Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Is the Open Championship really the truest test?

Published

on

What a tournament that was. Last weekend, golf fans were treated to the best of what professional golf has to offer. There was a guy named Beef in all his bearded glory, Phil the Thrill going for another major and Stenson closing it out with a tie for lowest final round in major history. The final two rounds saw two of the best players in the world go toe to toe with shot making, skill and sportsmanship.

I feel confident saying the Open is the most entertaining golf tournament of the year, with only the Masters offering much of a challenge. The U.S. Open is great, but you can only watch players hacking it out of six inches of rough for so long — and let’s not even get started on the rulings. The PGA Championship is fine, but with it coming two weeks after the Open this year, it seems a little anticlimactic.

And who doesn’t love watching players negotiate howling winds, freezing rain and weather more suited for November than summer. It’s television and entertainment at its best.

There is a larger question to ask about the Open, though; does it really do the best job of identifying the top-performing golfers in the field? Because we heard over and over this week how the Open was the “truest test” in major championship golf. Nick Faldo led off Sunday’s coverage on Golf Channel saying it was. The Open even calls the winner the Champion Golfer of the Year.

But we heard another subject from the players discussed more often before, during and after the tournament even started.

The dreaded draw.

If you weren’t on the right side of the draw at Royal Troon this year, you weren’t in contention. The top 10 heading into Saturday all played on Thursday afternoon and Friday morning. For those counting at home, there was a seven-shot difference between Kevin Na’s two-round total of 139 in 11th place and Mickelson’s 132 at the top. Who is to say Na’s two-day total wasn’t as good as the leaders? Yet he was nearly out of it, 7 strokes back. Stuck on the wrong side of the draw, Jason Day talked about “luck” and Justin Rose called it “frustrating.”

Rory McIlroy, after already making some incendiary comments early in the week, took the high road saying“I’m not going to let being on the wrong side ruin my mood or ruin my week.”

The next day he did this.

Now none of this is to say Mickelson or Stenson shouldn’t have been in the final pairing on Sunday. It’s hard to argue when two golfers close out the Sunday of a major a combined 14-under par. But it doesn’t mean others couldn’t have been in contention on Saturday if they had the opposite side of the draw. So let’s stamp down the high praise and boasting of how well the Open does finding the true champion and golfer of the year.

You can call it the most fun major to watch, you can call it the most entertaining found of golf you’ve ever seen, you can even call it the best final round in major history… just don’t call it the truest test in golf. Because if a tournament is so reliant on when you tee off, how true a test is it really?

Seth is an avid golfer playing year round in Florida.

15 Comments

15 Comments

  1. Jim

    Jul 24, 2016 at 5:11 am

    Playing against the brunt of the nature is definitely a better test than going against USGA’s sadistic 6-inch rough made on purpose to make life difficult for no absolute reason.

  2. TGS

    Jul 21, 2016 at 2:06 am

    Calloway makes equipment that just goes straight and keeps you in play. I find that to be the case with their woods this year. Very straight

  3. Nev

    Jul 20, 2016 at 8:48 pm

    I find it hard to fathom comments about the luck of the draw, when Thursday was a perfect day, yet none of the best golfers in the world failed to take advantage of it. Maybe it is more that some players find it hard to play links courses. I would rather watch golf played on this style of course, rather than watch players trying to hack their way out of 6 inch rough.

  4. Scott

    Jul 20, 2016 at 4:44 pm

    Seth, you whine worse that Sergio Garcia. Correct me if I am wrong, but 1/2 of the field played in identical conditions, yet the best anyone else could muster is 11 strokes behind 2nd place?

    i guess the reason is that the golf gods wanted Phil and Henrik to be in one of the best mach play duels in recent history. The golf gods hated everyone else.

  5. matto

    Jul 20, 2016 at 5:31 am

    Phil was absolutely soaked to the bone on Friday. Didn’t look easy to me. A lot of this “bad side of the draw” talk seems to be because the OGWR top 4 didn’t fair well.

  6. Rich

    Jul 20, 2016 at 4:54 am

    Sorry Seth, you’re an idiot. You can’t conclude that The Open is not the truest test of golf if you are not going to define what the truest test is. How can you argue that something does or doesn’t fit the brief, if there is no brief. I’m not saying it is or isn’t, I’m just saying your article gives nothing except your opinion.

    Seems like Golfwrx are just getting articles from more and more sources that are either cheap or rubbish just to fill their quota of new articles. Is golf really that uninteresting these days that we are subjected to rubbish articles like this? God I hope not.

  7. Uno

    Jul 20, 2016 at 3:00 am

    Truest test would be to put these Pros on some Muni track with crappy greens, un-raked bunkers and fairways that don’t run out at all

  8. Jack

    Jul 20, 2016 at 2:45 am

    Yup let’s just have the next Open played on a golf simulator so nobody needs to ever play from another player’s divot, and wind conditions can all be simulated to be exactly the same and fair for everyone. That’ll be a true test of skill. /sarcasm

  9. Pete

    Jul 20, 2016 at 1:03 am

    so 14 shot difference between winner and 3rd bc luck of draw???

    that effect is practically standard in any 4 day stroke play event.

    +1 on the sour grapes, next time cool off for a few days before writing an article!

  10. Rancho

    Jul 20, 2016 at 12:36 am

    Ok, having subjected us to this rubbish OpEd, what is the truest test? Send them all to Topgolf?

  11. RedX

    Jul 19, 2016 at 8:28 pm

    +1 to SV, Philip & Ian’s comments.

    Too much has been made of the disparity in the draw in this Open. Any tee time Thursday was ideal as the course was defenceless all day (bunkers excepted) but highly ranked guys like JDay, Rors & Speith wasted their opportunities to go low. Friday was definitely more lopsided but not easy in the morning either.

    Weather played a significant part in this years US Open through to the cut as it has in other PGA tour events during the year.

    I do think the US players “feel” this a little more generally as they are often not called upon to play in wind and rain as regularly. Lighting is often a factor in the US under these conditions and (sensibly) play is suspended. It is rare in the Open and as such maybe they feel it more keenly when asked to play on and get on with it.

    “Hats off” to Phil as a positive example, shunning the umbrella, donning the wet weather gear and the two gloves in the thick of it Friday and just getting stuck in.

  12. SV

    Jul 19, 2016 at 2:48 pm

    It may be more prevalent in The Open, but weather-wise the luck of the draw can/will have an affect at any tournament. It just happened that this time the current “names” got caught, so some think it is a big deal. Life is not fair. Golf is not fair. Deal with it.
    Yes, The Open is the truest test of golf. It examines each player and asks them to answer the problems put before them. The questions change, but those that are able to answer them get a good grade. Henrik got an A+. Phil got an A. Others, those that missed the cut, got Fs.

  13. Philip

    Jul 19, 2016 at 2:36 pm

    And what tournament doesn’t have this aspect? Based on your argument not one tournament can really claim to offer the truest test of golf because seldom all of the golfers play in the same conditions – especially Thursday and Friday.

  14. Ian

    Jul 19, 2016 at 2:33 pm

    Grumble grumble grumble. Sounds like the sour grapes of realizing that a non-American Major stole the spotlight. Credit where credits due.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers

Published

on

PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.

In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.

Check out the full Q&A below.

Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?

Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.

I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.

Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?

Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.

Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.

Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?

Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.

In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.

Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?

Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.

Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?

Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.

Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.

Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?

Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.

The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.

Continue Reading

Club Junkie

A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast

Published

on

In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.

We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.

To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50

Published

on

This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?

As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.

I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.

Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.

I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.

It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.

So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.

1. Think About What You Want

Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.

Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.

For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.

You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.

The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.

But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.

None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.

2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work

One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.

You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.

You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.

I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.

Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.

I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.

3. Get Custom Fit

If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.

If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.

Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.

It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.

Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.

I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.

So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.

Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.

Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.

I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.

4. Distance and Strategy Matter

There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.

I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.

Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending