Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

The Campaign Starts Here: Bring Back The Skins Game!

Published

on

Here we are just weeks away from the biggest golf event of the year and I find myself somehow obsessed with a defunct, out-of-date, made-for-TV event that took place every year on Thanksgiving weekend.

Yes, even though the Skins Game meant Holiday shopping, Christmas trees and ski vacation planning to many of us, it also drove new viewers to golf on TV while showcasing a unique format that couldn’t be seen anywhere else. So, why even bring up the Skins Game now? Three reasons: viewership, ratings and at one point in time, it was simply so much fun.

The Masters seems to have become the one and only golf event that routinely draws in new viewers seemingly out of the woodwork who don’t normally watch golf on TV (with the US Open finishing in distant second). And viewership is what golf needs in order to attract future players to keep the game growing and thriving.

For a time in the 80s and early 90s, there was something fresh and fun about the Skins Game. In fact, the ratings for the early Skins were second only to the Masters, and I’m fairly certain that golf could use that kind of ratings boost.

If we can somehow bring the Skins Game back, albeit with some changes to make it fresh and fun again, it would give golf a nice shot in the arm during the doldrums of golf viewing that is typically experienced after the season concludes.

I figured if I am going to bring the Skins Game back, I better start right away in order to give the powers-that-be the time they need to pull it off. I know that come Halloween, if I don’t see it looming on a network schedule somewhere, I may be forced to send off a strongly-worded e-mail to someone.

THE SKINS GAME — REFRESHER COURSE 101

Jack Nicklaus playfully tosses his club during the Skins Game

Jack Nicklaus playfully tosses his club during the Skins Game

For those of you who are not familiar with the Skins Game, here’s a refresher:

  • It was a made-for-TV event shown annually over two days of the Thanksgiving weekend that ran from 1983-2008.
  • It featured an intriguing mix of four golfers comprised of the biggest names in golf. The foursome would consist of players drawn from the PGA Tour, the then-named “Senior Tour,” a legend (or two) and typically one of the younger, noteworthy pros on Tour. On some years you would get a young Tiger Woods alongside Fred Couples, Raymond Floyd and Greg Norman. Or the draw could include Lee Trevino, Jack Nicklaus, Fred Couples and Davis Love III. This format resulted in a huge boost of exposure to players on the “Senior Tour” so this was a great chance for one of the legends to show the young bucks a thing or two while simultaneously giving exposure to the Senior Tour and provide them with a well-needed boost.
  • The players would compete in a hole-by-hole match with whoever shot the lowest score on that hole of getting “the Skin” (the pot) for that hole. If two or more players tied the hole (halved), no skin was won, and all of the players would proceed to the next hole with all four again eligible to win the skin (aka “carryover” or “carries”) of both holes. The carries would grow as more holes were “halved.”
  • At the end, the winner would be presented with one of those larger-than-life, Publisher’s Clearinghouse-type checks that were handwritten and would be signature to the event. It was always fun to see if someone would clean the slate and win them all sending the other three home with “bupkis.” Most years, at least one of the players would walk away empty-handed which had an air of cruelty to their efforts. Such is life in the game of golf.

THE SKINS GAME — WHAT HAPPENED?

The participants for the final Skins Game in 2008 (left to right: Stephen Ames, Fred Couples, Zach Johnson, and Brett Wetterich)

The participants for the final Skins Game in 2008, from left Stephen Ames, Fred Couples, Zach Johnson and Brett Wetterich)

When I first started watching the Skins Game, I am pretty sure that it was the only golf I would watch on TV with the Masters as the possible, lone exception. I wasn’t a golfer back then, but there was something about the Skins Game where it had this laid-back vibe, while the money was absolutely front-and-center. It was like a “get-rich-quick” scheme played out with drivers and irons on perfectly sunny days in the Southern California desert. And, man, back in the day it seemed like each hole was being played for a lot of money. Okay, it ‘s still is a lot of money to me, but as far as golf purses go, the old amounts are comparatively pedestrian. This issue may be the very crux of the problem with the Skins Game.

What happened to the Skins Game anyway? Did it still exist somewhere and I just kept missing it? Nope; it was cancelled after 2008 when the format grew stale, the players were second-tier and the TV landscape had become over-saturated with Thanksgiving football that essentially took over the airwaves for the holiday weekend.

The biggest issue that spelled doom for the Skins Game was all about the money: The top-tier pros who were the reason for early-Skins rating success eventually simply made too much money to even bother with an event that didn’t guarantee them to walk away with anything. Plus, throw in the fact that it was during the Thanksgiving weekend, and many pros would rather be home with their families. These are real obstacles, but I think with the right mix of format, money and exposure, there is a place for this event on Black Friday, leaving the rest of the Thanksgiving weekend all clear for football.

THE SKINS GAME — WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO BRING IT BACK

The Big Three at the Skins Game

The Big Three at the Skins Game

Here are my list demands which must be met in order to make the Skins Game relevant, enjoyable and hugely successful.  I have created this list in order of importance:

1. The field includes four noteworthy, top-tier players (see below).

2. It has to include no less than two of the cream-of-the crop PGA players including a two of the following: Tiger, Rory, Phil  and/or (believe it or not) Bubba.

3. Next, it has to include one of the following either flashy or established PGA stars: Fowler, Poulter, Mahan, Bradley, Westwood or GMac.

4. Finally, it can have one “wildcard” pick from the Champions Tour, LPGA, PGA or someone that has legendary status that can compete without embarrassment. This can be any of the names above or a wildcard that is both widely-known and that adds to the intrigue: Freddie, Michelle Wie, Greg Norman, Sergio, Gary Player (Why not? Have him tee from the “golds”), or even Anika. The wild card has to be a personality who transcends mainstream golf somehow.

5. All competitors and caddies are “miked” throughout the event and are assigned a dedicated camera to each player so that all aspects of the event are covered from head to toe.

6. The Skins Game should still televised over the Thanksgiving holiday but instead of two days (preferable), current-day logistics may dictate the need to have it all take place just on Black Friday (day after Thanksgiving). This will appeal to those of us who prefer not to brave the madness at the malls.

7. The purse must be huge overall: We need to start with $1.8 million purse total broken out as $100,000 per hole — at the very least. There is no escalation of hole values as the event draws on; the holes are all worth equal amounts (*see below for discussion of prize money). There may need to be a “secret sponsor’s player fee” paid to the participants in order to assure their attendance. I would prefer not to know about this payout as I prefer the fable where a pro goes home empty-handed. This amount should be split between the players and the charities of their choice  or they can decide to donate all of their winnings to the charity. This should provide for excellent exposure to their charities and part of the TV coverage should include segments devoted to the charities.

8. If there is a tie/carryover on No. 18, whichever the two (or more) that tied on 18 go to a sudden death playoff; winner take all. No ties, no carries.

THE SKINS GAME — OBSTACLES TO OVERCOME

skins - couples

The biggest obstacle is setting the purses that are enough to draw out the huge names in golf while somehow not alienating the viewing public who could turn on the spectacle by thinking that it is just “the rich getting richer.” The reality is that the old purses from the Skins Game past, although riches beyond many of our dreams to many of us working stiffs, are not significant to the all-important “cream-of-the-crop” list mentioned above. The answer to this quandary of balancing large purses to attract the top names while not making them look greedy lies somewhere in having these massive purses committed partially (or substantially) to the charities of choice to the players. As mentioned, the spotlight to the charities could be huge to them while providing goodwill from the competitors themselves showing their allegiance to these organizations.

The second big obstacle lies in attracting this top talent on a holiday weekend, especially when the top talent already have more money than they can spend in a lifetime. I do know know the “ins and outs” of making pros clear their calendars for an event, so this may be like to trying to force LeBron James into the Slam Dunk contest. But, I would hope that the benefit to their respective charities combined with the massive exposure to the event would hopefully be enough to attract the big names.

THE SKINS GAME — WHAT MAKES IT SO FUN AND UNIQUE?

Fred Funk dons a dress after being out-driven by Anika

Fred Funk dons a skirt after being out-driven by Anika.

My main reason that this is a special event is due to the unbelievable access that the nature of the event grants to the viewers. For nearly every golf broadcast, we as viewers bounce from leader to leader on hole to hole where we see a variety of putts, drives, irons, etc. However, we don’t get a great chance to really follow players from shot to shot like we can as a member of the gallery. Just once a year, I would really enjoy hearing the banter between players, caddies, and competitors in a shot-by-shot format. It’s a different viewing experience but overall fun and an eye-opening glimpse into the pro mindset. Plus, the pros themselves seemed to genuinely enjoy the event. They would all get into the act and let their hair down a bit giving us a rare glimpse into what they are like away from glaring lights of heated competition. But, make no mistake about it: Every pro wanted to win the most skins and none ever wanted to get shut out.

In order for this to work, the players and caddies all need to be miked up as they have done in the past. This allows us to get into their discussions when planning shots, strategies, and execution. This format exposes us to live each shot with them as they try to figure out a way to win the hole outright. In fact, I recall that this was the only event where I really ever saw real conversations between players and their caddies from shot to shot and hole to hole. I also remember enjoying the exchanges between the players themselves. I liked the “good shot,” “nice play” and “how’s the family doing” type of stuff that all of us golfers do when we are out playing.

I remember watching when guys would get shut-out and thinking how hard it would be for the losing pro to see someone like Norman walk away with $800,000, while Freddie scooped up a paltry $40,000, but the loser got nothing but bills for the trip. That’s the breaks in the Skins Game. A guy like Norman could do nothing all day, watch Tiger and Jack halve hole after hole, then he sticks it close on 17 and walks away with everything. There’s nothing quite like massive reward for minimum effort.

Give me my Tiger TV! Let’s throw Rory into the Shark Tank. Heck, while we are at it, let’s see The Shark himself make a return! How about Anika? She still has game, I bet. Throw in a Bubba and sprinkle in a marketing-machine like a Rickie or a Poulter and we have ourselves some good turkey TV! So, I’m looking for your tweets, golf fans! I promise that this would work. It’s been gone long enough and it’s high-time for the Skins to come back to a TV near you.  Let’s get the Skins Game back!

Chris Hibler is an avid golfer, writer and golf gear junkie. If he's not practicing his game with his kids, he's scouring the GolfWRX classifieds looking for a score.

11 Comments

11 Comments

  1. 8thehardway

    Apr 2, 2013 at 4:34 pm

    My idea of a great skins game would be to open it to any non-tour player putting up a $5,000 entry fee. Based on the number of entries have qualifying rounds pay out $1,000/hole for 8 holes, $2,000 for the next 6 holes, etc. Ratchet it up as the brackets tighten by requiring winners of of each flight to re-ante 80% of their winnings in order to advance and raise the payouts.

    Add caddies who will get a percentage of the winners purse, make everyone stay in the same house the night before and you get hours of cheap, exciting programming.

  2. Dane

    Apr 1, 2013 at 2:06 pm

    Ben, not everyone is interested in watching just Tiger or the big names. The format and players do need to be changed. I’d love to watch Watson and Freddy in a skins foursome. Or how bout instead of giving a cash prize they find a way to format it for the best amateurs to play for sponsors exemptions or something of that sort? I think there are plenty of people that would love to watch the up and coming names of the game. It won’t draw ratings like the masters, but there could be a place for it.

    • Chris Hibler

      Apr 19, 2013 at 11:00 pm

      Great “out-of-the-box” suggestions~

  3. Tservos

    Apr 1, 2013 at 9:36 am

    I enjoyed the Skins Game when it was new. But now that there are 1,000 other things which compete for our attention combined with the fact that they have to go way down the Money List to get 4 ppl who want to give up their time to play golf, I see it as an idea whose time has past.

    I remember back in the 70s the football teams who played in the Super Bowl would meet in Hawaii and compete in all sorts of activities like rowing and tug of war. It was really fun to watch but I can’t imagine for a second it being successful these days. You couldn’t get millionaire football players today to fly to Hawaii to do silly things in the sand.

  4. benseattle

    Mar 30, 2013 at 11:25 am

    <>

    Duh.

    So what sort of “inside chatter” are you expecting… verifiable audio of Tiger snapping at Joe LaCava after a bad yardage? Phil complaining to Bones that he didn’t take his Enbrel on time? Rory going behind the ropes to rail at Carolyn for not emptying the dishwasher? Please. This business of slapping a microphone on player or caddy and expecting anything more than the usual dull “what’s the yardage?” is only a pipedream. The author speaks of “Tiger TV!” as though his game has never before been on television but once you’re past the handful of even mildly interesting stars, then what? Let’s keep in mind that it wasn’t just plummeting ratings that sent The Skins Game off to it’s long-overdue burial; it was the complete lack of interest in those few players who fans would actually want to see over Thanksgiving. When you can’t get Tiger or Phil or Rory or Bubba to tee it up in your little “exhibition,” what you have is an event that only one person cares about: an amateur golf writer in desperate need of a topic.

  5. Chris Hibler

    Mar 29, 2013 at 7:03 pm

    Although benseattle makes some good points, albeit harshly — many of them are the same points I spelled out in my piece above as far as why the Skins had grown tired. But, what he fails to recognize is that the format is unique, especially from a viewing perspective. What other tournament actually gives us shot-by-shot coverage along with conversations between players & caddies? None. There is a place for this event on a day where there is no other golf played. Remember: the Skins is an exhibition, not a tournament.

  6. benseattle

    Mar 29, 2013 at 3:30 pm

    This endless plea to regurgitate an event that has run its course was so lengthy, so monotonous that few at GolfWRX will both trudging through it all. The once-unique Skins Game was often a hightlight of Thanksgiving weekend, an unexpected helping of long-gone golf in the midst of the NFL season. But as the years past and the stars became journeymen (Stephen Ames…Brett Wetterich??) the made-for-TV show become stale, uninteresting and “must-avoid TV.” You think people will tune in to see already-rich golfers play for what… 5 million dollars a hole? You’re dreaming. The Skins Game died because it was both pointless and meaningless. It answered no questions, it proved nothing. The idea that someone would actually hope to resurrect such a tired and lame promotion shows that you just don’t pay much attention to the PGA Tour; you know… the place where REAL golf is played?

    • Hunterdog

      Mar 31, 2013 at 8:35 am

      Ben – I agree. As an avid golfer, and occasional TV golf viewer, I have no interest in watching the second and third tier of the Tour line their pockets with boring golf. Now ( not even possible) get Tiger, Phil, Rory and maybe Bubba, on real risk reward venue; I’d tune into that. Otherwise, let the pigskin fly and maybe, just maybe, I can get in not her round before the season ends.

      • Hunterdog

        Mar 31, 2013 at 8:36 am

        Sorry, meant be “get in another round” before the season ends.

  7. Matt Newby, PGA

    Mar 29, 2013 at 1:01 pm

    Second!

  8. Dane

    Mar 29, 2013 at 11:22 am

    Bring it back!

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

The 2 primary challenges golf equipment companies face

Published

on

As the editor-in-chief of this website and an observer of the GolfWRX forums and other online golf equipment discourse for over a decade, I’m pretty well attuned to the grunts and grumbles of a significant portion of the golf equipment purchasing spectrum. And before you accuse me of lording above all in some digital ivory tower, I’d like to offer that I worked at golf courses (public and private) for years prior to picking up my pen, so I’m well-versed in the non-degenerate golf equipment consumers out there. I touched (green)grass (retail)!

Complaints about the ills of and related to the OEMs usually follow some version of: Product cycles are too short for real innovation, tour equipment isn’t the same as retail (which is largely not true, by the way), too much is invested in marketing and not enough in R&D, top staffer X hasn’t even put the new driver in play, so it’s obviously not superior to the previous generation, prices are too high, and on and on.

Without digging into the merits of any of these claims, which I believe are mostly red herrings, I’d like to bring into view of our rangefinder what I believe to be the two primary difficulties golf equipment companies face.

One: As Terry Koehler, back when he was the CEO of Ben Hogan, told me at the time of the Ft Worth irons launch, if you can’t regularly hit the golf ball in a coin-sized area in the middle of the face, there’s not a ton that iron technology can do for you. Now, this is less true now with respect to irons than when he said it, and is less and less true by degrees as the clubs get larger (utilities, fairways, hybrids, drivers), but there remains a great deal of golf equipment truth in that statement. Think about it — which is to say, in TL;DR fashion, get lessons from a qualified instructor who will teach you about the fundamentals of repeatable impact and how the golf swing works, not just offer band-aid fixes. If you can’t repeatably deliver the golf club to the golf ball in something resembling the manner it was designed for, how can you expect to be getting the most out of the club — put another way, the maximum value from your investment?

Similarly, game improvement equipment can only improve your game if you game it. In other words, get fit for the clubs you ought to be playing rather than filling the bag with the ones you wish you could hit or used to be able to hit. Of course, don’t do this if you don’t care about performance and just want to hit a forged blade while playing off an 18 handicap. That’s absolutely fine. There were plenty of members in clubs back in the day playing Hogan Apex or Mizuno MP-32 irons who had no business doing so from a ballstriking standpoint, but they enjoyed their look, feel, and complementary qualities to their Gatsby hats and cashmere sweaters. Do what brings you a measure of joy in this maddening game.

Now, the second issue. This is not a plea for non-conforming equipment; rather, it is a statement of fact. USGA/R&A limits on every facet of golf equipment are detrimental to golf equipment manufacturers. Sure, you know this, but do you think about it as it applies to almost every element of equipment? A 500cc driver would be inherently more forgiving than a 460cc, as one with a COR measurement in excess of 0.83. 50-inch shafts. Box grooves. And on and on.

Would fewer regulations be objectively bad for the game? Would this erode its soul? Fortunately, that’s beside the point of this exercise, which is merely to point out the facts. The fact, in this case, is that equipment restrictions and regulations are the slaughterbench of an abundance of innovation in the golf equipment space. Is this for the best? Well, now I’ve asked the question twice and might as well give a partial response, I guess my answer to that would be, “It depends on what type of golf you’re playing and who you’re playing it with.”

For my part, I don’t mind embarrassing myself with vintage blades and persimmons chasing after the quasi-spiritual elevation of a well-struck shot, but that’s just me. Plenty of folks don’t give a damn if their grooves are conforming. Plenty of folks think the folks in Liberty Corner ought to add a prison to the museum for such offences. And those are just a few of the considerations for the amateur game — which doesn’t get inside the gallery ropes of the pro game…

Different strokes in the game of golf, in my humble opinion.

Anyway, I believe equipment company engineers are genuinely trying to build better equipment year over year. The marketing departments are trying to find ways to make this equipment appeal to the broadest segment of the golf market possible. All of this against (1) the backdrop of — at least for now — firm product cycles. And golfers who, with their ~15 average handicap (men), for the most part, are not striping the golf ball like Tiger in his prime and seem to have less and less time year over year to practice and improve. (2) Regulations that massively restrict what they’re able to do…

That’s the landscape as I see it and the real headwinds for golf equipment companies. No doubt, there’s more I haven’t considered, but I think the previous is a better — and better faith — point of departure when formulating any serious commentary on the golf equipment world than some of the more cynical and conspiratorial takes I hear.

Agree? Disagree? Think I’m worthy of an Adam Hadwin-esque security guard tackle? Let me know in the comments.

@golfoncbs The infamous Adam Hadwin tackle ? #golf #fyp #canada #pgatour #adamhadwin ? Ghibli-style nostalgic waltz – MaSssuguMusic

Continue Reading

Podcasts

Fore Love of Golf: Introducing a new club concept

Published

on

Episode #16 brings us Cliff McKinney. Cliff is the founder of Old Charlie Golf Club, a new club, and concept, to be built in the Florida panhandle. The model is quite interesting and aims to make great, private golf more affordable. We hope you enjoy the show!

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

On Scottie Scheffler wondering ‘What’s the point of winning?’

Published

on

Last week, I came across a reel from BBC Sport on Instagram featuring Scottie Scheffler speaking to the media ahead of The Open at Royal Portrush. In it, he shared that he often wonders what the point is of wanting to win tournaments so badly — especially when he knows, deep down, that it doesn’t lead to a truly fulfilling life.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by BBC SPORT (@bbcsport)

“Is it great to be able to win tournaments and to accomplish the things I have in the game of golf? Yeah, it brings tears to my eyes just to think about it because I’ve literally worked my entire life to be good at this sport,” Scheffler said. “To have that kind of sense of accomplishment, I think, is a pretty cool feeling. To get to live out your dreams is very special, but at the end of the day, I’m not out here to inspire the next generation of golfers. I’m not out here to inspire someone to be the best player in the world, because what’s the point?”

Ironically — or perhaps perfectly — he went on to win the claret jug.

That question — what’s the point of winning? — cuts straight to the heart of the human journey.

As someone who’s spent over two decades in the trenches of professional golf, and in deep study of the mental, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of the game, I see Scottie’s inner conflict as a sign of soul evolution in motion.

I came to golf late. I wasn’t a junior standout or college All-American. At 27, I left a steady corporate job to see if I could be on the PGA Tour starting as a 14-handicap, average-length hitter. Over the years, my journey has been defined less by trophies and more by the relentless effort to navigate the deeply inequitable and gated system of professional golf — an effort that ultimately turned inward and helped me evolve as both a golfer and a person.

One perspective that helped me make sense of this inner dissonance around competition and our culture’s tendency to overvalue winning is the idea of soul evolution.

The University of Virginia’s Division of Perceptual Studies has done extensive research on reincarnation, and Netflix’s Surviving Death (Episode 6) explores the topic, too. Whether you take it literally or metaphorically, the idea that we’re on a long arc of growth — from beginner to sage elder — offers a profound perspective.

If you accept the premise literally, then terms like “young soul” and “old soul” start to hold meaning. However, even if we set the word “soul” aside, it’s easy to see that different levels of life experience produce different worldviews.

Newer souls — or people in earlier stages of their development — may be curious and kind but still lack discernment or depth. There is a naivety, and they don’t yet question as deeply, tending to see things in black and white, partly because certainty feels safer than confronting the unknown.

As we gain more experience, we begin to experiment. We test limits. We chase extreme external goals — sometimes at the expense of health, relationships, or inner peace — still operating from hunger, ambition, and the fragility of the ego.

It’s a necessary stage, but often a turbulent and unfulfilling one.

David Duval fell off the map after reaching World No. 1. Bubba Watson had his own “Is this it?” moment with his caddie, Ted Scott, after winning the Masters.

In Aaron Rodgers: Enigma, reflecting on his 2011 Super Bowl win, Rodgers said:

“Now I’ve accomplished the only thing that I really, really wanted to do in my life. Now what? I was like, ‘Did I aim at the wrong thing? Did I spend too much time thinking about stuff that ultimately doesn’t give you true happiness?’”

Jim Carrey once said, “I think everybody should get rich and famous and do everything they ever dreamed of so they can see that it’s not the answer.”

Eventually, though, something shifts.

We begin to see in shades of gray. Winning, dominating, accumulating—these pursuits lose their shine. The rewards feel more fleeting. Living in a constant state of fight-or-flight makes us feel alive, yes, but not happy and joyful.

Compassion begins to replace ambition. Love, presence, and gratitude become more fulfilling than status, profits, or trophies. We crave balance over burnout. Collaboration over competition. Meaning over metrics.

Interestingly, if we zoom out, we can apply this same model to nations and cultures. Countries, like people, have a collective “soul stage” made up of the individuals within them.

Take the United States, for example. I’d place it as a mid-level soul: highly competitive and deeply driven, but still learning emotional maturity. Still uncomfortable with nuance. Still believing that more is always better. Despite its global wins, the U.S. currently ranks just 23rd in happiness (as of 2025). You might liken it to a gifted teenager—bold, eager, and ambitious, but angsty and still figuring out how to live well and in balance. As much as a parent wants to protect their child, sometimes the child has to make their own mistakes to truly grow.

So when Scottie Scheffler wonders what the point of winning is, I don’t see someone losing strength.

I see someone evolving.

He’s beginning to look beyond the leaderboard. Beyond metrics of success that carry a lower vibration. And yet, in a poetic twist, Scheffler did go on to win The Open. But that only reinforces the point: even at the pinnacle, the question remains. And if more of us in the golf and sports world — and in U.S. culture at large — started asking similar questions, we might discover that the more meaningful trophy isn’t about accumulating or beating others at all costs.

It’s about awakening and evolving to something more than winning could ever promise.

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending