Opinion & Analysis
Why I root for Sergio

I know Sergio Garcia.
Well, OK maybe not really. I don’t literally know Sergio Garcia, as I am Canadian and work in an office and he is Spanish and plays on the PGA Tour, but humor me for a second. I know what it feels like to be Sergio, at least Sergio minus the millions of dollars, which is probably not as significant a difference as we assume.
I know what it feels like to not achieve what you thought you’d achieve, to feel like you missed out on things, to go through tough moments in your life and have it affect how you act. I know what it feels like to do or say something stupid in the heat of the moment and instantly regret it. Yes, I may not have millions of dollars to comfort me but I also don’t have millions of people criticizing me or taking pleasure in my failures either. I understand, or at least try to understand, Sergio.
I watch him and can’t help but feel how close he has come to being something completely different, to being the champion we all thought he’d be when he skipped up the fairway at Medinah, to being the overall athlete we crave as fans, who wins and then tells us how they really feel about it, or about everything really. Only it hasn’t happened yet, and with each passing year I wonder if it will ever happen. I also wonder what it would change if it did, if a major title would transform him from the guy into the humble, honest superstar I believe he is. I guess the difference with me is I’m not willing to wait; I cheer for him now. And so should you.
To understand Sergio now, you have to go back to the beginning. In simple physics terms, no one can fall this far without starting so high, and that is true in his case. Sergio had a ton of promise. As a junior, he set a record as the youngest player ever to make the cut in a European Tour event (since broken), he turned pro after being the low amateur at the 1999 Masters, and then won his first pro tournament in only his sixth start at the 1999 Irish Open. Of course that was only wetting our appetite for his epic duel with Tiger Woods at the 1999 PGA Championship at Medinah, a tournament that has become a staple of Golf Channel classics, and which featured one of the greatest shots ever hit in major championship golf. Sports Illustrated wrote an article about Woods’ win that August, in which it said Tiger and Sergio had the star quality of Newman and Redford, and that the weekend launched a rivalry that would take golf into a new era.
Garcia couldn’t be praised enough, whether it was for his “mischievous glare” he gave Tiger on No. 13, or for his delightful scissor kick down the No. 16 fairway. He was the swashbuckling Spaniard on what he would afterwards call “the best day of my life.” He was only 19 years old and already a superstar, and already having picked up his first second-place finish in a major, a stat that would come to define him
It seems like a long time ago that Sergio was known for his exuberance. Sergio gave a great interview after Medinah, about his glare, about his desire to play Tiger in that year’s Ryder cup. He did humerus ads for Michelob beer where he spoofed James Bond, or caroused with women next to pools. He wasn’t a traditional superstar, he was honest and refreshing. This was not a guy who answered questions with “It is what it is.” This was a guy who really let you know how he felt. We appreciated that when things were going well. We like our pros to be honest when things are going well.
Things stopped being perfect in 2002, probably the first time Sergio faced real backlash. By then he had won eight global tournaments and had certainly not been too much of a disappointment, but he arrived at Bethpage Black with no majors and a bit of a nasty habit of re-gripping the club. In perhaps a bit of irony, we praised New Yorkers for being tough but crushed Sergio for responding with a middle finger salute to the gallery when fans heckled him. Should we have congratulated Sergio for flipping the bird to a group of wiseguy New Yorkers who were counting Sergio’s regrips? No, I suppose not.
But why was he targeted? Sergio spent most of Sunday in contention and ended up finishing fourth. This was the same guy who three years earlier had thrilled us trying to chase down Tiger at Medinah, and here he was again trying to chase down the same man in the Big Apple. Had fans turned on him for re-gripping his club? For responding with a rude gesture to fans calling him “waggle boy” and who were also apparently taking potshots at his then-girlfriend Martina Hingis?
Garcia probably didn’t help his case by also suggesting that the Saturday conditions favored Woods and the tournament likely would have postponed play if their tee times had been reversed. Yet, it certainly wasn’t the first time Tiger had been accused of getting breaks, but it wasn’t usually from players. It’s OK for fans to say it, but not for Garcia. In any regard, Garcia apologized and even left a personalized note in Woods’ locker regarding his comments. Is this really that unforgivable? To respond to rude gestures with rude gestures of your own? To complain that co-workers have benefited from more favorable circumstances? Nevertheless, Bethpage 2002 is still not regarded as Sergio’s finest hour.
His reputation somewhat tarnished, Sergio went on to win five more tournaments in the next five years. He now had 16 global victories while still in only his mid 20s, but majors still eluded him. Between 2002 and 2007, Garcia would reach the pinnacle of what I’ll call the dreaded “Phil Mickelson Status” of being the unanimous best player without a major. In that span, he had 11 top 10s in majors including multiple top 10s in every individual major event. His name popped up on leaderboards like a whack-a-mole. But with Mickelson winning the Masters in 2004 (Garcia finished T4 that year), the press had a new target to torment. His spitting incident in March 2007 gave the media an opportunity to pile up on Sergio anew about his attitude and his failure to play up to our expectations.
It’s tough to defend a man spitting in the cup, which Sergio did at Doral in 2007, but the act and its aftermath was vintage Garcia. He fessed up to it immediately, and then awkwardly (and somewhat comically) described to Jimmy Roberts how the spit went in the middle of the cup, fell through and posed no immediate threat to ensuing golfers. He then chided a reporter the following day for questioning him on it again, asking him if he was “disappointed he didn’t do it again today.” But blood was in the water again, and several publications used the incident to talk about how disappointing his career had been, how childish he could act, and how he just wasn’t a winner on par with Tiger Woods, like we expected him to be in 1999. It’s hard to imagine this not bothering someone, not weighing on him every time he stepped out on the course, especially someone we knew to be fairly emotional. Phil Mickelson would later admit winning a major was important to him all along, certainly it must have been for Sergio as well.
The 2007 Open Championship and 2008 PGA Championship were probably the straws that broke the camel’s back so to speak. Even after coming so close before, these were major tournaments that Sergio really should have won. He led both in the final round, and in 2007 in particular, looked dominant the first three rounds while building up a big lead. Even despite giving it up on the final day, he still had a makeable putt for the win, and to this day every time I watch that putt it still looks like it’s going in.
At the 2008 PGA Championship, he battled hard again with Padraig Harrington on Sunday at Oakland Hills before a shot into the water at No. 16 helped seal yet another second-place finish. Coming so close and still failing after so many years of pressure, to be one or two shots away from finally having people stop wondering about his mental fortitude, about whether he was capable of winning a major, seemed to send Sergio into a tailspin. Well, arguably that and his much publicized breakup with Greg Norman’s daughter, Morgan. Garcia would fall all the way down the rankings to No. 78, after being as high as second only a year earlier. He would miss the Ryder Cup for the first time in his career in 2010, a year in which he struggled with his emotions (arguably reaching that apex when he broke down into tears during the Madrid Masters) and simply in the end deciding to take time off golf.
As you would expect by now, Sergio dealt with this as he often did, with brutal honesty. He would give interviews where he became one of the only pro athletes I can remember openly talking about how hurt feelings over a relationship contributed to his poor play. He laid it all out there over and over to any reporter who wanted to ask. He routinely talked about not being happy on the course and how that affected his play. He talked about his breakup with Morgan Norman. Say what you want about that man, but again he never answers anything with “It is what it is.”
Fast forward to 2012, and Sergio has been back for two years. He has won two more events bringing his professional wins total to 24, including 18 on the PGA and European Tours. There is no one younger than him on either pro tour that has more wins then his eight (Tour) and 10 (Euro). It feels like it’s been a long ride to get here, but Sergio is only 33, and despite his past, he said he had no regrets.
Garcia did a gem of an interview with David Feherty in 2012 for the Golf Channel, saying essentially that, but also admitting that maybe he’d be better off if there was a bit of a break between the on-course action and having to give interviews. He seems pretty aware that he said dumb things in the heat of the moment, and hinted to realizing later how foolish he could look to saying some things. He also said that he tried to remember that he was just a golfer, just a guy with a gift of talent but who was no better nor different than the average fan.
“I think if we all thought like this the world would be a better place,” he said to David Feherty.
I took from his comments to mean that it’s really important for him to just be a good guy.
So I try to think of Sergio as a regular guy, like myself. Maybe we all should. Maybe an honest and open guy is always going to struggle in the spotlight but is that such a bad thing? Why do some people enjoy rooting against someone who time and time again is accountable, who lays it out there and is vulnerable? How can we condemn someone for saying things in the heat of the moment when we all do that? Who among us has never thrown a club, spoke ill of a coworker, responded to bullying with an obscene gesture or comment? Let them cast the first stone, but I will not do it.
When I look at Garcia, I see a guy who is fallible, out on Tour struggling to become what we expect him to be. I see fans criticizing the guy because he doesn’t fit their view of what they think they’d be like in his place. Maybe instead of spoofing James Bond in a commercial, he should’ve impersonated Superman, capable of performing acts we can’t fathom on the golf course, but unable to shake being the mortal Clark Kent off it. I for one like that about Garcia, and hope others will start appreciating it too, because there aren’t many who let us see that side to them.
And that brings us back to where we are. Sergio Garcia at 33 with the Masters around the corner. He sits locked at those 18 major Tour wins and 17 top 10s in majors, facing the downswing of his career which may culminate in him being labelled a whining disappointment.
There is still hope for Garcia. Just a little under a decade ago, Mickelson entered April 2004 in virtually the same position.
“Phil the Thrill” came into that Masters with 22 Tour wins and 16 top 10s in majors at the age 33. He had a lot of the same demons and a similar volume of detractors. That must seem like a long time ago for Phil.
What then, will we say about Garcia in 2023? Will he win his majors? If so what will fans make of it? Will winning make his human side more tolerable or more heavily scrutinized? I can hardly imagine Garcia himself will change, knowing what we do. And that is what makes the coming years fascinating for me. He won’t change, but will him winning change fans?
As we’ve learned already with Garcia, anything is possible. And I will be rooting for him all the way, because I believe sometimes the good guys should finish first.
Opinion & Analysis
The 2 primary challenges golf equipment companies face

As the editor-in-chief of this website and an observer of the GolfWRX forums and other online golf equipment discourse for over a decade, I’m pretty well attuned to the grunts and grumbles of a significant portion of the golf equipment purchasing spectrum. And before you accuse me of lording above all in some digital ivory tower, I’d like to offer that I worked at golf courses (public and private) for years prior to picking up my pen, so I’m well-versed in the non-degenerate golf equipment consumers out there. I touched (green)grass (retail)!
Complaints about the ills of and related to the OEMs usually follow some version of: Product cycles are too short for real innovation, tour equipment isn’t the same as retail (which is largely not true, by the way), too much is invested in marketing and not enough in R&D, top staffer X hasn’t even put the new driver in play, so it’s obviously not superior to the previous generation, prices are too high, and on and on.
Without digging into the merits of any of these claims, which I believe are mostly red herrings, I’d like to bring into view of our rangefinder what I believe to be the two primary difficulties golf equipment companies face.
One: As Terry Koehler, back when he was the CEO of Ben Hogan, told me at the time of the Ft Worth irons launch, if you can’t regularly hit the golf ball in a coin-sized area in the middle of the face, there’s not a ton that iron technology can do for you. Now, this is less true now with respect to irons than when he said it, and is less and less true by degrees as the clubs get larger (utilities, fairways, hybrids, drivers), but there remains a great deal of golf equipment truth in that statement. Think about it — which is to say, in TL;DR fashion, get lessons from a qualified instructor who will teach you about the fundamentals of repeatable impact and how the golf swing works, not just offer band-aid fixes. If you can’t repeatably deliver the golf club to the golf ball in something resembling the manner it was designed for, how can you expect to be getting the most out of the club — put another way, the maximum value from your investment?
Similarly, game improvement equipment can only improve your game if you game it. In other words, get fit for the clubs you ought to be playing rather than filling the bag with the ones you wish you could hit or used to be able to hit. Of course, don’t do this if you don’t care about performance and just want to hit a forged blade while playing off an 18 handicap. That’s absolutely fine. There were plenty of members in clubs back in the day playing Hogan Apex or Mizuno MP-32 irons who had no business doing so from a ballstriking standpoint, but they enjoyed their look, feel, and complementary qualities to their Gatsby hats and cashmere sweaters. Do what brings you a measure of joy in this maddening game.
Now, the second issue. This is not a plea for non-conforming equipment; rather, it is a statement of fact. USGA/R&A limits on every facet of golf equipment are detrimental to golf equipment manufacturers. Sure, you know this, but do you think about it as it applies to almost every element of equipment? A 500cc driver would be inherently more forgiving than a 460cc, as one with a COR measurement in excess of 0.83. 50-inch shafts. Box grooves. And on and on.
Would fewer regulations be objectively bad for the game? Would this erode its soul? Fortunately, that’s beside the point of this exercise, which is merely to point out the facts. The fact, in this case, is that equipment restrictions and regulations are the slaughterbench of an abundance of innovation in the golf equipment space. Is this for the best? Well, now I’ve asked the question twice and might as well give a partial response, I guess my answer to that would be, “It depends on what type of golf you’re playing and who you’re playing it with.”
For my part, I don’t mind embarrassing myself with vintage blades and persimmons chasing after the quasi-spiritual elevation of a well-struck shot, but that’s just me. Plenty of folks don’t give a damn if their grooves are conforming. Plenty of folks think the folks in Liberty Corner ought to add a prison to the museum for such offences. And those are just a few of the considerations for the amateur game — which doesn’t get inside the gallery ropes of the pro game…
Different strokes in the game of golf, in my humble opinion.
Anyway, I believe equipment company engineers are genuinely trying to build better equipment year over year. The marketing departments are trying to find ways to make this equipment appeal to the broadest segment of the golf market possible. All of this against (1) the backdrop of — at least for now — firm product cycles. And golfers who, with their ~15 average handicap (men), for the most part, are not striping the golf ball like Tiger in his prime and seem to have less and less time year over year to practice and improve. (2) Regulations that massively restrict what they’re able to do…
That’s the landscape as I see it and the real headwinds for golf equipment companies. No doubt, there’s more I haven’t considered, but I think the previous is a better — and better faith — point of departure when formulating any serious commentary on the golf equipment world than some of the more cynical and conspiratorial takes I hear.
Agree? Disagree? Think I’m worthy of an Adam Hadwin-esque security guard tackle? Let me know in the comments.
@golfoncbs The infamous Adam Hadwin tackle ? #golf #fyp #canada #pgatour #adamhadwin ? Ghibli-style nostalgic waltz – MaSssuguMusic
Podcasts
Fore Love of Golf: Introducing a new club concept

Episode #16 brings us Cliff McKinney. Cliff is the founder of Old Charlie Golf Club, a new club, and concept, to be built in the Florida panhandle. The model is quite interesting and aims to make great, private golf more affordable. We hope you enjoy the show!
Opinion & Analysis
On Scottie Scheffler wondering ‘What’s the point of winning?’

Last week, I came across a reel from BBC Sport on Instagram featuring Scottie Scheffler speaking to the media ahead of The Open at Royal Portrush. In it, he shared that he often wonders what the point is of wanting to win tournaments so badly — especially when he knows, deep down, that it doesn’t lead to a truly fulfilling life.
View this post on Instagram
“Is it great to be able to win tournaments and to accomplish the things I have in the game of golf? Yeah, it brings tears to my eyes just to think about it because I’ve literally worked my entire life to be good at this sport,” Scheffler said. “To have that kind of sense of accomplishment, I think, is a pretty cool feeling. To get to live out your dreams is very special, but at the end of the day, I’m not out here to inspire the next generation of golfers. I’m not out here to inspire someone to be the best player in the world, because what’s the point?”
Ironically — or perhaps perfectly — he went on to win the claret jug.
That question — what’s the point of winning? — cuts straight to the heart of the human journey.
As someone who’s spent over two decades in the trenches of professional golf, and in deep study of the mental, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of the game, I see Scottie’s inner conflict as a sign of soul evolution in motion.
I came to golf late. I wasn’t a junior standout or college All-American. At 27, I left a steady corporate job to see if I could be on the PGA Tour starting as a 14-handicap, average-length hitter. Over the years, my journey has been defined less by trophies and more by the relentless effort to navigate the deeply inequitable and gated system of professional golf — an effort that ultimately turned inward and helped me evolve as both a golfer and a person.
One perspective that helped me make sense of this inner dissonance around competition and our culture’s tendency to overvalue winning is the idea of soul evolution.
The University of Virginia’s Division of Perceptual Studies has done extensive research on reincarnation, and Netflix’s Surviving Death (Episode 6) explores the topic, too. Whether you take it literally or metaphorically, the idea that we’re on a long arc of growth — from beginner to sage elder — offers a profound perspective.
If you accept the premise literally, then terms like “young soul” and “old soul” start to hold meaning. However, even if we set the word “soul” aside, it’s easy to see that different levels of life experience produce different worldviews.
Newer souls — or people in earlier stages of their development — may be curious and kind but still lack discernment or depth. There is a naivety, and they don’t yet question as deeply, tending to see things in black and white, partly because certainty feels safer than confronting the unknown.
As we gain more experience, we begin to experiment. We test limits. We chase extreme external goals — sometimes at the expense of health, relationships, or inner peace — still operating from hunger, ambition, and the fragility of the ego.
It’s a necessary stage, but often a turbulent and unfulfilling one.
David Duval fell off the map after reaching World No. 1. Bubba Watson had his own “Is this it?” moment with his caddie, Ted Scott, after winning the Masters.
In Aaron Rodgers: Enigma, reflecting on his 2011 Super Bowl win, Rodgers said:
“Now I’ve accomplished the only thing that I really, really wanted to do in my life. Now what? I was like, ‘Did I aim at the wrong thing? Did I spend too much time thinking about stuff that ultimately doesn’t give you true happiness?’”
Jim Carrey once said, “I think everybody should get rich and famous and do everything they ever dreamed of so they can see that it’s not the answer.”
Eventually, though, something shifts.
We begin to see in shades of gray. Winning, dominating, accumulating—these pursuits lose their shine. The rewards feel more fleeting. Living in a constant state of fight-or-flight makes us feel alive, yes, but not happy and joyful.
Compassion begins to replace ambition. Love, presence, and gratitude become more fulfilling than status, profits, or trophies. We crave balance over burnout. Collaboration over competition. Meaning over metrics.
Interestingly, if we zoom out, we can apply this same model to nations and cultures. Countries, like people, have a collective “soul stage” made up of the individuals within them.
Take the United States, for example. I’d place it as a mid-level soul: highly competitive and deeply driven, but still learning emotional maturity. Still uncomfortable with nuance. Still believing that more is always better. Despite its global wins, the U.S. currently ranks just 23rd in happiness (as of 2025). You might liken it to a gifted teenager—bold, eager, and ambitious, but angsty and still figuring out how to live well and in balance. As much as a parent wants to protect their child, sometimes the child has to make their own mistakes to truly grow.
So when Scottie Scheffler wonders what the point of winning is, I don’t see someone losing strength.
I see someone evolving.
He’s beginning to look beyond the leaderboard. Beyond metrics of success that carry a lower vibration. And yet, in a poetic twist, Scheffler did go on to win The Open. But that only reinforces the point: even at the pinnacle, the question remains. And if more of us in the golf and sports world — and in U.S. culture at large — started asking similar questions, we might discover that the more meaningful trophy isn’t about accumulating or beating others at all costs.
It’s about awakening and evolving to something more than winning could ever promise.
Sergio fan
Apr 10, 2017 at 1:04 am
Finally!
Willy Wonka
Apr 13, 2013 at 2:09 pm
I don’t believe in negative comments, but I will never like Sergio as a player. Off the course he may be a great guy, but I will never understand why when people are waiting in anticipation for a tantrum, you can’t control yourself, and you do it again. When he was fresh to the tour, and young he smiled and played the game and didn’t seem as what now looks to be taking this game for granted as if it owes him something. I WAS a fan of Sergio, and had high hopes for him, but I now don’t give him any sympathy. I would not want my kids to look at his ON COURSE antics as a role model player. Not everyone is perfect, any many other overpaid athletes have issues as well. But in MY OPINION, I just can’t stand behind Sergio nor care if he ever wins anything. If anything he would have one a major by now if the golf gods felt he deserved it. His game is great, swing is one of the best, but just can’t get past the attitude, facial expressions (can’t ever just smile and walk away) or throwing clubs, and beating a bunker to death with a lob wedge. Be as sympathetic as you want for him, but I no longer look at him the same way I did when he was an aspiring player who had the future at his fingertips, but let what’s between his ears get the best of him.
Mike
Apr 13, 2013 at 8:26 am
Great article! Feel the same about Sergio. Although there are times I get frustrated with his windmill dueling, he is fresh, honest, loyal to hometown causes (finances a soccer team, etc…) and a great interview. Today’s round will be key for him. I’d love to see a green jacket on him but really fell Merion is his best bet. C’mon Sergio, do it for the us, the faithful!
Joe
Apr 12, 2013 at 10:37 pm
Amazing article!!!! I really feel for this guy!! I want home to win a major so bad as I really feel it will change everything for him!!!
Ken
Apr 11, 2013 at 11:03 pm
Well after the first round he’s in the lead. Thats 1 round down and three more to go. I hope he can keep it all together for those 3 rounds
Willam Long
Apr 9, 2013 at 1:22 pm
Wow. Well done. I have had similar feelings about Sergio for years, believing each year that the best was yet to come. I continue to hope that the maturity he has sometimes lacked in his life outside the ropes held him back inside the ropes, and when that maturity came, it would, like a tipping point, propel his professional accomplishments to the highest level that we all expected he would achieve.
Troy Vayanos
Apr 8, 2013 at 5:41 pm
Sergio is one of those players that was always chasing Tiger in the early part of the century. I think because of that everyone wants to see him finally win a big one at some stage of his career.
John Wunder
Apr 8, 2013 at 5:36 pm
What an awesome read! Well done sir!
I still root hard for Sergio, he’s a heart on his sleeve kind of player and in my opinion that is the most compelling golf to watch.
Kevin
Apr 8, 2013 at 4:41 pm
I don’t see how anybody can pull for such a horrible loser. Sure we all hate to lose, but that is not justification for unclassy, unsportsmanship. I hope he never wins another match, ESPECIALLY the Masters.
jj
Apr 8, 2013 at 12:33 pm
Great article. I completely agree with the author. I’ve always been a big Sergio fan and although I’ve been upset with how he’s dealt with certain things over his career – I feel the same way about my behavior on the course. It’s refreshing to have someone that’s honest and reacts how I would react. I can fully understand how he feels, and personally can’t blame him for acting the way he does sometimes, outside of the fact that he is a professional and role model. With that being said, is it really that bad for children to see that professional atheletes make mistakes and aren’t perfect, just as we are?
Ken
Apr 8, 2013 at 10:00 am
Great artcle about Sergio. Like yourself I find myself still picturing Sergio running down the fairway doing his scissor kick. A great moment followed by an equally great shot. Its unfortunate that possibly other people’s expectations will define his career but I will always root for Sergio and with some of his past indiscretions (whining and spitting and pouting) it just makes him more human and in the end more likeable. I hope that the Golf Gods look favourably upon him at the Masters this year and he gets to put on the Green Jacket and exorcise those demons. Maybe one Major will lead to multiple ones like Phil, one can only hope and cheer on his fighting spirit