Equipment
A Look at Major OEMs’ January Golf Club Patents

Many of the patents major OEMs apply for with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office take several months to a year to get published, or made public. In other words, companies begin working on a technology and apply for a patent (if it’s something unique enough that the parties in question believe they alone should profit from for the term of a patent) well before we, the general public, are able to hear about it.
Still, it’s interesting to examine the technologies that some of the highest-paid equipment wonks in the world are working on, even if these specific models never make it market.
Let’s take a look at major OEMs’ published patents from the month of January, starting with what they’ve been working on at Nike’s Oven.
Nike
On January 14th of last year, Nike filed a patent application for a drag-reducing driver head design, which features a series of airfoil surface sections. The design is supposed to improve the club’s aerodynamic performance, and the structures appear intended to reduce drag in the last third of the swing in particular. As the company states, it believes existing “drag-reducing” designs focus too much on the moment of impact, rather than the entirety of the swing in general, and moments of greatest acceleration, in particular.
Further, Nike seems to be paying particular attention to hosel design. As the filing states:
Reducing the drag of the club head not only at the point of impact, but also during the course of the entire downswing prior to the point of impact, would result in improved club head speed and increased distance of travel of the golf ball. When analyzing the swing of golfers, it has been noted that the heel/hosel region of the club head leads the swing during a significant portion of the downswing and that the ball striking face only leads the swing at (or immediately before) the point of impact with the golf ball.
Obviously, the square shape is notable, as well, and is reminiscent of the SasQuatch.
See the full patent filing here.
On April 22, Nike also filed for a patent related to a multi-piece driver head, as well as the method for making said club head. Although the SQ didn’t utilize the same multi-piece construction that Nike references in the patent filing, the design appears very similar to that club, well beyond just the square shape.
As you can see in the two illustrations, the driver is made of several component parts, including the face, and there appears to be additional technology in the sweet spot of the club.
See the full patent filing here.
Customization has been the dominant refrain in the world of golf club technology in the past decade. It’s not surprising then, that a major OEM is looking into technology that allows golfers to adjust the sound of their equipment. In one sense, the ability to adjust the sound of a driver is a new gimmick and a potential industry trend. However, it could be much more. Imagine you’re demoing a driver and love everything but the sound. Imagine, too, you could easily adjust the head to make the sound at impact something you enjoyed. From the company’s standpoint, your ability to do so could make or break a sale.
Nike’s patent, filed on September 3rd, includes technology by which “A user may change the vibrational characteristics associated with the club head when a golf ball is struck, thereby changing the sound emanating from the club head when a golf ball is struck.” The specific means for this adjustment appears to be two screws, indicated in 1520A/1520B in the sketch, and additional technology to occupy the hollow shaft area indicated in 1530A/1530B—possibly a screw of some sort.
See the full patent filing here.
Callaway
Callaway—recent challengers to TaylorMade’s dominance of all advertising mediums—was recently granted a patent for the golf club head design pictured below. The Carlsbad-based company applied for the club head-related patent on September 24th, and it seems acoustics are a primary concern for this clubmaker as well.
Callaway’s driver features a “a sound modifying sole and crown design,” as well as “club head with face component composed of a metal material for a more efficient transfer of energy to a golf ball at impact, a non-metallic aft-body to control the mass distribution, and a connection between the sole and crown at a location other than the periphery of the club head for altering the frequency, amplitude, and duration of the sound of the golf club head striking a golf ball, as well as improving the rigidity of the head.” In other words, substances joined to optimize distance and produce (for lack of a better term) a good sound.
See the full patent filing here.
Titleist
Tileist is pursuing removable weight technology in the form a cap and a slug. Further, “the slug includes an anti-rotation feature that prevents relative rotation between the slug and the receptacle and a lead-in portion.” The design seems to be for a pretty straightforward removable weight positioned in the center of the sole of the club, as well as a mechanism to hold the weight in place.
See the full patent filing here.
Cobra
This design from Cobra was one of the more interesting concepts from the January batch of major OEM patents. The company is pursuing a patent for a “golf club head with a top line insert.” What’s interesting about this patent application: It appears to be for an iron. In addition to a traditional cavity in the back of the club, and in contrast to a cavity in the sole of the club, which companies including TaylorMade have implemented recently, Cobra’s design features a filled cavity in the top line of the club.
So, what does this insert do? According to the filing:
The insert has a density that is less than the density of the club head body, and the insert preferably is a light-weight insert. The insert may include one or more damping materials. The recess removes material from the club head, which in turn may do one or more of the following: increase the overall size of the club head, expand the size of the club head sweet spot, lower the club head center of gravity, and/or produce a greater club head moment of inertia.
See the full patent filing here.
Ping
Phoenix, Arizona-based Ping was granted a patent for “golf club heads with ribs and related methods.” The company applied for the patent on September 4th.
As the filing indicates, “Ribs have commonly been employed in the crowns of club heads to enable the crowns to be as lightweight as possible while still providing sufficient stiffness in the fore and aft direction.” However, the company also believes “The prior art fails to recognize that a club head having a crown with parallel ribs that uniformly reinforce the face of the club head is not an efficient structure since the club head face is not uniformly loaded but is subjected to essentially a point impact near its center.” Thus, Ping has developed the superior ribbed club head below.
See the full patent filing here.
If you liked this segment, let us know, as we’re considering making it a regular feature. All patent information was obtained through FreshPatents.com.
Equipment
BK’s Breakdowns: Cameron Young’s winning WITB, 2025 Wyndham Championship

Cameron Young’s WITB from his win at the 2025 Wyndham Championship. Cameron is a Titleist staff player but his bag is definitely filled with some unique clubs. Here are the clubs he used to secure his first PGA Tour win!
Driver: Titleist GT2 (9 degrees, A1 SureFit setting)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei 1K Pro Orange 70 TX
3-wood: Titleist GT3 (15 degrees)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei 1K White 80 TX
Hybrid: Titleist GT2 (21 degrees)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus HB Black VeloCore+ 10 X
Irons: Titleist T200 (4), Titleist T100 (5), Titleist 631.CY Prototype (6-9)
Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold X7 (4-9)
Wedges: Titleist Vokey Design SM10 (48-10F, 52-12F, 56-14F @57), WedgeWorks (60-K* @62)
Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold X7
Putter: Scotty Cameron Phantom 9.5 Tour Prototype
Grips: Golf Pride Tour Velvet Cord
Ball: Titleist Pro V1x Prototype
Whats in the Bag
Peter Malnati WITB 2025 (August)

- Peter Malnati what’s in the bag accurate as of the Wyndham Championship. More photos from the event here.
Driver: Titleist GT3 (10 degrees, C2 SureFit setting)
Shaft: Project X Denali Blue 60 TX
3-wood: Titleist GT3 (15 degrees, A1 SureFit setting)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus TR Blue 7 X
7-wood: Titleist GT2 (21 degrees, D1 SureFit setting)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus TR Blue 8 X
Irons: Titleist T150 (4, 5), Titleist T100 (6-9)
Shafts: True Temper AMT Tour White X100
Wedges: Titleist Vokey Design SM10 (48-10F @47, 52-12F, 56-08M @57, 60-04T @62)
Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue S400
Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Style Fastback 1.5 Tour Prototype
Grips: Golf Pride Tour Velvet
Ball: Titleist Pro V1x Yellow
Equipment
GolfWRX Members Choice presented by 2nd Swing: Best driver of 2025

We’re proud to once again partner with 2nd Swing Golf to bring you GolfWRX Members Choice 2025! 2nd Swing has more than 150,000 new and pre-swung golf clubs available in six store locations and online. Check them out here.
What is the best driver in 2025? At GolfWRX, we take great pride in our online community and the cumulative knowledge and experience of our members. When it comes to the best driver of 2025, we want to know what our forum faithful think.
Since our founding in 2005, the bedrock of GolfWRX.com has been the community of passionate and knowledgeable golfers in our forums, and we put endless trust in the opinions of our GolfWRX members — the most knowledgeable community of golfers on the internet. No other group of golfers in the world tests golf clubs as frequently or as extensively, nor is armed with such in-depth information about the latest technology.
Below are the results of GolfWRX member voting for the 2025 best driver, along with the vote percentage for each club.
Best driver of 2025: The top 5
5. Callaway Elyte Triple Diamond: 6.02%
Callaway’s pitch: “For golfers looking for a fast, forgiving, yet workable driver, the Elyte Triple Diamond features a tour-inspired shape and is the preferred model by most Callaway tour players.”
You can read what other golfers are saying about the driver in the GolfWRX forums, and see our launch piece here. Shop the Callaway Elyte Triple Diamond here.
4. Ping G440 Max: 6.86%
Ping’s pitch: “The most forgiving G440 model, MAX has a hotter face to generate speed and distance, and a lighter overall system weight with a longer shaft (46″) for faster clubhead speed, higher launch and longer carries. The Free Hosel and Carbonfly Wrap crown save weight to create our lowest CG ever and increase forgiveness while contributing to a more muted, pleasing sound.”
You can read what other golfers are saying about the driver in the GolfWRX forums, and see our launch piece here. Shop the Ping G440 Max here.
3. Ping G440 LST: 9.53%
Ping’s pitch: “LST is an especially good fit for faster swings, offering less spin and more control with a penetrating trajectory. A hotter face, lighter overall system weight and longer shaft (46″) deliver more speed and distance while maintaining tight dispersion.”
@phizzy30: “Not a fan of Ping drivers in general, but 440 LST takes the cake. It’s super forgiving across the face for a low spin head, looks and sounds good and the ability to make it play neutral or slightly fade biased through the hosel settings is very appealing.”
You can read what other golfers are saying about the driver in the GolfWRX forums, and see our launch piece here. Shop the Ping G440 LST here.
2. Titleist GT3: 16.55%
Titleist’s pitch: “The GT3 Driver offers Titleist’s boldest combination of power and personalization through adjustable performance. Dial in the CG Track to your frequent contact location to make your biggest drives even bigger while taking total control over flight and shaping.”
@mrmikeac: “I’ve been Anti-Titleist for years and years and years (outside of Vokey, of course). With that being said, HOLY BEGEEZUS the GT3 driver is an absolute NUCLEAR MONSTER! This thing blew my G430 10K Max out of the water in every single category. Forgiveness is the biggest thing that stands out of me, the 3 model has always been one of the less forgiving models in the past but this GT3 can take bad shot after bad shot and still end up in the fairway, I think a ton of that has to do with the adjustability, it’s actually effective. Feel and sound is perfect, that solid crack is so addicting to hear and when you hit it out the screws this thing can absolutely bomb it. Titleist, I’m sorry for doubting you. You have converted me.”
You can read what other golfers are saying about the driver in the GolfWRX forums, and see our launch piece here. Shop the Titleist GT3 here.
1. Titleist GT2: 22.91%
Titleist’s pitch: “Delivering impressive distance from any impact point, the Titleist GT2 Driver extracts maximum performance through a forgiving design. Get the stability and added confidence of a high-MOI driver without sacrificing speed.”
@DTorres: “The Titleist GT2 has proven to be the best driver of the year. Packaged in a classic profile, GT2 perfectly balances performance and forgiveness while consistently being a high performer across all categories.”
You can read what other golfers are saying about the driver in the GolfWRX forums, and see our launch piece here. Shop the Titleist GT2 here.
Other drivers receiving >2% of the vote
Driver | Vote percentage (%) |
---|---|
Cobra DS Adapt Max K | 4.85% |
Ping G430 Max 10K | 3.85% |
Callaway Elyte Triple Diamond | 3.68% |
TaylorMade Qi35 | 3.51% |
Callaway Elyte | 3.18% |
Cobra DS Adapt X | 2.34% |
Cobra DS Adapt LS | 2.17% |
TaylorMade Qi35 LS | 2.17% |
View this post on Instagram
dave dawsey
Feb 3, 2014 at 7:18 pm
For all of those that are interested, there is an entire blog directed to this; see http://www.Golf-Patents.com
Ben Alberstadt
Feb 3, 2014 at 7:43 pm
Fancy that it’s your blog… Thanks for bringing this to the readers’ attention though.
dave
Feb 4, 2014 at 10:07 am
Fancy that, couldn’t be where the idea came from… Thanks though, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
Chris
Feb 2, 2014 at 3:02 pm
I love that WRX has someone checking up on these things as there is no way I would do it personally. Does anyone follow up to see how long it takes these patents to come to life??? For instance, these patents passed through this year, so when will we see these clubs?
Aldo
Feb 2, 2014 at 1:49 pm
Inferesting article. Make it a regular feature!
Birdie Bob
Feb 2, 2014 at 11:27 am
Keep them coming!!
BB
yo!
Feb 2, 2014 at 10:47 am
Interesting article for someone interested in the tech behind clubhead design. To change the way a driver sound is interesting because many players can be put off buying a driver due to its sound at impact.
christian
Feb 2, 2014 at 9:09 am
Why are patent filings done with what looks like hand drawn pictures on a napkin?
Bill
Feb 2, 2014 at 10:37 pm
This is a requirement of the US Patent office.
corey
Feb 3, 2014 at 8:36 pm
bill is right, those basic looking drawings are actually very difficult to draw. the reason being is that they are done by hand and every part of the drawing has to be to scale. thats the reason people who do those drawings will usually charge around $200 a page
Ben Alberstadt
Feb 1, 2014 at 6:09 pm
Thanks for the kind words, all! It was a piece I thought might work well and that I’m happy to do again in the future. Many thanks for the feedback!
GolfWRX
Feb 1, 2014 at 4:55 pm
I love the article!
RG
Feb 1, 2014 at 3:34 pm
Great article once again Ben!
Steve
Feb 1, 2014 at 3:31 pm
I think this should be an included feature as often as possible. Would make for great discussion and a little insight on what may be coming out. Always cool to see what these guys are coming up with next.
That Titleist patent looks like it would create something like the Callaway BBA with a changeable weight changing the COG. I like it!
robby
Feb 1, 2014 at 1:45 pm
Very interesting!
Christopher Barnes
Feb 1, 2014 at 12:44 pm
very interesting – great segment into the science of the game