Opinion & Analysis
Practicing without boundaries: How I rediscovered my short game
These days you will hear many instructors talking about the concept of technique versus skill as it relates to your golf game. I think this is a very important notion for players who are looking to improve, and I’ve explored it in my new book.
Many golfers become obsessed with perfecting their technique at the expense of their skill, and personally I believe it should be the other way around.
What is skill?
I had a conversation with Andrew Rice last year that stuck in my head, and I’ve been thinking about it a lot ever since. I asked him a simple question about how he felt golfers could practice more effectively. He quickly responded by saying that players should focus more on doing things “outside of the box.”
Andrew, an instructor whose opinion I strongly respect, said that the one thing he noticed with junior players is that many of them have tremendous short games and the ability to pull off all kinds of shots. He believed it had to do with the fact that they were always experimenting, and were not bound by any kind of structure or technical thoughts during their practice sessions.
In other words, they were just playing.
Immediately this made me think of my childhood and how I used to practice. When I was younger I had an amazing short game, and could get up and down from almost anywhere with a variety of shots.
The reason I was able to do this was because I would spend hours in my backyard experimenting with all kinds of wedge shots. Unfortunately, it resulted in tearing up the lawn, hitting a parked cop car, and even a few errant shots striking the house (luckily I avoided the windows). But I did improve.
All of those “play” sessions were so successful because I wasn’t thinking about wrist hinge, where the ball was in my stance, or any kind of other technical cues. I was just seeing if I could get the ball from Point A to Point B in a creative way. If something worked then I tried to recreate that feeling on the next shot.
I didn’t know it at the time, but I was developing my skill as a golfer.
As I grew older my short game got worse and worse, and I began to worry about what was causing it. The more I thought about what I was doing with the club in terms of technique, the more petrified I became of my wedge shots on the course. It got to the point where I was approaching yip territory.
My practice sessions became obsessed with trying to fix these issues, but they didn’t work. Looking back, it was clear that I lost all of the inspiration that made my short game so great as a kid, and I was trying to solve the issue in an adult way. I had lost my ability to work on my skill, and was just worrying about technique.
What changed?
The last couple of years I have regained a lot of my short game skill because I have returned to the kind of practice that got me there. Now I have my own lawn that I am free to tear up, and I spend 15-20 minutes of my practice time trying to experiment.
I throw about 10 balls on the grass and choose a bunch of different targets. One shot will be a low runner to the bucket 20 feet away from me. Another will be a lofted pitch to a towel 60 feet away. I keep shifting from shot to shot, and see what happens.
This is the kind of practice that develops your skill as a golfer. It’s random, and it gets you focusing on a different target each time. There is plenty of evidence from coaches who are looking into cognitive research that support doing this kind of practice rather than just trying to hit the same target over and over again.
Why is skill so important?
Skill is important for a golfer because a round of golf requires you to adapt to all kinds of situations. You might be stuck behind a tree, have a fluffy lie in the rough with a bunker in between you and the green, or have a severely sloped stance in the fairway.
You need to adjust your technique to each situation. I believe that is the essence of skill, being able to adapt. I have seen so many players who are able to execute amazing shots with technique that would be considered unorthodox, but because they had developed their skill as a golfer, they had the confidence to pull them off.
Don’t get me wrong though; there is absolutely a place for proper technique in your golf game. It’s certainly an important fundamental. But golfers are not robots, and I think it’s important to sometimes move your attention away from these technical thoughts and just focus on finding a way to advance the ball to your target. Isn’t that the point of this game?
So the next time you are at the range, or have a few minutes to practice in your backyard, try doing things outside of the box. Imagine there is a tree in front of you and you have to hook your 6-iron around it. Pretend there is a bunker right in front of you that you have to clear to land your wedge shot safely on the green.
Try to have fun, experiment, and play like a child. Don’t worry about your technique so much.
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship

Alex
Mar 15, 2016 at 11:42 am
I’ve just bumped into this article. Your story is my story. Outstanding wedge player as a kid, went sour in my late 20s. I still remember the endless hours of “playing” in my backyard, making up shots and pretending I was about to win the Masters if I holed out from the fringe.
I’ll definitely give it a try. The rest of my game is still in shape. But I need to regain my confidence with my wedges.
Mbwa Kali Sana
Mar 7, 2016 at 1:21 pm
YOUR article confirms what I have always contended ,e.g practicing is useless ,I never go to a driving range nor practice on a practice Green .But I play on the golf course every two days ,18 holes .often alone ,So when There’s nô one in front or behind I play several balls in different ways With different clubs .My short game is very sharp ,And at AGE over 81 ,I Still play to a 7 handicap ,Thanks to m’y short game ,which compensates for loss of distance off the TEE ,due to AGE .
rymail00
Mar 6, 2016 at 12:13 am
Great article.
There’s new articles every few days on the front page, and my personal favorite ones are practice type articles like this. I hope they keep articles like this going on a regular basis. Even if the article is about something I may already do everytime I practice there’s still always a chance of learning something new or different, or even a slightly different approach towards what we are trying to improve at. So these types of things I love reading about.
Jon Sherman
Mar 6, 2016 at 12:10 pm
Thank you! I think a lot of players need some direction in their practice sessions (me included). It’s just a matter of getting some ideas on how you can spend that time effectively.
KK
Mar 5, 2016 at 8:55 pm
Great article. Humans naturally avoid uncomfortable situations. Unfortunately, a round of golf is often full of uncomfortable situations, haha.
Ronald Montesano
Mar 5, 2016 at 7:15 pm
I have a friend (We’ll call him “The Scrambler”) who wants to know distance from the fairway down to the foot, it seems. Get him on the green, or near it, and all that goes away. If I want to bust his chops, I feign revelation of # of feet to hole; he flips out. That’s affirmation of the point you’re making, I think. Full golf is fairly fundamental, while short golf is artistic play.
Jon Sherman
Mar 6, 2016 at 12:11 pm
I would agree with that. The short game requires a lot of creativity, and there are many ways to play each shot. While technique has its place, imagination and skill are just as important.
Andy
Mar 5, 2016 at 5:24 pm
Great post. I think this is applicable to the entire game also. I see way too many people who are playing “golf swing” instead of “golf”. At the end of the day the point of the game is to get the ball in the hole in the fewest number of strokes. I practice my short game where I never hit the same shot twice, similar to what you have described above. At the range I never hit the same club more than three times in a row and spend at least 5-10 minutes hitting crazy low hooks/fades, half shots, high shots, etc. with different clubs….i.e. the shots you actually need 2-3 times a round. This has really forced me to get better and not thinking about technique and just making the ball move a certain way and has lowered my scores.
RAT
Mar 5, 2016 at 3:18 pm
Doesn’t matter how you get there as long as your 1st ( excluding cheating)! I think too many people have been watching too much instruction on TV with all the high tech computer stuff and have forgotten how to practice and play loose. Most people don’t want to learn the tuff shots because they just move the ball where it’s out of trouble and doesn’t require a special shot making attempt. I say if you want to roll the ball go bowling. I have witnessed balls being moved 10-15 feet for an unobstructed shot. I love making the tuff attempts to test my skills and to impress , (Show-n -off)! Grant you I’m not good but I love to dream up stuff and have been fairly lucky in pulling them off.I have a friend we were playing together he was in the woods and I suggested he should hit through an opening in the trees about 15 x15 inches he challenged me to do it and I did and he said 100 bucks if you do it again just a smaller hole about 6 inches over., I did but there was no pay off. Both landed on the green one rolled into the trap-First one was slick..
Philip
Mar 5, 2016 at 2:08 pm
I prefer to be creative on the course. After work, when I finish practicing on the range, take a club (8i) and play 3-4 holes until dark. In addition, during this season every 3rd or 4th round I will carry just a sunday bag with 5-6 clubs and no scorecard, and go out and enjoy the day outside. Even trying to get into trouble to see what I’ll do to get back in play.
Jon Sherman
Mar 5, 2016 at 2:45 pm
I 100% agree with you, and have written an article about that before. If it’s possible, I believe practicing on an actual golf course is one of the best ways to improve. During the summer when it stays darker out later I try to take 4-5 balls on the course and try all kinds of shots on a few holes. Not everyone has access to a situation like that, but if you can do it it will pay big dividends.
Paul Byrne
Mar 5, 2016 at 1:02 pm
Another excellent article Jon. You have hit the nail on the head. Players like yourself, who are skilled at the short game, have learned through experimentation having been exposed to a wide variety of different course conditions, lie, turf hardness, slope etc., in their early years of development. They all possess an innate understanding that if you strike the ball lower down on its circumference, or increase swing speed, it will spin more. Or, if you hit down, it will launcher lower. The skill is in finding the correct balance between each of these elements, given the prevailing conditions, in order to obtain the appropriate launch angle, trajectory and spin rate for the desired shot.
I agree, working on technique or relying on smash factor, spin loft, dynamic loft, attack angle numbers, etc, as advocated by many golf instructors, is no substitute for experimentation as you have described. That approach is more akin to ‘painting by numbers’, and is not the route to mastery.
Look forward to more of your articles.
All the best
Paul
Jon Sherman
Mar 5, 2016 at 2:42 pm
Thank you Paul! As you know it’s a delicate balance between the two.