.

Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.

For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.

You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.

The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.

But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.

None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.

2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work

One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.

You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.

You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.

I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.

Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.

I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.

3. Get Custom Fit

If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.

If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.

Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.

It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.

Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.

I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.

So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.

Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.

Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.

I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.

4. Distance and Strategy Matter

There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.

I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.

Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending