By now, you have likely read and heard endless anguish and musings about the recent decision by the USGA and R&A to tweak the testing for golf ball distance conformity in an effort to roll back golf ball performance for the game’s elite players. Whether you think this is a good idea or not is beside the point, as it appears to be a “done deal.” So, I’d like to offer some musings from my perspective as a 40-year veteran of the golf equipment industry and over 60 years of playing this game at a reasonably serious level.

My perspective covers a lot of ground as I have personally experienced the technology of our industry as an accomplished scratch or near-scratch player. I’ve seen most all of it in those six decades. From learning and developing my game into my 30s with persimmon drivers, pure muscle-back blades and balata balls . . . to what I find in my bag today. I’ve seen the quantum leaps in driving distance for golfers of all levels with each new development, with huge leaps in performance delivered by the first metal woods (thanks TaylorMade), then to the Big Bertha and all its copies and on to the continuing advancements in size, COR, shafts and other driver performance technologies.

You simply cannot discuss distance and focus only on the golf ball, when you have this amazing run of technology in the driver category. And besides those advancements in head designs, driver shafts also made great strides in both weight and performance. I can share that the driver in my bag today is right at 30-percent lighter than the overall weight of my steel-shafted persimmon drivers from back then. I’m sure my clubhead speed at 71 years old is likely close to what I had in my 30s and 40s because of that.

And because of the great strides in driver technologies and the forgiveness of off-center hits, golfers began to get bigger and fitter in pursuit of swinging ever faster. I agree with Adam Scott’s assessment that the distance gains are much more about driver technologies than the golf ball. In case you didn’t experience real “woods,” with these big drivers, a perfect strike is much less important than it was in the days of persimmon or even early oversized metal drivers.

But let’s get back to the golf ball and what I think is going to happen over the next five to seven years . . .
Up until the mid-1990s, the “state of the art” was that old rubber-band-wound and balata-covered ball that spun like crazy but went out of round if you looked at it wrong. While many give Titleist and its Pro V1 franchise credit for the revolution to multi-piece ball construction and technologies, history shows that Spalding was ahead of them in this area with their early work with the Top Flite and Tour Edition lines. But it was Mark O’Meara winning both the Masters and U.S. Open in 1998 playing the revolutionary Strata ball that triggered the entire ball industry to abandon the old rubber band ball and pursue these new multi-piece technologies.

Since then, there is no question that continual strides have been made in golf ball technologies, as these rocket scientist engineers explore and optimize every element of the ball, from core properties to cover properties to dimple aerodynamics. I’ll be the first to admit that the most brilliant and technologically advanced engineers are plying their craft in the ball segment of the industry.

That’s why I believe what we’ll see come out of this next half-decade of research and development is an approach to golf ball performance that will surprise us all. It seems totally realistic that these brainiacs will figure out how to make golf balls that optimize distance performance at various clubhead speeds. I have complete confidence they can figure out how to make a ball that meets the new standards at the highest swing speeds, while not causing the 90-95 mph clubhead player to lose even a yard.

In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me at all to see the ball brands come up with a fitting matrix to fit the golf ball to your exact swing speed, so that instead of the average golfers losing distance, we would actually gain some. Those major brands’ line-ups could be as thorough in fitting the exact ball to your swing speed as we find the fitting bays doing so with shafts.

It will be fun and interesting to watch, that’s for sure.