Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

David Toms, Louisiana’s hometown hero, discusses his sticks

Published

on

Just to kick this off, I am a huge fan of David Toms. Have been since his Zevo days. This was a pleasure to write.

David Toms is the chosen son of Louisiana golf. Nobody in recent memory garners the amount of excitement or favor as DT. And it’s well earned. The guy is as well-liked and respected for his play and demeanor as anyone out there period. One of the most interesting aspects of his career was his ability to build efficiency and playability in his bag regardless of ego.

We had a chance to chat with David and Cleveland/Srixon tour rep Jeff Burleigh about his clubs, and this is what they had to say.

JW: What was in your bag at the beginning of your career and what was your knowledge level (of your equipment) at that time? 

DT: I used Yamaha irons and woods when I first turned pro, switching to Mizuno when I got my Hogan Tour card.

I didn’t pay much attention to equipment at that time. I just knew what I hit well and what I didn’t. I liked to keep it simple.

JW: Talk to me about your time with Zevo (1997, 1998) and what your overall opinion was of that experience and the equipment. Were you in the clubs top to bottom?

DT: Zevo was my first experience with custom-fit clubs, and I thought they did a really nice job with their equipment especially loved the fairway woods. They worked. I won my first event with them at Quad City.

JW: Your relationship with Cleveland started in 1999 and continued for the bulk of your career, how did that come about and what attracted you to them?

DT: I sat next to their president Greg Hopkins on a flight to the 1997 PGA at Winged Foot and talked about the possibility of me representing them in the near future. Obviously, it was a good partnership. I was with them for 15-plus years and have great memories.

JW: You have preferred a forged cavity back for the bulk of your career. Why do your preferences go in that direction over a muscle back?

DT: I need all the help I can get! And I always felt like I didn’t give up any control with a compact cavity back iron. Played them consistently my whole career.

JW: What set of irons during your career was your favorite? What wedges were your favorite?

DT: The original [Cleveland] 588 irons and wedges, without question.

JW: You have also been a player that hasn’t been afraid to combo a set, meaning as early as 2001 you would put a beefed-up 3-iron in the bag. Why was that? 

DT: Again I just felt that I needed the forgiveness in the long irons. Having a more forgiving long iron in the bag gave me the ability to hold a few more greens from 200-plus yards out.

JW: You have one club that is a bit more famous than the others, which is the Cleveland Quad Pro 5-wood with the Bi-Matrix shaft. Since you have leaned towards hybrids to fill that gap, what do the hybrids offer you that the 5-wood doesn’t?

DT: I felt that the hybrids provided a little more versatility in windy conditions and were better for the longer par 3s.

JW: You have always been in a three wedge setup (48/54/60). Have you ever tried adding a fourth wedge for gapping?

DT: I will put an extra wedge in the bag at some of the Champions Tour tournaments depending on the course. Usually, 48/54/60 is the setup.

JW: Talk to me about your time with TaylorMade. What went well? What didn’t work?

DT: I really enjoyed my time at TaylorMade. What a great golf equipment company! I thought the woods were second-to-none at that time but struggled a bit with the wedges. I think the wedges these days are really well designed just not during that time period, I had a 14 club deal, so that made it difficult for me inside 100 yards. Again, I would not hesitate to use their wedges nowadays.

JW: If you could build your favorite bag of all time, what would it look like?

DT:

TaylorMade M2 driver  

Cleveland Quad Pro fairway wood

Cleveland Launcher hybrid

Cleveland 588 irons and wedges (the original Roger Cleveland design)

Scotty Cameron Coronado putter

JW: What is currently in your bag?

DT:

Driver: Callaway Mavrik 10.5. Project X Evenflow Blue 65 6.0 (255 Carry)

FW: Callaway Epic 15. Project X Evenflow 75 6.0 (235 Carry)

FW: Callaway 5 wood 18. Project X Evenflow 85 6.0 (225 Carry)

Hybrid: Cleveland Launcher 20.5. Project X-HC1 6.5 (215 Carry)

Irons: Srixon Z585 (4) Z785 (5-PW). Nippon Pro Modus3 Tour 105 S

Carry Numbers

4/200

5/190

6/180

7/167

8/155

9/140

PW/128

Wedges: Callaway MD4 54 (105 carry), 60 (85 Carry). Dynamic Gold Tour Issue S400

Putter: Scotty Cameron

Ball: Titleist Pro V1

We also had the chance to speak with Jeff Burleigh from the Cleveland/Srixon tour department. This was his input on DT.

JW: Overall, what was the recurring theme in your time with DT? Was it fighting a miss? Finding height? Spin etc. Every player seems to look for one specific thing.

JB: David Toms really didn’t have many swing issues. Very smooth and incredibly efficient. David was an absolute dream to work with because his swing was always the same. The main issue was dispersion and feel. He loved being able to feel the clubhead and response of an active shaft. With better feel came a touch more dispersion, so we balanced the two. Focusing on the perfect build and keeping everything consistent which flowed into his game. His entrance into the trailer was always “OK. Where are you hiding all the new stuff?…as he slowly opened the drawers trying to find the latest and greatest.

JW: His preference in irons always leaned towards cavity backs (588P, 588P CG2 stamped, CG2 Tour, CG7 etc) what was the process like getting him into a new iron and why was the preference towards CB.

JB: Yes, he always leaned towards our cavity backs but not necessarily for forgiveness, it was purely for the offset. He loved the look of offset irons. Most of our iron creations back then were tailored from that original 588P. The process was very easy with David, as long as the visual aspect was there and the head appealed to his eye, he was always on board. My job was to create a new set exactly like the gamer. As long as they matched and the visual offset appeal, he was all in. He loved to work with us to improve the product, which made our equipment better. If the equipment was better, then he would play it every time.

JW: He was in a Project X Rifle 6.0 for a good portion of his career. Did he ever mess with other shafts in the irons and why?

JB: Yes. We would try just about everything available at the time. Far less than today because there were fewer shaft companies, especially if it was new. The best shaft that he felt helped him in competition. The only way to know back then was to build it and hit it. He would usually play Wednesday’s pro-am with the experimental set then give me feedback after the round. He always gave everything we built a chance.

There were a few shafts he gravitated to. Shortly after joining us, he tried the new Dynamic Gold Lite in S400. David loved the feel and the flight was very controlled. He played and won a few tournaments with them. That shaft had a .610 butt. Which was a little bigger than the other steel options. When gripping, he always wanted a smaller grip so I had to do a little stretchy stretch on the grip to get the size just right. 60 round Tour Velvets were always easy to work with.

When the 6.0 Project X came out, he was very interested. He felt the shaft did one thing better than the DG Lite: dispersion was tighter. The composition of that shaft was consistent. Frequency matching was the big deal then, and I believe the slightly heavier weight made his good shots just a little better. Also, the spin rate was down just a touch to flatten the flight. Leep in mind we had monster grooves back then. We did do one thing different on the install: I stepped them out one just because the hosel was lower in the CB iron. We didn’t want them playing stiffer than 6.0, so we favored the softer install.

JW: DT has always preferred a higher launch profile in his driver. Did he have trouble getting the ball in the air or was that for a bit more spin/control?

JB: Distance was the focus, always. His ball flight was ideal for the time. High launch and like everyone said, sneaky long. He was one of the few at the time not discouraged by loft (10 degrees and above). Always leading overall driving. He was top 5 on tour in efficiency. If my memory serves me correctly, actually top three if not leading. Shaft of choice was the Black Grafalloy Prolite in our Cleveland Comp head. Control and spin seemed to be always constant with him.

JW: Did he have consistent specs over the years?

JB: Yes. Driver was a 45-inch Grafalloy ProLite Black. 60 gram D3 with Tour Velvet 60 round. Pretty square face. 59-degree lie and 10.5-degree loft.

His Quad Pro 3 and 5-wood. With the BiMatrix steel-graphite combo. I remember the 3-wood was 42.5 and D5. 5-wood was 42. D5. Tour Velvet grip.

Irons were standard length. Degree strong, which then was 47 on PW and 1/2-degree upright. Irons were around D2-D2.5. His light grips helped us achieve a standard swing weight. We used lead tape to fine-tune the weights if needed. Everything we built was weight sorted (grips, shafts, heads), so the specs would always be consistent. Wedges were always standard length. One degree up and D5.

JW: Did you ever do anything special to his wedges? Grinding?

JB: The only thing I did that was different was spinning the shafts with a three bearing fishing spine jig called the spin finder. Used in fly fishing, we used it on golf shafts. Worked extremely well on graphite as most had two spines front and back. It was never mandatory during install but I always felt it can’t hurt our players so I generally did it unless I was buried in build trying to survive. Consistency is key whether it’s you or in the bag.

Grinding was only for weight. To achieve D5, I took across the entire back so as not to change the center of gravity. Our wedges are the best out of the wrapper, simply the way they are designed. David never was interested in massive grinding because he trusted my assessment that it changes the center of gravity negatively. He also liked bounce which we had plenty of. Once in a while, he would want a little bounce removed or added depending on where we were in the country.

Cosmetically, I would gently touch the leading edge to blend the set as well as soften the edge just a little. A little hand buff with some WD40 to even the finish and he was pleased. David loved a new set of wedges, but then again who doesn’t.

I always enjoyed David Toms—fun in the trailer, and you always had a feeling of accomplishment working with him. He’s always been a great friend, and I’ll always reflect back with a smile on my face. Sure miss those days.

*Fun little nugget from a tour rep perspective: When David had that 60-degree into 18 to beat Phil at the 2001 PGA Championship, I had just built that club that week and was freaking out watching coverage from my Hampton Inn. Going over the build in my head panicking when he hit the shot. Shaft, length, lie, loft…OK. Phew. 12 feet for the win.

 

9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. joro

    Apr 27, 2020 at 10:15 am

    One of the best sets of Irons I ever had was the VAS, these things were the perfect design for an Iron. People laughed when they saw them in my bag, but weren’t so happy when they paid off at the end of the round. As a 2 hip at the time they game me a better game than any other Iron. What was funny was the Ping I3 iron that had a pretty much the same look except for the hosel, which always put the hands in the lead. I loved those ugly shovels, easy to hit, long and high and straight, stuck like a nail when landing. .

  2. Jbone

    Apr 25, 2020 at 8:43 am

    Great article

  3. Rich

    Apr 24, 2020 at 2:51 pm

    “David Toms, Louisiana’s hometown hero”

    Louisiana isn’t a town. It’s a state.

    “Homegrown” would be a more apt adjective.

    • Rascal

      Apr 24, 2020 at 5:38 pm

      Oh my god, give it a rest.

    • Mark

      Apr 25, 2020 at 9:09 am

      Thank you. The educated always appreciate it when such a correction is made.

      • Rascal

        Apr 27, 2020 at 3:20 pm

        The educated already made the correction when they read it, and use their time to go do something useful.

  4. Doug

    Apr 24, 2020 at 12:22 pm

    My chance to be a true WRXer!

    Ackshually… the 4 iron pictured in his bag is a Srixon 585 not a 785. Thus making it a combo set as you described him liking in the interview.

  5. JB

    Apr 24, 2020 at 10:38 am

    This was a fun read. Would love to see more articles like this!

    • Benny

      Apr 26, 2020 at 6:49 pm

      I agree. Awesome to read and think about. Both David’s perspective as well as Cleveland builder/pro fitter.

      Really great article fellas. Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers

Published

on

PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.

In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.

Check out the full Q&A below.

Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?

Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.

I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.

Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?

Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.

Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.

Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?

Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.

In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.

Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?

Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.

Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?

Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.

Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.

Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?

Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.

The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.

Continue Reading

Club Junkie

A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast

Published

on

In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.

We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.

To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50

Published

on

This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?

As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.

I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.

Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.

I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.

It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.

So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.

1. Think About What You Want

Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.

Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.

For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.

You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.

The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.

But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.

None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.

2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work

One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.

You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.

You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.

I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.

Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.

I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.

3. Get Custom Fit

If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.

If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.

Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.

It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.

Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.

I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.

So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.

Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.

Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.

I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.

4. Distance and Strategy Matter

There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.

I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.

Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending