Opinion & Analysis
Why the Masters is undefeated
Jim Nantz said, “The Masters is more than a golf tournament. It’s a tradition, a rite of spring, and a reunion.” I hate starting a piece with a quote like some 5th-grader in a first five-paragraph essay, but now I’ve done it and here we are.
As you may have heard, pro golf’s “rite of spring” begins this week — so let’s talk about Bobby Jones’ Augusta National Invitation Tournament for a minute.
The success of the Masters Tournament — its popularity, its primacy among the majors — is down to what? Iconic moments? Incredible competition? Fully-cooked fields? Sure. But the same is true for the U.S. Open, the Open Championship, and even the PGA Championship — and all three tournaments are older and have had more of the stuff! Also, the Masters has, objectively, the smallest, weakest field of the majors.
Now, perhaps it’s a contrarian spirit or some sort of relativism, but I’ve actually heard folks attempt to rebut the claim that the Masters sits alone on the throne. OK. While it may not be your favorite major, it is the favorite major, broadly. This is reality. My heart is not made of Pimento cheese. My brain is not egg salad (well, maybe it is). I am not some badge-hatted Masters stan. I’m a mere messenger of an obvious truth.
While I suppose there could be other metrics of an event’s popularity, the much-discussed TV viewership would seem to be the most informative. Let us consider, then, the ratings.
The data is even more lopsided in years Tiger Woods contended or won — none more so than 1997 when 20.3 million tuned in for Woods’ iconic win (a number that was only sniffed once, 2001) since — but let’s take a look at some slices of major championship viewership over the past decade.
2024 major viewership (final round average)
- Masters: 9.59 million
- PGA Championship: 4.9 million
- U.S. Open: 5.9 million
- The Open Championship: 3.39 million
(Via Sports Media Watch)
As a follow-up, for fun, let’s pick a random form of media consumption from the buffet: Instagram. The Masters’ official Instagram account has more followers than the other three majors combined.
- Masters: 1.9 million
- PGA Championship: 396K
- U.S. Open: 402K
- Open Championship: 724K
So, we’ve established the green jacket covers all media. Why is this? Well, in a word, everything.
Everything Augusta National as a whole does, and everything that the competition committee does in conducting the tournament, is aimed at the singular goal of presenting the premier professional golf tournament.

The power of the product
Every single thing — every detail — is considered and focused on during the tournament. Stories of this are legion. You’ve heard them — icing the azaleas, the sub-air system, dedicated sandwich wrapper picker-uppers…
Not only is it important that the tournament is the best this year, but next year, and the year after that, etc, as well. This is only possible with a judicious approach to continuous improvement in every facet of the Masters experience. Consider the aforementioned social media. Augusta National was anything but an early adopter of the ‘gram, but when they eventually jumped in, they did it in a considered fashion — and now they kill it in the space. Ditto pretty much every other element of the tournament and its presentation. While specific course changes are discussed, debated, and even occasionally decried, the Masters has basically maintained the same scoring average for decades, which aids in the production of a predictably excellent product.
Just as important as changes and improvements is what doesn’t change. In fact, you likely associate ANGC more with not changing, which is a testament to how good the club is at keeping the core elements — scoreboards, green jackets, the clubhouse, caddie bibs, hole locations, etc. — the same and changing nothing just for the sake of change.
Now, it’s one thing to have this ambition (another thing to do it), but the relentless focus on selling it as such is a not insignificant piece of the equation — and we can trace this all the way back to the Immortal Bobby and Clifford Roberts who were the ultimate spokesmen for the tournament, figuring out early the importance of branding, converting media members to advocates, providing a top-notch player experience, etc. Selling the tournament was not akin to selling sand in the desert, to be sure, but its prophets were (and are) many.

And, of course, the course
Returning annually to the predictably Edenic venue of Augusta National doesn’t hurt either, does it? Players, patrons (“patrons” not “fans” is something in itself, isn’t it?), and viewers expect to see the Elysian Fields — are told the azaleas will be in bloom — and they do! The 12th is the 12th. The 16th is the 16th. The wonders of Fruitland Nurseries abound. Every April. Spring is springing. It’s the first major on the calendar. How can these facts alone not set the golf heart aflutter?
Compare this to the other championships, which are held at a formal or informal rota of courses in various weather conditions (worse on the whole than those at Augusta), coming later in the year when the picture of the year’s major winners has been partially painted. There’s no Masters without Augusta National (both the course and the club, really). The much-revised Alister MacKenzie track, in its totality, trumps other venues.
So, with the Masters’ arrival, the power of the product (and the organizers’ component approach to it), its public presentation, and the importance of Augusta National itself are the elements that bubble to the top of the water hazard of my mind. What else contributes to the Masters’ undefeated status in your mind, WRXers?
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship

Bobby G
Apr 9, 2025 at 12:09 am
That little jingle/piano scale CBS starts playing in January to advertise the Masters with “a tradition, unlike any other” pounded into our head. It works.
Branding is key, the Green Jacket, the Champions Dinner, the Azaleas.
If the Open was at the Old Course every year, it would be the same.
William
Apr 8, 2025 at 7:50 am
I’ll go with the rite of Spring. Being a Northerner and a golfer, most years I’m watching it when there is snow and ice on the landscape and I’m dreaming of the days that I can be three-putting again. Even my wife gets excited when she sees those azaleas and remembers that we have a a couple too…somewhere.
Juan
Apr 7, 2025 at 6:30 pm
Love Augusta. Still have it as the third best major tho
Bob Jones
Apr 7, 2025 at 3:19 pm
I think you got it right in your Power of the Product section. The masters around that tournament are the masters of self-promotion. It’s not the championship of anything, it’s just a well-run tournament played on a pretty course that gets watched because everyone knows the course so well. Like Jack Nicklaus said recently, there are six shots that you have to pay attention to, and the rest of the course is not that hard. Oakmont, where the U.S. Open is being played this year, would eat Augusta for lunch. I watch the Masters very year, but I don’t think it is a religious experience like so many people do. Sorry!
WSinTX
Apr 7, 2025 at 1:44 pm
Well put.