Opinion & Analysis
Wishon: 7 club fitting keys to improve shot consistency
One of the simplest ways golfers can improve their games is through proper club fitting, which is often overlooked because of the emphasis golf equipment companies place on trying to help golfers hit the ball farther. Adding distance is great, but it doesn’t always come with an improvement in shot consistency. Sometimes, it actually has the opposite effect, whereas a proper fitting almost always improves shot consistency and often leads to more distance as well.
When I speak about shot consistency, exactly what am I talking about? A higher percentage of on-center hits? Sure, that’s an improvement in shot consistency. But so too, and perhaps even more important, are elements of consistency such as a reduction in how far a slice or hook curves off line, or a reduction in the number of poor shots.
Perhaps the best way to express what an improvement in shot consistency means is to help the golfer “miss the ball” better. If you’ve played the game a while, you are well aware of the type of shots that are classified as a “good misses.” No one hits all the shots well. In fact, the best golfers can be said to be those who “miss their shots the best.”
Therefore, the purpose of this article is to offer some of the best fitting tips for “better missed shots” and from it, better shot consistency.
1. A shorter driver, but also shorter fairway woods
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, the percentage of golfers who have improved their tee shot consistency by going much shorter with the length of their driver is nothing short of spectacular. The only male golfers who have a real chance to play well with a 45-inch driver are those with a smooth tempo, great swing rhythm/timing, inside-out to square swing path, later release and good golf athletic ability on top of those things.
For golfers who fall short in one or more of those elements, don’t even think about a driver longer than 44 inches. If the golfer falls short in three or more of those factors, don’t go longer than 43 to 43.5 inches. Longer length only means higher club head speed for golfers with a later-to-very-late release. And even for those with a later release, for 98 percent of them longer length means more off-center hits.
But don’t just think shorter drivers for better shot consistency. Think shorter fairway woods, too. The old fairway wood length standards were 43 inches for a 3 wood, 42.5 inches for a 4 wood, 42 inches for a 5 wood and 41 inches for a 7 wood. Golfers should consider using fairway woods that are a half inch to a full inch shorter than that if they do not possess most of the above ideal swing tempo/release characteristics. You’d be amazed at the improvement in shot consistency from shorter fairway woods.
2. Proper face angle fitting to address misdirection tendencies
Preaching to the choir, element No. 2 for shot consistency is to fit the face angle of the driver, fairway woods and even the hybrids to offset the golfer’s slice or hook tendency with those clubs.
Always keep these two key points in mind when viewing a face angle change for improving shot consistency through better accuracy:
- At a carry distance of 200 yards, a 1-degree change in the face angle from what it was before represents a slice or hook reduction of 4 to 5 yards.
- For a face angle change to work best, you have to know the face angle of your present clubs so you know how much of a change to make to bring about a visible reduction in the slice or hook.
For a face angle change to do its job, you have to address the ball with the face angle sitting as it is designed. All too often, golfers not used to an open or closed face will rotate the head to assume a more square position at address. If you hook or slice and want that to be immediately reduced, you’ll need to just get used to the fact that if you slice or hook the ball, your new face angle is going to sit with the face pointing in the opposite direction of your misdirection tendency.
One last point for golfers with one of the adjustable hosel drivers: The only way these drivers can change the loft is if the golfer always holds the face square in the address position. If you are a relatively straight hitter, fine, you won’t need any face angle help. But if you are a chronic fader/slicer/drawer/hooker, a change in the face angle from what you currently use can be a huge help.
As such, trying to get that from one of the adjustable hosel drivers is difficult and confusing. For that reason, it is best to work with a club fitter who knows his stuff and can source the right driver head that has both the loft AND face angle you need.
3. Matching total weight and swing weight to the golfer’s transition, tempo and strength
If the total weight and/or the swing weight are too heavy for the golfer, more off-center hits, pushed shots and thin shots can result. If the total weight and/or the swing weight are too light for the golfer, a more outside-in path, slice and off-center hits can result.
While we talk a lot in fitting about the total weight (shaft weight) and the swing weight as separately fit elements, from a shot consistency standpoint you have to think of the two working together. For many golfers, the swing weight (meaning the head weight FEEL) is more important for shot consistency improvement than the total weight.
Typically, the more forceful the transition, the faster the tempo and the stronger the golfer, the heavier the total weight (shaft weight) and swing weight would be to best match the golfer’s timing and rhythm. And vice versa, usually the more smooth the transition and tempo and the weaker the golfer, the lighter the total weight (shaft weight) and swing weight would be. It’s not always this way, however, because golfers develop differences in what they think feels best when they swing the club.
It’s also totally possible for golfers with a stronger transition and tempo to end up being well fit into a lighter weight shaft (lighter total weight), but much less likely that a weaker/smoother-swinging golfer would be well fit into a heavy shaft for a heavy total weight.
If a stronger golfer with a little more aggressive transition move were to use a 55-to-65-gram shaft, the light total weight of such a light shaft weight can be offset by using a little to a lot higher swing weight. But on the other hand, it is rarely if ever a good thing to fit a golfer with a smooth transition/tempo and below average strength with a shaft that weighs more than 75 grams, but then try to mute that heavier shaft effect with a low swing weight.
But do remember, weight fitting also has to take the golfer’s personal, acquired preference for the weight feel of the clubs into account. There can be infrequent times when the weaker/smoother-swinging player prefers a heavy feel while a strong/aggressive player could possibly like a lighter feel.
In the end, there is no such thing as a total weight/swing weight detector in fitting. You start with the tendencies of swing force versus club weighting listed here, then experiment to find the combination that works best. In the end, the right total weight and swing weight is found when the golfer never has to make any type of conscious move or effort to control his swing tempo and timing.
4. MOI match the woods and the irons instead of swingweight matching
Ask any mechanical engineer. If the goal is to build all the clubs in a set so they swing with exactly the same effort and feel, the best way to do that is to build the clubs to have the same MOI rather than the same swing weight. MOI matching has been around now for 10 years so the statistics are starting to show tendencies.
When the MOI is chosen properly for the golfer, again based on his transition, tempo, strength and personal FEEL preference, the subtle improvements show up as more on-center hits more often, fewer pulled and pushed shots and a few more greens hit in regulation. But what MOI is right for each golfer is still a guess-and-check process.
The way the best club fitters do it is to build a test club of at least the 5 or 6 iron that possesses everything BUT the weighting the golfer needs in his fitting. The club has the right length, loft, lie, shaft and grip, but the head weight is left light. Then the golfer goes through a process of hit three shots, after which weight is added to the head. This process is repeated until the point is found when the golfer definitely perceives the head weight to be too heavy and too laboring to swing consistently on tempo. A fitter then backs off some of the weight and that becomes the benchmark club from which the MOI is measured and then duplicated on the other clubs in the set.
Final point: For the vast majority of golfers, the best MOI for the driver and woods will be +60-to-70 g/cm2 (the MOI measurement increment) higher than what was found to be the golfer’s best MOI in the irons.
5. Set makeup changes: so underappreciated, but so important
One of the most overlooked fitting factors that will assuredly improve overall shot consistency and deliver better misses for golfers is the set makeup. The whole concept of proper set makeup fitting is to get rid of hard-to-hit clubs and replace them with clubs that hit the ball the same distance and are easier to hit more consistently.
I am talking about the following elements:
- Having an alternative “control driver” of shorter length and higher loft. It can be used in lieu of the normal driver for courses with a greater number of tight tee shot holes, or for days when the swing is not as much “in sync” as other days.
- No three wood for the majority of golfers. Many should start with a 4 or 5 wood, unless the golfer definitely has the skill to consistently hit a fairway wood with 14-to-15 degrees of loft off the ground well up in the air.
- Having more woods, and definitely a 7 wood for most average players. Even a 9 wood for many golfers will work well, especially if the golfer tends to sweep the ball and/or has an early to midway release. And make it a little shorter as well.
- More hybrids instead of more fairway woods? As the golfer’s release gets from midway to slightly later than midway, and as the golfer can consistently hit down and through the shot, the option leans for more hybrids instead of more fairway woods to avoid the hard to hit low-lofted irons.
- Use one more hybrid than the golfer thinks he/she should use. Get the golfer to be totally honest in answering this question, “What is the lowest number iron I can hit consistently well 4 out of 5 times from normal lies?” If he is an 8-handicap golfer or lower, make that iron the break between the last hybrid and first iron in the set. If he is above an 8 handicap, add on one more hybrid and start the irons one number higher than what the golfer thinks he should use. Today’s much lower-lofted irons are fine as long as the golfer is honest in admitting what iron number sees the first big increase in inconsistency and starting the hybrids there. Don’t let ego get in the way of a smart set makeup that allows you to hit more greens and score better.
- Additional wedges. Or rather, tailor the wedge set makeup to the grass, sand and green design of the golf course(s) the golfer plays the most. It is very smart for a golfer to have different wedges of different lofts and sole designs so he can pick the wedge set makeup for the course he happens to be playing that day (this is a big topic to know what wedges to play for what differences in turf, sand and green design, and one I promise to write a detailed story about it in the future).
6. Grip size and feel for comfort
Forget the hand size/finger size charts that golfers use as a deciding factor for grip size. Fit for grip size ONLY on the basis of golfer comfort. Regardless of hand/finger size, the best grip size for every golfer is the size that he feels is most comfortable and allows him to maintain a secure hold on the grip with the least amount of grip pressure with the hands and forearms.
One more thing about grips versus shot consistency: Scrub/wash your rubber grips every other round, and lightly sand the rubber grips every 1 to 2 months as needed with 220- to 240-grit sandpaper. Keeping grips feeling more new can most definitely can help the golfer maintain a higher level of swing and shot consistency.
7. The correct lie angle for ALL the clubs
You’ve all seen the diagram that shows the ball going left when the toe end of the club head is up at impact and the ball going right when the heel side of the head is up at impact.
It goes without saying that dynamic lie fitting eliminates all possibility of an ill-fit lie from ever causing an offline shot. As such, why NOT do it? And think about getting your woods and hybrids fit dynamically for lie. Can’t find anyone with fairway woods and hybrids that can be bent to accommodate a wide range of lie fitting needs? If you look hard enough, you will. They do exist.
I can’t tell you enough in strong terms how valuable all of these fitting keys can be for your score and your enjoyment of this great game. Don’t pooh-pooh these fitting elements as either being less important or something only for mid-handicap players and above. They work to deliver better misses, which in turn means lower scores. Have fun, and as always the very best to everyone in this great game.
As the editor-in-chief of this website and an observer of the GolfWRX forums and other online golf equipment discourse for over a decade, I’m pretty well attuned to the grunts and grumbles of a significant portion of the golf equipment purchasing spectrum. And before you accuse me of lording above all in some digital ivory tower, I’d like to offer that I worked at golf courses (public and private) for years prior to picking up my pen, so I’m well-versed in the non-degenerate golf equipment consumers out there. I touched (green)grass (retail)!
Complaints about the ills of and related to the OEMs usually follow some version of: Product cycles are too short for real innovation, tour equipment isn’t the same as retail (which is largely not true, by the way), too much is invested in marketing and not enough in R&D, top staffer X hasn’t even put the new driver in play, so it’s obviously not superior to the previous generation, prices are too high, and on and on.
Without digging into the merits of any of these claims, which I believe are mostly red herrings, I’d like to bring into view of our rangefinder what I believe to be the two primary difficulties golf equipment companies face.
One: As Terry Koehler, back when he was the CEO of Ben Hogan, told me at the time of the Ft Worth irons launch, if you can’t regularly hit the golf ball in a coin-sized area in the middle of the face, there’s not a ton that iron technology can do for you. Now, this is less true now with respect to irons than when he said it, and is less and less true by degrees as the clubs get larger (utilities, fairways, hybrids, drivers), but there remains a great deal of golf equipment truth in that statement. Think about it — which is to say, in TL;DR fashion, get lessons from a qualified instructor who will teach you about the fundamentals of repeatable impact and how the golf swing works, not just offer band-aid fixes. If you can’t repeatably deliver the golf club to the golf ball in something resembling the manner it was designed for, how can you expect to be getting the most out of the club — put another way, the maximum value from your investment?
Similarly, game improvement equipment can only improve your game if you game it. In other words, get fit for the clubs you ought to be playing rather than filling the bag with the ones you wish you could hit or used to be able to hit. Of course, don’t do this if you don’t care about performance and just want to hit a forged blade while playing off an 18 handicap. That’s absolutely fine. There were plenty of members in clubs back in the day playing Hogan Apex or Mizuno MP-32 irons who had no business doing so from a ballstriking standpoint, but they enjoyed their look, feel, and complementary qualities to their Gatsby hats and cashmere sweaters. Do what brings you a measure of joy in this maddening game.
Now, the second issue. This is not a plea for non-conforming equipment; rather, it is a statement of fact. USGA/R&A limits on every facet of golf equipment are detrimental to golf equipment manufacturers. Sure, you know this, but do you think about it as it applies to almost every element of equipment? A 500cc driver would be inherently more forgiving than a 460cc, as one with a COR measurement in excess of 0.83. 50-inch shafts. Box grooves. And on and on.
Would fewer regulations be objectively bad for the game? Would this erode its soul? Fortunately, that’s beside the point of this exercise, which is merely to point out the facts. The fact, in this case, is that equipment restrictions and regulations are the slaughterbench of an abundance of innovation in the golf equipment space. Is this for the best? Well, now I’ve asked the question twice and might as well give a partial response, I guess my answer to that would be, “It depends on what type of golf you’re playing and who you’re playing it with.”
For my part, I don’t mind embarrassing myself with vintage blades and persimmons chasing after the quasi-spiritual elevation of a well-struck shot, but that’s just me. Plenty of folks don’t give a damn if their grooves are conforming. Plenty of folks think the folks in Liberty Corner ought to add a prison to the museum for such offences. And those are just a few of the considerations for the amateur game — which doesn’t get inside the gallery ropes of the pro game…
Different strokes in the game of golf, in my humble opinion.
Anyway, I believe equipment company engineers are genuinely trying to build better equipment year over year. The marketing departments are trying to find ways to make this equipment appeal to the broadest segment of the golf market possible. All of this against (1) the backdrop of — at least for now — firm product cycles. And golfers who, with their ~15 average handicap (men), for the most part, are not striping the golf ball like Tiger in his prime and seem to have less and less time year over year to practice and improve. (2) Regulations that massively restrict what they’re able to do…
That’s the landscape as I see it and the real headwinds for golf equipment companies. No doubt, there’s more I haven’t considered, but I think the previous is a better — and better faith — point of departure when formulating any serious commentary on the golf equipment world than some of the more cynical and conspiratorial takes I hear.
Agree? Disagree? Think I’m worthy of an Adam Hadwin-esque security guard tackle? Let me know in the comments.
@golfoncbs The infamous Adam Hadwin tackle ? #golf #fyp #canada #pgatour #adamhadwin ? Ghibli-style nostalgic waltz – MaSssuguMusic
Episode #16 brings us Cliff McKinney. Cliff is the founder of Old Charlie Golf Club, a new club, and concept, to be built in the Florida panhandle. The model is quite interesting and aims to make great, private golf more affordable. We hope you enjoy the show!
Last week, I came across a reel from BBC Sport on Instagram featuring Scottie Scheffler speaking to the media ahead of The Open at Royal Portrush. In it, he shared that he often wonders what the point is of wanting to win tournaments so badly — especially when he knows, deep down, that it doesn’t lead to a truly fulfilling life.
View this post on Instagram
“Is it great to be able to win tournaments and to accomplish the things I have in the game of golf? Yeah, it brings tears to my eyes just to think about it because I’ve literally worked my entire life to be good at this sport,” Scheffler said. “To have that kind of sense of accomplishment, I think, is a pretty cool feeling. To get to live out your dreams is very special, but at the end of the day, I’m not out here to inspire the next generation of golfers. I’m not out here to inspire someone to be the best player in the world, because what’s the point?”
Ironically — or perhaps perfectly — he went on to win the claret jug.
That question — what’s the point of winning? — cuts straight to the heart of the human journey.
As someone who’s spent over two decades in the trenches of professional golf, and in deep study of the mental, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of the game, I see Scottie’s inner conflict as a sign of soul evolution in motion.
I came to golf late. I wasn’t a junior standout or college All-American. At 27, I left a steady corporate job to see if I could be on the PGA Tour starting as a 14-handicap, average-length hitter. Over the years, my journey has been defined less by trophies and more by the relentless effort to navigate the deeply inequitable and gated system of professional golf — an effort that ultimately turned inward and helped me evolve as both a golfer and a person.
One perspective that helped me make sense of this inner dissonance around competition and our culture’s tendency to overvalue winning is the idea of soul evolution.
The University of Virginia’s Division of Perceptual Studies has done extensive research on reincarnation, and Netflix’s Surviving Death (Episode 6) explores the topic, too. Whether you take it literally or metaphorically, the idea that we’re on a long arc of growth — from beginner to sage elder — offers a profound perspective.
If you accept the premise literally, then terms like “young soul” and “old soul” start to hold meaning. However, even if we set the word “soul” aside, it’s easy to see that different levels of life experience produce different worldviews.
Newer souls — or people in earlier stages of their development — may be curious and kind but still lack discernment or depth. There is a naivety, and they don’t yet question as deeply, tending to see things in black and white, partly because certainty feels safer than confronting the unknown.
As we gain more experience, we begin to experiment. We test limits. We chase extreme external goals — sometimes at the expense of health, relationships, or inner peace — still operating from hunger, ambition, and the fragility of the ego.
It’s a necessary stage, but often a turbulent and unfulfilling one.
David Duval fell off the map after reaching World No. 1. Bubba Watson had his own “Is this it?” moment with his caddie, Ted Scott, after winning the Masters.
In Aaron Rodgers: Enigma, reflecting on his 2011 Super Bowl win, Rodgers said:
“Now I’ve accomplished the only thing that I really, really wanted to do in my life. Now what? I was like, ‘Did I aim at the wrong thing? Did I spend too much time thinking about stuff that ultimately doesn’t give you true happiness?’”
Jim Carrey once said, “I think everybody should get rich and famous and do everything they ever dreamed of so they can see that it’s not the answer.”
Eventually, though, something shifts.
We begin to see in shades of gray. Winning, dominating, accumulating—these pursuits lose their shine. The rewards feel more fleeting. Living in a constant state of fight-or-flight makes us feel alive, yes, but not happy and joyful.
Compassion begins to replace ambition. Love, presence, and gratitude become more fulfilling than status, profits, or trophies. We crave balance over burnout. Collaboration over competition. Meaning over metrics.
Interestingly, if we zoom out, we can apply this same model to nations and cultures. Countries, like people, have a collective “soul stage” made up of the individuals within them.
Take the United States, for example. I’d place it as a mid-level soul: highly competitive and deeply driven, but still learning emotional maturity. Still uncomfortable with nuance. Still believing that more is always better. Despite its global wins, the U.S. currently ranks just 23rd in happiness (as of 2025). You might liken it to a gifted teenager—bold, eager, and ambitious, but angsty and still figuring out how to live well and in balance. As much as a parent wants to protect their child, sometimes the child has to make their own mistakes to truly grow.
So when Scottie Scheffler wonders what the point of winning is, I don’t see someone losing strength.
I see someone evolving.
He’s beginning to look beyond the leaderboard. Beyond metrics of success that carry a lower vibration. And yet, in a poetic twist, Scheffler did go on to win The Open. But that only reinforces the point: even at the pinnacle, the question remains. And if more of us in the golf and sports world — and in U.S. culture at large — started asking similar questions, we might discover that the more meaningful trophy isn’t about accumulating or beating others at all costs.
It’s about awakening and evolving to something more than winning could ever promise.
‘Why would anybody want to change that swing?’ – Brandel Chamblee says PGA Tour star was wrong to change his swing
‘The stupidest freaking thing I’ve ever heard’ – Billy Horschel slams Open idea suggested by Padraig Harrington
WITB Time Machine: Brandt Snedeker’s winning WITB, 2018 Wyndham Championship
Golfer proudly posts photo of ball mark on iron, receives immediate roasting
WITB Time Machine: Matthew Wolff’s winning WITB, 2019 3M Open
Oakmont Country Club bans Wyndham Clark over locker incident; Reveals specific conditions to earn reinstatement
Adam Scott puts Callaway blades in the bag at Wyndham Championship
Report: LIV star fires caddie and coach in shock shake up
Rickie Fowler makes equipment change to ‘something that’s a little easier on the body’
The championship formula: How 3 key stats separate winners from the field
Peter Malnati WITB 2025 (August)
Peter Malnati what’s in the bag accurate as of the Wyndham Championship. More photos from the event here. Driver: Titleist...
Cameron Young’s winning WITB: 2025 Wyndham Championship
Driver: Titleist GT2 (9 degrees, A1 SureFit setting) Buy here. Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei 1K Pro Orange 70 TX 3-wood: Titleist...
Camilo Villegas WITB 2025 (July)
Camilo Villegas WITB accurate as of the Wyndham Championship. Villegas was undecided on a 3-wood when we shot his bag. ...
WITB Time Machine: Brandt Snedeker’s winning WITB, 2018 Wyndham Championship
Brandt Snedeker fired a final-round 65 at the 2018 Wyndham Championship to outlast Webb Simpson and C.T. Pan. His 5-under...
Don Koes
Jan 7, 2021 at 4:42 am
Hi Tom,
In regards to MOI matching, is there any general rules of MOI increment between iron set vs hybrid vs woods vs driver?
Thanks a lot.
rob huget
Nov 7, 2016 at 10:10 am
Tom I have ordered your 575 mb 5 to the gap also your driver. When I ordered my previous set of mizuno mp 32 they were 2 degree’s flat, when Ross Beebe in Chilliwack measured the shafts they were an inch longer than standard. Is this normal if you are going to flatten the degree’s to have the shaft longer. Also I would assume lie fitting for the driver would be the same as the irons, if impact is more to the heel the lie should be flatter. Thanks Rob Huget
Pingback: Improving Slim Shots For Sale | petsloseweight.com
Jim
Jan 20, 2015 at 10:53 am
Tom, I would like to learn how to be a club maker and fitter, I have
read your materials and have some fairway woods from you and
very happy with clubs and your knowledge. So what I am asking is
your advise on how to go about this venture. Thanks Jim
PS I live Massachusetts
zzkevinw
Feb 20, 2014 at 4:03 pm
Thanks Tom,
I’m 60 years old, fit and athletic, a 21 handicap, and have played for 4 years now. I’m ready to buy my first set of new clubs, and put the yard sale clubs in the basement. Whenever I’m listening in on a fitting session at a golf store, the whole experience seems daunting and a bit dodgy, as if it’s only about how much money they can talk you into spending. I’m very green when it comes to the golf-club lingo and such. Can you steer me toward a competent, trustworthy fitter somewhere near either York, ME or Worcester, MA? Cheers.
Starving Golfer
Feb 11, 2014 at 12:04 pm
Tom,
Any recommendations for club fitter/maker in Nashville, TN?
Regards,
Scall1968
Feb 6, 2014 at 2:13 pm
Tom,
How long until the wedge article?
Tom Wishon
Feb 7, 2014 at 5:37 pm
Well the WRX editors were talking to me today about what’s next. Are you asking about how to choose the right wedge for you and your game?
Iain Clarke
May 24, 2014 at 10:57 am
Hi Tom ,
I am also very interested in you forthcoming wedge article as I am currently producing a my own line of wedges via a manufacturer in Fujian , I read part of an article where you were promoting the virtues of a company called Vtech in Tiawan . would it be possible for you to recommend at contact at the company please.
Iain
Zdenek
Feb 6, 2014 at 10:44 am
Hi Tom! I would like to buy first driver for my girlfriend. Like Mizuno EZ driver – 44″ ladies spec…What is you recommendation – something like 42-43? Thanks Zdenek
Tom Wishon
Feb 7, 2014 at 5:36 pm
Need some more information about her.
1. What is the measurement of the distance from her wrist to the floor while standing comfortably erect, shoulders level, arms relaxed at her sides, standing on a hard surface floor in flat sole shoes.
2. What is her avg score or handicap
3. Is her swing path outside in, square or inside out
4. Is her swing tempo, smooth/easy, forceful and aggressive or somewhere in between these
5. Would you say that she is above average in her athletic ability, about average or below avg
Get that info to me and I will be happy to offer the best recommendation for her so the length does not get in the way of her being as good as she can be, yet it can be comfortable for her too.
TOM
Zdenek
Feb 8, 2014 at 10:24 am
Hi Tom many thanks!
1. 82cm (32inch)
2.112, but know in winter we trained a lot with PRO
3.inside out
4.slow backswing, fast change to agressive downswing
5.above average athletic ability
Mike
Feb 6, 2014 at 10:18 am
Great insight Tom. Always learn something from your articles and posts on the site. Just made the switch to heavier shafts in my driver and fairway wood and definitely see a big difference and less Slices. Not to mention cutting the driver down to 44″ and 3 wood to 42″ for better consistency. Looking forward to reading more of your articles.
Bo svensson
Feb 2, 2014 at 9:32 am
Thanks tom for an excellent article. I am really keen after reading this to make a proper set for myself. Do you have any experience of teeview, a club fitter in stockholm, sweden? Or recommend someone else in the area?
Thanks in advance!
Tom Wishon
Feb 7, 2014 at 5:39 pm
Tee View is OUTSTANDING in clubfitting. Seriously, Conny and Leif are really good, very experienced and without question you WILL walk away with the very best fit you can possibly get. (and I bet you did not know that Leif is a former Olympic athlete for Sweden) Don’t hesitate to call them – your golf game will love them when you are finished!
Jack cheney
Jan 30, 2014 at 1:42 pm
Tom, great article, and I told Glenn Malmquist you said hello. He is 88 years young and still active. He says hello to you and keep up the good work! Thanks, jack
Tom Wishon
Feb 7, 2014 at 5:41 pm
I bet he is still active. Shoot, from what I remember about his energy level when I used to talk to him regularly in clubmaking back in the 80s and 90s, he is going to outlive every one of us here! And you tell him that too!
Christian
Jan 24, 2014 at 3:13 pm
Hi Tom, thanks for the article. I have a question specifically about Hybrid fitting. I have been trying very hard to find a 2H with mixed results. I’m a 1 hdcp and play a straight or small draw, can’t hit a fade to save my life. I’ve owned three 2hybrids in my search and am finding a pattern. The 2h’s I’ve tried from a tee produce an unexpected big fade and often start right of target. I’m not sure why it is the only club in my bag producing these results. All shafts have been stiff at 75-80 grams.
So the question is, what are the most important spec’s to consider when getting fit for a 2hybrid? Thanks Tom.
Christian
Tom Wishon
Jan 29, 2014 at 1:08 pm
It is difficult to know for sure what could be causing you to fade the ball this much with this hybrid when you do not do that at all with any other club. Typically for that to happen, the face angle of the hybrid would have to be much more open than any of your other clubs. But as a 1, I would think that you would see this when you put the club down in the address position. Really from all my experience for a really good player to fade/slice one club only would point to this having a much more open face. Only other thing would be if the headweight feel was much too light for your swing tempo, but here again as a 1, you would have noticed that right away.
I tend to see hybrids as irons, meaning to be the same length as an iron of that same loft. Most all OEM hybrids are made to lengths that are longer by 1″ to 2″ than what an iron of the same loft would be. Now for you as a 1, that length should not be an issue. Only other thing I can add is to experiment with your ball position with this hybrid. Some hybrids by virtue of their length play more consistently when a little more forward ala a fwy wood, while others require from their length to be played a little back, like halfway between left heel and center.
Christian
Mar 12, 2014 at 1:05 pm
Thanks for the reply Tom. I have since tried another 2 different 2h which produced big hooks. I’m starting to think I just don’t know how to hit a 41″ 2h 17* club specifically.I don’t know enough about shafts to compare and all 5-6 2h’s I’ve tried have all had different stiff shafts. At this point I think I’ll go find a fitter just to find a 2h I can become “friends” with. I have 13 clubs that are my close “friends”, can’t wait to figure out what my issue is with 2h’s and find one to fit into my set. *still searchin*
Don Porter
Jan 23, 2014 at 6:52 pm
I have been more accurate with my driver since I started choking up. Does shortening the club help more than just choking up?
Tom Wishon
Feb 7, 2014 at 5:43 pm
As Mr Penick taught me years ago, he preferred the term “gripping down” on the club as there is just this “other” connotation with the term “choke”. . . . cough cough. ((!!))
Gripping down is fine as an alternative to physically cutting the club shorter as long as the smaller grip diameter that brings about is not uncomfortable to you. That’s really the only downside to gripping down because grips are all tapered in their diameter.
Brian
Jan 20, 2014 at 1:47 pm
Hey Tom, I am a 4 handicap living in Minot, North Dakota. I have been looking into a new set of irons as well as a new 3 wood. I am 6’4″ and have used standard length, lie clubs my entire life. My problem with my irons is that my misses with my short irons tend to be a blade, and my problem with my 3 wood is that it feels way too light for my swing/swing speed. Any suggestions on an experienced club fitter in my area? I would really like to know what it feels like to swing properly fitted clubs.
Thanks,
Brian
Tom Wishon
Jan 20, 2014 at 5:16 pm
Brian
Ouch, sorry about the fact that custom clubmakers are scarce up in your neck of the woods. In such cases when there is not a decent clubmaker in someone’s area, we have a program where we can help you. If you would please send us an email at contact@wishongolf.com we will be glad to explain how we can help you.
Thanks
TOM
Chris
Jan 28, 2014 at 2:26 pm
Brian,
If you ever get the chance to stop in at an Austad’s Golf in Fargo, they have a store there. Talk to Nick, he is the manager at the store and would probably be of great help to you. I work at one of the other stores and Nick is a very nice guy. It would definitely be something I would consider if you wanted to get fit off a launch monitor.
James brown
Jan 17, 2014 at 8:31 pm
Just had elbow surgery on left elbow. I’m looking to do a whole new club set. Dr. Says to go with graphite shafts. I had the UST recoil prototype put in my mp-69 and have just hit today the wedge and 9 iron. How good they feel and different also. Can you tell me of a very good Wishon clubfitter in North Carolina? I am in High Point-Greensboro area. That’s in central part of state.
I have spent my last 2-3 months on the shelf reading your material. Thanks, james
Tom Wishon
Jan 19, 2014 at 12:57 pm
I can offer two recommendations not too far from High POint. Steve Thornton in the Winston Salem area at 336-817-6907 or StevesRxGolf@aol.com – or in the Thomasville area, Special Tee Custom Golf at 336-887-3333.
Thanks very much for using my reading material to help you get through the re hab period! Best to you!
AJ Jensen
Jan 16, 2014 at 12:57 pm
Funny you mention this about the 7-wood. A friend of mine has an old seven and he uses it for so many different shots, and with such good results, I’ve had my own eye out for a seven just like it.
With the recent trend toward higher lofted drivers, do you see fairway woods making a similar loft increase? I ask because I’m in the market for a new fairway wood, after hitting a Stage 2 HL model with 16.5 loft, and in the simulator it seemed to outperform my current Burner 1.0 13-degree spoon.
Tom Wishon
Jan 19, 2014 at 11:28 am
No, actually fairway woods have undergone a very slight loft decrease over the past 30 yrs – like irons but not even close to as much of a loft decrease as with the irons. Up to the 80s, 3 woods were all 16*, 4 wood was 19*, 5 wood 22*, 7 wood 25*. These days the avg 3 wood is 14-15, 4 wood 16-17, 5 wood 18, 7 wood 21 and 9 wood around 24.
The reason higher loft drivers hit the ball farther as swing speed is slower while with fwy woods and irons that isn’t the case has to do with the relationship of swing speed to how much the ball can keep flying up and up in the air on a lower launch angle. For most golfers, that “point of reverse return” when less loft means more distance comes at around 16, 17, 18 degrees – also depending on swing speed for sure. But once you get to 20*+ almost all golfers will hit a lower loft longer in distance because the height of the shot at higher lofts keeps the ball up in the air with enough spin to allow the ball to fly as far as the ball speed allows. With slower speeds and lower lofts, you just do not have the ball speed or spin to keep the ball up in the air longer enough to really fly to the maximum distance the ball speed would allow. So more loft on the driver means more distance for slower speeds because the loft launches the ball higher and with more spin to keep the ball up in the air longer.
Where the slower swingers have to be careful with woods is to generally not try to use a 3 wood unless you have a 90mph speed and have good swing fundamentals. Today’s 14-15 3wood lofts are just too low for slower swing speeds and especially for slower speeds + less that great swing characteristics to hit well up to fly.
JRUt
Jan 16, 2014 at 11:23 am
Tom,
Great article. It really applies to those of us whom are “vertically challenged.
What are your opinions regarding club fit and the growing junior golfer? Should they be fit twice a year, or more?
It’s been an interesting 18 months with multiple growth spurts.
Tom Wishon
Jan 19, 2014 at 12:51 pm
Having remembered when the growth spurt hit with my son, I certainly understand what you are going through. Usually though the faster it happens, the sooner it will calm down so changes in the length of the clubs can be limited. In general, with more athletic kids, if their initial jr clubs were fit properly for length, you can figure that for each 4″ they grow in height, the clubs would need to get another 1 inch longer. This is a basic average and for sure can be different due to kids’ differences in height vs arm length. But for economics sake, it would be best if you could extend the length of the clubs for the first length increase you need up to an increase of +2″. Then when you need to go longer than that, you would need to re shaft or get new sticks.
Steelydan
Jan 16, 2014 at 4:53 am
Tom,
Thanks for the great article. For a tall guy like me with relatively short arms (wrist to floor is 39″), would you rather start an iron fitting with upright lie or with longer shafts? I hear so many different opinions about this. Most recommend to limit shaft length and increase lie angle, but I understand length is not so much of a problem in irons? Would +2″ still acceptable?
Thanks
SD
Ken Christopherson
Jan 15, 2014 at 10:40 am
Tom, as usual, you make sense. Thank you. I think any one of your books is a great place for someone to start to get an idea of how they are handicapped by not having equipment that fits them and their game. It is interesting that Titleist used to write on their website that less than 5% of customers can use off the shelf clubs effectively, and that most golfers would benefit from being custom fit. Each of us needs: different swing weights, different club lengths, different lie and face angles, different grip sizes, matching clubs to MOI, the correct choice of shaft weight & flex, all to fit our specific athletic and physical characteristics. You are a voice of reason and effective common sense in a market filled with marketing hype.
dman
Jan 14, 2014 at 12:15 pm
Tom, I find it hard get a hold of good clubMAKERS. Can you recommend someone in the LA area? East side if possible? There are so many guys out there at these big box stores that really don’t know what they are doing or are just careless. Thanks.
Tom Wishon
Jan 14, 2014 at 4:04 pm
Based on my limited knowledge of LA geography, a really good clubmaker in what I perceive to be “sort of east” LA would be Ron Burleson of Corona Custom Golf in Corona – 951-279-9663 or ron@coronacustomgolf.com (www.coronacustomgolf.com). And then further east would be Philip Moore of Exact Golf in Cathedral City – 760-904-5198 or 951-377-6268 / underpar45@aol.com. I’ve known both of these men for some time, have had them at clubfitting seminars over the years, and can testify they both know what they are doing for sure in serious clubfitting.
dman
Jan 14, 2014 at 6:21 pm
thank you very much!
Stan Szczsponik
Jan 11, 2014 at 7:22 pm
Tom,
Wondering if you can recommend someone in Rhode Island, Massachusetts or Connecticut to perform the fitting. If not, are you available and where are you located?
Thank you.
Stan Szczsponik
Coventry, Rhode Island
Chad
Jan 12, 2014 at 3:48 pm
Stan,
Tom Spargo – Spargo Golf in Cranston, RI
spargogolf.com
You won’t be disappointed!!
Tom Wishon
Jan 13, 2014 at 7:18 pm
Real quick Stan to echo what Chad told you about Tom Spargo. I know him personally from him being at a number of the clubfitting seminars I have done over the years and he is VERY good.
Tanner
Jan 10, 2014 at 7:43 pm
Good info Tom. As a life long 25-30 handicapper, should I forget the
the proper core turn and swing from the ground up and just get the face
fixed? I will say, I don’t have an issue of a slice. The problem is usually a lack of distance or a proper strike where my ball falls short of the target. Will these changes help there or is it more to fix
a slice?
Cheers
Tanner
dman
Jan 14, 2014 at 12:12 pm
this is a very specific question for a high handicapper. go see a pro who is also a clubfitter!
Phil Marshall
Jan 10, 2014 at 7:46 am
Superb article, I have followed conventional wisdom and industy maketing down some blind allies eg lighter shaft, total club weight, that were inappropriate for me. Amazing results from trial and error outcomes that so closely match Tom’s real wisdom. This shaft weight and head weight matching to a golfer is just so impotant to performance.
Tom, I think another book is warranted.
Thanks so much
Dennis
Jan 10, 2014 at 12:37 am
Hi Tom,
Great article, has got me thinking and reading more shafts. I play Mizuno MP 58 with DG S300 shafts that play well. Woods and hybrid not so much. These are also Mizuno. Driver MP 630 10.5 deg, 4 wood mp 16.5 deg, 20 deg hybrid mp clk. What shaft would be best to get the same feel in these as the irons?
Thanks
Tom Wishon
Jan 13, 2014 at 7:21 pm
Most players who like the feel of the Dynamic Gold do need to get themselves into a tip firm shaft as well for the woods. Problem is there are MANY tip firm shafts in woods in MANY varying levels of tip stiffness. So the bottom line is really to see if there is a really experienced clubfitter in your area with whom you can work so he can better evaluate the shafts you have used in the woods that are not quite right, then from that he can get a better idea of where you need to go next with the wood shaft. What town/city do you live in/near? Let me know that and I can look to see if there is such a good clubfitter in reasonable proximity to where you live.
Chuck
Jan 9, 2014 at 10:09 pm
This is just a stunningly intelligent article. I’ve been playing with a 42.5″ steel (DGLite X100) 3-wood for 12 years. TM 200 Tour “smoothie”. I would not take $400 if someone wanted to buy it from me.
And I plan to build myself a 43.5″ steel (DGSL) driver this year; probably a SLDR 430.
Experimenting is fun, easy and enjoyable when the shafts cost $14.95.
Thank you for all of your wonderful writing, Tom.
Shallowface
Jan 9, 2014 at 6:03 pm
The tricky part about grip size is the different amounts of taper from one shaft to another. Some shafts taper very little, and some taper a great deal. When you’ve got a driver with one shaft, fairways with another, hybrids with another still and then the set of irons, getting that grip size consistent, especially under the trail hand, can be a chore. But it’s necessary if you’re going to have a consistent grip with every club.
Loop
Jan 9, 2014 at 5:39 pm
Tom fantastic info on the budget MOI fit for irons. Thanks. With the 3/8 length changes, do the lie angles have to also be adjusted accordingly?
Tom Wishon
Jan 9, 2014 at 6:51 pm
Lie angle always should be rechecked dynamically whenever a golfer changes lengths on his clubs (or if you’re dead serious when you change shafts, change swingweight/headweight too).
LY
Jan 9, 2014 at 2:45 pm
Tom:
I saw a big improvement in my consistency when two years ago I changed my set make-up so that the 7 iron was the first iron in my bag. I volunteer at an LPGA event every year and I get a chance to look in a lot of the players bags. I noticed a very high percentage carried more than one hybrid. So I’m thinking to myself on the drive home, if the best women players are using more than one hybrid then how come I’m not.
James
Jan 9, 2014 at 2:22 pm
Mr. Wishon, what is the best way to ensure my current driver, if cut down to 44 inches from current 45.5, is weighted properly? Unfortunately in my area, clubmakers are rare and most things I have to do myself.
Tom Wishon
Jan 9, 2014 at 7:01 pm
Get yourself some lead tape and head to the driving range. After warming up through the bag, hit 2-3 shots, add 2 strips of lead tape, each 4″ in length (anywhere you want on the head – though flat across the sole is a real easy place to put it) hit 2-3 shots, add tape and so on.
What you want to do is note the feeling of the head’s weight during the whole swing, backswing, transition and then downswing while hitting shots and progressively adding a little weight. Do this until you start to feel that the head’s weight is feeling a little on the heavy side to you. Then back off 1-2 strips of the lead tape and hit 3-5 shots with that, and see if you feel that you need to drop any more headweight from a FEEL standpoint of it still being a little heavy.
Then several days later come back to the range, warm up, then hit 3-4 drivers with the club as you finished weighting it the last range session and reflect on that headweight feel one more time to see if you sense whether the weight feel of the head on the end of the shaft still feels pretty good, not too heavy and not too light.
It really is best to do it this way so you do not get trapped into a specific set swingweight measurement. Some guys will add weight back to the head after shortening the club to make the shorter club’s swingweight the same as what it was at the longer length. Lots of times if you do cut 1″ or more from the length, that becomes too much headweight when you add weight to get the swingweight back to the same as it was at the longer length. Swingweight is not an actual weight – it is simply an expression of the relationship of weight on one end of the club vs the other. When you change length dramatically, the swingweight that represents the best headweight FEEL for your swing timing and tempo won’t likely be the same at the shorter length as it was at the longer length.
Hence the reason to have to go through a hit a few, add weight, hit a few, add weight – and reflect on the headweight FEEL as you keep doing this a little at a time. You’ll find that point where the weight feel of the head during the swing is not too heavy and not too light. And that’s where you stop and forget it from then on as you head out to play.
TOM
Ron
Jan 18, 2014 at 1:58 pm
Tom, love your posts. I’ve got a Nike Covert that I have to choke up about an inch or so to hit consistently, but I was hesitant to cut it down. It’s the stock length which is 45.75 which is way too long for me, even as a 3 handicap. I’ve got a very aggressive swing with fast tempo so I’m right in the category you say will benefit from shorter driver length. If I lop off 1.75 inches, I’m afraid that’s going to take an awful lot of lead tape. Any ballpark of how many strips I’ll need? If it helps, my favorite driver of the past few years was a Callaway Razr Fit with a whiteboard x73 that measured D6. I went away from it last year when I gained about 20 pounds, lost flexibility from less play, and lost about 8 MPH swing speed. I haven’t been fully properly fit since my fitness declined but I just tweaked based on feel. Any advice for a fitter in central NJ?
J.A.
Jan 9, 2014 at 1:51 pm
Tom, what about proper iron length? If you recommend shortening woods by a half to a full inch, would that also be suggested for irons?
Tom Wishon
Jan 10, 2014 at 11:29 am
No, irons over the years have not increased inordinately in length as have drivers and fwy woods. If you go back to the 80s before this length increase began, drivers were 43″, 3 woods were 42″, and the 5 iron std length was 37 1/2″ Today we see the avg driver at 45.5″ with some at 46″, the avg 3w is 43 to 43.5, but the avg 5 iron length is 38″, representing only a half inch increase.
So irons have not “gotten out of line” nor have they increased in length to the point that the modern length could be a performance problem for golfers.
Duncan Castles
Jan 9, 2014 at 1:24 pm
As always, fascinating and informative. And it all works.
Tom is too modest to mention it, but his excellent hybrids, fairways and drivers can be easily adjusted to the correct lie angle without the use of any weight-adding, deceptive hosel device.
Ralph Patterson
Jan 9, 2014 at 12:39 pm
Tom,
Someone asked if you should shorten the driver, 3-wood etc. by cutting the butt or the tip of the shaft but I never saw your answer. What’s the best way to shorten them?
Thanks,
Ralph
Oldplayer
Jan 9, 2014 at 3:39 pm
Always the butt. Cutting the tip can change the flex characteristics dramatically.
Conrad
Jan 9, 2014 at 12:23 pm
I’ve always played 46 in my driver, tried shorter shafts but gained little to no accuracy from it. Drivers always been solid as its the best club in my bag
Tom Wishon
Jan 9, 2014 at 4:40 pm
If you have the time, find my article on How To arrive upon your best lengths which is floating around the tech forum and has been getting some more commentary so it is not too many pages deep in that forum.
You’ll find the exact description of how to know what golfer swing characteristics indicate that longer is better or shorter is better. In general, the smoother/more rhythmic the transition and tempo, the later the release, the more square to slightly in/out the path, the flatter the plane and the better the golfer’s sense of feel and timing, the more they could play well with longer lengths.
The opposite of these swing characteristics all add up to say shorter is a must. I’m betting if you do well with 46″, you possess many to most of the above swing characteristics.
Jeff Burns
Jan 9, 2014 at 12:14 pm
Which one of these tips will give me 17 extra yards? Ha.. I joke, I kid!
Great article Tom and I’ve very happy to see vindication for my 7 wood in here. I’ve even carried a 9 wood in the past and it’s been a huge help. I’ve taken my driver down to 44.5 but I might go shorter and bring the 3 wood down with it.
Thanks for the excellent information.
J
DB
Jan 9, 2014 at 8:46 am
Shorter driver and fairway wood really is the #1 tip. I can’t understand why more amateurs don’t do it. I see all these guys, even shorter guys, with 45.5-46″ drivers.
I’m 6’1″, and went to 44.75″ driver and 42.5″ 4-wood. Both D3. I love it, will never go back to anything longer. In the fairway more often, and I don’t even think I lost any distance. Still have the same clubhead speed.
Bryce
Jan 9, 2014 at 9:56 am
Hi
Shorter with tip cut to make stiffer or butt end cut?
Thanks 🙂
Tom Wishon
Jan 10, 2014 at 11:30 am
When shortening an existing club, cut from the butt end. And then go to work with lead tape to see what headweight increase is necessary to get the headweight FEEL comfortable during the swing.
Mats "PUMP 2" Bergsten
Jan 9, 2014 at 7:52 am
Tom,
Great article, as always when you decide to share your thoughts and knowledge!
Living in Sweden I use David Leet, PGA Pro at Falsterbo GK, to fit my clubs. He uses all the equipment to get my clubs MOI matched and all other variables as well. Very much into details, as well as I am. Reading your articles and visiting you website, givs me a better understanding, when collaborating with him, in a strive to get the best fitted equipment for myself and my game.
Keep up the good work!
Tom Wishon
Jan 9, 2014 at 12:00 pm
Matz:
Thanks much and just wanted to echo that you couldn’t be in a better place for your golf! Not only is Falsterbo such a great links, but David Leet is truly a “pro’s pro” in every facet from teaching to training to fitting to being one of the nicest people on the planet. And it is great that your club is continuing to work on improving the links with the course revisions you are making. I’ve been very fortunate to have been to your club several times. I wish I could own a house in the neighborhood and be a member and hang out there a lot.
Rich
Jan 9, 2014 at 7:39 am
I have been in the golf retail industry and buying gold equipment on a regular basis in the Australia (Sydney) for the best part of 20 years now. There is no one (green grass or off course retail) that would know how to do this kind of detailed fitting here. It just does not exist. I know more than any (maybe all put together) of the people (including club pro’s) working in golf retail in my area, about golf equipment, shafts, tech data and performance, full stop. I was even fit for a set of Titleist irons in the last 12 months or so and the fitter had to refer to a book (fitting manual of some kind) because he didn’t know how to fit me properly. Needless to say I didn’t buy the irons. Fitting here in Sydney Australia is a buzz word, not something that people know how to do. I’m not sure there is anyone that knows how to do it properly in my experience. The only people I have left to try are the Ping guys here in Sydney. When I’ve spoken to them on the phone, they sound like they actually know what they are doing but I haven’t tried their fitting process out yet so I may have to give them ago the next time I’m in the marker for something.
Tom Wishon
Jan 9, 2014 at 12:18 pm
Do you know Gary Tozer at Aussie Custom Golf up in Gateshead? http://www.aussiecustomgolf.com – 417 297 266 . Maybe about 60 miles from Sydney.
Oldplayer
Jan 9, 2014 at 3:44 pm
What about Melbourne Australia Tom? I have experienced the same as Rich and find it hard to get fitted properly. Sydney is 800 Kilometers away.
Tom Wishon
Jan 9, 2014 at 4:35 pm
Ahhh, Melbourne you are in LUCK!!!! Call Geoff Waldon on 39 439 8151 or email him at geoffwaldon@intermode.on.net and book a fitting appt as fast as you can. Geoff is REALLY GOOD, very experienced and has been doing this on a low key basis for quite a number of years now.
TOM
Rich
Jan 9, 2014 at 4:30 pm
Thanks Tom. Gateshead is about a 90-120 mins drive from Sydney but’I might have to get in touch with him. Cheers.
Brandon
Jan 9, 2014 at 12:58 pm
Pure Performance Golf Labs Sydney location opens at the end of January. Over 30,000 combinations and every brand that is not only fit but then hand built to those exact specs.
Pureperformancegolflabs.com.au is the website
Rich
Jan 9, 2014 at 4:59 pm
Thanks Brandon, I will check them out too. Cheers.
JohSte
Feb 26, 2014 at 8:57 pm
Hi Rich
see Dave Reckless at Dural Golf Driving Range.
In the best 100 fitters in the world.
sam Brooks
Jan 9, 2014 at 4:46 am
Yip I’ve just gone back to 45.5″ driver.. That’s all I need to hear. I’m cutting it down an inch first thing in the morning… Tom says I do!!!
Patrick
Jan 9, 2014 at 3:36 am
Tom, fixing slices a
Robert
Jan 9, 2014 at 3:29 am
Nice article, a lot of good information in there. However, I am sceptical towards changing the face angle. I mean, shouldn’t we as practitioners of the sport strive towards perfecting our technique instead of compensating with equipment in a way that almost encourages swing faults?
Tom Wishon
Jan 9, 2014 at 12:07 pm
Without question golfers should work on their swings and do their best to keep improving their swing characteristics. But the hard cold fact is that not that many golfers have the time, money or commitment to take the lessons and work as hard as is required to make permanent swing changes. Not only that but the swing moves required to hit the ball straight are most definitely body movements that not that many people have the athletic ability to do – to master a square to slightly inside out swing path with a later to very late release are two very challenging movements for less athletically inclined people to master.
To natural athletes, these things are not that difficult to do so they can’t imagine why all golfers can’t do it. but it is a fact that with MANY golfers who swing over the top, outside in and slice the ball, no matter what they will never master a swing path and release change to be able to turn that slice into a straight ball.
It is for those golfers that face angle fitting stands as one of THE most important game improvement elements that can be used to enjoy the game more. And according to Golf Digest, over 70% of all golfers do slice the ball to some degree – so that’s a whole lot of golfers who could enjoy the game more if they did draw upon face angle fitting as part of their fitting improvement work.
paul
Jan 8, 2014 at 11:51 pm
He writes, I read.
P
Jan 8, 2014 at 9:58 pm
Problem is, hardly any fitter has MOI machines. And it takes FOR EVER to do MOI fit.
Ian
Jan 8, 2014 at 9:47 pm
Tom, after getting the weight in the six iron correct how do you determine the proper weight for the rest of the irons. I know there are MOI measuring machines but if you don’t have one what would you suggest the swing weight progression should be?
Tom Wishon
Jan 9, 2014 at 12:11 pm
One can come VERY close to an MOI match by making the irons to be in 3/8″ increments for length AND then making the swingweights to progress upward in 0.5 swingweight point increments down through the set. So let’s say the ideal 6 iron you find is 37 1/2″ and D1. Starting with the #7, the lengths get shorter in 3/8″ increments per iron and the swingweights go D1.5 for the #7, D2 for the #8, D2.5 for the #9, D3 for the PW. And on the other side of the #6, the #5 becomes 37 7/8″” longer and D0.5, the #4 becomes 38 1/4″ and D0. WE joke around and call this the “poor man’s MOI match” but it is a VERY close approximation of using the $500 MOI machine to do the match for the clubs in the set.
P
Jan 10, 2014 at 3:26 am
If that is true, then why do we even need the machine?
Tom Wishon
Jan 13, 2014 at 7:23 pm
Only if you get concerned about the clubs being perfectly matched for MOI within 1 to 2 g-cm2 or if you are ok with being close within say 10-15 g-cm2. for most golfers, the progressive swingweight approach will be close enough.
John Muir
Jan 8, 2014 at 8:38 pm
Great article. I like the driver/control driver/5 wood set makeup idea.
John
Deck
Jan 8, 2014 at 6:33 pm
I recognize that photo!
As usual another Fantastic article Tom.
Tom Wishon
Jan 9, 2014 at 12:20 pm
Hey Deck!! Thanks! Staying warm up there? And like us, counting the minutes until spring?!! HA!
Merty Huckle
Jan 8, 2014 at 6:12 pm
good stuff.
tom stickney
Jan 8, 2014 at 6:08 pm
Fantastic article….big fan of your work, sir!
melrosegod
Jan 8, 2014 at 6:01 pm
It’s refreshing to read intellegent thoughts based on precision experience rather than “smash-boom” hype. Thanks Tom!
Jeffrey Trigger
Jan 8, 2014 at 5:48 pm
I play an R1 Black with a Kiyoshi white shaft, I had it cut down. I actually hit it further than my longer shafted driver. I play an RBZ Stage 2 Tour HL 3 wood that is a quarter inch shorter than standard. I will never again play a 15 degree 3 wood. Absolute monster. I have a 4 hybrid and 4 through PW. All of those are two degrees upright. I like slim wedge grips on all my clubs. Although finding 580 core grips can sometimes be very hard.
Andrew
Jan 8, 2014 at 5:43 pm
Very insightful as ever Tom. Gone to a 44″ driver earlier this year after reading some of your other articles and the consistency difference is massive…still thinking of going shorter as well along with shortening the 3 wood/3 hybrid to more ‘old school’ lengths.
Was fitted and Went to four wedges last year and have never looked back. Got 46/06, 50/08, 54/11, 58/6 to make sure distance gaps are covered. Santa brought me some higher bounce options to help with the softer winter conditions in the UK and they’re working well also and should give me options through the summer I guess
People really need to look at this especially given some of ‘std’ (very strong) lofts manufacturers are using.
tiger168
Jan 8, 2014 at 5:42 pm
Back to the basics, awesome article, this will be an instant classic.
Pingback: Tom Wishon: 7 club fitting keys to improve shot consistency | Min kärlek till golfen...
Dwaine Ingarfield
Jan 8, 2014 at 5:37 pm
Great article. I am a big believer in using a shorter than new standard driver.
Tom Wishon
Jan 9, 2014 at 6:50 pm
From 1905 to 1985, “standard” length for a men’s driver was 43″. And believe me EVERY company followed that as their standard driver length. having worked in the golf equipment industry since 1980 and doing head design work since 1986 it has always been interesting to be to wonder just why did that “standard” grow some 3″ in the years from 1985 to present day. Golfers didn’t get taller or grow shorter arms over the past 28 yrs. I’ve always wanted to ask the golf companies for an answer to that question.