Opinion & Analysis
Do Fairways Hit Equal Low Scores?
If you’ve played this game long enough, you know how important it is to hit the fairway. It allows any of us to control the ball’s spin and flight far easier than out of the rough or in a bunker.
With that being the case, one would think that the men winning on the PGA Tour week-in and week-out would be the leaders of fairways hit. It is easy to come to this conclusion but a look at the stats is surprising. Tiger Woods, the greatest golfer of our time, is no straight hitter off the tee and neither is Phil Mickelson, the next winningest player on Tour. So how is it that they win so frequently? Because driving accuracy is not as important as you might think.
Driving the golf ball straight is important, but there are far more important stats like Strokes Gained-Putting and scoring. Driving the ball straight is far less important than putting and getting up and down from 100 yards and in.
Of course, golfers can’t hit it all over the planet; they have to keep it in bounds and out of hazards. So if you’re hitting 70-yard slices and hooks that should be a addressed, but if your stats show you miss fairways but keep it within the tree line and you’re still not scoring, hitting it straighter might not be the pace to focus.
The top-10 players leading in driving accuracy on the PGA Tour are probably not who you think they are. There is definitely something to the adage “drive for show, putt for dough.” Below are two graphs, the first is showing the top-five leaders in driving accuracy, the second is showing the top FedEx Cup points leaders.
Jeff Maggert is fifth in driving accuracy on Tour at 71.46 percent. He also has a very respectable GIR percentage (Greens in Regulation) at 68.20 percent, which ranks him 3oth on Tour. With numbers like that, it would be easy to conclude he would be having a standout year and be ranked high in the FedExCup Standings.But he’s not even close. Maggert is ranked 156th in the FedExCup standings.
Once again, it is all what you do 100 yards and in on a hole. When looking at the first graph, only one man on it is having a stellar year, Graeme McDowell. Why is that? Well, it is easy to see when you move across the graph and look at his scrambling stat. He is a grinder with a scrambling stat of 74.49 percent, which means he makes par 74.49 percent of the time when he misses a green. Jeff Maggert on the other hand only makes par 59.38 percent of the time under those same circumstances.
And the five men leading in driving accuracy are not leading in the strokes gained putting category. All of them, with the exception of McDowell and Kohles, are giving shots back to the field putting.
The first shocking thing noticeable is that Woods and Mickelson are no better than 56 percent in driving accuracy. Tiger, on the other hand, is lapping the field in the strokes gained putting, not so much for Mickelson, but he is very respectable at .345 in that category. Seve Ballesteros was never ever a great driver of the ball but that man could get up and down from the moon.
Snedeker is the most consistent member in this group, because he does everything well. He is not leading in any of the categories, but he is near the top in most. He is a straight hitter with both his woods and irons and he can scramble. It is not hard to see why he is having a standout year this year. Kevin Streelman, who won his first tournament this year at the Tampa Bay Championship, is havign a Snedeker-type season — he’s doing everything well, too.
So what is separating Tiger Woods, who has won three times in 2013, from everyone else? Putting, putting, putting. I’ll take some literary freedom here and draw what I think is the most important thing about Tiger: He is never out of a hole. He may hit it into a bunker or the trees, but he fights it out knowing there is a great chance if he can get on the green with a stroke to spare he will make that putt.
These stats show that we as amateur golfers probably spend too much time working on the long game. A golfer’s time would be far better spent practicing the game from 100 yards and in. With half of the stats on a par 4 allotted to putting, that should tell us something. Also, if a golfer can get his wedge play to be accurate from inside 100, it will wear out the people you play — just ask Jeff Maggert.
With all of this in mind, we should head out to the putting and pitching green and commit to getting good in these areas. I realize spending 30 minutes or more putting doesn’t have the appeal of bombing out long, straight drives on the range. But keep in mind how much lower your scores will get if you only need two shots from inside 100 yards. That should be motivation enough!
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship



Adrian
Dec 7, 2013 at 10:48 am
While I agree that the short game is very important in my opinion the long game is much more important until you get to a certain level, which is probably below a 5 handicap, when those strokes saved really come into play. The most important stat to an amateur golfer in my opinion is greens in regulation. Greens in regulation have almost a direct correlation with an amateurs score. Increasing GIR will have a much bigger impact on the score. I have always hit around 60% of my fairways but it wasn’t until this past month when I got my GIR’s up from 24 to 56 percent that my scoring really improved. My putts per round are rarely below 31 but I still shoot in the mid 70’s since I am hitting 9-10 greens and getting up and down 30 to 40 % of the time when I miss the green. Not saying short game isn’t important, but long game is what really costs most golfers.
John Scott
May 1, 2013 at 5:09 pm
Interesting article but can you correct the spelling on Seve Ballesteros please, you have his surname wrong.
Cheers.
Matt M
May 2, 2013 at 4:44 am
Sorry bout the Seve typo no disrepect meant.
Troy Vayanos
Apr 27, 2013 at 9:53 pm
Great post Matt,
It just goes to show how important the short game is and the ability to get up and down from everywhere.
My local driving range is filled with guys practising just their driver and yet the putting green is empty … go figure!
Cheers
dbamford
Apr 26, 2013 at 1:09 pm
One point I forgot to mention — there is a BIG difference between launching a 300-yard bomb from the tee into the rough, which happens to be blanketed by a crowd of spectators and PGA ball-spotters.
If average golfers don’t hit fairways, the ball might be lost. If your drives are 300+ yards, that becomes “frequently” lost. The lack of spotters and galleries reduces the payoff for the “bomb it into the rough” strategy in the real-world.
My biggest pet peeve is landing a shot in the center of the fairway and having the ball simply vanish. Maybe it hit a sprinkler head and ricocheted, maybe it fell into a hole, who knows… everyone has had this happen to them at one time or another.
Nick
Aug 6, 2013 at 10:16 am
Could not agree more. Many times I see errant drives by the big hitters that I know for a fact would be lost and gone forever for the average player. With LB being so overly penalized (should be a lateral IMO) that’s a huge impact on your average players score that the pros deal with far less frequently.
dbamford
Apr 26, 2013 at 12:52 pm
I tracked every club I hit over the last 5 or 6 rounds I played last season. It’s not something I had ever done before but it sure was eye-opening. A full 50% of the shots I hit were from my 9-iron through my LW. Another 25% were between by 6I and my 9I. I could almost throw away every club between my driver and my 5I and not be too bad off.
I guess the point I’m making is that In agreement with this article and many others that the lofted irons and putters are the most critical clubs to master. If you’re a good bunker/rough/junk player (e.g. a master of you wedges) you won’t care so much where you land. Bomb it close, plop it on the green for your GIR, and putt. If you’re not a long hitter you had better hit the green from 200+ out, and that is perhaps impossible on highly protected and fast greens. Ironically, if greens were approachable from long distances, or weren’t too slick to hold an approach shot, it might negate the long hitters’ advantage of coming into the green with a lob wedge all the time.
I really agree that it is GIR + Putting that counts. If you are getting your GIR (however you slice it) you will have scoring chances.
JChoj
Apr 26, 2013 at 11:54 am
I really wish they would make it harder for them to hit out of the rough. Pros just don’t care where the ball is. Make it more rewarding for the player to hit the fairway.
Mike
Apr 26, 2013 at 10:51 am
I get what you are saying here. But I’d love to see a statistical analysis of how much better Tiger scores when he is hitting fairways consistently, and same with Phil. Tiger and Phil’s short games are usually consistently good to great, but when they are hitting fairways it seems that they have many more birdie and eagle opportunities.