Opinion & Analysis
Ways to Win: Taking V1 Game’s Virtual Caddie live on the LPGA Tour
Recently, I was invited to caddie for LPGA Tour player Vicky Hurst at the tour stop at Old American Golf Club just outside of Dallas, Texas. As the developer of the V1 Game app, it was a chance to put my Virtual Caddie skills to the test in a live environment with some of the world’s best. Realistically, Vicky is a phenomenal player and did not need a ton of help out there, but I could not pass up the opportunity to walk inside the ropes and observe professional golf at the highest level to see what I could learn.
As a scratch golfer myself, I’ve always had that curiosity of how my game might stack up on the LPGA. The short answer is — they would smoke me. While I was able to caddie for three days in total, I was only able to caddie for a single tournament day due to prior obligations. On that tournament day, Vicky was super impressive, firing a 68 (-3) and finishing in a tie for 16th.

These are my main takeaways from a fantastic experience over the course of a few days.
Phenomenal Short Games
Whether it was during practice rounds, the pro-ams, or even in competition, I was blown away by the short games of all the tour players I witnessed. They would casually throw balls down on super tight lies, open the clubface, and hit shots I do not have. The confidence, the technique, the touch…all of it. Perfected through years of practice and dedication, it’s something you cannot fake while working a desk job and casually practicing once a month. The variety of shots and the ease of which they hit them made me jealous. On Thursday, Vicky was able to get up and down six times out of eight opportunities inside 75 yards (keep in mind that V1 Game counts all opportunities inside 75 yards as a scrambling opportunity). A short game like that has to free up the rest of the game with confidence that you can get out of a jam if needed. It wasn’t just the short range shots either. All of her wedges inside 100 yards were just on another level. Distance control was paramount. This is also where the majority of her practice time was spent in the practice rounds.

Putt for Dough
It’s hard to score without putting well, and Vicky did exactly that. From the Round Summary above, we see she gained +4.5 strokes on a Scratch with the flatstick. Easy to do when you make 126 feet on just 26 putts! Now, Vicky was by no means perfect. On the first hole, she left an eight-foot putt short and in the jaws, dropping a shot for her only bogey of the day and not helping my nerves that I was going to mess this up! However, she did not miss any short putts until a five-foot eagle try on the 17th hole. The ball just didn’t take the break and caught the edge. Outside of that, she made putts from 10, 13, 17, 18, 20, and 24 feet. A mid-range putting display that reminded me of Jordan Spieth. While some of those were clutch par saves, she also made four birdies on the day with three of them coming from mid-range putts.

Vicky only lost strokes to a male Scratch handicap from two distance buckets. Based on what I witnessed over the couple of days, this was no outlier for Vicky. She made bomb after bomb in the 9-hole pro-am as well. It definitely looked like her recent change to an armlock grip was paying off on the greens, even if I tried to sabotage her performance by dropping her putter after the 12th hole. After two bombs, it was just too hot to handle properly!
Playing it Safe
Probably the biggest surprise watching Vicky play was the conservative nature in decision making. Vicky only hit six drivers in 13 holes, often hitting 3-wood off the tee and relying on mid-irons for her approach shots into the greens. She is fantastic with her mid-irons so, on the surface, this made sense. She routinely hit her driving, 5, and 6-irons tight throughout the week. On Thursday, this strategy paid off as she hit 10 of 13 fairways.
She was also conservative (and smart) the one time she drove into trouble. On the 14th hole, Vicky smoked a 3W that ran through the fairway and into the hazard. The ball was playable, but sitting on the muddy lake shore. To hit the green she would have to navigate chest-high grass on a more aggressive line. This is a situation where the average amateur (myself included) is probably going to take it on and try to carry the grass to aim at the green. This fails to take into account all the risk. A shot online with the green would have to carry 40 yards and elevate quickly to avoid going into the lake using roughly a 9-iron.
Rough calculations would say one out of five times that would lead to a par, two out of five times you miss the green anyway and make bogey, and two out of five times you chunk it into the lake and make double or worse for an overall average of 5.2 with that strategy.

Laying up is safer, but does it pay off? Let’s say one out of five times, it leads to a par, four out of five times, it leads to a bogey, and it eliminates double bogey. That comes out to an average of 4.8 with that strategy.
Clearly, over the long run, Option Two is the better decision in this case. Vicky knew this and made the right decision. To top it off, after an average wedge into the green, she made the 24-footer to save par!
This is one takeaway that I will likely take into my own game. After watching Vicky play, I reflected on my own decisions and it became clear to me that I often try to force shots and hit the ball too far or bring in unnecessary risk because I don’t trust other parts of my game. For shorter holes with risky landing areas, it makes sense to just get the ball in play. Make sure to avoid big pitfalls like bunkers or penalty areas. Statistically, you want to get as short a club in your hand as possible going into the greens, but that doesn’t always require bashing a driver. Most of us can live with bogeys: Let’s eliminate the big numbers.
Sometimes Too Safe
I am in no position to be critical of Vicky’s golf game, but taking a statistical point of view, there were times when in my opinion she was too safe. The 10th hole at Old American is the best example. I saw Vicky play this hole three times and all three times, she hit 3-wood off the tee. The challenge is a bunker that divides the fairway. Using the V1 Game Course Explorer, we can measure distances between any three points on the course. In the leftmost image below, it is roughly 207 yards to cover the fairway bunker. This yardage is at the edge of how far Vicky was carrying her 3W. The effective width of the fairway is only 40 yards at this location as to the left of a bunker is a severe slope that will repel balls into some nasty rough. To hit 3W, she should aim well right of the bunker. In the three attempts I saw, Vicky hit the bunker, pulled it left where it bounced down into the rough, and missed the bunker by one yard! Clearly it was a problem spot for her. On this hole, I would have loved to have seen her hit her driver. I never saw her hit a poor driver and she has more than enough carry distance to cover the bunker.

Hitting driver actually moves her landing spot to a wider and flatter portion of the fairway as shown in the rightmost image above. It also significantly shortens the distance she would have into the hole from roughly 160 yards to less than 140. If she were to hit into the rough or into trouble, she would still have a higher percentage of being able to reach the green.
It was definitely educational to observe the way Vicky manages the course. There was a lot that us amateurs could learn from her decision making and club selection as she routinely made the right moves.
Enjoy the Ride
Probably the biggest takeaway I had while caddying for Vicky was how stress-free she seemed to be. She was friendly to everyone, she never seemed rushed before, during, or after the round. She was thoughtful. She took a picture with my son, signed a golf ball for him, and the volunteers walking with us. A true professional. Nothing seemed to bother her and she legitimately seemed to enjoy the golf. She would make long putts and just give a little shrug and a fist bump as if to say ‘how about that?’ Never too high or low emotionally, always a smile.

I contrast that with myself, and I definitely over-stress. When playing in a tournament, if I don’t get there an hour early, I feel rushed. I do things too quickly. I think too much about my score. I am fist pumping birdies and dog cussing myself for several minutes after a bad shot or hole. I can let the golf affect my mood. I get too wrapped up in my golf. Vicky seemed perfectly balanced. There is no doubt she cares just as much if not more. There is no doubt that situations were stressful. She didn’t show it. It was probably the most impressive thing I saw that week. I definitely want to be more like Vicky.
Deep down I think we all know that thinking about score or obsessing over the previous shot does not help, but it was liberating to see a player on the big stage that legitimately seemed to enjoy what she was doing.
A quick example: Thursday was the first day of the tournament and Vicky had a 12:30 tee time. We agreed to meet at 11:10. I showed up way in advance of her tee time, at around 9:30. It was a chance for me to watch some of the other players and to make sure I did not hit traffic. 11 rolled around and no word from Vicky. Then 11:10 and still no word. I sent her a text to make sure that I hadn’t missed her arrival to which she replied “on my way.”
I was already nervous to caddie on the bigger stage, but I figured she’d be rushed to get to the course, eat something, warm up, and make it to the tee on time so I was even more nervous. When Vicky showed up, she casually asked if I was ready for lunch. We moseyed into player dining, sat down and took our time eating lunch with small talk, leaving just under an hour to warm up for the day’s round.

In my head, I’m thinking “Okay, it’s a 10 minute cart ride to the range, a 10 minute cart ride to the first tee, we should probably be at the tee box roughly 10 minutes early… That leaves 30 minutes to hit balls, putt, put on sunscreen, etc…” I’m nervous. She is as cool as the other side of the pillow.
We get to the range, where she works through her bag, hitting maybe 20ish shots.
“Should we go putt?” she asked and we walked coolly over to the putting green where she rolled 10 to 15 putts.
Looking at my watch we had 15 minutes until our tee time and she was already ready to go. So much for being rushed!
My big takeaway here is if you’ve already put the work in, then your warm-up is exactly that. It’s a warm-up. Too many times I’m searching for that right feeling or trying to hit each shot cleanly to go into the round with confidence. Right before your round is the wrong time to be searching for something. Use the time to get your body right, trust your swing and ability, and enjoy the ride.
Wrapping Up
I had a blast caddying for Vicky. I think I was more nervous than she was as it’s always hard to let go of the steering wheel. I kept waiting for the moment I was going to drop her bag at the wrong time or stand in the wrong place. Luckily, I escaped unscathed, and she even said I “passed the caddie test.” It was an eye-opening experience and a ton of fun. I definitely picked up a few areas where I need to work on after following her around for a few days and, hopefully, a few ideas to roll into V1 Game to help others. If she is ever back in town, I hope I get the call. I’d gladly go for another loop!
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship

L
Aug 22, 2021 at 3:50 pm
She has a super swing