Opinion & Analysis
Golf forums: Where are all the women?
Last year, I joined the online golfing community by signing up for a golf forum. I joined mainly to share knowledge and get ideas for my blogs. This was before I joined GolfWRX. Although I enjoyed this new type of interaction, I realized after a while that I was only talking to men. Where were the women? I was wondering what was going on.
I found that this trend wasn’t unique to the particular forum I was using, and similar trends were seen on other golf forums. According to the web audience measurement tool Quantcast, the split on golf forums is around 70 percent men and 30 percent women. (1) So the question is, why do women shun online golf forums? Also, is it specific to golf forums, or does the same apply to other sports forums? And does this trend even apply to online forums across the board?
Women and men debating this issue on social media (2) put forward various reasons:
- Women golfers are, in general, older and are less likely to go online than older men. Overall, 34 percent of men 65 and older use the internet, compared with 21 percent of women that age (3). This is not the full story, as there are plenty of women golfers on social media such as Twitter.
- Maybe women aren’t as competitive about golf as men? They consider it a hobby, and they don’t spend time on it outside the golf course. I know plenty of women who are very competitive about their golf, though so this can’t be the reason.
- Maybe women stay away from golf forums for the same reason that prevents women from taking up golf; they just don’t feel welcome. Some women may consider that they are not supposed to have an opinion on sports. If this were true then they would also be absent from social media, which isn’t the case.
- Women have less time to contribute to online forums. It is indeed true that studies have found that women around the world have less free time than men. In the UK, men have 40 minutes more free time each day than women. When women have free time, they prefer to spend it with their family or socializing in real life rather than online. (4) This could be one of the reasons, but is this the whole story?
I don’t think any of the above fully explain the issues, so we have to dig deeper. Maybe the issue is less to do with golf and more to do with the difference in online behavior between women and men. I decided to put my scientific hat on and do a bit of research.
I quickly came across research that shows that although women and men are equally represented online, (3) their online behavior is very different. And the way men and women communicate online reflects how they communicate in real life. Women post about different things, prefer certain platforms and use language differently from men. (5) Men are more likely to use social media to search for information about certain topics (sports or politics), while women use social platforms like to connect with people and to post about personal issues. (5)
One of the reasons why women may be more reluctant to go online is also fear of negative feedback, which unfortunately happens more to women than to men. In addition, discussions on forums can sometimes become hostile, and women are not as confrontational as men. Taking part in overly hostile discussions may not seem worth the effort.
The lack of women’s participation was not limited to online forums, of course. It’s more widespread online, such as on media websites. The New York Times found that it received 1 million comments on online articles between 2013 and 2014, of which only 25 percent were from women. This was despite the fact that 44 percent of New York Times readers are women. In 2014, Harvard’s Business School started teaching female students how to speak up more in the classroom after it found that women had been participating less than men.
In conclusion, the absence of women form golf forums is not linked to the sport, but rather certain behavioral traits and preferences of women — both on and offline. Once again, it seems that women are from Venus and men from Mars, as famously said by John Gray.
Should we accept that women are absent from forums, or is there anything that can be done to attract more women to online forums?
References
- www.Quantcast.com
- http://www.golfgal-blog.com/2009/03/golf-forums-where-are-women.html (comments) – site accessed:4.5.2018
- Deborah Fallows (2015). How women and men use the internet. Pew Internet & American life project 28.12.2005
- http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2005/12/PIP_Women_and_Men_online.pdf
- Office for national statistics. (2015) Leisure time in the UK.
- A. Atanasova (2016). Gender-specific behaviors on social media and what they mean for online communications www.socialmediatoday
- Emilie Pearson (2014) How men dominate online commenting https://qz.com/259149/how-men-dominate-online-commenting/ site accessed 14/05/2018
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship

Lovejoy
Jul 31, 2018 at 3:40 am
Women are generally too intelligent to waste time on internet forums.
barb
Jul 31, 2018 at 2:38 pm
…. or too preoccupied with their dudes.
Tom Duckworth
Jul 30, 2018 at 7:25 pm
Women just don’t Geek Out over equipment like men do. My granddaughter loves to play
and is happy with her gear and just isn’t always looking to upgrade like her Grandpa.
She knows whats good gear but isn’t overly concerned about it and knows it’s all about the person swinging the club almost like thinking about gear takes away from the golf game for her. Face it most “not all” of these forums are about gear I’ll bet cave men endlessly went over their spears and bows and were always looking for better wood or the best rock for arrow tips.
Alex
Jul 30, 2018 at 11:28 am
There are plenty of young women entering the golf industry, maybe we don’t engage on golf forums as much because there are few posts relevant to the trials we face playing a male-dominated sport. Would love to talk about the lack of equipment fit for professional women golfers and such, that I would get on a forum for. Thanks for the article Inga!
James T
Jul 29, 2018 at 4:27 pm
I love it. This is the first-ever golf forum article I’ve read with references/footnotes! More of that should be required in the comments for those of us who bloviate.
JB
Jul 29, 2018 at 8:13 am
I tried to start a conversation with my wife about Ryan Moore’s iron shafts and ………She didn’t care.
Scott
Jul 30, 2018 at 1:37 pm
LOL. that sums it up.
barb
Jul 31, 2018 at 2:36 pm
Have you ever discussed your shafts with her?
Brian
Jul 29, 2018 at 1:40 am
It’s the same way on cycling forums. I think guys just like talking about their toys more.
barb
Jul 31, 2018 at 2:37 pm
boys love their toys… at any age.
Tish
Jul 29, 2018 at 1:21 am
I’ve a women…love the sport, carry a single digit handicap and have been reading the forums on here for a few years. I do like the forums truly stick with golf…I’ve never see a rant.
One thing that disappoints me is female golfers are NEVER chosen to test clubs and equipment. VERY, VERY sad. What I really want to know is what other women are using, wearing, swinging, etc…or how they review some of the equipment. I’ve put in dozens of times, but have never been tapped. I don’t try anymore. We need an equipment section and style section for women.
Wiger Toods
Jul 29, 2018 at 12:17 am
A well researched article saying this place is a Sausage Party – and she’s definitely right – and then you get to the bottom and see about 93% “shanks”. My goodness… if we had women’s participation go up just 20%, you wouldn’t see all the courses closing as they are. Yet, here’s this old-timey manly men garbage.
Ladies, PLEASE, show up. Your tour is more interesting to watch from a mere-mortal standpoint. Your growth in this game will save it from itself. Your opinions are welcome and encouraged, and if you have a problem with anyone based on gender in a post, REPORT IT.
Shame on many, many of you. The answer to golf being more mainstream is simply your not acting like belligerent teenage boys. ¯\_(?)_/¯
bob
Jul 28, 2018 at 11:47 pm
who cares
barb
Jul 31, 2018 at 2:39 pm
you apparently do.
Kip
Jul 28, 2018 at 10:09 pm
3/10 sounds really high. In fact, I would think an article of this nature would celebrate that ratio. That must be significantly greater than the proportion of women/men on the golf course.
Joe
Jul 30, 2018 at 1:57 pm
That was my thought. I’d say maybe 2 out of 10 posters on a forum like WRX are female. Maybe.
Just the facts
Jul 30, 2018 at 2:31 pm
And two out of ten golfers as well.
Bruce Ferguson
Jul 28, 2018 at 9:42 pm
I have to wonder what the split is on tennis forums.
Men can go on and on about clubs, brand loyalty, shovels vs. blades, etc. Women are wired differently and probably couldn’t care less. Women are more focused on relationships. Outside of the LPGA-related forums relating to tour players and tour drama (aka-gossip), there’s evidently little interest beyond that.
KandyMan
Jul 28, 2018 at 9:20 pm
Huh this just made me realize ive never noticed a womens section on the BST. Maybe there is one and i just never paid any attention? Though from the few women i know that do play golf its 99% reason to get out of the house and socialize. The ole “my drinking team has a golfing problem” thing.
Acemandrake
Jul 28, 2018 at 9:14 pm
Do/say what you want, have thick skin, & ignore the critics.
Remember, an attack is not personal if the other person doesn’t know you.
Geohogan
Jul 28, 2018 at 7:37 pm
According to the web audience measurement tool Quantcast, the split on golf forums is around 70 percent men and 30 percent women
I am surprised that 30% of golf forum web audiences are women.
Do we know % of all golfers who are women?
Jack
Jul 30, 2018 at 2:50 am
Exactly… This article does all that research but doesn’t bother to tell us that core number. Where I play it’s a lot less than 30 pct female golfers. So 30 pct forum makeup would be high.
Just the facts
Jul 30, 2018 at 9:37 am
20%
Jamie
Jul 28, 2018 at 7:16 pm
… but mainly about golf issues that are of interest to men and promoting the men’s game. A man would be crucified if this were listed in their professional description.