Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Why fair is the wrong adjective for golf

Published

on

You’ll no doubt hear anyone within earshot of an interview this week describe Royal Birkdale as a fair test of golf, perhaps the fairest Open rota test of them all. Please dismiss the speaker as hopelessly tethered to a misconception of epic size.

Golf is not fair. You know it. We can fit our equipment, our apparel, even the courses we play, to take advantage of conditions, but we can never make it fair. In fact, nothing in life is fair, but that’s a topic for Monday’s water cooler or Friday’s happy hour.

Good breaks on the golf course are meant to be celebrated, as are bad ones. We envy the former and we commiserate with the later. We’ve enjoyed one and suffered the other. It is not different with golfing professionals, and if they want it that way, tough beans. They cannot, and should not, have “fair” ever enter the equation.

Have you ever played a farmland course during a drought? That’s links golf. When your fairways are burned to a crisp, yellow like wheat. When the soil seems parched and the dust creeps up slightly, you’ve got the perfect conditions for links golf. Take your putter from 70 yards out and give it a whack. It will bound this way, trundle that. It will hop, skip, carom, ricochet, and might even take unintentional flight. And it will be a wonderful breath of distinction from the game you normally encounter.

If golf were fair, balls would not glance off hazard and out-of-bounds stakes, back into play. Balls would not enter golf holes and spin out, sometimes into hazards. Or would they? Who determines fair? The one who was punished, or the one who was rewarded?

Friends more elegant and eloquent have commented on the nuances that keep golf interesting. They say that uneven lies, unfortunate weather, and unexpected conditions should separate the proper champion from the pretender. I agree. I empathize with tournament players on the wrong side of the draw, but them’s the breaks!

Remember this. A fellow who drains a 45-foot putt on the 72nd green some two hours before the final pairing reaches that same putting surface should not be in contention. A leader who plays a splendid iron into that surface should not be dealt a chip from beyond the green. If golf were fair, Tom Watson would have six Open championships, and Stewart Cink, none.

Now, go out and play some unfair golf. And have an unfair blast the entire round.

Ronald Montesano writes for GolfWRX.com from western New York. He dabbles in coaching golf and teaching Spanish, in addition to scribbling columns on all aspects of golf, from apparel to architecture, from equipment to travel. Follow Ronald on Twitter at @buffalogolfer.

19 Comments

19 Comments

  1. Ronald Montesano

    Jul 20, 2017 at 10:00 am

    So USA!!

    Going to other countries for golf is only part of the opportunity. You get a taste of their style of course condition, but if you don’t golf with locals and imbibe their opinions and attitudes, the taste is unsatisfying.

    Your observations are spot on. Keep commenting!

  2. Matt

    Jul 20, 2017 at 3:10 am

    No such thing as ‘unfair’ in golf. If I want a score that has any relationship to par, or to approach/better my official handicap for that matter, then it’s fair to expect I’ll be challenged by both the course and my lack of ability to advance the ball perfectly. Isn’t that challenge the whole point?

  3. Double Mocha Man

    Jul 19, 2017 at 10:30 pm

    Wait a minute! That’s me, but I have a 2.8 handicap. So it is true of everyone… though my clubs are 7 years old. And the cart girl can never show up soon enough.

  4. james rebey

    Jul 19, 2017 at 7:28 pm

    That is not what they mean by fair. They are speaking to all the field has a shot at winning by playing their game, not just the bombers .

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jul 20, 2017 at 9:56 am

      That’s an angle, for sure. If it’s what the talking heads mean, then there is certainly marrow to that bone.

  5. Lloyd

    Jul 19, 2017 at 6:25 pm

    But some of what he says is true.

  6. Double Mocha Man

    Jul 19, 2017 at 5:30 pm

    Ron, with respect to that drought-stricken farmland course I thought you were going to say something about the 310 yard drive you hit that rolls forever. And that would be fair. And then that wedge you hit into the extra-firm green (brown) that rolls well over the back. That would be unfair.

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jul 20, 2017 at 9:58 am

      No, because that would be taking advantage of a good result while bemoaning a bad one (unless you wanted a short drive and to be chipping from behind the putting surface.)

      I do appreciate your writing, 2XMocha.

  7. Matt-78

    Jul 19, 2017 at 1:56 pm

    I definitely appreciate the article Ronald and agree on the whole that golf should not be considered fair. However, I see the two uses of the word “fair” in the article to be different. For example, when I hear a pro say that a particular course is “a fair test”, what I hear is that it isn’t overly punishing for certain misses or doesn’t reward only one type of shot. However, the sentiment “golf isn’t fair” in my mind refers to the fact that sometimes good shots are punished and bad shots are rewarded. This is true even on the easiest courses. Sometimes your piped drive finds a muddy divot when you hacker buddy’s slice finds an opening, etc. Like when the tree seed fell into Phil’s putt line while he was putting. This is just my .02 though.

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jul 20, 2017 at 10:04 am

      Your pennies are well received, Matt-78.

      There is much to the term, which is why its bland, banal nature is ineffective. We should strive for greater accuracy in our use of language. #NoDumbDownHere

      The test of what we all take to be fair, or just, or deserved, will always be open for discussion, debate and disagreement. All athletic endeavors have similar moments, be it sweat on the hardwood, a sun’s ray in the eyes, or a loose piece of carpet on the football field.

      Let’s not even bring up the impact of referees!

  8. BlubberButt

    Jul 19, 2017 at 11:22 am

    Ronald doesn’t seem to know what the word “fair” means… I get the sentiment and the feeling you’re trying to evoke from the reader, but you picked the wrong word to center the article around. Everything you listed in your article are examples of how golf is actually fair. Physics doesn’t favor one person over the other. Neither does the weather or course design. Maybe the word you meant was “easy”. Like, “Why Easy is the Wrong Adjective for Golf”. The “good and bad breaks” you describe are just the results of the golfer’s actions.

    • BlubberButt

      Jul 19, 2017 at 11:25 am

      Or perhaps “predictable”. “Why predictable is the wrong adjective for golf”.

      • Ronald Montesano

        Jul 19, 2017 at 12:50 pm

        Your word choices are transparent and finite. “Fair” is neither, which is why so many commentators and tournament professionals default to it, and also why I selected it from the lexicon. The euphemism was chosen by the wizard, not the other way around. Any motion on my part to alter the terminology would have been disingenuous.

        • BlubberButt

          Jul 20, 2017 at 12:16 pm

          Apparently your vocabulary rich with polysyllabic words is not an indication of your ability to follow a line a logic. Even if you want to stick with the original terminology provided (“fair”), that doesn’t change the fact that everything about golf is, in fact, fair. The commentators, or “wizards” are correct, and your entire article is saying that somehow it is not fair. It seems like you want to distort the word “fair” to mean something else in order to make your article (although it more accurately amounts to a blog post) hold water. You say “If golf were fair, balls would not glance off hazard and out-of-bounds stakes, back into play. Balls would not enter golf holes and spin out, sometimes into hazards.” Those things don’t make golf unfair. They’re just the results of physics and a golfer’s actions. They’re completely fair.

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jul 19, 2017 at 12:44 pm

      Nope. Fair.

  9. Ronald Montesano

    Jul 19, 2017 at 7:20 am

    Shank fairy strikes again! Don’t know who it is, but always drops in as a +1 in that column. Wouldn’t be the same withoutcha!!

    • Nick Ritacco

      Jul 19, 2017 at 3:58 pm

      Why are you on a golf site?

      • Ronald Montesano

        Jul 20, 2017 at 10:08 am

        Well, he did drop “viscous” and “plethora” during his tirade, so points for those.

        I feel his/her/zee pain, as there is much about the business of golf that can appear to be at odds with the entry to the spiritual that rounds of golf provide.

        Murphy wasn’t off when he wrote about this in Golf In The Kingdom 1 & 2. There is much to gain from our time on the golf fields.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers

Published

on

PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.

In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.

Check out the full Q&A below.

Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?

Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.

I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.

Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?

Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.

Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.

Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?

Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.

In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.

Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?

Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.

Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?

Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.

Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.

Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?

Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.

The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.

Continue Reading

Club Junkie

A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast

Published

on

In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.

We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.

To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50

Published

on

This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?

As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.

I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.

Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.

I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.

It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.

So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.

1. Think About What You Want

Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.

Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.

For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.

You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.

The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.

But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.

None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.

2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work

One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.

You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.

You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.

I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.

Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.

I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.

3. Get Custom Fit

If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.

If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.

Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.

It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.

Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.

I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.

So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.

Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.

Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.

I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.

4. Distance and Strategy Matter

There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.

I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.

Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending