Opinion & Analysis
Teaching professionals, take a seat (literally)
I’ve had the opportunity over the years to watch hundreds of teaching professionals give lessons — generally from a distance so as not to disturb them or their students. What I’ve observed is that they are always standing as if they were a waiter in a restaurant taking a dinner order.
I have to ask: Why?
Where is it written that a teaching professional must stand when giving a lesson? And yet I would venture that this is the standard protocol for virtually 100 percent of them. As a teacher, I think it is essential that we understand the great teachers that have gone before us, and so I’ve made a point to research each and every one of them dating back to Harry Vardon. In my research I found an accounting of John Jacobs’ life written by author Laddie Lucas in 1987. What he reported was that Jacobs, Europe’s preeminent teaching professional, had an advanced case of varicose veins because he had always stood while working with students during the course of his entire career.
I wish he could have read this article early in his career; it could have saved him a good deal of discomfort and pain. That said, before discussing this issue further, I think it is important to make a distinction between two different types of teaching professionals:
- Those that spend most of their time in the golf shop. When requested, they give a lesson here and there. They may not give more than 10-15 lessons per week, and in many cases these lessons are of a “touch-up” nature lasting no longer than 30 minutes.
- Those who are career teaching professionals and may give 40-50 lessons a week. They might be at a country club, a public course or a driving range. For the most part, their lessons are an hour in length. They may spend between 8-10 hours a day on the lesson tee teaching — on some occasions, seven days a week.
You might imagine standing for that long on your feet day after day, week after week, year after year. In what other profession would you be required to withstand that level of punishment. And for what? I was hired as the Teaching Professional at Interlachen Country Club in Edina, Minnesota in 1977. This was of course where Bobby Jones won the third leg of his Grand Slam in 1930. The very exclusive club is steeped in history, having held every possible USGA championship at one time or another. The invitation fee in 1977 was $50,000 and there was a two-year waiting list.
How did those members react back then when they saw two chairs sitting behind my teaching station? They were initially surprised, but when I explained the purpose of the chairs they understood completely. And those members who took lessons found how much they enjoyed the opportunity to sit down and relax between shots.
Here was the routine that I followed.
- At the beginning of the lesson, the student and I would sit down and talk about what had transpired since their last session.
- In the event they were a new student, I wanted to hear their story. I would, during this first session, ask them a few probing questions while identifying their goals and objectives — all the while in a relaxed and comfortable atmosphere.
- I would then ask them to hit a few shots with a variety of clubs. I would sit and watch. After they were done, I’d ask them to sit down. I would then stand, and move to the practice station, where I would explain what changes were necessary for them to improve. I would demonstrate the right and wrong way if I thought it would be helpful.
- The student would then stand and join me. I would then adjust their grip or setup if necessary. And then when advantageous, I would physically guide them through the correct backswing or downswing movements to provide them with the correct feel.
Through this process, I had armed the student with:
- An intellectual understanding of the problem.
- A visual picture of the correct position or desired movements.
- A physical feel for the required changes.
I would then sit down again as they began hitting shots, while at the same time giving them feedback from one shot to another. After they’d hit several shots, I would have them join me in sitting again. I would then have them state the changes they were to work on for two reasons:
- I wanted to make sure what they heard was what I had said, because I’d found over the years that often times the two accounts were different. This step avoided any possible confusion.
- I was of the opinion that if the student was not able to articulate what they’d learned, they likely didn’t really understand it. And in that case, I would clarify it for them.
In most cases, my next student would be warming up just as I was finishing with the first. I would slide over and repeat the entire process again with a fresh diagnosis and a custom-designed remedy.
I have not varied from this routine for more than 40 years. The only exception has been on some occasions that I have utilized a bench or a pair of stools while achieving the same effect. And what I’ve found through this process is that my students are not only more refreshed between shots, but they enjoy their lessons more because they are not so fatigued. You might be wondering, have I ever been chided by a student for sitting down? The answer is “No, never.” Whenever you visit the doctor, he enters the room what does he do? He sits down. Exactly.
Teachers around the country, I would like you to look at yourself in a mirror and repeat these words after me until you come to believe them as if they were gospel: “I am a highly trained and experienced professional, and for that reason there is no need for me to perpetually stand in front of my students as if I was hoping for a tip.” Once you have convinced yourself of that fact, find yourself two comfortable chairs, stools or a bench and start using them as I’ve described on the lesson tee.
And now that we’ve established that, let’s sit down and have a talk.
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship

One Day At A Time
May 10, 2018 at 1:49 am
I want to point out a chronological pattern I’ve observed. Working carts, we sat down for a few minutes twice a day. Working the driving range, the picker was considered a bit of a break. Working the counter, we met customers standing, face to face. Teaching juniors, we often were kneeling and moving up and down the line. Observing from down the line and moving to face on in doing a diagnosis. Standing in front of mirrors demonstrating an adjustment to an address position. Moving from an inside setting to an outside setting. Taking payment, face to face, with a handshake and a “Thank You for coming out”.
The trend is, it’s an active job when done in this linear fashion.
Dave r
May 5, 2018 at 11:08 pm
Hey. He’s giving you the lesson I’m not paying some pro $150.00 an hour to sit and watch sorry. I go for a reason for him to tell me what I’m doing wrong I shouldn’t have to ask .
Rev G
May 4, 2018 at 11:53 am
Another nice thing about sitting while practicing or taking a lesson is it gives you a chance to slow down and collect your thoughts. Also, physically it stretches out your back and relaxes your shoulders. If you just sit there and bang balls standing up for an hour straight, it’s often difficult to stay mentally and physically ready to hit balls in a manner like you want to on the course.
larrybud
May 3, 2018 at 10:54 pm
I quit an instructor because he would sit the entire lesson. He would say “do this” and never show me. So it depends on the student and what you’re working on. If you’re trying to get me into a certain position, or tell me a certain drill, you better show me.
PGA Coach
May 4, 2018 at 9:19 am
Did you ever say “I’m not sure understand, can you show me?”
Radim Pavlicek
May 5, 2018 at 6:31 am
Did you tell him?
ViagrGolfer
May 3, 2018 at 12:27 pm
A new set of golf clubs will do wonders for your swing and your game. It did for mine.. PXG.