Opinion & Analysis
An interview with Jon Cavalier, amateur golf course photographer
A congregation of golf course architecture aficionados gathers regularly on the internet, to preach the word of design. Their Stonehenge is a website called Golf Club Atlas, and when the denizens aren’t posting long-form pieces on golf course architecture history, they engage in smoldering debate on the origin, merit, and authenticity of architects, their decisions, and the outcome of those decisions. Members of the community often gather, site unseen, for events called the King’s Putter, the Midwest Mashie, and the Knockout. Their allegiance is unwavering, the stuff of legends, even when a match is on the line, or a favorite course’s origin is called into question.
Many on the site have money and the wherewithal to join, or travel to as guests, the world’s the great clubs. Many others do not, and garner knowledge through the descriptions of these sojourners. To the great benefit of all, members like Joseph Bausch (a Villanova University professor) and this writer (not a Villanova University professor) post their images for all to view.
More than any other, and in a brief period of time, Jon Cavalier has emerged as the lens witness to the glory of golf course architecture. Cavalier shoots more courses, with greater frequency, than one might think humanly possible. What exceeds belief, is that photography is not his career. Cavalier is a lawyer, based in Philadelphia. One of his passions is golf course architecture and its photography. Without him, golfers on Golf Club Atlas and Instagram and Twitter (where he post as @linksgems) would not have access to the Pine Valleys, the Cypress Points, and the Yeaman’s Halls of this country and the world. It is our pleasure to present this interview with him, along with a dozen of his favorite photos. If you don’t know the spots, enjoy their beauty and follow Mr. Cavalier on social media for a daily dosage.
1. How did you transition from just golfer to golfer and photographer?
I’ve been an avid golfer for about 20 years now. I picked the game up in college after aging out of traditional sports due to rapidly declining athleticism. I was hooked after my first round. At the same time, I’ve always had at least a passing interest in photography. And as best I can remember, I photographed a golf course for their website (I built the website too) back in 2002 or so. But for some reason, I never really combined the two until 2013 or so. As it happened, I was playing Somerset Hills on a gorgeous fall day and had a camera in the car – the fall colors were so beautiful that I decided to bring the camera out with me. Afterwards, I realized that I’d enjoyed taking the photos almost as much as I enjoyed playing the course. I’ve been doing both ever since.
2. Who inspired/motivated you to undertake golf course photography?
I’ve always been inspired by the top golf photographers — guys like Walter Iooss, Evan Schiller (@Evan_Schilller_Photography) and Jacob Sjoman (@sjomanart), and other talented guys like Ben Peters (@thegolfhawk) and Mike Gibbons (@gibbonsphoto). Beyond that, my biggest source of both inspiration and motivation is the people who like seeing my photos and who asked to see more, especially those on the GolfClubAtlas forum and those who follow me on social media. My wife, who had already been putting up with my full blown golf habit, has always encouraged the photography as well.
3. When did it transition from more than something fun, to something bigger?
That’s a great question, and I suppose the answer depends on what is meant by “something bigger.” As it stands, even now, I take and share golf photos because it’s fun and I enjoy doing it. Taking photos adds to my enjoyment of a round of golf, and sharing them has led to interactions with so many great people, many of whom I am fortunate to now call dear friends. If golf photography ever stopped being fun, I’d stop doing it.
4. Talk equipment for a moment-what camera and lens do you love, and what software do you use for editing?
I’ve been shooting mostly Sony cameras for the past few years, and I’m a big fan. My go-to is a Sony a7Riii mirrorless with either a Sony OSS 24-240 or a Sony 24-105 G OSS lens. This combo offers great versatility and photo quality, and is perfect for golf photography.
When I want something smaller, I use a pocket-sized Sony RX-100 MK6, which is a terrific camera for its size. I’ve used the RX-100 series since the MK3, and they are excellent.
Occasionally, I’ll shoot with a small Leica, a Fuji X100, or my iPhone X.
For the aerial photography, I’ve always used DJI Phantom drones. I’m currently using a Phantom 4 Pro 2.0, but I’ve used, crashed and/or given away every model of Phantom going back to the original. The photo and video quality has improved by leaps and bounds in the latest models.
5. You are a Golf Club Atlas participant. How did the discussion board of that site impact your growing enthusiasm for golf course photography?
Enormously, and in several different ways. First and most importantly, the GCA discussion board launched and nurtured my infatuation (and subsequent obsession) with golf course architecture. This led me to seek out golf courses that I otherwise might have ignored or about which I’d never have learned. I believe an understanding and appreciation of golf course architecture is essential for quality golf course photography, and there is no better resource for that than GCA.
Beyond that, the GCA forum was the first place I shared my photos. I believe the first photos I posted were from that round at Somerset Hills, and the response was overwhelmingly positive. The ability to share and subsequently discuss my photography and the subject course not only gave me an outlet for my shots, but it certainly encouraged me to take and share more. And the criticism helped me become a better photographer.
I similarly credit and appreciate Andy Johnson and Jason Way at The Fried Egg for the same reasons.
6. At what point did you incorporate drone photography into your arsenal, and how did that change your approach to a complete shoot?
I was a very early adopter of drone technology to take aerial photos of golf courses. It was clear to me right away that this tech was perfectly suited to shoot golf. I don’t know that having the ability to shoot aerials changed my approach to photographing golf courses much, but it certainly gave me the ability to see and shoot courses from a different and unique perspective.
7. What do drone and ground photography offer, that the other does not?
Drone photography offers two main benefits that you just can’t get from the ground. First, aerial photography gives the ability to capture the entire golf course and its surrounds in one frame. We have all seen and love those old photos of classic courses taken from a low-flying airplane. Drone photography allows a “zoomed out” perspective of the course, which can show the full routing, how the holes and hazards interconnect, and how the course interacts with its environment. Second, drones allow us to capture a course from an infinite number of angles and perspectives. Ground photography is fundamentally two-dimensional – there are only so many places to stand and take a photo. Drones allow us to place a camera almost anywhere in three-dimensional space, which in turn allows for unlimited creativity and perspective. These angles, which we would never otherwise see, can be really compelling.
The advantage of “regular” photography is that it shows the course from the perspective of the golfer – the perspective we’re used to seeing. And so it’s ideal for taking shots that “transport” the viewer to the course.
For me, the ideal way to capture a course is through a mix of both forms.
8. Which golf course has given you the greatest artistic experience in shooting?
That’s a tough question. The courses I most enjoy shooting tend to be the courses that have both compelling visuals and extremely interesting golf architecture. So the top of the list, you’d certainly find courses like National Golf Links of America, Sleepy Hollow, Cypress Point, Fishers Island, Shinnecock Hills, Eastward Ho, Maidstone, Monterey Peninsula CC and Sand Hills. These are all courses that are quite beautiful by any definition and are also outstanding examples of brilliant golf course design.
At the same time, I also really enjoy the challenge of photographing courses that lack ocean or mountain views and thus may not be considered traditionally beautiful by everyone, but that are excellent from an architecture standpoint – courses like Chicago Golf Club or Oakmont. After all, it’s hard to take a bad photo of a place next to the ocean like MPCC, but doing justice to the quality of the course at a place that doesn’t have the visuals to fall back on is very satisfying.
9. Is there a golf course that you have yet to shoot, that you would like to?
Too many to count. It’s certainly a fantasy to shoot (and play) Augusta National. Beyond that, it’s all international courses: The Old Course, North Berwick, Royal County Down, Dornoch, Portrush, Ballybunion, Lahinch and countless others in the UK, and Royal Melbourne, Kingston Heath, Tara Iti, Barnbougle Dunes, Cape Kidnappers, Jack’s Point, Cape Wickham, Kauri Cliffs and many others in Australia and New Zealand. I’d also love to shoot Morfontaine in France – from what I’ve seen, it looks amazing.
10. BONUS QUESTION: What question haven’t we asked, that you wish we would? Ask it and answer it please. Thank you for your time.
What is the best thing that has come from your golf course photography?
As I mentioned above, I’ve met so many wonderful people as a result of my photography, and I’ve been able to see some of the best golf courses in the world. But even better still, thanks to the incredibly loyal and supportive people who follow me on twitter and Instagram, I’ve been able to financially support some charities that are important to my wife and me. For the last two years, I’ve sold a photo calendar that has enabled donations of over $15,000 to Woodstock Farm Sanctuary. Just recently, thanks to the work of my good friend Tyler Petrovich (@thetravellinggolfer), we auctioned off a glass print of Pebble Beach and raised almost $1500 for SLC6A1 Connect and Milestnes for Maxwell. It’s been truly gratifying to be able to use an avocation that I enjoy to support those who need a bit of a hand, and we’re always looking for new ways to do more of it.
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship













gunmetal
Apr 2, 2019 at 10:21 am
As a fellow golfer and Landscape photographer, the post processing is a bit heavy handed for my taste but some of the compositions are wonderful. Really great shots and a very cool article and interview.
Ronald Montesano
Apr 5, 2019 at 6:21 am
What would you have differently? Asking sincerely for a friend. Thanks for your thoughts.
rm
Steve
Apr 1, 2019 at 5:46 pm
Enjoyed the interview Ron, very informative, especially having the Bonus Question finish!
Ronald Montesano
Apr 5, 2019 at 6:22 am
Thank you, Steve. The bonus question is always a favorite of mine. Interviewers mull which questions to ask, but invariably miss one. It is usually the favorite of most readers as well!
rm