Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Two ways Tiger could have won and what we learned

Published

on

“If I shot 65, I thought I could win it,” Tiger Woods said after his final round of the 2013 Masters.

The world’s No.1-ranked golfer went into the tournament with the kind of confidence, playing level and health that haven’t been seen in him for perhaps 10 years. But on Sunday evening he sat in fourth place, snake bit just like so many times in recent years.

Woods has crossed Hogan Bridge many times in public view, but after his latest in a series of near misses I’m starting to wonder if he may have walked under Greg Norman’s Ladder at some point.

For Woods, the operative word for the 2013 Masters is “if.” He was correct that if he has shot 65 he would have won. But the weekend had a couple of other “ifs” to ponder.

If Tiger crushes the par-5s he wins.

The holes at Augusta National Golf Course have names like Azalea, Rosebud and Carolina Cherry — names that reflect serenity and rare beauty. The par-5 No. 8 is named Yellow Jasmine, the par-5 No. 15 is called Firethorn. Woods might think that they would be better described as Black Cat and Broken Mirror.

He has built a career on devouring par-5s and nowhere is this more true than at Augusta. In his four victories, Woods has never been worse than 6-under under par on the par 5s, including the mind-numbing 13-under on the par 5s in 1997.

But Friday at No. 15, Woods made one of the most famous “8’s” in golf history. On Saturday on No. 8, his short par putt took almost two complete tours around the hole before the ball decided that gravity could kiss its butt. Tiger was just 4-under this year on the par-5s; if had executed better on Augusta’s most generous holes he would likely have achieved his goal. 

If Tiger doesn’t hit the pin in 15, the golf world stays on its axis.

Tiger Woods drop

When the golf world went to bed on Friday night, it was filled with images of the No. 1 player in the world amongst the leaders, poised to make a weekend charge for his fifth green jacket and first since 2005. It awoke to the news that there was a storm brewing in Augusta, Ga., that had nothing to do with the weather.

The bombshell news that Woods might be disqualified for an improper drop on No. 15 during the second round ignited a global conversation that had people from every corner of the world weighing in. From Peter Jacobson to Piers Morgan, everyone had an opinion about what had exactly had happened and what exactly should be the consequences.

The potential outcomes for Tiger were all bad from the moment that ball hit the pin on No. 15 approach. According to Rule 16-1,Woods’ options were to either use the designated drop area, drop from as close as possible to the place where he hit the first shot or drop along the line where the ball last entered the hazard, keeping the hole on that line. Woods chose a kind of hybrid, dropping a few yards back along the line of where the ball first entered the hazard. He hit a shot pin high to within 4 feet of the hole, earning praise not only for executing the shot but also for maintaining his composure.

Tiger spoke to reporters after his round without knowing that potential ramifications. He stated openly and honestly that after considering and rejecting the option to hit from the designated drop area, he had moved back a couple of yards from where he had hit his third shot to give himself a margin of error. After hearing that, rules officials determined that Woods might not have dropped the ball as close as possible. It was only at that point that officials thought it would be a good idea to talk to Woods, who said the same thing that he had said to the media. That led officials to decide to give him a two-stroke penalty and not to DQ him.

Questions Asked

Fred Masters

The issues are complex but also quite clear. How did the infraction go undetected by on-course officials? Did Tiger Woods receive preferential treatment? And most importantly, how can a travesty like this be prevented?

Let’s start with the officials.

I spoke to people at the highest levels of the golf industry who were incredulous that there was not some level of intervention from the officials on the course at the time of the incident. They assured me that there is a battalion of rules officials from a variety of golf’s ruling bodies on the course at any given time; what’s more, because of it’s significance and the water present, there were likely at least two rules officials within shouting distance at the time of Woods’ infraction.

Surely one of those pairs of eyes should have recognized that Tiger was about to follow a shot into cold water with a jump into hot water. In every other sport, players are expected to play and officials are expected to officiate. I know that players are expected to know and play by the rules. But there is integrity, and then there is doing your job. During last year’s officials strike the NFL found out the cost of having amateur officials determining the outcome of professional sporting contests.

With millions of eyes watching and millions of dollars on the line, golf needs to get its officiating house in order; to leave any key call up to the knowledge of the players is unfair and inappropriate at this level of competition. Players will still call penalties on themselves, but they shouldn’t have to. Woods was within the rules as he understood them. To suggest something else was afoot seems petty and pointless. When questioned by officials, he was honest and he took his penalty like a man.

Next is the issue of preferential treatment.

The controversy was started by a call to officials by a television viewer; Rule 33-7 was introduced as a way to deal with the fact that television viewers have a say in what goes on in a professional event. The rule is meant to give officials the opportunity to address an issue that has already been addressed without giving a player the death penalty (a DQ) after the fact.

The rule states that a “save” can be made at the discretion of the rules committee, and it is the word discretion that causes the opportunity for conflict.

Saturday’s ruling is by far the most significant use of the rule to save a player from disqualification, and the general question amongst current and former players is whether or not the rules committee would have acted in their favor in similar circumstance. Judging from what is in the Twitterverse, the answer seems to be that they feel they would not have received the same tender mercies that Woods received. But that is conjecture; the fact is that any and all players can and should benefit from rule 33-7; the fact that the most famous player in the world is among the first should ensure that in the future all players would be given the same consideration because of the notoriety that this ruling received.

Some have suggested that Woods should have been disqualified or should have withdrawn from competition for signing a wrong scorecard. But rules officials knew about the controversy before he signed his scorecard. To me it is inexplicable that they did not consult Woods about the issue before he signed his scorecard. Had they done so, they could have assessed the penalty and Woods would have signed an infuriating but incorrect scorecard and we would have had a different conversation.

Lessons Learned

Tiger Woods Par 5

No matter how you feel about what happened on Friday and Saturday, there should be agreement on the point that it’s time to stop managing this problem and start solving it. Golf needs to have a scoring system in place to review questionable calls. How about having a review official in the TV booth the same way that the NFL has one? On-course officials can flag calls for a review that would be completed before the player’s round is completed and an incorrect scorecard is signed.

The problem here is that only the players that are good enough or are doing well enough to merit television coverage would be subject to this review, but these are the only cases where viewer call-ins are an issue. Speaking of viewer call-in, let’s once and for all end the practice of taking outside calls that affect a sporting event. He thought of a viewer call affecting the outcome in any other professional sport is so absurd as to draw laughter. In other sports, players and officials both have to take credit for their excellence and responsibility for their mistakes. Golf should not be the exception.

Lastly, why not have an official score that is kept by the officials? An official digital scorecard can be kept for every foursome, which would mean that the chance of signing for a wrong scorecard would be thing of the past. There are many wonderful traditions in golf; having a player who has left his or her heart on soul on the course only to have that effort wiped away because of bad arithmetic is not one of them. When it happens it not only breaks the heart of existing fans, it drives away potential new fans who rightly find the practice brutal and senseless. The time has come to let players play and let scorers score.

Usually, I am in favor of anything that brings global attention to golf, and the Masters is an event that does it every year because of its beauty and its tradition. It’s unfortunate that when the game should have been taking a star turn, it became mired in a controversy that confused and agitated the lovers of the game and confounded casual fans who wondered how so many smart people could get themselves so fouled up.

What we do know is that this episode opened up a new chapter in the game. Golfers will likely now want to know the rules better, which will help speed up everyday play. And hopefully golf will use this as a wake-up call to take a look at modernizing the scoring and rules process, which is much more crucial to the growth to the growth of the game than how long a putter is.

Williams has a reputation as a savvy broadcaster, and as an incisive interviewer and writer. An avid golfer himself, Williams has covered the game of golf and the golf lifestyle including courses, restaurants, travel and sports marketing for publications all over the world. He is currently working with a wide range of outlets in traditional and electronic media, and has produced and hosted “Sticks and Stones” on the Fox Radio network, a critically acclaimed show that combined coverage of the golf world with interviews of the Washington power elite. His work on Newschannel8’s “Capital Golf Weekly” and “SportsTalk” have established him as one of the area’s most trusted sources for golf reporting. Williams has also made numerous radio appearances on “The John Thompson Show,” and a host of other local productions. He is a sought-after speaker and panel moderator, he has recently launched a new partnership with The O Team to create original golf-themed programming and events. Williams is a member of the United States Golf Association and the Golf Writers Association of America.

29 Comments

29 Comments

  1. tnuts

    Apr 17, 2013 at 9:25 am

    The only question I have is what about the other players in the field? How do you call in a rules infraction on them? Viewer call ins on the rules is quite ridiculous considering the amount of money and stress involved with playing in such high profile event.

  2. Kevin S, PGA

    Apr 16, 2013 at 10:51 pm

    I couldn’t disagree more..I think signing a correct scorecard and being responsible for it are as much of a tradition of the game as anything else. I also think that part of what makes golf such a. Great game is players calling penalties on themselves and the honor system. Take that away and a lot of tradition goes with it. I do agree however with eliminating the practice of fans calling in with rules disputes.

    Kevin S, PGA Professional, Park Ridge, NJ

  3. Joe C

    Apr 16, 2013 at 9:45 am

    If a person is going to play golf in competition for tons of money and notariety I think they should know the rules of the game better than anyone. If a player does not know them and get caught breaking one it is not the fault of any referee, official, or committee, or TV viewer, it is the player’s fault. Anybody who believes otherwise does not understand how golf is meant to be played at its highest level.

    I believe Tiger unintentionally broke the rule but still should have applied the proper penalty to himself once he was aware of the infraction. And the penalty for signing an incorrect card is disqualification, not two strokes.

    Having an official scorekeeper would be OK as long as a player still had to sign his name to his card.

  4. Chris

    Apr 16, 2013 at 9:21 am

    It was a tough break but it is what it is. He got unlucky but to say it cost him the tournament is debateable. He had several other chances to make up strokes and didn’t take advantage. He would be the first person to tell you that. Eyes set on the US Open now.

  5. Ty

    Apr 16, 2013 at 8:12 am

    Good point Tommy – I can’t think of a better situational shot than Cabrera’s off the top of my head. That man certainly has some cajones. What amazes me is that Tiger’s B game is almost capable of winning majors. If his ball had never hit the flagstick on 15, he would have ended up 4 shots better and in a 3-way playoff at 9 under par.

    • Steve

      Apr 16, 2013 at 1:28 pm

      I would go as far to say he probably would have ended up 5 strokes better. That was one of those shots that looked like it would have stopped right next to the pin for an easy birdie putt.

    • TWShoot67

      Apr 16, 2013 at 5:10 pm

      IF, IF , IF. we all know the old saying if my aunt had …. she’s be my uncle. The fact is we’ll never know how this all would have went down if things were handled correctly by officials. It has to mess with your mindset when you go to bed with one score then wake up to find your being penalized 2 shots. Not saying tiger didn’t deserve the 2 shot penalty. Just saying what IF…… LOL

      Part 2 IF Tiger never hit the flag he may have gone on a little run and went into Saturday with a lead and we all know what happens most times when Tiger’s in that position. IF IF IF. Tiger will be fine. Now the rules committee needs to stop the outside agency (phone callers) NOW! Arnold, Jack, and Ben never dealt with that at all during their round in the middle of a MAJOR CHAMPIONSHIP!

  6. Tommy

    Apr 16, 2013 at 12:30 am

    The 2 shot penalty did not prevent him from winning. He would still have missed the playoff by 2 shots. If he had made a “weekend charge” maybe he would have been closer. There was no weekend charge. Even without the 2 shot penalty on Friday’s score he didn’t break 70 on any day. He simply didn’t play well enough to win.
    On a more positive note, has there ever been a better situational shot than Cabrera’s 7 iron on 18, knowing he had to birdy to tie.

  7. Ty

    Apr 15, 2013 at 11:42 pm

    Also, “unknowingly” breaking the rule would qualify as an inadvertent mistake you moron.

  8. Ty

    Apr 15, 2013 at 11:41 pm

    Jay – 33-7 was used in this instance to save Tiger from the committee’s mistake. Standard procedure on a call-in penalty like that is to review the potential infraction with the player in question before he signs his scorecard in the scorer’s tent. In this case, they reviewed the potential infraction on there own and deemed that there had been no infraction. If they had simply followed protocol and confronted Tiger, he would have added the 2 strokes before he signed and there would be no discussion whatsoever.

  9. Jay

    Apr 15, 2013 at 11:00 pm

    I thought the purpose of 33-7 was to save a golfer from an inadvertent mistake. Knowingly or not, Tiger broke the rule to gain an advantage. He wanted 4 yards off the shot, so he moved back 2 yards and took 2 yard off with the swing.

  10. Dalton

    Apr 15, 2013 at 5:16 pm

    A lot of people are up in arms about the call in rulings. The Dustin Johnson ruling was a call in too, and I don’t remember there being a big fuss then. Maybe I just don’t remember it, but for everyone crying about tiger getting preferential treatment this would definitely be a case. When a rule negatively effects him there is a storm of outcry to change the rule.

    • Steve

      Apr 16, 2013 at 1:24 pm

      There were a ton of people that:
      A) thought calling in was ridiculous
      B) thought it was a dumb call to even claim that was a bunker

      If the rule was in place back then, I’d be willing to bet DJ would have been “saved” as well.

  11. Jeff

    Apr 15, 2013 at 4:36 pm

    wait, you say he was “only” -4 on the par 5s for the week? Even forgetting the craziest-triple-bogey-of-all-time, playing 16 holes at -4 is pretty darn good for anyone, including tour pros. His entire score was -5…I’m thinking if he had played THE REST OF THE HOLES as well as he played the par 5s he would’ve won.

  12. Mike B.

    Apr 15, 2013 at 3:59 pm

    I believe Tiger will win 2 majors this year, so don’t feel too sorry for him. Now if he could only hit his driver into the fairway, he’d be untouchable!

  13. Ty

    Apr 15, 2013 at 3:25 pm

    Carmine Conti, what you’ve just said … is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

    This one falls on the Rules Committee. After the caller notified them of the potential infraction, they should have not only reviewed the tape themselves but also notified Tiger in the scorer’s tent before he signed his card. Had they done this, Tiger would have admitted his mistake, signed for the correct score and all of this would be a non-issue.

  14. Barry Smoot

    Apr 15, 2013 at 3:05 pm

    The “Viewer Phone Caller” was Jack

  15. Carmine Conti

    Apr 15, 2013 at 2:45 pm

    Once Again were all left scratching our Nike Hatted Heads wondering why and how come…. The Key Point or decision was made prior to his round ending,,,after the viewer phone call, the Rules Committee of Augusta National made the decision that his drop was legal…. Lets Stop right there…… How do they decide or in God’s name do they see that as a “legal drop”…. Now the debate begins….. I give Mr Woods credit for admitting what his intent was, as well as what his intent was with twelve woman he dialed in, but for the acclaimed and holier than thou Augusta Committee of the “sacred” to not penalize immediately is unacceptable… Refs on the course absolutely, and if they miss the call, there is no foul,unless like in the movie “Bagger Vance” the player calls it on himself… For the “Greatest Golfer of All Time” what an example he would of set,, but On-Course Officials, could prevent, (as in other Sports) cheating, and the calls from viewers will cease and desist…. This though was not good for the game, and Mr. Woods knowing his intent, should’ve “Withdrew”, showing even he is not bigger than the game, when intel, it would of showed all the world he’s respectful of the what has made him the icon he so desperately wants to be… In this case even if he’d had won….”It Woods not of taken care of everything”….

  16. chris

    Apr 15, 2013 at 2:38 pm

    He screwed up, he lost, it is done. Get on with life.

  17. Raul Schwarx

    Apr 15, 2013 at 2:20 pm

    Finally someone makes the proper analysis… Congratulations on a well researched and developed article. Broadcasters should learn from this !

  18. bob

    Apr 15, 2013 at 2:20 pm

    Sorry for the typos

  19. bob

    Apr 15, 2013 at 2:19 pm

    Enough with the tiger this or that he lost but so did a wholr bunch of other good golfers and men. On another note keeping your own score is more inherent to the integrity of the game then long ,shooort or another club length. You need to refocus .

  20. TWShoot67

    Apr 15, 2013 at 2:13 pm

    Yes there needs to be some changes for sure. In no way should a spectator at home or on course having any influence on the game. second half of the field cold be making same mistake Tiger made and it would go undetected to TV viewer as said players is ever on TV like the leaders of an event are. The game needs to be fair for everyone and like any other sports mistakes happen even with refs. But guess what we live with them. In baseball strike zones are subject to ridicule ever single game. In basketball and football fouls get called and some do not. Golf needs to have referees in place and they make the call and that’s it. No more second guessing TV viewer calling in and then changing what happens. All I know NO ONE that watched on Friday that I sat with thought anything Tiger did was wrong. In fact if you listed to David Feherty who’s sitting in a booth and a former player was under no pressure and he didn’t even know which hazard it was yellow or Red! Things definitely need to change and it’s up to golf to not let anything like this happen again. Also if TV/Media thought tiger was evasive in the past after post round interviews, I could see him being even more vague as his statements along with a phone caller and a late night dinner changed the course of the Masters. One last though thanks for a well written article! Tim

    • Allen

      Apr 16, 2013 at 6:16 am

      I’ve been thinking about this supposed “TV viewer” calling in rules infractions and feel certain that I’m not the first one to think: how in the world do they know what number to call; who to speak with: why do they take their call. if I called the Augusta National today would Billy Payne take my call? Common sense tells me that if isn’t an ordinary viewer. I suspect it is either a disgruntled marginal pro or a member of the golf media. My hunch is it is the latter. Most pros wouldn’t know who to call either and since there has never been one single story pursuing the identity of these “callers”, it sure looks like a conspiracy of silence.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

Brandel Chamblee PGA Championship Q&A: Rose’s huge McLaren risk, distracted LIV pros and why Aronimink suits the bombers

Published

on

PGA Championship week is here, and Brandel Chamblee did not hold back in our latest discussion ahead of the season’s second major.

In our 2026 PGA Championship Q&A, golf’s leading analyst made the case that PIF pulling LIV’s funding has left its players competing in a state of confusion, called Justin Rose’s mid-season equipment switch a huge risk at 45, and explained why Aronimink will be a bombers’ delight this week.

Check out the full Q&A below.

Gianni: With the PIF confirming that they’re pulling funding from LIV at the end of the season, what impact do you expect that to have on the LIV players competing at the PGA Championship?

Brandel: I would imagine that they have all been thrown into a state of confusion, and will be distracted, not knowing where they are going to play next year and not knowing exactly their road back to either the DP World Tour or the PGA Tour. Or in Rahm’s case, being tied to a sinking ship for the next few years, likely playing for pennies on the dollar in events that no one cares about or watches.

I doubt this would put him in the best frame of mind to compete at his highest level. Keeping in mind, however, that majors are the only time that LIV disciples get to play in events that matter, so never disregard the motivation they have to prove to the world they are still relevant.

Gianni: Justin Rose switched to McLaren Golf equipment mid-season while playing some of the best golf of his career. What do you make of the change?

Brandel: I don’t really know what to make of Rose switching equipment. It seems a huge risk on his part, even though it is likely, in my opinion, that the clubs he’s playing are similar, if not the exact grinds, to what he was playing previously, with a McLaren stamp on them.

Having said that, at best, it is a distraction when he seemed to be as dialed in with his game as any 45-year-old could be and trending in the majors to perhaps do something that would definitely put him in the Hall of Fame. At worst, given the possibility that these clubs aren’t just duplicates of his old set stamped with McLaren on them, he’s made an equipment change that would take time, and 45-year-old athletes don’t have the time to do such things.

Gianni: Aronimink has only hosted a handful of professional events since it hosted the 1962 PGA Championship. What kind of test does it present, and does a course with less recent major championship history tend to level the playing field?

Brandel: Even though Aronimink has only hosted a handful of meaningful professional events, it has been fairly discerning in who can win there. When Keegan Bradley won the BMW Championship on the Donald Ross masterpiece in 2018, he was the 2nd best iron player on tour coming into that week. When Nick Watney won the AT&T at Aronimink in 2011, he was 2nd in strokes gained total coming into the week.

In 2020, Aronimink hosted the KPMG Championship, and Sei Young Kim won. On the LPGA that year, she was first in greens in regulation, putts per green in regulation, and scoring average on the way to being the LPGA player of the year. And then there is the 1962 PGA Championship won by Gary Player, who eventually became just one of a few players to win the career grand slam on the way to winning 9 majors. It is a formidable test, and if it’s not softened by rain, it will bring out the best in the upper echelons of the game.

Gianni: Is there a specific hole at Aronimink that you think will do the most to decide the winner?

Brandel: The hardest hole at Aronimink in each of the three tour events that have been played there since 2010 has been the long par-3 8th hole, with the par-4 10th being the second hardest, so most of the carnage will happen around the turn, but with the par-5 16th offering opportunities for bold plays and the tough closing holes at 17 and 18, the finish is likely to be frenetic.

Gianni: The PGA Championship has always sat in the shadow of the other majors. What does the ideal PGA Championship look like in your eyes, and what would it take for it to carve out its own identity?

Brandel: The PGA Championship, to whatever degree it suffers from the comparison to the other three majors, is still counted just as much when adding them up at the end of one’s career. Almost 1/3 of Nicklaus’ major wins were the five PGA Championships he won. Walter Hagen won 11 majors, five of which were PGA Championships.

Tiger Woods twice in his career won back-to-back PGA Championships, and those four majors count just as much as the other 11 he won. The PGA may not have the prestige of the other three, but it carries the same weight. Having said that, I preferred the identity that it had as the last major of the year.

Gianni: You nailed your Masters picks. Rory won, Scottie finished solo second, and Morikawa surged to a tie for seventh. Who are your top 3 picks for the PGA Championship and why?

Brandel: I am not a huge fan of majors played on golf courses that have been shorn of most of the trees, although I understand some of the agronomic reasons for doing so and of course the ease with which it allows members to play after errant drives. However, at the highest level, it all but eliminates any strategy off the tee and turns professional golf into an even bigger slugfest. That means that it will likely be a bomber’s delight this week, but fortunately, Scottie Scheffler is long enough to play that game and straight enough to play it better than anyone else.

The major championships give us very few surprises anymore, going back to the beginning of 2012, so the last 57 majors played, the average world rank of the winners has been better than 15th in the world. So look at the highest ranked and longest drivers who are on form coming into the PGA Championship who also have great short games as the surrounds at Aronimink are very challenging. That’s Scottie Scheffler by a mile and then McIlroy and Cameron Young with a far bigger nod towards DeChambeau than I gave him at the Masters.

Continue Reading

Club Junkie

A putter that I love and hate – Club Junkie Podcast

Published

on

In this episode of the Club Junkie Podcast, we dive into one of the most interesting flatstick releases of the year with a full review of the new TaylorMade SYSTM 2 putters. After spending time on the greens, I break down what makes this design stand out, where it performs, and why it has me completely torn between loving it and fighting it. If you are into feel, alignment, and consistency, this is one you will want to hear about.

We also take a look at some of the putters in play on the PGA Tour last week. From familiar favorites to a few surprising setups, there is always something to learn from what the best players in the world are rolling with under pressure.

To wrap things up, I walk through the process of building a set of JP Golf Prime irons paired with Baddazz Gold Series shafts. From component selection to performance goals, this is a deep dive into what goes into creating a unique custom set and why this combo has been so intriguing.

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

From 14 handicap to pro: 4 things I’d tell golfers at 50

Published

on

This year my 50th birthday. Gosh, where has the time gone?

As a teenager in rural Missouri, some of my junior high and high school years felt interminable. Graduation seemed light years away. But the older I get, the faster life seems to fly by.

I’m also increasingly aware of my mortality. My dad died recently. Earlier this year, a friend and fellow PGA of America professional and I were texting about our next catch-up. The next message I received was news of his unexpected passing at 48. Shortly after, a woman I dated in college succumbed to cancer at 51.

Certainly, one can share perspective at any age. Seniors help freshmen, veterans guide rookies. But reaching this milestone feels like as good a time as any to do one of those “what would I tell my younger self?” articles.

I’ve had a uniquely varied career in golf. I started as a 27-year-old, average-length-hitting, 14-handicap computer engineer and somehow managed to turn pro before running out of money, constantly bootstrapping my way forward. I’ve won qualifiers and set venue records in the World Long Drive Championships, finished fifth at the Speedgolf World Championships, coached all skill levels as a PGA of America professional, built industry-leading swing speed training programs for Swing Man Golf, helped advance the single-length iron market with Sterling Irons®, caddied on the PGA TOUR and PGA TOUR Champions, and played about 300 courses across 32 countries.

It’s been a ride, and I’ve gone both deep and wide.

So while I can consult and advise from a lot of angles, let me keep it to a few things I’d tell the average golfer who wants to improve.

1. Think About What You Want

Everyone has their own reason for picking up a golf club.

Oddly, as a professional athlete, I’m not internally driven by competition. That can be challenging, as the industry currently prioritizes and incentivizes competition over the love of the game.

For me, I love walking and being outdoors. Nature helps balance my energy. I prefer courses that are integrated into the natural beauty of their surroundings. I’m comfortable practicing alone. I’m a deep thinker, and I genuinely enjoy investigating the game, using data and intuition to unearth unique, often innovative insights. I’m fortunate to be strong and athletic, so I appreciate the chance to engage with my abilities. Traveling feels adventurous. I could go on.

You don’t have to overthink it like I do. For you, it might be as simple as hitting balls to escape work, hanging out with friends, and playing loosely with the rules and the score.

The point is to give yourself permission to play for your own reasons, and let that be enough.

But if improvement is your goal, thinking about your destination—and when you want to get there—is important, because it dictates the steps you need to take. When I set out to go from a 14-handicap to the PGA TOUR as quickly as possible, the steps I needed were very different from those of a working golfer trying to break 90 in six months. That’s also different from someone who just wants a few peaceful hours outside each week, away from work or family.

None of these goals are better than the others, but each requires a different plan that you can work backward from.

2. There Are Lots of Things That Can Work

One of the challenges of golf is that, although there are rules for playing, there aren’t clear, industry-wide standards for how to best play the game. There’s a lot of gray area.

You might hear a top coach or trainer insist that a certain move is the best way to swing or train. Then you dig a bit deeper and, much to your confusion and frustration, another respected coach or trainer says something completely different. I don’t think anyone is trying to confuse you—at least I hope not. It’s just where the industry is right now.

You have to be careful with advice from tournament pros, too. They might be great at scoring, but they’re also human and sometimes just as susceptible as amateurs to believing things that don’t really move the needle. Tour players might describe what they feel, but that’s not always what they’re actually doing when assessed with technology.

I recently ran a test on my YouTube channel (which connects to my GolfWRX article “How to use your hands in the golf swing for power and accuracy”), and, interestingly, two of the most commonly taught hand actions produced the worst results in the test.

Coaches can certainly help. If you find someone you connect with to help navigate, that’s great. But there are many ways to get the ball in the hole. In the current landscape, you may need to seek multiple opinions, think critically, and use your own intuition to discern what seems true and whose advice resonates with you.

I’d recommend seeking someone who is open-minded and always learning, because things constantly change. Absolutes like “correct” or “proper” should raise a red flag. AI can be useful, but it tends to confidently repeat popular advice, so proceed with caution.

3. Get Custom Fit

If you’re serious about becoming a better player, getting custom fit is hugely important. There’s no sense fighting your equipment if you don’t have to. Most better players get fit these days and, if they don’t, they’re usually skilled enough to work around clubs that aren’t ideal.

If you plan to play for a long time, it’s worth spending a little more upfront to get something that truly fits you and your game, rather than continually buying and discarding equipment.

Equipment rules haven’t really changed significantly since the early 2000s. To stay in business, manufacturers keep pushing those limits. If you pull a bunch of clubs and balls off the rack and test them, you’ll find differences. I’ve tested two new drivers and seen a 30-yard total distance gap. Usually, the issue isn’t bad equipment; it’s that the combination of components simply isn’t the best fit.

It’s like wearing a new pair of floppy clown shoes. Sure, they’re shoes—but you won’t sprint your best in them compared to track shoes that fit perfectly.

Be wary of what’s called custom fitting, too. Sometimes the term is used as a marketing strategy rather than an actual fitting. In some retail settings, fitters may be incentivized to steer you toward higher-priced components. That doesn’t automatically mean it’s not the best fit, but you should be aware of potential biases.

I learned a version of this lesson outside of golf. Years ago, I bought a tennis racquet at a big box store from a seemingly knowledgeable employee who thought it would suit me best. The racquet gave me tennis elbow, and I spent months recovering with rest and acupuncture. The next season, I invested more time and money to find what actually fit me, and I walked away with something amazing that I still play with years later.

So if you’re going to get fit, be smart about it.

Find someone you believe has deep knowledge—possibly with certifications, but not necessarily. Make sure there’s a wide inventory across many brands. Check recent reviews for the individual fitter if possible. Make sure you trust that the fitter has your best interests at heart. If they’re wearing a hat or shirt with a specific brand’s logo, proceed with caution. Unless you specifically want a certain brand or look, be wary of upsells, especially if two options perform nearly the same.

Also, while golf is called a sport of integrity, there’s a thread of manipulation in the industry. I once drafted an equipment article for an industry magazine, structured just like one of their previous popular stories, with matching word count and great photos. The assistant editor loved it; it was useful to readers and required little work on his part. But the editor-in-chief nixed the story. When I asked why, I was told it was because I wasn’t an advertiser. It turned out the article I’d modeled mine after was a paid ad cleverly disguised as editorial content.

I really dislike games, clickbait, and fear-based manipulation. I hope this changes, but golfers deserve to know it exists.

4. Distance and Strategy Matter

There’s a real relationship between how far you hit the ball and your scoring average, even at the PGA TOUR level.

I experienced this early in my pro career. I started as a power hitter, swinging in the high 120s and breaking 200 mph ball speed with a stock driver.

Back then, some instructors advised swinging at 80%, so I tried slowing down for more accuracy. That worked fine on shorter, tighter courses. But on longer setups, I was coming into greens with too much club, and par 5s stopped being

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending