Opinion & Analysis
The Campaign Starts Here: Bring Back The Skins Game!
Here we are just weeks away from the biggest golf event of the year and I find myself somehow obsessed with a defunct, out-of-date, made-for-TV event that took place every year on Thanksgiving weekend.
Yes, even though the Skins Game meant Holiday shopping, Christmas trees and ski vacation planning to many of us, it also drove new viewers to golf on TV while showcasing a unique format that couldn’t be seen anywhere else. So, why even bring up the Skins Game now? Three reasons: viewership, ratings and at one point in time, it was simply so much fun.
The Masters seems to have become the one and only golf event that routinely draws in new viewers seemingly out of the woodwork who don’t normally watch golf on TV (with the US Open finishing in distant second). And viewership is what golf needs in order to attract future players to keep the game growing and thriving.
For a time in the 80s and early 90s, there was something fresh and fun about the Skins Game. In fact, the ratings for the early Skins were second only to the Masters, and I’m fairly certain that golf could use that kind of ratings boost.
If we can somehow bring the Skins Game back, albeit with some changes to make it fresh and fun again, it would give golf a nice shot in the arm during the doldrums of golf viewing that is typically experienced after the season concludes.
I figured if I am going to bring the Skins Game back, I better start right away in order to give the powers-that-be the time they need to pull it off. I know that come Halloween, if I don’t see it looming on a network schedule somewhere, I may be forced to send off a strongly-worded e-mail to someone.
THE SKINS GAME — REFRESHER COURSE 101
For those of you who are not familiar with the Skins Game, here’s a refresher:
- It was a made-for-TV event shown annually over two days of the Thanksgiving weekend that ran from 1983-2008.
- It featured an intriguing mix of four golfers comprised of the biggest names in golf. The foursome would consist of players drawn from the PGA Tour, the then-named “Senior Tour,” a legend (or two) and typically one of the younger, noteworthy pros on Tour. On some years you would get a young Tiger Woods alongside Fred Couples, Raymond Floyd and Greg Norman. Or the draw could include Lee Trevino, Jack Nicklaus, Fred Couples and Davis Love III. This format resulted in a huge boost of exposure to players on the “Senior Tour” so this was a great chance for one of the legends to show the young bucks a thing or two while simultaneously giving exposure to the Senior Tour and provide them with a well-needed boost.
- The players would compete in a hole-by-hole match with whoever shot the lowest score on that hole of getting “the Skin” (the pot) for that hole. If two or more players tied the hole (halved), no skin was won, and all of the players would proceed to the next hole with all four again eligible to win the skin (aka “carryover” or “carries”) of both holes. The carries would grow as more holes were “halved.”
- At the end, the winner would be presented with one of those larger-than-life, Publisher’s Clearinghouse-type checks that were handwritten and would be signature to the event. It was always fun to see if someone would clean the slate and win them all sending the other three home with “bupkis.” Most years, at least one of the players would walk away empty-handed which had an air of cruelty to their efforts. Such is life in the game of golf.
THE SKINS GAME — WHAT HAPPENED?

The participants for the final Skins Game in 2008, from left Stephen Ames, Fred Couples, Zach Johnson and Brett Wetterich)
When I first started watching the Skins Game, I am pretty sure that it was the only golf I would watch on TV with the Masters as the possible, lone exception. I wasn’t a golfer back then, but there was something about the Skins Game where it had this laid-back vibe, while the money was absolutely front-and-center. It was like a “get-rich-quick” scheme played out with drivers and irons on perfectly sunny days in the Southern California desert. And, man, back in the day it seemed like each hole was being played for a lot of money. Okay, it ‘s still is a lot of money to me, but as far as golf purses go, the old amounts are comparatively pedestrian. This issue may be the very crux of the problem with the Skins Game.
What happened to the Skins Game anyway? Did it still exist somewhere and I just kept missing it? Nope; it was cancelled after 2008 when the format grew stale, the players were second-tier and the TV landscape had become over-saturated with Thanksgiving football that essentially took over the airwaves for the holiday weekend.
The biggest issue that spelled doom for the Skins Game was all about the money: The top-tier pros who were the reason for early-Skins rating success eventually simply made too much money to even bother with an event that didn’t guarantee them to walk away with anything. Plus, throw in the fact that it was during the Thanksgiving weekend, and many pros would rather be home with their families. These are real obstacles, but I think with the right mix of format, money and exposure, there is a place for this event on Black Friday, leaving the rest of the Thanksgiving weekend all clear for football.
THE SKINS GAME — WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO BRING IT BACK
Here are my list demands which must be met in order to make the Skins Game relevant, enjoyable and hugely successful. I have created this list in order of importance:
1. The field includes four noteworthy, top-tier players (see below).
2. It has to include no less than two of the cream-of-the crop PGA players including a two of the following: Tiger, Rory, Phil and/or (believe it or not) Bubba.
3. Next, it has to include one of the following either flashy or established PGA stars: Fowler, Poulter, Mahan, Bradley, Westwood or GMac.
4. Finally, it can have one “wildcard” pick from the Champions Tour, LPGA, PGA or someone that has legendary status that can compete without embarrassment. This can be any of the names above or a wildcard that is both widely-known and that adds to the intrigue: Freddie, Michelle Wie, Greg Norman, Sergio, Gary Player (Why not? Have him tee from the “golds”), or even Anika. The wild card has to be a personality who transcends mainstream golf somehow.
5. All competitors and caddies are “miked” throughout the event and are assigned a dedicated camera to each player so that all aspects of the event are covered from head to toe.
6. The Skins Game should still televised over the Thanksgiving holiday but instead of two days (preferable), current-day logistics may dictate the need to have it all take place just on Black Friday (day after Thanksgiving). This will appeal to those of us who prefer not to brave the madness at the malls.
7. The purse must be huge overall: We need to start with $1.8 million purse total broken out as $100,000 per hole — at the very least. There is no escalation of hole values as the event draws on; the holes are all worth equal amounts (*see below for discussion of prize money). There may need to be a “secret sponsor’s player fee” paid to the participants in order to assure their attendance. I would prefer not to know about this payout as I prefer the fable where a pro goes home empty-handed. This amount should be split between the players and the charities of their choice or they can decide to donate all of their winnings to the charity. This should provide for excellent exposure to their charities and part of the TV coverage should include segments devoted to the charities.
8. If there is a tie/carryover on No. 18, whichever the two (or more) that tied on 18 go to a sudden death playoff; winner take all. No ties, no carries.
THE SKINS GAME — OBSTACLES TO OVERCOME
The biggest obstacle is setting the purses that are enough to draw out the huge names in golf while somehow not alienating the viewing public who could turn on the spectacle by thinking that it is just “the rich getting richer.” The reality is that the old purses from the Skins Game past, although riches beyond many of our dreams to many of us working stiffs, are not significant to the all-important “cream-of-the-crop” list mentioned above. The answer to this quandary of balancing large purses to attract the top names while not making them look greedy lies somewhere in having these massive purses committed partially (or substantially) to the charities of choice to the players. As mentioned, the spotlight to the charities could be huge to them while providing goodwill from the competitors themselves showing their allegiance to these organizations.
The second big obstacle lies in attracting this top talent on a holiday weekend, especially when the top talent already have more money than they can spend in a lifetime. I do know know the “ins and outs” of making pros clear their calendars for an event, so this may be like to trying to force LeBron James into the Slam Dunk contest. But, I would hope that the benefit to their respective charities combined with the massive exposure to the event would hopefully be enough to attract the big names.
THE SKINS GAME — WHAT MAKES IT SO FUN AND UNIQUE?
My main reason that this is a special event is due to the unbelievable access that the nature of the event grants to the viewers. For nearly every golf broadcast, we as viewers bounce from leader to leader on hole to hole where we see a variety of putts, drives, irons, etc. However, we don’t get a great chance to really follow players from shot to shot like we can as a member of the gallery. Just once a year, I would really enjoy hearing the banter between players, caddies, and competitors in a shot-by-shot format. It’s a different viewing experience but overall fun and an eye-opening glimpse into the pro mindset. Plus, the pros themselves seemed to genuinely enjoy the event. They would all get into the act and let their hair down a bit giving us a rare glimpse into what they are like away from glaring lights of heated competition. But, make no mistake about it: Every pro wanted to win the most skins and none ever wanted to get shut out.
In order for this to work, the players and caddies all need to be miked up as they have done in the past. This allows us to get into their discussions when planning shots, strategies, and execution. This format exposes us to live each shot with them as they try to figure out a way to win the hole outright. In fact, I recall that this was the only event where I really ever saw real conversations between players and their caddies from shot to shot and hole to hole. I also remember enjoying the exchanges between the players themselves. I liked the “good shot,” “nice play” and “how’s the family doing” type of stuff that all of us golfers do when we are out playing.
I remember watching when guys would get shut-out and thinking how hard it would be for the losing pro to see someone like Norman walk away with $800,000, while Freddie scooped up a paltry $40,000, but the loser got nothing but bills for the trip. That’s the breaks in the Skins Game. A guy like Norman could do nothing all day, watch Tiger and Jack halve hole after hole, then he sticks it close on 17 and walks away with everything. There’s nothing quite like massive reward for minimum effort.
Give me my Tiger TV! Let’s throw Rory into the Shark Tank. Heck, while we are at it, let’s see The Shark himself make a return! How about Anika? She still has game, I bet. Throw in a Bubba and sprinkle in a marketing-machine like a Rickie or a Poulter and we have ourselves some good turkey TV! So, I’m looking for your tweets, golf fans! I promise that this would work. It’s been gone long enough and it’s high-time for the Skins to come back to a TV near you. Let’s get the Skins Game back!
Opinion & Analysis
Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers
PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.
In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.
Check out the full Q&A below.
Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?
Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.
I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.
Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?
Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.
Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.
Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?
Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.
In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.
Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?
Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.
Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?
Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.
Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.
Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?
Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.
The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.
Club Junkie
A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast
In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.
We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.
To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.
Opinion & Analysis
From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50
This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?
As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.
I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.
Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.
I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.
It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.
So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.
1. Think About What You Want
Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.
Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.
For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.
You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.
The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.
But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.
None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.
2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work
One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.
You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.
You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.
I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.
Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.
I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.
3. Get Custom Fit
If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.
If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.
Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.
It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.
Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.
I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.
So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.
Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.
Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.
I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.
4. Distance and Strategy Matter
There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.
I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.
Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose WITB 2026 (April): Full WITB breakdown with new McLaren irons
-
Equipment1 week agoWhat’s the story behind Webb Simpson’s custom-stamped irons?
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCadillac Championship Tour Report: Spieth’s sizable changes, McLaren Golf launches, and more
-
Whats in the Bag3 days agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag1 week agoCameron Young’s winning WITB: 2026 Cadillac Championship
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoNelly Korda WITB 2026 (April)
-
Equipment2 weeks agoJustin Rose on the switch to McLaren Golf, learnings from previous equipment moves
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 Cadillac Championship





8thehardway
Apr 2, 2013 at 4:34 pm
My idea of a great skins game would be to open it to any non-tour player putting up a $5,000 entry fee. Based on the number of entries have qualifying rounds pay out $1,000/hole for 8 holes, $2,000 for the next 6 holes, etc. Ratchet it up as the brackets tighten by requiring winners of of each flight to re-ante 80% of their winnings in order to advance and raise the payouts.
Add caddies who will get a percentage of the winners purse, make everyone stay in the same house the night before and you get hours of cheap, exciting programming.
Dane
Apr 1, 2013 at 2:06 pm
Ben, not everyone is interested in watching just Tiger or the big names. The format and players do need to be changed. I’d love to watch Watson and Freddy in a skins foursome. Or how bout instead of giving a cash prize they find a way to format it for the best amateurs to play for sponsors exemptions or something of that sort? I think there are plenty of people that would love to watch the up and coming names of the game. It won’t draw ratings like the masters, but there could be a place for it.
Chris Hibler
Apr 19, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Great “out-of-the-box” suggestions~
Tservos
Apr 1, 2013 at 9:36 am
I enjoyed the Skins Game when it was new. But now that there are 1,000 other things which compete for our attention combined with the fact that they have to go way down the Money List to get 4 ppl who want to give up their time to play golf, I see it as an idea whose time has past.
I remember back in the 70s the football teams who played in the Super Bowl would meet in Hawaii and compete in all sorts of activities like rowing and tug of war. It was really fun to watch but I can’t imagine for a second it being successful these days. You couldn’t get millionaire football players today to fly to Hawaii to do silly things in the sand.
benseattle
Mar 30, 2013 at 11:25 am
<>
Duh.
So what sort of “inside chatter” are you expecting… verifiable audio of Tiger snapping at Joe LaCava after a bad yardage? Phil complaining to Bones that he didn’t take his Enbrel on time? Rory going behind the ropes to rail at Carolyn for not emptying the dishwasher? Please. This business of slapping a microphone on player or caddy and expecting anything more than the usual dull “what’s the yardage?” is only a pipedream. The author speaks of “Tiger TV!” as though his game has never before been on television but once you’re past the handful of even mildly interesting stars, then what? Let’s keep in mind that it wasn’t just plummeting ratings that sent The Skins Game off to it’s long-overdue burial; it was the complete lack of interest in those few players who fans would actually want to see over Thanksgiving. When you can’t get Tiger or Phil or Rory or Bubba to tee it up in your little “exhibition,” what you have is an event that only one person cares about: an amateur golf writer in desperate need of a topic.
Chris Hibler
Mar 29, 2013 at 7:03 pm
Although benseattle makes some good points, albeit harshly — many of them are the same points I spelled out in my piece above as far as why the Skins had grown tired. But, what he fails to recognize is that the format is unique, especially from a viewing perspective. What other tournament actually gives us shot-by-shot coverage along with conversations between players & caddies? None. There is a place for this event on a day where there is no other golf played. Remember: the Skins is an exhibition, not a tournament.
benseattle
Mar 29, 2013 at 3:30 pm
This endless plea to regurgitate an event that has run its course was so lengthy, so monotonous that few at GolfWRX will both trudging through it all. The once-unique Skins Game was often a hightlight of Thanksgiving weekend, an unexpected helping of long-gone golf in the midst of the NFL season. But as the years past and the stars became journeymen (Stephen Ames…Brett Wetterich??) the made-for-TV show become stale, uninteresting and “must-avoid TV.” You think people will tune in to see already-rich golfers play for what… 5 million dollars a hole? You’re dreaming. The Skins Game died because it was both pointless and meaningless. It answered no questions, it proved nothing. The idea that someone would actually hope to resurrect such a tired and lame promotion shows that you just don’t pay much attention to the PGA Tour; you know… the place where REAL golf is played?
Hunterdog
Mar 31, 2013 at 8:35 am
Ben – I agree. As an avid golfer, and occasional TV golf viewer, I have no interest in watching the second and third tier of the Tour line their pockets with boring golf. Now ( not even possible) get Tiger, Phil, Rory and maybe Bubba, on real risk reward venue; I’d tune into that. Otherwise, let the pigskin fly and maybe, just maybe, I can get in not her round before the season ends.
Hunterdog
Mar 31, 2013 at 8:36 am
Sorry, meant be “get in another round” before the season ends.
Matt Newby, PGA
Mar 29, 2013 at 1:01 pm
Second!
Dane
Mar 29, 2013 at 11:22 am
Bring it back!